Inthesamemanner,asmoneyisthesignandrepresentativeofathing,everythingisasignandrepresentativeofmoney;andthestateisinaprosperousconditionwhenontheonehandmoneyperfectlyrepresentsallthings,andontheotherallthingsperfectlyrepresentmoney,andarereciprocallythesignofeachother;thatis,whentheyhavesucharelativevaluethatwemayhavetheoneassoonaswehavetheother。
Thisneverhappensinanyotherthanamoderategovernment,nordoesitalwayshappenthere;forexample,ifthelawsfavourthedishonestdebtor,hiseffectsarenolongerarepresentativeorsignofmoney。
Withregardtoadespoticgovernment,itwouldbeaprodigydidthingsthererepresenttheirsign。Tyrannyanddistrustmakeeveryoneburytheirspecie;[3]thingsthereforearenottheretherepresentativeofmoney。
Legislatorshavesometimeshadtheartnotonlytomakethingsintheirownnaturetherepresentativeofspecie,buttoconvertthemevenintospecie,likethecurrentcoin。C?sar,whenhewasdictator,permitteddebtorstogivetheirlandsinpaymenttotheircreditors,atthepricetheywereworthbeforethecivilwar。[4]Tiberiusorderedthatthosewhodesiredspecieshouldhaveitfromthepublictreasuryonbindingovertheirlandtodoublethevalue[5]UnderC?sarthelandswerethemoneywhichpaidalldebts;underTiberiustenthousandsestercesinlandbecameascurrentmoneyequaltofivethousandsestercesinsilver。TheMagnaChartaofEnglandprovidesagainsttheseizingofthelandsorrevenuesofadebtor,whenhismovableorpersonalgoodsaresufficienttopay,andheiswillingtogivethemuptohiscreditors;thusallthegoodsofanEnglishmanrepresentmoney。
ThelawsoftheGermansconstitutedmoneyasatisfactionfortheinjuriesthatwerecommitted,andforthesufferingsduetoguilt。Butastherewasbutverylittlespecieinthecountry,theyagainconstitutedthismoneytobepaidingoodsorchattels。ThiswefindappointedinaSaxonlaw,withcertainregulationssuitabletotheeaseandconvenienceoftheseveralranksofpeople。Atfirstthelawdeclaredthevalueofasouincattle;[6]thesouoftwotremisesansweredtoanoxoftwelvemonths,ortoaewewithherlamb;thatofthreetremiseswasworthanoxofsixteenmonths。Withthesepeoplemoneybecamecattle,goods,andmerchandise,andtheseagainbecamemoney。
Moneyisnotonlyasignofthings;itisalsoasignandrepresentativeofmoney,asweshallseeinthechapteronexchange。
3。OfidealMoney。Thereisbothrealandidealmoney。Civilisednationsgenerallymakeuseofidealmoneyonly,becausetheyhaveconvertedtheirrealmoneyintoideal。Atfirsttheirrealmoneywassomemetalofacertainweightandstandard,butsoondishonestyorwantmadethemretrenchapartofthemetalfromeverypieceofmoney,towhichtheyleftthesamename;forexample,fromalivreatapoundweighttheytookhalfthesilver,andstillcontinuedtocallitalivre;thepiecewhichwasthetwentiethpartofapoundofsilvertheycontinuedtocallasou,thoughitisnomorethetwentiethpartofthispoundofsilver。
Bythismethodthelivreisanideallivre,andthesouanidealsou。
Thusoftheothersubdivisions;andsofarmaythisbecarriedthatwhatwecallalivreshallbeonlyasmallpartoftheoriginallivreorpound,whichrendersitstillmoreideal。Itmayevenhappenthatwehavenopieceofmoneyoftheprecisevalueofalivre,noranypieceexactlywithasou,thenthelivreandthesouwillbepurelyideal。
Theymaygivetoanypieceofmoneythedenominationofasmanylivresandasmanysousastheyplease,thevariationmaybecontinual,becauseitisaseasytogiveanothernametoathingasitisdifficulttochangethethingitself。
Totakeawaythesourceofthisabuse,itwouldbeanexcellentlawforallcountrieswhoaredesirousofmakingcommerceflourishtoordainthatnonebutrealmoneyshouldbecurrent,andtopreventanymethodsfrombeingtakentorenderitideal。
Nothingoughttobesoexemptfromvariationasthatwhichisthecommonmeasureofall。Tradeisinitsownnatureextremelyuncertain;anditisagreateviltoaddanewuncertaintytothatwhichisfoundedonthenatureofthething。
4。OftheQuantityofGoldandSilver。Whilecivilisednationsarethemistressesoftheworld,goldandsilver,whethertheydrawitfromamongthemselves,orfetchitfromthemines,mustincreaseeveryday。
Onthecontrary,itdiminisheswhenbarbarousnationsprevail。WeknowhowgreatwasthescarcityofthesemetalswhentheGothsandVandalsontheoneside,andontheothertheSaracensandTartars,brokeinlikeatorrentonthecivilisedworld。
5。ThesameSubjectcontinued。ThebulliondrawnfromtheAmericanmines,importedintoEurope,andthencesenttotheEast,hasgreatlypromotedthenavigationoftheEuropeannations;foritismerchandisewhichEuropereceivesinexchangefromAmerica,andwhichshesendsinexchangetotheIndies。Aprodigiousquantityofgoldandsilveristhereforeanadvantage,whenweconsiderthesemetalsasmerchandise;
butitisotherwisewhenweconsiderthemasasign,becausetheirabundancegivesanalloytotheirqualityasasign,whichischieflyfoundedontheirscarcity。
BeforethefirstPunicwar,[7]copperwastosilveras960to1;[8]itisatpresentnearlyas731/2to1。Whentheproportionshallbeasitwasformerly,silverwillbetterperformitsofficeasasign。
6。TheReasonwhyInterestwasloweredone—halfaftertheConquestoftheIndies。Garcilassoinformsus[9]thatinSpainaftertheconquestoftheIndiestheinterest,whichwasattenpercent,felltofive。Thiswasanecessaryconsequence。AgreatquantityofspeciebeingallofasuddenbroughtintoEurope,muchfewerpersonshadneedofmoney。Thepriceofallthingsincreased,whilethevalueofmoneydiminished;theproportionwasthenbroken,andalltheolddebtsweredischarged。WemayrecollectthetimeoftheSystem,[10]wheneverythingwasatahighpriceexceptspecie。ThosewhohadmoneyaftertheconquestoftheIndieswereobligedtolowerthepriceorhireoftheirmerchandise,thatis,inotherwords,theirinterest。
Fromthistimetheywereunabletobringinteresttoitsancientstandard,becausethequantityofspeciebroughttoEuropehasbeenannuallyincreasing。Besides,asthepublicfundsofsomestates,foundedonrichesprocuredbycommerce,gavebutaverysmallinterest,itbecamenecessaryforthecontractsofindividualstoberegulatedbythese。Inshort,thecourseofexchangehavingrenderedtheconveyingofspeciefromonecountrytoanotherremarkablyeasy,moneycannotbescarceinaplacewheretheymaybesoreadilysuppliedwithitbythosewhohaveitinplenty。
7。HowthePriceofThingsisfixedintheVariationoftheSignofRiches。Moneyisthepriceofmerchandiseormanufactures。Buthowshallwefixthisprice?or,inotherwords,bywhatpieceofmoneyiseverythingtoberepresented?
Ifwecomparethemassofgoldandsilverinthewholeworldwiththequantityofmerchandisethereincontained,itiscertainthateverycommodityormerchandiseinparticularmaybecomparedtoacertainportionoftheentiremassofgoldandsilver。Asthetotaloftheoneistothetotaloftheother,sopartoftheonewillbetopartoftheother。Letussupposethatthereisonlyonecommodityormerchandiseintheworld,oronlyonetobepurchased,andthatthisisdivisiblelikemoney;apartofthismerchandisewillanswertoapartofthemassofgoldandsilver;thehalfofthetotaloftheonetothehalfofthetotaloftheother;thetenth,thehundredth,thethousandthpartoftheone,tothetenth,thehundredth,thethousandthpartoftheother。Butasthatwhichconstitutespropertyamongmankindisnotallatonceintrade,andasthemetalsormoneywhicharethesignofpropertyarenotallintradeatthesametime,thepriceisfixedinthecompoundratioofthetotalofthingswiththetotalofsigns,andthatofthetotalofthingsintradewiththetotalofsignsintradealso;andasthethingswhicharenotintradeto—daymaybeintradeto—morrow,andthesignsnotnowintrademayenterintotradeatthesametime,theestablishmentofthepriceofthingsfundamentallydependsontheproportionofthetotalofthingstothetotalofsigns。
Thustheprinceorthemagistratecannomoreascertainthevalueofmerchandisethanhecanestablishbyadecreethattherelation1hasto10isequaltothatof1to20。Julian’sloweringthepriceofprovisionsatAntiochwasthecauseofamostterriblefamine。[11]
8。ThesameSubjectcontinued。TheNegroesonthecoastofAfricahaveasignofvaluewithoutmoney。Itisasignmerelyideal,foundedonthedegreeofesteemwhichtheyfixintheirmindsforallmerchandise,inproportiontotheneedtheyhaveofit。Acertaincommodityormerchandiseisworththreema—coutes;another,sixmacoutes;another,tenmacoutes;thatis,asiftheysaidsimplythree,six,andten。Thepriceisformedbyacomparisonofallmerchandisewitheachother。Theyhavethereforenoparticularmoney;buteachkindofmerchandiseismoneytotheother。
Letusforamomenttransfertoourselvesthismannerofvaluingthings,andjoinitwithours:allthemerchandiseandgoodsintheworld,orelseallthemerchandiseormanufacturesofastate,particularlyconsideredasseparatefromallothers,wouldbeworthacertainnumberofmacoutes;and,dividingthemoneyofthisstateintoasmanypartsastherearemacoutes,onepartofthisdivisionofmoneywillbethesignofamacoute。
Ifwesupposethequantityofspecieinastatedoubled,itwillbenecessarytodoublethespecieinthemacoute;butifindoublingthespecieyoudoublealsothemacoute,theproportionwillremainthesameasbeforethedoublingofeither。
If,sincethediscoveryoftheIndies,goldandsilverhaveincreasedinEuropeintheproportionof1to20,thepriceofprovisionsandmerchandisemusthavebeenenhancedintheproportionof1to20。Butif,ontheotherhand,thequantityofmerchandisehasincreasedas1to2——itnecessarilyfollowsthatthepriceofthismerchandiseandprovisions,havingbeenraisedinproportionof1to20,andfalleninproportionof1to2——itnecessarilyfollows,Isay,thattheproportionisonlyas1to10。
Thequantityofgoodsandmerchandiseincreasesbyanaugmentationofcommerce,theaugmentationofcommercebyanaugmentationofthespeciewhichsuccessivelyarrives,andbynewcommunicationswithfreshly—discoveredcountriesandseas,whichfurnishuswithnewcommoditiesandnewmerchandise。
9。OftherelativeScarcityofGoldandSilver。Besidesthepositiveplentyandscarcityofgoldandsilver,thereisstillarelativeabundanceandarelativescarcityofoneofthesemetalscomparedwiththeother。
Theavaricioushoarduptheirgoldandsilver,forastheydonotcaretospend,theyarefondofsignsthatarenotsubjecttodecay。Theyprefergoldtosilver,becauseastheyarealwaysafraidoflosing,theycanbestconcealthatwhichtakesuptheleastroom。Goldthereforedisappearswhenthereisplentyofsilver,byreasonthateveryonehassometoconceal;itappearsagainwhensilverisscarce,becausetheyareobligedtodrawitfromitsconfinement。
Itisthenarulethatgoldiscommonwhensilverisscarce,andgoldisscarcewhensilveriscommon。Thisletsusseethedifferencebetweentheirrelativeandtheirrealabundanceandscarcity,ofwhichIshallpresentlyspeakmoreatlarge。
10。OfExchange。Therelativeabundanceandscarcityofspecieindifferentcountriesformswhatiscalledthecourseofexchange。
Exchangeisafixingoftheactualandmomentaryvalueofmoney。
Silverasametalhasvaluelikeallothermerchandise,andanadditionalvalueasitiscapableofbecomingthesignofothermerchandise。Ifitwerenomorethanmeremerchandise,itwouldlosemuchofitsvalue。
Silver,asmoney,hasavalue,whichtheprinceinsomerespectscanfix,andinotherscannot。
1。Theprinceestablishesaproportionbetweenaquantityofsilverasmetal,andthesamequantityasmoney,2。Hefixestheproportionbetweentheseveralmetalsmadeuseofasmoney。3。Heestablishestheweightandstandardofeverypieceofmoney。Infine,4,hegivestoeverypiecethatidealvalueofwhichIhavespoken。Ishallcallthevalueofmoneyinthesefourrespectsitspositivevalue,becauseitmaybefixedbylaw。
Thecoinofeverystatehas,besidesthis,arelativevalue,asitiscomparedwiththemoneyofothercountries。Thisrelativevalueisestablishedbytheexchange,andgreatlydependsonitspositivevalue。
Itisfixedbythegeneralopinionofthemerchants,neverbythedecreesoftheprince;becauseitissubjecttoincessantvariations,anddependsonathousandaccidents。
Theseveralnations,infixingthisrelativevalue,arechieflyguidedbythatwhichhasthegreatestquantityofspecie。Ifshehasasmuchspecieasalltheotherstogether,itisthenmostproperfortheotherstoregulatetheirsbyherstandard:andtheregulationbetweenalltheotherswillprettynearlyagreewiththeregulationmadewiththisprincipalnation。
Intheactualstateoftheglobe,Hollandisthenationwearespeakingof。Letusexaminethecourseofexchangewithrelationtoher。
TheyhaveinHollandapieceofmoneycalledaflorin,worthtwentysous,orfortyhalf—sousorgros。But,torenderourideasassimpleaspossible,letusimaginethattheyhavenotanysuchpieceofmoneyinHollandasaflorin,andthattheyhavenootherbutthegros:amanwhoshouldhaveathousandflorinsshouldhavefortythousandgros;andsooftherest。NowtheexchangewithHollandisdeterminedbyourknowinghowmanygroseverypieceofmoneyinothercountriesisworth;andastheFrenchcommonlyreckonbyacrownofthreelivres,theexchangemakesitnecessaryforthemtoknowhowmanygrosarecontainedinacrownofthreelivres。Ifthecourseofexchangeisatfifty—four,acrownofthreelivreswillbeworthfifty—fourgros;ifitisatsixty,itwillbeworthsixtygros。IfsilverisscarceinFrance,acrownofthreelivreswillbeworthmoregros;ifplentiful,itwillbeworthless。
Thisscarcityorplenty,whenceresultsthemutabilityofthecourseofexchange,isnotthereal,butarelative,scarcityorplenty。Forexample,whenFrancehasgreateroccasionforfundsinHollandthantheDutchofhavingfundsinFrance,specieissaidtobecommoninFranceandscarceinHolland:andviceversa。
LetussupposethatthecourseofexchangewithHollandisatfifty—four。IfFranceandHollandcomposedonlyonecity,theywouldactaswedowhenwegivechangeforacrown:theFrenchmanwouldtakethreelivresoutofhispocket,andtheDutchmanfifty—fourgrosfromhis。ButasthereissomedistancebetweenParisandAmsterdam,itisnecessarythathewhoforacrownofthreelivresgivesmefifty—fourgros,whichhehasinHolland,shouldgivemeabillofexchangeforfifty—fourgrospayableinHolland。Thefifty—fourgrosisnotthethinginquestion,butabillforthatsum。Thus,inordertojudgeofthescarcityorplentyofspecie,[12]wemustknowifthereareinFrancemorebillsoffifty—fourgrosdrawnuponHollandthantherearecrownsdrawnuponFrance。IftherearemorebillsfromHollandthantherearefromFrance,specieisscarceinFrance,andcommoninHolland;itthenbecomesnecessarythattheexchangeshouldrise,andthattheygiveformycrownmorethanfifty—fourgros;otherwiseIwillnotpartwithit;andviceversa。
Thusthevariousturnsinthecourseofexchangeformanaccountofdebtorandcreditor,whichmustbefrequentlysettled,andwhichthestateindebtcannomoredischargebyexchangethananindividualcanpayadebtbygivingchangeforapieceofsilver。
Wewillsupposethattherearebutthreestatesintheworld,France,Spain,andHolland;thatseveralindividualsinSpainareindebtedtoFrance,tothevalueofonehundredthousandmarksofsilver;andthatseveralindividualsofFranceoweinSpainonehundredandtenthousandmarks:now,ifsomecircumstancebothinSpainandFranceshouldcauseeachtowithdrawhisspecie,whatwillthenbethecourseofexchange?
Thesetwonationswillreciprocallyacquiteachotherofahundredthousandmarks;butFrancewillstillowetenthousandmarksinSpain,andtheSpaniardswillstillhavebillsuponFrance,tothevalueoftenthousandmarks;whileFrancewillhavenoneatalluponSpain。
ButifHollandwasinacontrarysituationwithrespecttoFrance,andinordertobalancetheaccountmustpayhertenthousandmarks,theFrenchwouldhavetwowaysofpayingtheSpaniards:eitherbygivingtheircreditorsinSpainbillsfortenthousandmarksupontheirdebtorsinHolland,orelsebysendingspecietothevalueoftenthousandmarkstoSpain。
Henceitfollowsthatwhenastatehasoccasiontoremitasumofmoneytoanothercountry,itisindifferent,inthenatureofthething,whetherspeciebeconveyedthitherortheytakebillsofexchange。Theadvantageordisadvantageofthesetwomethodssolelydependsonactualcircumstances。WemustinquirewhichwillyieldmostgrosinHolland—moneycarriedthitherinspecie,orabilluponHollandforthelikesum。[13]
WhenmoneyofthesamestandardandweightinFranceyieldsmoneyofthesamestandardandweightinHolland,wesaythattheexchangeisatpar。
Intheactualstateofspecie[14]theparisnearlyatfifty—fourgrostothecrown。Whentheexchangeisabovefifty—fourgros,wesayitishigh;whenbeneath,wesayitislow。
Inordertoknowthelossandgainofastateinaparticularsituationofexchange,itmustbeconsideredasdebtorandcreditor,asbuyerandseller。Whentheexchangeisbelowpar,itlosesasadebtor,andgainsasacreditor;itlosesasabuyerandgainsasaseller。Itisobviousitlosesasdebtor;suppose,forexample,FranceowesHollandacertainnumberofgros,thefewergrosthereareinacrownthemorecrownsshehastopay。Onthecontrary,ifFranceiscreditorforacertainnumberofgros,thelessnumberofgrosthereareinacrownthemorecrownsshewillreceive。Thestatelosesalsoasbuyer,fortheremustbethesamenumberofgrostopurchasethesamequantityofmerchandise;andwhiletheexchangeislow,everyFrenchcrownisworthfewergros。Forthesamereasonthestategainsasaseller。IsellmymerchandiseinHollandforacertainnumberofgros;IreceivethenmorecrownsinFrance,whenforeveryfiftygrosIreceiveacrown,thanIshoulddoifIreceivedonlythesamecrownforeveryfifty—four。Thecontrarytothistakesplaceintheotherstate。IftheDutchareindebtedacertainnumberofcrownstoFrance,theywillgain;ifthismoneyisowingtothem,theywilllose;iftheysell,theylose;andiftheybuy,theygain。
Itispropertopursuethissomewhatfurther。Whentheexchangeisbelowpar;forexample,ifitbeatfiftyinsteadoffifty—four,itshouldfollowthatFrance,onsendingbillsofexchangetoHollandforfifty—fourthousandcrowns,couldbuymerchandiseonlytothevalueoffiftythousand;andthatontheotherhand,theDutchsendingthevalueoffiftythousandscrownstoFrancemightbuyfifty—fourthousand,whichmakesadifferenceof8/54,thatis,alosstoFranceofmorethanone—seventh;sothatFrancewouldbeobligedtosendtoHollandone—seventhmoreinspecieormerchandisethanshewoulddoweretheexchangeatpar。Andasthemischiefmustconstantlyincrease,becauseadebtofthiskindwouldbringtheexchangestilllower,Francewouldintheendberuined。Itseems,Isay,asifthisshouldcertainlyfollow;
andyetitdoesnot,becauseoftheprinciplewhichIhaveelsewhereestablished;[15]whichisthatstatesconstantlyleantowardsabalance,inordertopreservetheirindependency。Thustheyborrowonlyinproportiontotheirabilitytopay,andmeasuretheirbuyingbywhattheysell;andtakingtheexamplefromabove,iftheexchangefallsinFrancefromfifty—fourtofifty,theDutchwhobuymerchandiseinFrancetothevalueofathousandcrowns,forwhichtheyusedtopayfifty—fourthousandgros,wouldnowpayonlyfiftythousand,iftheFrenchwouldconsenttoit。ButthemerchandiseofFrancewillriseinsensibly,andtheprofitwillbesharedbetweentheFrenchandtheDutch;forwhenamerchantcangain,heeasilyshareshisprofit;therearisesthenacommunicationofprofitbetweentheFrenchandtheDutch。InthesamemannertheFrench,whoboughtmerchandiseofHollandforfifty—fourthousandgros,andwho,whentheexchangewasatfifty—four,paidforthemathousandcrowns,willbeobligedtoaddone—seventhmoreinFrenchcrownstobuythesamemerchandise。ButtheFrenchmerchant,beingsensibleofthelosshesuffers,willtakeuplessofthemerchandiseofHolland。TheFrenchandtheDutchmerchantwillthenbothbelosers,thestatewillinsensiblyfallintoabalance,andtheloweringoftheexchangewillnotbeattendedwithallthoseinconvenienceswhichwehadreasontofear。
Amerchantmaysendhisstockintoaforeigncountrywhentheexchangeisbelowparwithoutinjuringhisfortune,because,whenitreturns,herecoverswhathehadlost;butaprincewhosendsonlyspecieintoaforeigncountrywhichnevercanreturn,isalwaysaloser。
Whenthemerchantshavegreatdealingsinanycountry,theexchangethereinfalliblyrises。Thisproceedsfromtheirenteringintomanyengagements,buyinggreatquantitiesofmerchandise,anddrawinguponforeigncountriestopayforthem。
Aprincemayamassgreatwealthinhisdominions,andyetspeciemaybereallyscarce,andrelativelycommon;forinstance,ifthestateisindebtedformuchmerchandisetoaforeigncountry,theexchangewillbelow,thoughspeciebescarce。
Theexchangeofallplacesconstantlytendstoacertainproportion,andthatintheverynatureofthings。IfthecourseofexchangefromIrelandtoEnglandisbelowpar,andthatofEnglandtoHollandisalsounderpar,thatofIrelandtoHollandwillbestilllower;thatis,inthecompoundratioofthatofIrelandtoEngland,andthatofEnglandtoHolland;foraDutchmerchantwhocanhavehisspecieindirectlyfromIreland,bywayofEngland,willnotchoosetopaydearerbyhavingitinthedirectway。This,Isay,oughtnaturallytobethecase;but,however,itisnotexactlyso。Therearealwayscircumstanceswhichvarythesethings;andthedifferentprofitofdrawingbyoneplace,orofdrawingbyanother,constitutestheparticularartanddexterityofthebankers,whichdoesnotbelongtothepresentsubject。
Whenastateraisesitsspecie,forinstance,whenitgivesthenameofsixlivres,ortwocrowns,towhatwasbeforecalledthreelivres,oronecrown,thisnewdenomination,whichaddsnothingrealtothecrown,oughtnottoprocureasinglegrosmorebytheexchange。Weoughtonlytohaveforthetwonewcrownsthesamenumberofgroswhichwebeforereceivedfortheoldone。Ifthisdoesnothappen,itmustnotbeimputedasaneffectoftheregulationitself,buttothenoveltyandsuddennessoftheaffair。Theexchangeadherestowhatisalreadyestablished,andisnotalteredtillafteracertaintime。
Whenastate,insteadofonlyraisingthespeciebyalaw,callsitin,inordertodiminishitssize,itfrequentlyhappensthatduringthetimetakenupinpassingagainthroughtheminttherearetwokindsofmoney——thelarge,whichistheold,andthesmall,whichisthenew;
andasthelargeiscrieddownasnottobereceivedasmoney,andbillsofexchangemustconsequentlybepaidinthenew,onewouldimaginethenthattheexchangeshouldberegulatedbythenew。If,forexample,inFrance,theancientcrownofthreelivres,beingworthinHollandsixtygros,wasreducedone—half,thenewcrownoughttobevaluedonlyatthirty。Ontheotherhand,itseemsasiftheexchangeoughttoberegulatedbytheoldcoin;becausethebankerwhohasspecie,andreceivesbills,isobligedtocarrytheoldcointothemintinordertochangeitforthenew,bywhichhemustbealoser。Theexchangethenoughttobefixedbetweenthevalueoftheoldcoinandthatofthenew。
Thevalueoftheoldisdecreased,ifwemaycallitso,bothbecausethereisalreadysomeofthenewintrade,andbecausethebankerscannotkeepuptotherigourofthelaw,havinganinterestinlettingloosetheoldcoinfromtheirchests,andbeingsometimesobligedtomakepaymentswithit。Again,thevalueofthenewspeciemustrise,becausethebankerhavingthisfindshimselfinasituationinwhich,asweshallimmediatelyprove,hewillreapgreatadvantagebyprocuringtheold。Theexchangeshouldthenbefixed,asIhavealreadysaid,betweenthenewandtheoldcoin。Forthenthebankersfindittotheirinteresttosendtheoldoutofthekingdom,becausebythismethodtheyprocurethesameadvantageastheycouldreceivefromaregularexchangeoftheoldspecie,thatis,agreatmanygrosinHolland;andinreturn,aregularexchangealittlelower,betweentheoldandthenewspecie,whichwouldbringmanycrownstoFrance。
Supposethatthreelivresoftheoldcoinyieldbytheactualexchangeforty—fivegros,andthatbysendingthissamecrowntoHollandtheyreceivesixty,butwithabillofforty—fivegros,theyprocureacrownofthreelivresinFrance,whichbeingsentintheoldspecietoHolland,stillyieldssixtygros;thusalltheoldspeciewouldbesentoutofthekingdom,andthebankerswouldrunawaywiththewholeprofit。
Toremedythis,newmeasuresmustbetaken。Thestatewhichcoinedthenewspeciewoulditselfbeobligedtosendgreatquantitiesoftheoldtothenationwhichregulatestheexchange,and,bythusgainingcreditthere,raisetheexchangeprettynearlytoasmanygrosforacrownofthreelivresoutofthecountry。Isaytonearlythesame,forwhiletheprofitsaresmallthebankerswillnotbetemptedtosenditabroad,becauseoftheexpenseofcarriageandthedangerofconfiscation。
Itisfitthatweshouldgiveaveryclearideaofthis。Mr。Bernard,oranyotherbankeremployedbythestate,proposesbillsuponHolland,andgivesthematone,two,orthreegroshigherthantheactualexchange;
hehasmadeaprovisioninaforeigncountry,bymeansoftheoldspecie,whichhehascontinuallybeensendingthither;andthushehasraisedtheexchangetothepointwehavejustmentioned。Inthemeantime,bydisposingofhisbills,heseizesonallthenewspecie,andobligestheotherbankers,whohavepaymentstomake,tocarrytheiroldspecietothemint;and,asheinsensiblyobtainsallthespecie,heobligestheotherbankerstogivehimbillsofexchangeataveryhighprice。Bythismeanshisprofitintheendcompensatesinagreatmeasureforthelosshesufferedatthebeginning。
Itisevidentthatduringthesetransactions,thestatemustbeinadangerouscrisis。Speciemustbecomeextremelyscarce——1,becausemuchthegreatestpartiscrieddown;2,becauseapartwillbesentintoforeigncountries;3,becauseeveryonewilllayitup,asnotbeingwillingtogivethatprofittotheprincewhichhehopestoreceivehimself。Itisdangeroustodoitslowly;anddangerousalsotodoitintoomuchhaste。Ifthesupposedgainbeimmoderate,theinconveniencesincreaseinproportion。
第36章