Itisanessentialpointtofixthenumberofcitizenswhoaretoformthepublicassemblies;otherwiseitwouldbeuncertainwhetherthewhole,oronlyapartofthepeople,hadgiventheirvotes。AtSpartathenumberwasfixedattenthousand。ButRome,designedbyProvidencetorisefromtheweakestbeginningstothehighestpitchofgrandeur;
Rome,doomedtoexperienceallthevicissitudesoffortune;Rome,whohadsometimesallherinhabitantswithoutherwalls,andsometimesallItalyandaconsiderablepartoftheworldwithinthem;Rome,Isay,neverfixedthenumber[3]andthiswasoneoftheprincipalcausesofherruin。
Thepeople,inwhomthesupremepowerresides,oughttohavethemanagementofeverythingwithintheirreach:thatwhichexceedstheirabilitiesmustbeconductedbytheirministers。
Buttheycannotproperlybesaidtohavetheirministers,withoutthepowerofnominatingthem:itis,therefore,afundamentalmaximinthisgovernment,thatthepeopleshouldchoosetheirministers——thatis,theirmagistrates。
Theyhaveoccasion,aswellasmonarchs,andevenmoreso,tobedirectedbyacouncilorsenate。Buttohaveaproperconfidenceinthese,theyshouldhavethechoosingofthemembers;whethertheelectionbemadebythemselves,asatAthens,orbysomemagistratedeputedforthatpurpose,asoncertainoccasionswascustomaryatRome。
Thepeopleareextremelywellqualifiedforchoosingthosewhomtheyaretoentrustwithpartoftheirauthority。Theyhaveonlytobedeterminedbythingstowhichtheycannotbestrangers,andbyfactsthatareobvioustosense。Theycantellwhenapersonhasfoughtmanybattles,andbeencrownedwithsuccess;theyare,therefore,capableofelectingageneral。Theycantellwhenajudgeisassiduousinhisoffice,givesgeneralsatisfaction,andhasneverbeenchargedwithbribery:thisissufficientforchoosingapr?tor。Theyarestruckwiththemagnificenceorrichesofafellow—citizen;nomoreisrequisiteforelectinganedile。Thesearefactsofwhichtheycanhavebetterinformationinapublicforumthanamonarchinhispalace。Butaretheycapableofconductinganintricateaffair,ofseizingandimprovingtheopportunityandcriticalmomentofaction?No;thissurpassestheirabilities。
Shouldwedoubtthepeople’snaturalcapacity,inrespecttothediscernmentofmerit,weneedonlycastaneyeontheseriesofsurprisingelectionsmadebytheAtheniansandRomans;whichnoonesurelywillattributetohazard。
WeknowthatthoughthepeopleofRomeassumedtherightofraisingplebeianstopublicoffices,yettheyneverwouldexertthispower;andthoughatAthensthemagistrateswereallowed,bythelawofAristides,tobeelectedfromallthedifferentclassesofinhabitants,thereneverwasacase,saysXenophon,[4]whenthecommonpeoplepetitionedforemploymentswhichcouldendangereithertheirsecurityortheirglory。
Asmostcitizenshavesufficientabilitytochoose,thoughunqualifiedtobechosen,sothepeople,thoughcapableofcallingotherstoanaccountfortheiradministration,areincapableofconductingtheadministrationthemselves。
Thepublicbusinessmustbecarriedonwithacertainmotion,neithertooquicknortooslow。Butthemotionofthepeopleisalwayseithertooremissortooviolent。Sometimeswithahundredthousandarmstheyoverturnallbeforethem;andsometimeswithahundredthousandfeettheycreeplikeinsects。
Inapopularstatetheinhabitantsaredividedintocertainclasses。Itisinthemannerofmakingthisdivisionthatgreatlegislatorshavesignalisedthemselves;anditisonthisthedurationandprosperityofdemocracyhaveeverdepended。
ServiusTulliusfollowedthespiritofaristocracyinthedistributionofhisclasses。WefindinLivy[5]andinDionysiusHalicarnassus,[6]inwhatmannerhelodgedtherightofsuffrageinthehandsoftheprincipalcitizens。HehaddividedthepeopleofRomeinto193
centuries,whichformedsixclasses;andrankingtherich,whowereinsmallernumbers,inthefirstcenturies,andthoseinmiddlingcircumstances,whoweremorenumerous,inthenext,heflungtheindigentmultitudeintothelast;andaseachcenturyhadbutonevote[7]itwaspropertyratherthannumbersthatdecidedtheelection。
SolondividedthepeopleofAthensintofourclasses。Inthishewasdirectedbythespiritofdemocracy,hisintentionnotbeingtofixthosewhoweretochoose,butsuchaswereeligible:therefore,leavingtoeverycitizentherightofelection,hemade[8]thejudgeseligiblefromeachofthosefourclasses;butthemagistratesheorderedtobechosenonlyoutofthefirstthree,consistingofpersonsofeasyfortunes。[9]
Asthedivisionofthosewhohavearightofsuffrageisafundamentallawinrepublics,sothemannerofgivingthissuffrageisanotherfundamental。
Thesuffragebylotisnaturaltodemocracy;asthatbychoiceistoaristocracy。[10]
Thesuffragebylotisamethodofelectingthatoffendsnoone,butanimateseachcitizenwiththepleasinghopeofservinghiscountry。
Yetasthismethodisinitselfdefective,ithasbeentheendeavourofthemosteminentlegislatorstoregulateandamendit。
SolonmadealawatAthensthatmilitaryemploymentsshouldbeconferredbychoice;butthatsenatorsandjudgesshouldbeelectedbylot。
Thesamelegislatorordainedthatcivilmagistracies,attendedwithgreatexpense,shouldbegivenbychoice;andtheothersbylot。
Inorder,however,toamendthesuffragebylot,hemadearulethatnonebutthosewhopresentedthemselvesshouldbeelected;thatthepersonelectedshouldbeexaminedbyjudges[11]andthateveryoneshouldhavearighttoaccusehimifhewereunworthyoftheoffice:[12]
thisparticipatedatthesametimeofthesuffragebylot,andofthatbychoice。Whenthetimeoftheirmagistracyhadexpired,theywereobligedtosubmittoanotherjudgmentinregardtotheirconduct。
Personsutterlyunqualifiedmusthavebeenextremelybackwardingivingintheirnamestobedrawnbylot。
Thelawwhichdeterminesthemannerofgivingsuffrageislikewisefundamentalinademocracy。Itisaquestionofsomeimportancewhetherthesuffragesoughttobepublicorsecret。Ciceroobserves[13]thatthelaws[14]whichrenderedthemsecrettowardsthecloseoftherepublicwerethecauseofitsdecline。Butasthisisdifferentlypractisedindifferentrepublics,Ishallofferheremythoughtsconcerningthissubject。
Thepeople’ssuffragesoughtdoubtlesstobepublic[15]andthisshouldbeconsideredasafundamentallawofdemocracy。Thelowerclassoughttobedirectedbythoseofhigherrank,andrestrainedwithinboundsbythegravityofeminentpersonages。Hence,byrenderingthesuffragessecretintheRomanrepublic,allwaslost;itwasnolongerpossibletodirectapopulacethatsoughtitsowndestruction。Butwhenthebodyofthenoblesaretovoteinanaristocracy[16]orinademocracythesenate[17]asthebusinessisthenonlytopreventintrigues,thesuffragescannotbetoosecret。
Intriguinginasenateisdangerous;itisdangerousalsoinabodyofnobles;butnotsoamongthepeople,whosenatureistoactthroughpassion。Incountrieswheretheyhavenoshareinthegovernment,weoftenseethemasmuchinflamedonaccountofanactorasevertheycouldbeforthewelfareofthestate。Themisfortuneofarepubliciswhenintriguesareatanend;whichhappenswhenthepeoplearegainedbybriberyandcorruption:inthiscasetheygrowindifferenttopublicaffairs,andavaricebecomestheirpredominantpassion。Unconcernedaboutthegovernmentandeverythingbelongingtoit,theyquietlywaitfortheirhire。
Itislikewiseafundamentallawindemocracies,thatthepeopleshouldhavethesolepowertoenactlaws。Andyetthereareathousandoccasionsonwhichitisnecessarythesenateshouldhavethepowerofdecreeing;nay,itisfrequentlypropertomakesometrialofalawbeforeitisestablished。TheconstitutionsofRomeandAthenswereexcellent。Thedecreesofthesenate[18]hadtheforceoflawsforthespaceofayear,butdidnotbecomeperpetualtilltheywereratifiedbytheconsentofthepeople。
3。OftheLawsinrelationtotheNatureofAristocracy。Inanaristocracythesupremepowerislodgedinthehandsofacertainnumberofpersons。Theseareinvestedbothwiththelegislativeandexecutiveauthority;andtherestofthepeopleare,inrespecttothem,thesameasthesubjectsofamonarchyinregardtothesovereign。
Theydonotvoteherebylot,forthiswouldbeproductiveofinconveniencesonly。Andindeed,inagovernmentwherethemostmortifyingdistinctionsarealreadyestablished,thoughtheyweretobechosenbylot,stilltheywouldnotceasetobeodious;itisthenoblemantheyenvy,andnotthemagistrate。
Whenthenobilityarenumerous,theremustbeasenatetoregulatetheaffairswhichthebodyofthenoblesareincapableofdeciding,andtoprepareothersfortheirdecision。Inthiscaseitmaybesaidthatthearistocracyisinsomemeasureinthesenate,thedemocracyinthebodyofthenobles,andthepeopleareacipher。
Itwouldbeaveryhappythinginanaristocracyifthepeople,insomemeasure,couldberaisedfromtheirstateofannihilation。ThusatGenoa,thebankofSt。Georgebeingadministeredbythepeople[19]givesthemacertaininfluenceinthegovernment,whencetheirwholeprosperityisderived。
Thesenatorsoughtbynomeanstohavetherightofnamingtheirownmembers;forthiswouldbetheonlywaytoperpetuateabuses。AtRome,whichinitsearlyyearswasakindofaristocracy,thesenatedidnotfillupthevacantplacesintheirownbody;thenewmemberswerenominatedbythecensors。[20]
Inarepublic,thesuddenriseofaprivatecitizentoexorbitantpowerproducesmonarchy,orsomethingmorethanmonarchy。Inthelatterthelawshaveprovidedfor,orinsomemeasureadaptedthemselvesto,theconstitution;andtheprincipleofgovernmentchecksthemonarch:butinarepublic,whereaprivatecitizenhasobtainedanexorbitantpower,[21]theabuseofthispowerismuchgreater,becausethelawsforesawitnot,andconsequentlymadenoprovisionagainstit。
Thereisanexceptiontothisrule,whentheconstitutionissuchastohaveimmediateneedofamagistrateinvestedwithextraordinarypower。
SuchwasRomewithherdictators,suchisVenicewithherstateinquisitors;theseareformidablemagistrates,whorestore,asitwerebyviolence,thestatetoitsliberty。Buthowcomesitthatthesemagistraciesaresoverydifferentinthesetworepublics?ItisbecauseRomesupportedtheremainsofheraristocracyagainstthepeople;
whereasVeniceemploysherstateinquisitorstomaintainheraristocracyagainstthenobles。TheconsequencewasthatatRomethedictatorshipcouldbeonlyofshortduration,asthepeopleactedthroughpassionandnotwithdesign。Itwasnecessarythatamagistracyofthiskindshouldbeexercisedwithlustreandpomp,thebusinessbeingtointimidate,andnottopunish,themultitude。Itwasalsoproperthatthedictatorshouldbecreatedonlyforsomeparticularaffair,andforthisonlyshouldhaveanunlimitedauthority,ashewasalwayscreateduponsomesuddenemergency。Onthecontrary,atVenicetheyhaveoccasionforapermanentmagistracy;forhereitisthatschemesmaybesetonfoot,continued,suspended,andresumed;thattheambitionofasinglepersonbecomesthatofafamily,andtheambitionofonefamilythatofmany。
Theyhaveoccasionforasecretmagistracy,thecrimestheypunishbeinghatchedinsecrecyandsilence。Thismagistracymusthaveageneralinquisition,fortheirbusinessisnottoremedyknowndisorders,buttopreventtheunknown。Inaword,thelatterisdesignedtopunishsuspectedcrimes;whereastheformerusedrathermenacesthanpunishmentevenforcrimesthatwereopenlyavowed。
Inallmagistracies,thegreatnessofthepowermustbecompensatedbythebrevityoftheduration。Thismostlegislatorshavefixedtoayear;
alongerspacewouldbedangerous,andashorterwouldbecontrarytothenatureofgovernment。Forwhoisitthatinthemanagementevenofhisdomesticaffairswouldbethusconfined?AtRagusa[22]thechiefmagistrateoftherepublicischangedeverymonth,theotherofficerseveryweek,andthegovernorofthecastleeveryday。Butthiscantakeplaceonlyinasmallrepublicenvironed[23]byformidablepowers,whomighteasilycorruptsuchpettyandinsignificantmagistrates。
Thebestaristocracyisthatinwhichthosewhohavenoshareinthelegislaturearesofewandinconsiderablethatthegoverningpartyhavenointerestinoppressingthem。Thuswhen[24]AntipatermadealawatAthensthatwhosoeverwasnotworthtwothousanddrachmsshouldhavenopowertovote,heformedbythismethodthebestaristocracypossible;
becausethiswassosmallasumastoexcludeveryfew,andnotoneofanyrankorconsiderationinthecity。
Aristocraticfamiliesoughttherefore,asmuchaspossible,tolevelthemselvesinappearancewiththepeople。Themoreanaristocracybordersondemocracy,theneareritapproachesperfection:and,inproportionasitdrawstowardsmonarchy,themoreisitimperfect。
Butthemostimperfectofallisthatinwhichthepartofthepeoplethatobeysisinastateofcivilservitudetothosewhocommand,asthearistocracyofPoland,wherethepeasantsareslavestothenobility。
4。OftheRelationofLawstotheNatureofMonarchicalGovernment。Theintermediate,subordinate,anddependentpowersconstitutethenatureofmonarchicalgovernment;Imeanofthatinwhichasinglepersongovernsbyfundamentallaws。Isaidtheintermediate,subordinate,anddependentpowers。Andindeed,inmonarchiestheprinceisthesourceofallpower,politicalandcivil。Thesefundamentallawsnecessarilysupposetheintermediatechannelsthroughwhichthepowerflows:foriftherebeonlythemomentaryandcapriciouswillofasinglepersontogovernthestate,nothingcanbefixed,andofcoursethereisnofundamentallaw。
Themostnatural,intermediate,andsubordinatepoweristhatofthenobility。Thisinsomemeasureseemstobeessentialtoamonarchy,whosefundamentalmaximis:nomonarch,nonobility;nonobility,nomonarch;buttheremaybeadespoticprince。
TherearemenwhohaveendeavouredinsomecountriesinEuropetosuppressthejurisdictionofthenobility,notperceivingthattheyweredrivingattheverythingthatwasdonebytheparliamentofEngland。
Abolishtheprivilegesofthelords,theclergyandcitiesinamonarchy,andyouwillsoonhaveapopularstate,orelseadespoticgovernment。
ThecourtsofaconsiderablekingdominEuropehave,formanyages,beenstrikingatthepatrimonialjurisdictionofthelordsandclergy。Wedonotpretendtocensurethesesagemagistrates;butweleaveittothepublictojudgehowfarthismayaltertheconstitution。FaramIfrombeingprejudicedinfavouroftheprivilegesoftheclergy;however,I
shouldbegladiftheirjurisdictionwereoncefixed。Thequestionisnotwhethertheirjurisdictionwasjustlyestablished;butwhetheritbereallyestablished;whetheritconstitutesapartofthelawsofthecountry,andisineveryrespectinrelationtothoselaws:whetherbetweentwopowersacknowledgedindependent,theconditionsoughtnottobereciprocal;andwhetheritbenotequallythedutyofagoodsubjecttodefendtheprerogativeoftheprince,andtomaintainthelimitswhichfromtimeimmemorialhavebeenprescribedtohisauthority。
Thoughtheecclesiasticpowerbesodangerousinarepublic,yetitisextremelyproperinamonarchy,especiallyoftheabsolutekind。WhatwouldbecomeofSpainandPortugal,sincethesubversionoftheirlaws,wereitnotforthisonlybarrieragainsttheincursionsofarbitrarypower?Abarriereverusefulwhenthereisnoother:forsinceadespoticgovernmentisproductiveofthemostdreadfulcalamitiestohumannature,theveryevilthatrestrainsitisbeneficialtothesubject。
Inthesamemannerastheocean,threateningtooverflowthewholeearth,isstoppedbyweedsandpebblesthatliescatteredalongtheshore,somonarchs,whosepowerseemsunbounded,arerestrainedbythesmallestobstacles,andsuffertheirnaturalpridetobesubduedbysupplicationandprayer。
TheEnglish,tofavourtheirliberty,haveabolishedalltheintermediatepowersofwhichtheirmonarchywascomposed。Theyhaveagreatdealofreasontobejealousofthisliberty;weretheyevertobesounhappyastoloseit,theywouldbeoneofthemostservilenationsuponearth。
Mr。Law,throughignorancebothofarepublicanandmonarchicalconstitution,wasoneofthegreatestpromotersofabsolutepowereverknowninEurope。Besidestheviolentandextraordinarychangesowingtohisdirection,hewouldfainsuppressalltheintermediateranks,andabolishthepoliticalcommunities。Hewasdissolving[25]themonarchybyhischimericalreimbursements,andseemedasifheevenwantedtoredeemtheconstitution。
Itisnotenoughtohaveintermediatepowersinamonarchy;theremustbealsoadepositaryofthelaws。Thisdepositarycanonlybethejudgesofthesupremecourtsofjustice,whopromulgatethenewlaws,andrevivetheobsolete。Thenaturalignoranceofthenobility,theirindolenceandcontemptofcivilgovernment,requirethatthereshouldbeabodyinvestedwiththepowerofrevivingandexecutingthelaws,whichwouldbeotherwiseburiedinoblivion。Theprince’scouncilarenotaproperdepositary。Theyarenaturallythedepositaryofthemomentarywilloftheprince,andnotofthefundamentallaws。Besides,theprince’scounciliscontinuallychanging;itisneitherpermanentnornumerous;neitherhasitasufficientshareoftheconfidenceofthepeople;consequentlyitiscapableofsettingthemrightindifficultconjunctures,orofreducingthemtoproperobedience。
Despoticgovernments,wheretherearenofundamentallaws,havenosuchkindofdepositary。Henceitisthatreligionhasgenerallysomuchinfluenceinthosecountries,becauseitformsakindofpermanentdepositary;andifthiscannotbesaidofreligion,itmayofthecustomsthatarerespectedinsteadoflaws。
5。OftheLawsinrelationtotheNatureofadespoticGovernment。Fromthenatureofdespoticpoweritfollowsthatthesingleperson,investedwiththispower,commitstheexecutionofitalsotoasingleperson。A
manwhomhissensescontinuallyinformthathehimselfiseverythingandthathissubjectsarenothing,isnaturallylazy,voluptuous,andignorant。Inconsequenceofthis,heneglectsthemanagementofpublicaffairs。Butwerehetocommittheadministrationtomany,therewouldbecontinualdisputesamongthem;eachwouldformintriguestobehisfirstslave;andhewouldbeobligedtotakethereinsintohisownhands。Itis,therefore,morenaturalforhimtoresignittoavizir,[26]andtoinvesthimwiththesamepowerashimself。Thecreationofavizirisafundamentallawofthisgovernment。
Itisrelatedofapopethathehadstartedaninfinitenumberofdifficultiesagainsthiselection,fromathoroughconvictionofhisincapacity。Atlengthhewasprevailedontoacceptofthepontificate,andresignedtheadministrationentirelytohisnephew。Hewassoonstruckwithsurprise,andsaid,"Ishouldneverhavethoughtthatthesethingsweresoeasy。"ThesamemaybesaidoftheprincesoftheEast,who,beingeducatedinaprisonwhereeunuchscorrupttheirheartsanddebasetheirunderstandings,andwheretheyarefrequentlykeptignorantevenoftheirhighrank,whendrawnforthinordertobeplacedonthethrone,areatfirstconfounded:butassoonastheyhavechosenavizir,andabandonedthemselvesintheirseragliotothemostbrutalpassions;pursuing,inthemidstofaprostitutedcourt,everycapriciousextravagance,theywouldneverhavedreamedthattheycouldfindmatterssoeasy。
Themoreextensivetheempire,thelargertheseraglio;andconsequentlythemorevoluptuoustheprince。Hencethemorenationssuchasovereignhastorule,thelessheattendstothecaresofgovernment;themoreimportanthisaffairs,thelesshemakesthemthesubjectofhisdeliberations。
______
1。CompareAristotle,Politics,vi。2。
2。Declamations,17,18。
3。SeetheConsiderationsontheCausesoftheGrandeurandDeclineoftheRomans,9。
4。Pp。691,693,ed。Wechel,1596。
5。Bk。i。
6。Bk。iv,art。15etseq。
7。SeeintheConsiderationsontheCausesoftheGrandeurandDeclineoftheRomans,9,howthisspiritofServiusTulliuswaspreservedintherepublic。
8。DionysiusHalicarnassus,EulogiumofIsocrates,ii,p。97,ed。
Wechel。Pollux,viii。10,art。130。
9。SeeAristotle’sPolitics,ii。12。
10。Ibid,iv。9。
11。SeetheorationofDemosthenes,DeFalsalegat。,andtheorationagainstTimarchus。
12。Theyusedeventodrawtwoticketsforeachplace,onewhichgavetheplace,andtheotherwhichnamedthepersonwhowastosucceed,incasethefirstwasrejected。
13。DeLeg。,i,iii。
14。Theywerecalledlegestabulares;twotabletswerepresentedtoeachcitizen,thefirstmarkedwithanA,forAntique,orIforbidit;andtheotherwithanUandanR,forUtirogas,orBeitasyoudesire。
15。AtAthensthepeopleusedtoliftuptheirhands。
16。AsatVenice。
17。ThethirtytyrantsatAthensorderedthesuffragesoftheAreopagitestobepublic,inordertomanagethemastheypleased。——
Lysias,Orat。contraAgorat。8。
18。SeeDionysiusHalicarnassus,iv,ix。
19。SeeMr。Addison,TravelstoItaly,p。16。
20。Theywerenamedatfirstbytheconsuls。
21。ThisiswhatruinedtherepublicofRome。SeeConsiderationsontheCausesoftheGrandeurandDeclineoftheRomans,14,16。
22。Tournefort,Voyages。
23。AtLuccathemagistratesarechosenonlyfortwomonths。
24。Diodorus,xviii,p。601,ed。Rhodoman。
25。Ferdinand,kingofAragon,madehimselfgrandmasteroftheorders,andthatalonechangedtheconstitution。
26。TheEasternkingsareneverwithoutvizirs,saysSirJohnChardin。
BookIII。OfthePrinciplesoftheThreeKindsofGovernment1。DifferencebetweentheNatureandPrincipleofGovernment。Havingexaminedthelawsinrelationtothenatureofeachgovernment,wemustinvestigatethosewhichrelatetoitsprinciple。
Thereisthisdifferencebetweenthenatureandprinciple[1]ofgovernment,thattheformeristhatbywhichitisconstituted,thelatterthatbywhichitismadetoact。Oneisitsparticularstructure,andtheotherthehumanpassionswhichsetitinmotion。
Now,lawsoughtnolesstorelatetotheprinciplethantothenatureofeachgovernment。Wemust,therefore,inquireintothisprinciple,whichshallbethesubjectofthisthirdbook。
2。OfthePrincipleofdifferentGovernments。Ihavealreadyobservedthatitisthenatureofarepublicangovernmentthateitherthecollectivebodyofthepeople,orparticularfamilies,shouldbepossessedofthesupremepower;ofamonarchy,thattheprinceshouldhavethispower,butintheexecutionofitshouldbedirectedbyestablishedlaws;ofadespoticgovernment,thatasinglepersonshouldruleaccordingtohisownwillandcaprice。Thisenablesmetodiscovertheirthreeprinciples;whicharethencenaturallyderived。Ishallbeginwitharepublicangovernment,andinparticularwiththatofdemocracy。
3。OfthePrincipleofDemocracy。Thereisnogreatshareofprobitynecessarytosupportamonarchicalordespoticgovernment。Theforceoflawsinone,andtheprince’sarmintheother,aresufficienttodirectandmaintainthewhole。Butinapopularstate,onespringmoreisnecessary,namely,virtue。
WhatIhavehereadvancedisconfirmedbytheunanimoustestimonyofhistorians,andisextremelyagreeabletothenatureofthings。Foritisclearthatinamonarchy,wherehewhocommandstheexecutionofthelawsgenerallythinkshimselfabovethem,thereislessneedofvirtuethaninapopulargovernment,wherethepersonentrustedwiththeexecutionofthelawsissensibleofhisbeingsubjecttotheirdirection。
Clearisitalsothatamonarchwho,throughbadadviceorindolence,ceasestoenforcetheexecutionofthelaws,mayeasilyrepairtheevil;
hehasonlytofollowotheradvice;ortoshakeoffthisindolence。Butwhen,inapopulargovernment,thereisasuspensionofthelaws,asthiscanproceedonlyfromthecorruptionoftherepublic,thestateiscertainlyundone。
AverydrollspectacleitwasinthelastcenturytobeholdtheimpotenteffortsoftheEnglishtowardstheestablishmentofdemocracy。Astheywhohadashareinthedirectionofpublicaffairswerevoidofvirtue;
astheirambitionwasinffamedbythesuccessofthemostdaringoftheirmembers;[2]astheprevailingpartiesweresuccessivelyanimatedbythespiritoffaction,thegovernmentwascontinuallychanging:thepeople,amazedatsomanyrevolutions,invainattemptedtoerectacommonwealth。Atlength,whenthecountryhadundergonethemostviolentshocks,theywereobligedtohaverecoursetotheverygovernmentwhichtheyhadsowantonlyproscribed。
WhenSyllathoughtofrestoringRometoherliberty,thisunhappycitywasincapableofreceivingthatblessing。Shehadonlythefeebleremainsofvirtue,whichwerecontinuallydiminishing。InsteadofbeingrousedfromherlethargybyC?sar,Tiberius,CaiusClaudius,Nero,andDomitian,sherivetedeverydayherchains;ifshestrucksomeblows,heraimwasatthetyrant,notatthetyranny。