ChapterIII:ThatTheSentimentsOfDemocraticNationsAccordWithTheirOpinionsInLeadingThemToConcentratePoliticalPowerIfitbetruethat，inagesofequality，menreadilyadoptthenotionofagreatcentralpower，itcannotbedoubtedontheotherhandthattheirhabitsandsentimentspredisposethemtorecognizesuchapowerandtogiveittheirsupport。Thismaybedemonstratedinafewwords，asthegreaterpartofthereasons，towhichthefactmaybeattributed，havebeenpreviouslystated。
　　*aAsthemenwhoinhabitdemocraticcountrieshavenosuperiors，noinferiors，andnohabitualornecessarypartnersintheirundertakings，theyreadilyfallbackuponthemselvesandconsiderthemselvesasbeingsapart。Ihadoccasiontopointthisoutatconsiderablelengthintreatingofindividualism。Hencesuchmencannever，withoutaneffort，tearthemselvesfromtheirprivateaffairstoengageinpublicbusiness;theirnaturalbiasleadsthemtoabandonthelattertothesolevisibleandpermanentrepresentativeoftheinterestsofthecommunity，thatistosay，totheState。Notonlyaretheynaturallywantinginatasteforpublicbusiness，buttheyhavefrequentlynotimetoattendtoit。Privatelifeissobusyindemocraticperiods，soexcited，sofullofwishesandofwork，thathardlyanyenergyorleisureremainstoeachindividualforpubliclife。Iamthelastmantocontendthatthesepropensitiesareunconquerable，sincemychiefobjectinwritingthisbookhasbeentocombatthem。Ionlymaintainthatatthepresentdayasecretpowerisfosteringtheminthehumanheart，andthatiftheyarenotcheckedtheywillwhollyovergrowit。
　　[Footnotea:SeeAppendixW。]
　　Ihavealsohadoccasiontoshowhowtheincreasingloveofwell—being，andthefluctuatingcharacterofproperty，causedemocraticnationstodreadallviolentdisturbance。Theloveofpublictranquillityisfrequentlytheonlypassionwhichthesenationsretain，anditbecomesmoreactiveandpowerfulamongsttheminproportionasallotherpassionsdroopanddie。Thisnaturallydisposesthemembersofthecommunityconstantlytogiveortosurrenderadditionalrightstothecentralpower，whichaloneseemstobeinterestedindefendingthembythesamemeansthatitusestodefenditself。Asinagesofequalitynomaniscompelledtolendhisassistancetohisfellow—men，andnonehasanyrighttoexpectmuchsupportfromthem，everyoneisatonceindependentandpowerless。Thesetwoconditions，whichmustneverbeeitherseparatelyconsideredorconfoundedtogether，inspirethecitizenofademocraticcountrywithverycontrarypropensities。Hisindependencefillshimwithself—relianceandprideamongsthisequals;hisdebilitymakeshimfeelfromtimetotimethewantofsomeoutwardassistance，whichhecannotexpectfromanyofthem，becausetheyareallimpotentandunsympathizing。Inthispredicamenthenaturallyturnshiseyestothatimposingpowerwhichalonerisesabovethelevelofuniversaldepression。Ofthatpowerhiswantsandespeciallyhisdesirescontinuallyremindhim，untilheultimatelyviewsitasthesoleandnecessarysupportofhisownweakness。*bThismaymorecompletelyexplainwhatfrequentlytakesplaceindemocraticcountries，wheretheverymenwhoaresoimpatientofsuperiorspatientlysubmittoamaster，exhibitingatoncetheirprideandtheirservility。
　　[Footnoteb:Indemocraticcommunitiesnothingbutthecentralpowerhasanystabilityinitspositionoranypermanenceinitsundertakings。Allthemembersofsocietyareinceaselessstirandtransformation。Nowitisinthenatureofallgovernmentstoseekconstantlytoenlargetheirsphereofaction;henceitisalmostimpossiblethatsuchagovernmentshouldnotultimatelysucceed，becauseitactswithafixedprincipleandaconstantwill，uponmen，whoseposition，whosenotions，andwhosedesiresareincontinualvacillation。Itfrequentlyhappensthatthemembersofthecommunitypromotetheinfluenceofthecentralpowerwithoutintendingit。Democraticagesareperiodsofexperiment，innovation，andadventure。Atsuchtimestherearealwaysamultitudeofmenengagedindifficultornovelundertakings，whichtheyfollowalone，withoutcaringfortheirfellowmen。Suchpersonsmaybereadytoadmit，asageneralprinciple，thatthepublicauthorityoughtnottointerfereinprivateconcerns;but，byanexceptiontothatrule，eachofthemcravesforitsassistanceintheparticularconcernonwhichheisengaged，andseekstodrawupontheinfluenceofthegovernmentforhisownbenefit，thoughhewouldrestrictitonallotheroccasions。Ifalargenumberofmenapplythisparticularexceptiontoagreatvarietyofdifferentpurposes，thesphereofthecentralpowerextendsinsensiblyinalldirections，althougheachofthemwishesittobecircumscribed。
　　Thusademocraticgovernmentincreasesitspowersimplybythefactofitspermanence。Timeisonitsside;everyincidentbefriendsit;thepassionsofindividualsunconsciouslypromoteit;anditmaybeasserted，thattheolderademocraticcommunityis，themorecentralizedwillitsgovernmentbecome。]
　　Thehatredwhichmenbeartoprivilegeincreasesinproportionasprivilegesbecomemorescarceandlessconsiderable，sothatdemocraticpassionswouldseemtoburnmostfiercelyattheverytimewhentheyhaveleastfuel。Ihavealreadygiventhereasonofthisphenomenon。Whenallconditionsareunequal，noinequalityissogreatastooffendtheeye;
　　whereastheslightestdissimilarityisodiousinthemidstofgeneraluniformity:themorecompleteisthisuniformity，themoreinsupportabledoesthesightofsuchadifferencebecome。
　　Henceitisnaturalthattheloveofequalityshouldconstantlyincreasetogetherwithequalityitself，andthatitshouldgrowbywhatitfeedsupon。Thisnever—dying，ever—kindlinghatred，whichsetsademocraticpeopleagainstthesmallestprivileges，ispeculiarlyfavorabletothegradualconcentrationofallpoliticalrightsinthehandsoftherepresentativeoftheStatealone。Thesovereign，beingnecessarilyandincontestablyaboveallthecitizens，excitesnottheirenvy，andeachofthemthinksthathestripshisequalsoftheprerogativewhichheconcedestothecrown。Themanofademocraticageisextremelyreluctanttoobeyhisneighborwhoishisequal;herefusestoacknowledgeinsuchapersonabilitysuperiortohisown;hemistrustshisjustice，andisjealousofhispower;hefearsandhecontemnshim;andhelovescontinuallytoremindhimofthecommondependenceinwhichbothofthemstandtothesamemaster。Everycentralpowerwhichfollowsitsnaturaltendenciescourtsandencouragestheprincipleofequality;forequalitysingularlyfacilitates，extends，andsecurestheinfluenceofacentralpower。
　　Inlikemanneritmaybesaidthateverycentralgovernmentworshipsuniformity:uniformityrelievesitfrominquiryintoaninfinitenumberofsmalldetailswhichmustbeattendedtoifrulesweretobeadaptedtomen，insteadofindiscriminatelysubjectingmentorules:thusthegovernmentlikeswhatthecitizenslike，andnaturallyhateswhattheyhate。Thesecommonsentiments，which，indemocraticnations，constantlyunitethesovereignandeverymemberofthecommunityinoneandthesameconviction，establishasecretandlastingsympathybetweenthem。
　　Thefaultsofthegovernmentarepardonedforthesakeofitstastes;publicconfidenceisonlyreluctantlywithdrawninthemidstevenofitsexcessesanditserrors，anditisrestoredatthefirstcall。Democraticnationsoftenhatethoseinwhosehandsthecentralpowerisvested;buttheyalwayslovethatpoweritself。
　　Thus，bytwoseparatepaths，Ihavereachedthesameconclusion。Ihaveshownthattheprincipleofequalitysuggeststomenthenotionofasole，uniform，andstronggovernment:I
　　havenowshownthattheprincipleofequalityimpartstothematasteforit。Togovernmentsofthiskindthenationsofouragearethereforetending。Theyaredrawnthitherbythenaturalinclinationofmindandheart;andinordertoreachthatresult，itisenoughthattheydonotcheckthemselvesintheircourse。
　　Iamofopinion，that，inthedemocraticageswhichareopeninguponus，individualindependenceandlocallibertieswilleverbetheproduceofartificialcontrivance;thatcentralizationwillbethenaturalformofgovernment。*c[Footnotec:SeeAppendixX。]
　　ChapterIV:OfCertainPeculiarAndAccidentalCausesWhichEitherLeadAPeopleToCompleteCentralizationOfGovernment，OrWhichDivertThemFromItIfalldemocraticnationsareinstinctivelyledtothecentralizationofgovernment，theytendtothisresultinanunequalmanner。Thisdependsontheparticularcircumstanceswhichmaypromoteorpreventthenaturalconsequencesofthatstateofsociety—circumstanceswhichareexceedinglynumerous;
　　butIshallonlyadverttoafewofthem。Amongstmenwhohavelivedfreelongbeforetheybecameequal，thetendenciesderivedfromfreeinstitutionscombat，toacertainextent，thepropensitiessuperinducedbytheprincipleofequality;andalthoughthecentralpowermayincreaseitsprivilegesamongstsuchapeople，theprivatemembersofsuchacommunitywillneverentirelyforfeittheirindependence。Butwhentheequalityofconditionsgrowsupamongstapeoplewhichhasneverknown，orhaslongceasedtoknow，whatfreedomis（andsuchisthecaseupontheContinentofEurope），astheformerhabitsofthenationaresuddenlycombined，bysomesortofnaturalattraction，withthenovelhabitsandprinciplesengenderedbythestateofsociety，allpowersseemspontaneouslytorushtothecentre。
　　Thesepowersaccumulatetherewithastonishingrapidity，andtheStateinstantlyattainstheutmostlimitsofitsstrength，whilstprivatepersonsallowthemselvestosinkassuddenlytothelowestdegreeofweakness。
　　TheEnglishwhoemigratedthreehundredyearsagotofoundademocraticcommonwealthontheshoresoftheNewWorld，hadalllearnedtotakeapartinpublicaffairsintheirmother—country;
　　theywereconversantwithtrialbyjury;theywereaccustomedtolibertyofspeechandofthepress—topersonalfreedom，tothenotionofrightsandthepracticeofassertingthem。TheycarriedwiththemtoAmericathesefreeinstitutionsandmanlycustoms，andtheseinstitutionspreservedthemagainsttheencroachmentsoftheState。ThusamongsttheAmericansitisfreedomwhichisold—equalityisofcomparativelymoderndate。ThereverseisoccurringinEurope，whereequality，introducedbyabsolutepowerandundertheruleofkings，wasalreadyinfusedintothehabitsofnationslongbeforefreedomhadenteredintotheirconceptions。
　　Ihavesaidthatamongstdemocraticnationsthenotionofgovernmentnaturallypresentsitselftothemindundertheformofasoleandcentralpower，andthatthenotionofintermediatepowersisnotfamiliartothem。Thisispeculiarlyapplicabletothedemocraticnationswhichhavewitnessedthetriumphoftheprincipleofequalitybymeansofaviolentrevolution。Astheclasseswhichmanagedlocalaffairshavebeensuddenlysweptawaybythestorm，andastheconfusedmasswhichremainshasasyetneithertheorganizationnorthehabitswhichfitittoassumetheadministrationofthesesameaffairs，theStatealoneseemscapableoftakinguponitselfallthedetailsofgovernment，andcentralizationbecomes，asitwere，theunavoidablestateofthecountry。NapoleondeservesneitherpraisenorcensureforhavingcentredinhisownhandsalmostalltheadministrativepowerofFrance;for，aftertheabruptdisappearanceofthenobilityandthehigherrankofthemiddleclasses，thesepowersdevolvedonhimofcourse:itwouldhavebeenalmostasdifficultforhimtorejectastoassumethem。ButnonecessityofthiskindhaseverbeenfeltbytheAmericans，who，havingpassedthroughnorevolution，andhavinggovernedthemselvesfromthefirst，neverhadtocallupontheStatetoactforatimeastheirguardian。
　　Thustheprogressofcentralizationamongstademocraticpeopledependsnotonlyontheprogressofequality，butonthemannerinwhichthisequalityhasbeenestablished。
　　Atthecommencementofagreatdemocraticrevolution，whenhostilitieshavebutjustbrokenoutbetweenthedifferentclassesofsociety，thepeopleendeavorstocentralizethepublicadministrationinthehandsofthegovernment，inordertowrestthemanagementoflocalaffairsfromthearistocracy。Towardsthecloseofsucharevolution，onthecontrary，itisusuallytheconqueredaristocracythatendeavorstomakeoverthemanagementofallaffairstotheState，becausesuchanaristocracydreadsthetyrannyofapeoplewhichhasbecomeitsequal，andnotunfrequentlyitsmaster。Thusitisnotalwaysthesameclassofthecommunitywhichstrivestoincreasetheprerogativeofthegovernment;butaslongasthedemocraticrevolutionlaststhereisalwaysoneclassinthenation，powerfulinnumbersorinwealth，whichisinduced，bypeculiarpassionsorinterests，tocentralizethepublicadministration，independentlyofthathatredofbeinggovernedbyone’sneighbor，whichisageneralandpermanentfeelingamongstdemocraticnations。Itmayberemarked，thatatthepresentdaythelowerordersinEnglandarestrivingwithalltheirmighttodestroylocalindependence，andtotransfertheadministrationfromallpointsofthecircumferencetothecentre;whereasthehigherclassesareendeavoringtoretainthisadministrationwithinitsancientboundaries。Iventuretopredictthatatimewillcomewhentheveryreversewillhappen。
　　Theseobservationsexplainwhythesupremepowerisalwaysstronger，andprivateindividualsweaker，amongstademocraticpeoplewhichhaspassedthroughalongandarduousstruggletoreachastateofequalitythanamongstademocraticcommunityinwhichthecitizenshavebeenequalfromthefirst。TheexampleoftheAmericanscompletelydemonstratesthefact。TheinhabitantsoftheUnitedStateswereneverdividedbyanyprivileges;theyhaveneverknownthemutualrelationofmasterandinferior，andastheyneitherdreadnorhateeachother，theyhaveneverknownthenecessityofcallinginthesupremepowertomanagetheiraffairs。ThelotoftheAmericansissingular:theyhavederivedfromthearistocracyofEnglandthenotionofprivaterightsandthetasteforlocalfreedom;andtheyhavebeenabletoretainboththeoneandtheother，becausetheyhavehadnoaristocracytocombat。
　　Ifatalltimeseducationenablesmentodefendtheirindependence，thisismostespeciallytrueindemocraticages。
　　Whenallmenarealike，itiseasytofoundasoleandall—powerfulgovernment，bytheaidofmereinstinct。Butmenrequiremuchintelligence，knowledge，andarttoorganizeandtomaintainsecondarypowersundersimilarcircumstances，andtocreateamidsttheindependenceandindividualweaknessofthecitizenssuchfreeassociationsasmaybeinaconditiontostruggleagainsttyrannywithoutdestroyingpublicorder。
　　Hencetheconcentrationofpowerandthesubjectionofindividualswillincreaseamongstdemocraticnations，notonlyinthesameproportionastheirequality，butinthesameproportionastheirignorance。Itistrue，thatinagesofimperfectcivilizationthegovernmentisfrequentlyaswantingintheknowledgerequiredtoimposeadespotismuponthepeopleasthepeoplearewantingintheknowledgerequiredtoshakeitoff;buttheeffectisnotthesameonbothsides。Howeverrudeademocraticpeoplemaybe，thecentralpowerwhichrulesitisnevercompletelydevoidofcultivation，becauseitreadilydrawstoitsownuseswhatlittlecultivationistobefoundinthecountry，and，ifnecessary，mayseekassistanceelsewhere。
　　Hence，amongstanationwhichisignorantaswellasdemocratic，anamazingdifferencecannotfailspeedilytoarisebetweentheintellectualcapacityoftherulerandthatofeachofhissubjects。Thiscompletestheeasyconcentrationofallpowerinhishands:theadministrativefunctionoftheStateisperpetuallyextended，becausetheStatealoneiscompetenttoadministertheaffairsofthecountry。Aristocraticnations，howeverunenlightenedtheymaybe，neveraffordthesamespectacle，becauseintheminstructionisnearlyequallydiffusedbetweenthemonarchandtheleadingmembersofthecommunity。
　　ThepachawhonowrulesinEgyptfoundthepopulationofthatcountrycomposedofmenexceedinglyignorantandequal，andhehasborrowedthescienceandabilityofEuropetogovernthatpeople。Asthepersonalattainmentsofthesovereignarethuscombinedwiththeignoranceanddemocraticweaknessofhissubjects，theutmostcentralizationhasbeenestablishedwithoutimpediment，andthepachahasmadethecountryhismanufactory，andtheinhabitantshisworkmen。
　　Ithinkthatextremecentralizationofgovernmentultimatelyenervatessociety，andthusafteralengthoftimeweakensthegovernmentitself;butIdonotdenythatacentralizedsocialpowermaybeabletoexecutegreatundertakingswithfacilityinagiventimeandonaparticularpoint。Thisismoreespeciallytrueofwar，inwhichsuccessdependsmuchmoreonthemeansoftransferringalltheresourcesofanationtoonesinglepoint，thanontheextentofthoseresources。Henceitischieflyinwarthatnationsdesireandfrequentlyrequiretoincreasethepowersofthecentralgovernment。Allmenofmilitarygeniusarefondofcentralization，whichincreasestheirstrength;andallmenofcentralizinggeniusarefondofwar，whichcompelsnationstocombinealltheirpowersinthehandsofthegovernment。ThusthedemocratictendencywhichleadsmenunceasinglytomultiplytheprivilegesoftheState，andtocircumscribetherightsofprivatepersons，ismuchmorerapidandconstantamongstthosedemocraticnationswhichareexposedbytheirpositiontogreatandfrequentwars，thanamongstallothers。
　　Ihaveshownhowthedreadofdisturbanceandtheloveofwell—beinginsensiblyleaddemocraticnationstoincreasethefunctionsofcentralgovernment，astheonlypowerwhichappearstobeintrinsicallysufficientlystrong，enlightened，andsecure，toprotectthemfromanarchy。Iwouldnowadd，thatalltheparticularcircumstanceswhichtendtomakethestateofademocraticcommunityagitatedandprecarious，enhancethisgeneralpropensity，andleadprivatepersonsmoreandmoretosacrificetheirrightstotheirtranquility。Apeopleisthereforeneversodisposedtoincreasethefunctionsofcentralgovernmentasatthecloseofalongandbloodyrevolution，which，afterhavingwrestedpropertyfromthehandsofitsformerpossessors，hasshakenallbelief，andfilledthenationwithfiercehatreds，conflictinginterests，andcontendingfactions。
　　Theloveofpublictranquillitybecomesatsuchtimesanindiscriminatingpassion，andthemembersofthecommunityareapttoconceiveamostinordinatedevotiontoorder。
　　Ihavealreadyexaminedseveraloftheincidentswhichmayconcurtopromotethecentralizationofpower，buttheprincipalcausestillremainstobenoticed。Theforemostoftheincidentalcauseswhichmaydrawthemanagementofallaffairsintothehandsoftherulerindemocraticcountries，istheoriginofthatrulerhimself，andhisownpropensities。Menwholiveintheagesofequalityarenaturallyfondofcentralpower，andarewillingtoextenditsprivileges;butifithappensthatthissamepowerfaithfullyrepresentstheirowninterests，andexactlycopiestheirowninclinations，theconfidencetheyplaceinitknowsnobounds，andtheythinkthatwhatevertheybestowuponitisbestoweduponthemselves。
　　Theattractionofadministrativepowerstothecentrewillalwaysbelesseasyandlessrapidunderthereignofkingswhoarestillinsomewayconnectedwiththeoldaristocraticorder，thanundernewprinces，thechildrenoftheirownachievements，whosebirth，prejudices，propensities，andhabitsappeartobindthemindissolublytothecauseofequality。Idonotmeanthatprincesofaristocraticoriginwholiveindemocraticagesdonotattempttocentralize;Ibelievetheyapplythemselvestothatobjectasdiligentlyasanyothers。Forthem，thesoleadvantagesofequalitylieinthatdirection;buttheiropportunitiesarelessgreat，becausethecommunity，insteadofvolunteeringcompliancewiththeirdesires，frequentlyobeysthemwithreluctance。Indemocraticcommunitiestheruleisthatcentralizationmustincreaseinproportionasthesovereignislessaristocratic。Whenanancientraceofkingsstandsattheheadofanaristocracy，asthenaturalprejudicesofthesovereignperfectlyaccordwiththenaturalprejudicesofthenobility，thevicesinherentinaristocraticcommunitieshaveafreecourse，andmeetwithnocorrective。Thereverseisthecasewhenthescionofafeudalstockisplacedattheheadofademocraticpeople。Thesovereignisconstantlyled，byhiseducation，hishabits，andhisassociations，toadoptsentimentssuggestedbytheinequalityofconditions，andthepeopletendasconstantly，bytheirsocialcondition，tothosemannerswhichareengenderedbyequality。Atsuchtimesitoftenhappensthatthecitizensseektocontrolthecentralpowerfarlessasatyrannicalthanasanaristocraticalpower，andthattheypersistinthefirmdefenceoftheirindependence，notonlybecausetheywouldremainfree，butespeciallybecausetheyaredeterminedtoremainequal。Arevolutionwhichoverthrowsanancientregalfamily，inordertoplacemenofmorerecentgrowthattheheadofademocraticpeople，maytemporarilyweakenthecentralpower;
　　buthoweveranarchicalsucharevolutionmayappearatfirst，weneednothesitatetopredictthatitsfinalandcertainconsequencewillbetoextendandtosecuretheprerogativesofthatpower。Theforemostorindeedthesoleconditionwhichisrequiredinordertosucceedincentralizingthesupremepowerinademocraticcommunity，istoloveequality，ortogetmentobelieveyouloveit。Thusthescienceofdespotism，whichwasoncesocomplex，issimplified，andreducedasitweretoasingleprinciple。
　　BookFour—ChapterV
　　ChapterV:ThatAmongstTheEuropeanNationsOfOurTimeThePowerOfGovernmentsIsIncreasing，AlthoughThePersonsWhoGovernAreLessStableOnreflectinguponwhathasalreadybeensaid，thereaderwillbestartledandalarmedtofindthatinEuropeeverythingseemstoconducetotheindefiniteextensionoftheprerogativesofgovernment，andtorenderallthatenjoyedtherightsofprivateindependencemoreweak，moresubordinate，andmoreprecarious。ThedemocraticnationsofEuropehaveallthegeneralandpermanenttendencieswhichurgetheAmericanstothecentralizationofgovernment，andtheyaremoreoverexposedtoanumberofsecondaryandincidentalcauseswithwhichtheAmericansareunacquainted。Itwouldseemasifeverysteptheymaketowardsequalitybringsthemnearertodespotism。Andindeedifwedobutcastourlooksaround，weshallbeconvincedthatsuchisthefact。Duringthearistocraticageswhichprecededthepresenttime，thesovereignsofEuropehadbeendeprivedof，orhadrelinquished，manyoftherightsinherentintheirpower。
　　Notahundredyearsago，amongstthegreaterpartofEuropeannations，numerousprivatepersonsandcorporationsweresufficientlyindependenttoadministerjustice，toraiseandmaintaintroops，tolevytaxes，andfrequentlyeventomakeorinterpretthelaw。TheStatehaseverywhereresumedtoitselfalonethesenaturalattributesofsovereignpower;inallmattersofgovernmenttheStatetoleratesnointermediateagentbetweenitselfandthepeople，andingeneralbusinessitdirectsthepeoplebyitsownimmediateinfluence。Iamfarfromblamingthisconcentrationofpower，Isimplypointitout。
　　AtthesameperiodagreatnumberofsecondarypowersexistedinEurope，whichrepresentedlocalinterestsandadministeredlocalaffairs。Mostoftheselocalauthoritieshavealreadydisappeared;allarespeedilytendingtodisappear，ortofallintothemostcompletedependence。FromoneendofEuropetotheothertheprivilegesofthenobility，thelibertiesofcities，andthepowersofprovincialbodies，areeitherdestroyedoruponthevergeofdestruction。Europehasendured，inthecourseofthelasthalf—century，manyrevolutionsandcounter—revolutionswhichhaveagitateditinoppositedirections:butalltheseperturbationsresembleeachotherinonerespect—theyhaveallshakenordestroyedthesecondarypowersofgovernment。ThelocalprivilegeswhichtheFrenchdidnotabolishinthecountriestheyconquered，havefinallysuccumbedtothepolicyoftheprinceswhoconqueredtheFrench。
　　ThoseprincesrejectedalltheinnovationsoftheFrenchRevolutionexceptcentralization:thatistheonlyprincipletheyconsentedtoreceivefromsuchasource。Myobjectistoremark，thatallthesevariousrights，whichhavebeensuccessivelywrested，inourtime，fromclasses，corporations，andindividuals，havenotservedtoraisenewsecondarypowersonamoredemocraticbasis，buthaveuniformlybeenconcentratedinthehandsofthesovereign。EverywheretheStateacquiresmoreandmoredirectcontroloverthehumblestmembersofthecommunity，andamoreexclusivepowerofgoverningeachoftheminhissmallestconcerns。*aAlmostallthecharitableestablishmentsofEuropewereformerlyinthehandsofprivatepersonsorofcorporations;theyarenowalmostalldependentonthesupremegovernment，andinmanycountriesareactuallyadministeredbythatpower。TheStatealmostexclusivelyundertakestosupplybreadtothehungry，assistanceandsheltertothesick，worktotheidle，andtoactasthesolerelieverofallkindsofmisery。Education，aswellascharity，isbecomeinmostcountriesatthepresentdayanationalconcern。TheStatereceives，andoftentakes，thechildfromthearmsofthemother，tohanditovertoofficialagents:theStateundertakestotraintheheartandtoinstructthemindofeachgeneration。
　　Uniformityprevailsinthecoursesofpublicinstructionasineverythingelse;diversity，aswellasfreedom，isdisappearingdaybyday。NordoIhesitatetoaffirm，thatamongstalmostalltheChristiannationsofourdays，CatholicaswellasProtestant，religionisindangeroffallingintothehandsofthegovernment。Notthatrulersareover—jealousoftherightofsettlingpointsofdoctrine，buttheygetmoreandmoreholduponthewillofthosebywhomdoctrinesareexpounded;theydeprivetheclergyoftheirproperty，andpaythembysalaries;theydiverttotheirownusetheinfluenceofthepriesthood，theymakethemtheirownministers—oftentheirownservants—andbythisalliancewithreligiontheyreachtheinnerdepthsofthesoulofman。*b[Footnotea:Thisgradualweakeningofindividualsinrelationtosocietyatlargemaybetracedinathousandways。Ishallselectfromamongsttheseexamplesonederivedfromthelawofwills。Inaristocraciesitiscommontoprofessthegreatestreverenceforthelasttestamentarydispositionsofaman;thisfeelingsometimesevenbecamesuperstitiousamongsttheoldernationsofEurope:thepoweroftheState，farfrominterferingwiththecapricesofadyingman，gavefullforcetotheveryleastofthem，andinsuredtohimaperpetualpower。Whenalllivingmenareenfeebled，thewillofthedeadislessrespected:
　　itiscircumscribedwithinanarrowrange，beyondwhichitisannulledorcheckedbythesupremepowerofthelaws。IntheMiddleAges，testamentarypowerhad，sotospeak，nolimits:
　　amongsttheFrenchatthepresentday，amancannotdistributehisfortuneamongsthischildrenwithouttheinterferenceoftheState;afterhavingdomineeredoverawholelife，thelawinsistsuponregulatingtheverylastactofit。]
　　[Footnoteb:Inproportionasthedutiesofthecentralpowerareaugmented，thenumberofpublicofficersbywhomthatpowerisrepresentedmustincreasealso。Theyformanationineachnation;andastheysharethestabilityofthegovernment，theymoreandmorefilluptheplaceofanaristocracy。
　　InalmosteverypartofEuropethegovernmentrulesintwoways;itrulesoneportionofthecommunitybythefearwhichtheyentertainofitsagents，andtheotherbythehopetheyhaveofbecomingitsagents。]
　　Butthisisasyetonlyonesideofthepicture。Theauthorityofgovernmenthasnotonlyspread，aswehavejustseen，throughoutthesphereofallexistingpowers，tillthatspherecannolongercontainit，butitgoesfurther，andinvadesthedomainheretoforereservedtoprivateindependence。A
　　multitudeofactions，whichwereformerlyentirelybeyondthecontrolofthepublicadministration，havebeensubjectedtothatcontrolinourtime，andthenumberofthemisconstantlyincreasing。Amongstaristocraticnationsthesupremegovernmentusuallycontenteditselfwithmanagingandsuperintendingthecommunityinwhateverdirectlyandostensiblyconcernedthenationalhonor;butinallotherrespectsthepeoplewerelefttoworkouttheirownfreewill。Amongstthesenationsthegovernmentoftenseemedtoforgetthatthereisapointatwhichthefaultsandthesufferingsofprivatepersonsinvolvethegeneralprosperity，andthattopreventtheruinofaprivateindividualmustsometimesbeamatterofpublicimportance。Thedemocraticnationsofourtimeleantotheoppositeextreme。Itisevidentthatmostofourrulerswillnotcontentthemselveswithgoverningthepeoplecollectively:itwouldseemasiftheythoughtthemselvesresponsiblefortheactionsandprivateconditionoftheirsubjects—asiftheyhadundertakentoguideandtoinstructeachoftheminthevariousincidentsoflife，andtosecuretheirhappinessquiteindependentlyoftheirownconsent。Ontheotherhandprivateindividualsgrowmoreandmoreapttolookuponthesupremepowerinthesamelight;theyinvokeitsassistanceinalltheirnecessities，andtheyfixtheireyesupontheadministrationastheirmentorortheirguide。
　　IassertthatthereisnocountryinEuropeinwhichthepublicadministrationhasnotbecome，notonlymorecentralized，butmoreinquisitiveandmoreminuteiteverywhereinterferesinprivateconcernsmorethanitdid;itregulatesmoreundertakings，andundertakingsofalesserkind;anditgainsafirmerfootingeverydayabout，above，andaroundallprivatepersons，toassist，toadvise，andtocoercethem。Formerlyasovereignlivedupontheincomeofhislands，ortherevenueofhistaxes;thisisnolongerthecasenowthathiswantshaveincreasedaswellashispower。Underthesamecircumstanceswhichformerlycompelledaprincetoputonanewtax，henowhasrecoursetoaloan。ThustheStategraduallybecomesthedebtorofmostofthewealthiermembersofthecommunity，andcentralizesthelargestamountsofcapitalinitsownhands。
　　Smallcapitalisdrawnintoitskeepingbyanothermethod。Asmenareintermingledandconditionsbecomemoreequal，thepoorhavemoreresources，moreeducation，andmoredesires;theyconceivethenotionofbetteringtheircondition，andthisteachesthemtosave。Thesesavingsaredailyproducinganinfinitenumberofsmallcapitals，theslowandgradualproduceoflabor，whicharealwaysincreasing。Butthegreaterpartofthismoneywouldbeunproductiveifitremainedscatteredinthehandsofitsowners。Thiscircumstancehasgivenrisetoaphilanthropicinstitution，whichwillsoonbecome，ifIamnotmistaken，oneofourmostimportantpoliticalinstitutions。Somecharitablepersonsconceivedthenotionofcollectingthesavingsofthepoorandplacingthemoutatinterest。InsomecountriesthesebenevolentassociationsarestillcompletelydistinctfromtheState;butinalmostalltheymanifestlytendtoidentifythemselveswiththegovernment;andinsomeofthemthegovernmenthassupersededthem，takinguponitselftheenormoustaskofcentralizinginoneplace，andputtingoutatinterestonitsownresponsibility，thedailysavingsofmanymillionsoftheworkingclasses。ThustheStatedrawstoitselfthewealthoftherichbyloans，andhasthepoorman’smiteatitsdisposalinthesavingsbanks。Thewealthofthecountryisperpetuallyflowingaroundthegovernmentandpassingthroughitshands;theaccumulationincreasesinthesameproportionastheequalityofconditions;forinademocraticcountrytheStatealoneinspiresprivateindividualswithconfidence，becausetheStatealoneappearstobeendowedwithstrengthanddurability。*cThusthesovereigndoesnotconfinehimselftothemanagementofthepublictreasury;heinterferesinprivatemoneymatters;heisthesuperior，andoftenthemaster，ofallthemembersofthecommunity;and，inadditiontothis，heassumesthepartoftheirstewardandpaymaster。
　　[Footnotec:Ontheonehandthetasteforworldlywelfareisperpetuallyincreasing，andontheotherthegovernmentgetsmoreandmorecompletepossessionofthesourcesofthatwelfare。
　　Thusmenarefollowingtwoseparateroadstoservitude:thetastefortheirownwelfarewithholdsthemfromtakingapartinthegovernment，andtheirloveofthatwelfareplacesthemincloserdependenceuponthosewhogovern。]
　　Thecentralpowernotonlyfulfilsofitselfthewholeofthedutiesformerlydischargedbyvariousauthorities—extendingthoseduties，andsurpassingthoseauthorities—butitperformsthemwithmorealertness，strength，andindependencethanitdisplayedbefore。AllthegovernmentsofEuropehaveinourtimesingularlyimprovedthescienceofadministration:theydomorethings，andtheydoeverythingwithmoreorder，morecelerity，andatlessexpense;theyseemtobeconstantlyenrichedbyalltheexperienceofwhichtheyhavestrippedprivatepersons。FromdaytodaytheprincesofEuropeholdtheirsubordinateofficersunderstrictercontrol，andtheyinventnewmethodsforguidingthemmoreclosely，andinspectingthemwithlesstrouble。Notcontentwithmanagingeverythingbytheiragents，theyundertaketomanagetheconductoftheiragentsineverything;sothatthepublicadministrationnotonlydependsupononeandthesamepower，butitismoreandmoreconfinedtoonespotandconcentratedinthesamehands。Thegovernmentcentralizesitsagencywhilstitincreasesitsprerogative—henceatwofoldincreaseofstrength。