首页 >出版文学> Orthodoxy>第2章

第2章

  Ifhesawtwotruthsthatseemedtocontradicteachother,hewouldtakethetwotruthsandthecontradictionalongwiththem。
  Hisspiritualsightisstereoscopic,likehisphysicalsight:
  heseestwodifferentpicturesatonceandyetseesallthebetterforthat。Thushehasalwaysbelievedthattherewassuchathingasfate,butsuchathingasfreewillalso。Thushebelievedthatchildrenwereindeedthekingdomofheaven,butneverthelessoughttobeobedienttothekingdomofearth。Headmiredyouthbecauseitwasyoungandagebecauseitwasnot。Itisexactlythisbalanceofapparentcontradictionsthathasbeenthewholebuoyancyofthehealthyman。Thewholesecretofmysticismisthis:
  thatmancanunderstandeverythingbythehelpofwhathedoesnotunderstand。Themorbidlogicianseekstomakeeverythinglucid,andsucceedsinmakingeverythingmysterious。Themysticallowsonethingtobemysterious,andeverythingelsebecomeslucid。
  Thedeterministmakesthetheoryofcausationquiteclear,andthenfindsthathecannotsay"ifyouplease"tothehousemaid。
  TheChristianpermitsfreewilltoremainasacredmystery;butbecauseofthishisrelationswiththehousemaidbecomeofasparklingandcrystalclearness。Heputstheseedofdogmainacentraldarkness;
  butitbranchesforthinalldirectionswithaboundingnaturalhealth。
  Aswehavetakenthecircleasthesymbolofreasonandmadness,wemayverywelltakethecrossasthesymbolatonceofmysteryandofhealth。Buddhismiscentripetal,butChristianityiscentrifugal:
  itbreaksout。Forthecircleisperfectandinfiniteinitsnature;
  butitisfixedforeverinitssize;itcanneverbelargerorsmaller。Butthecross,thoughithasatitsheartacollisionandacontradiction,canextenditsfourarmsforeverwithoutalteringitsshape。Becauseithasaparadoxinitscentreitcangrowwithoutchanging。Thecirclereturnsuponitselfandisbound。
  Thecrossopensitsarmstothefourwinds;itisasignpostforfreetravellers。
  Symbolsaloneareofevenacloudyvalueinspeakingofthisdeepmatter;andanothersymbolfromphysicalnaturewillexpresssufficientlywelltherealplaceofmysticismbeforemankind。
  Theonecreatedthingwhichwecannotlookatistheonethinginthelightofwhichwelookateverything。Likethesunatnoonday,mysticismexplainseverythingelsebytheblazeofitsownvictoriousinvisibility。Detachedintellectualismis(intheexactsenseofapopularphrase)allmoonshine;foritislightwithoutheat,anditissecondarylight,reflectedfromadeadworld。
  ButtheGreekswererightwhentheymadeApollothegodbothofimaginationandofsanity;forhewasboththepatronofpoetryandthepatronofhealing。OfnecessarydogmasandaspecialcreedIshallspeaklater。Butthattranscendentalismbywhichallmenlivehasprimarilymuchthepositionofthesuninthesky。
  Weareconsciousofitasofakindofsplendidconfusion;
  itissomethingbothshiningandshapeless,atonceablazeandablur。Butthecircleofthemoonisasclearandunmistakable,asrecurrentandinevitable,asthecircleofEuclidonablackboard。
  Forthemoonisutterlyreasonable;andthemoonisthemotheroflunaticsandhasgiventothemallhername。
  IIITHESUICIDEOFTHOUGHT
  Thephrasesofthestreetarenotonlyforciblebutsubtle:
  forafigureofspeechcanoftengetintoacracktoosmallforadefinition。Phraseslike"putout"or"offcolour"mighthavebeencoinedbyMr。HenryJamesinanagonyofverbalprecision。
  Andthereisnomoresubtletruththanthatoftheeverydayphraseaboutamanhaving"hisheartintherightplace。"Itinvolvestheideaofnormalproportion;notonlydoesacertainfunctionexist,butitisrightlyrelatedtootherfunctions。Indeed,thenegationofthisphrasewoulddescribewithpeculiaraccuracythesomewhatmorbidmercyandperversetendernessofthemostrepresentativemoderns。
  If,forinstance,IhadtodescribewithfairnessthecharacterofMr。BernardShaw,Icouldnotexpressmyselfmoreexactlythanbysayingthathehasaheroicallylargeandgenerousheart;
  butnotaheartintherightplace。Andthisissoofthetypicalsocietyofourtime。
  Themodernworldisnotevil;insomewaysthemodernworldisfartoogood。Itisfullofwildandwastedvirtues。
  Whenareligiousschemeisshattered(asChristianitywasshatteredattheReformation),itisnotmerelythevicesthatareletloose。
  Thevicesare,indeed,letloose,andtheywanderanddodamage。
  Butthevirtuesareletloosealso;andthevirtueswandermorewildly,andthevirtuesdomoreterribledamage。ThemodernworldisfulloftheoldChristianvirtuesgonemad。Thevirtueshavegonemadbecausetheyhavebeenisolatedfromeachotherandarewanderingalone。Thussomescientistscarefortruth;
  andtheirtruthispitiless。Thussomehumanitariansonlycareforpity;andtheirpity(Iamsorrytosay)isoftenuntruthful。
  Forexample,Mr。BlatchfordattacksChristianitybecauseheismadononeChristianvirtue:themerelymysticalandalmostirrationalvirtueofcharity。Hehasastrangeideathathewillmakeiteasiertoforgivesinsbysayingthattherearenosinstoforgive。
  Mr。BlatchfordisnotonlyanearlyChristian,heistheonlyearlyChristianwhooughtreallytohavebeeneatenbylions。
  Forinhiscasethepaganaccusationisreallytrue:hismercywouldmeanmereanarchy。Hereallyistheenemyofthehumanrace——
  becauseheissohuman。Astheotherextreme,wemaytaketheacridrealist,whohasdeliberatelykilledinhimselfallhumanpleasureinhappytalesorinthehealingoftheheart。
  Torquemadatorturedpeoplephysicallyforthesakeofmoraltruth。
  Zolatorturedpeoplemorallyforthesakeofphysicaltruth。
  ButinTorquemada’stimetherewasatleastasystemthatcouldtosomeextentmakerighteousnessandpeacekisseachother。
  Nowtheydonotevenbow。Butamuchstrongercasethanthesetwooftruthandpitycanbefoundintheremarkablecaseofthedislocationofhumility。
  Itisonlywithoneaspectofhumilitythatwearehereconcerned。
  Humilitywaslargelymeantasarestraintuponthearroganceandinfinityoftheappetiteofman。Hewasalwaysoutstrippinghismercieswithhisownnewlyinventedneeds。Hisverypowerofenjoymentdestroyedhalfhisjoys。Byaskingforpleasure,helostthechiefpleasure;forthechiefpleasureissurprise。
  Henceitbecameevidentthatifamanwouldmakehisworldlarge,hemustbealwaysmakinghimselfsmall。Eventhehaughtyvisions,thetallcities,andthetopplingpinnaclesarethecreationsofhumility。Giantsthattreaddownforestslikegrassarethecreationsofhumility。Towersthatvanishupwardsabovethelonelieststararethecreationsofhumility。Fortowersarenottallunlesswelookupatthem;andgiantsarenotgiantsunlesstheyarelargerthanwe。Allthisgigantesqueimagination,whichis,perhaps,themightiestofthepleasuresofman,isatbottomentirelyhumble。Itisimpossiblewithouthumilitytoenjoyanything——
  evenpride。
  Butwhatwesufferfromto-dayishumilityinthewrongplace。
  Modestyhasmovedfromtheorganofambition。Modestyhassettledupontheorganofconviction;whereitwasnevermeanttobe。
  Amanwasmeanttobedoubtfulabouthimself,butundoubtingaboutthetruth;thishasbeenexactlyreversed。Nowadaysthepartofamanthatamandoesassertisexactlythepartheoughtnottoassert——himself。Theparthedoubtsisexactlythepartheoughtnottodoubt——theDivineReason。HuxleypreachedahumilitycontenttolearnfromNature。Butthenewscepticissohumblethathedoubtsifhecanevenlearn。Thusweshouldbewrongifwehadsaidhastilythatthereisnohumilitytypicalofourtime。
  Thetruthisthatthereisarealhumilitytypicalofourtime;
  butitsohappensthatitispracticallyamorepoisonoushumilitythanthewildestprostrationsoftheascetic。Theoldhumilitywasaspurthatpreventedamanfromstopping;notanailinhisbootthatpreventedhimfromgoingon。Fortheoldhumilitymadeamandoubtfulabouthisefforts,whichmightmakehimworkharder。
  Butthenewhumilitymakesamandoubtfulabouthisaims,whichwillmakehimstopworkingaltogether。
  Atanystreetcornerwemaymeetamanwhouttersthefranticandblasphemousstatementthathemaybewrong。Everydayonecomesacrosssomebodywhosaysthatofcoursehisviewmaynotbetherightone。Ofcoursehisviewmustbetherightone,oritisnothisview。Weareontheroadtoproducingaraceofmentoomentallymodesttobelieveinthemultiplicationtable。
  Weareindangerofseeingphilosopherswhodoubtthelawofgravityasbeingamerefancyoftheirown。Scoffersofoldtimeweretooproudtobeconvinced;butthesearetoohumbletobeconvinced。
  Themeekdoinherittheearth;butthemodernscepticsaretoomeekeventoclaimtheirinheritance。Itisexactlythisintellectualhelplessnesswhichisoursecondproblem。
  Thelastchapterhasbeenconcernedonlywithafactofobservation:
  thatwhatperilofmorbiditythereisformancomesratherfromhisreasonthanhisimagination。Itwasnotmeanttoattacktheauthorityofreason;ratheritistheultimatepurposetodefendit。
  Foritneedsdefence。Thewholemodernworldisatwarwithreason;
  andthetoweralreadyreels。
  Thesages,itisoftensaid,canseenoanswertotheriddleofreligion。Butthetroublewithoursagesisnotthattheycannotseetheanswer;itisthattheycannotevenseetheriddle。
  Theyarelikechildrensostupidastonoticenothingparadoxicalintheplayfulassertionthatadoorisnotadoor。Themodernlatitudinariansspeak,forinstance,aboutauthorityinreligionnotonlyasiftherewerenoreasoninit,butasiftherehadneverbeenanyreasonforit。Apartfromseeingitsphilosophicalbasis,theycannotevenseeitshistoricalcause。Religiousauthorityhasoften,doubtless,beenoppressiveorunreasonable;justaseverylegalsystem(andespeciallyourpresentone)hasbeencallousandfullofacruelapathy。Itisrationaltoattackthepolice;nay,itisglorious。Butthemoderncriticsofreligiousauthorityarelikemenwhoshouldattackthepolicewithouteverhavingheardofburglars。Forthereisagreatandpossibleperiltothehumanmind:aperilaspracticalasburglary。Againstitreligiousauthoritywasreared,rightlyorwrongly,asabarrier。
  Andagainstitsomethingcertainlymustberearedasabarrier,ifourraceistoavoidruin。
  Thatperilisthatthehumanintellectisfreetodestroyitself。
  Justasonegenerationcouldpreventtheveryexistenceofthenextgeneration,byallenteringamonasteryorjumpingintothesea,soonesetofthinkerscaninsomedegreepreventfurtherthinkingbyteachingthenextgenerationthatthereisnovalidityinanyhumanthought。
  Itisidletotalkalwaysofthealternativeofreasonandfaith。
  Reasonisitselfamatteroffaith。Itisanactoffaithtoassertthatourthoughtshaveanyrelationtorealityatall。Ifyouaremerelyasceptic,youmustsoonerorlateraskyourselfthequestion,"WhyshouldANYTHINGgoright;evenobservationanddeduction?
  Whyshouldnotgoodlogicbeasmisleadingasbadlogic?
  Theyarebothmovementsinthebrainofabewilderedape?"
  Theyoungscepticsays,"Ihavearighttothinkformyself。"
  Buttheoldsceptic,thecompletesceptic,says,"Ihavenorighttothinkformyself。Ihavenorighttothinkatall。"
  Thereisathoughtthatstopsthought。Thatistheonlythoughtthatoughttobestopped。Thatistheultimateevilagainstwhichallreligiousauthoritywasaimed。Itonlyappearsattheendofdecadentageslikeourown:andalreadyMr。H。G。Wellshasraiseditsruinousbanner;hehaswrittenadelicatepieceofscepticismcalled"DoubtsoftheInstrument。"Inthishequestionsthebrainitself,andendeavourstoremoveallrealityfromallhisownassertions,past,present,andtocome。Butitwasagainstthisremoteruinthatallthemilitarysystemsinreligionwereoriginallyrankedandruled。Thecreedsandthecrusades,thehierarchiesandthehorriblepersecutionswerenotorganized,asisignorantlysaid,forthesuppressionofreason。Theywereorganizedforthedifficultdefenceofreason。Man,byablindinstinct,knewthatifoncethingswerewildlyquestioned,reasoncouldbequestionedfirst。
  Theauthorityofprieststoabsolve,theauthorityofpopestodefinetheauthority,evenofinquisitorstoterrify:thesewereallonlydarkdefenceserectedroundonecentralauthority,moreundemonstrable,moresupernaturalthanall——theauthorityofamantothink。
  Weknownowthatthisisso;wehavenoexcusefornotknowingit。
  Forwecanhearscepticismcrashingthroughtheoldringofauthorities,andatthesamemomentwecanseereasonswayinguponherthrone。
  Insofarasreligionisgone,reasonisgoing。Fortheyarebothofthesameprimaryandauthoritativekind。Theyarebothmethodsofproofwhichcannotthemselvesbeproved。AndintheactofdestroyingtheideaofDivineauthoritywehavelargelydestroyedtheideaofthathumanauthoritybywhichwedoalong-divisionsum。
  Withalongandsustainedtugwehaveattemptedtopullthemitreoffpontificalman;andhisheadhascomeoffwithit。
  Lestthisshouldbecalledlooseassertion,itisperhapsdesirable,thoughdull,torunrapidlythroughthechiefmodernfashionsofthoughtwhichhavethiseffectofstoppingthoughtitself。
  Materialismandtheviewofeverythingasapersonalillusionhavesomesucheffect;forifthemindismechanical,thoughtcannotbeveryexciting,andifthecosmosisunreal,thereisnothingtothinkabout。Butinthesecasestheeffectisindirectanddoubtful。Insomecasesitisdirectandclear;
  notablyinthecaseofwhatisgenerallycalledevolution。
  Evolutionisagoodexampleofthatmodernintelligencewhich,ifitdestroysanything,destroysitself。Evolutioniseitheraninnocentscientificdescriptionofhowcertainearthlythingscameabout;or,ifitisanythingmorethanthis,itisanattackuponthoughtitself。Ifevolutiondestroysanything,itdoesnotdestroyreligionbutrationalism。Ifevolutionsimplymeansthatapositivethingcalledanapeturnedveryslowlyintoapositivethingcalledaman,thenitisstinglessforthemostorthodox;
  forapersonalGodmightjustaswelldothingsslowlyasquickly,especiallyif,liketheChristianGod,hewereoutsidetime。
  Butifitmeansanythingmore,itmeansthatthereisnosuchthingasanapetochange,andnosuchthingasamanforhimtochangeinto。Itmeansthatthereisnosuchthingasathing。
  Atbest,thereisonlyonething,andthatisafluxofeverythingandanything。Thisisanattacknotuponthefaith,butuponthemind;youcannotthinkiftherearenothingstothinkabout。
  Youcannotthinkifyouarenotseparatefromthesubjectofthought。
  Descartessaid,"Ithink;thereforeIam。"Thephilosophicevolutionistreversesandnegativestheepigram。Hesays,"Iamnot;thereforeI
  cannotthink。"
  Thenthereistheoppositeattackonthought:thaturgedbyMr。H。G。Wellswhenheinsiststhateveryseparatethingis"unique,"
  andtherearenocategoriesatall。Thisalsoismerelydestructive。
  Thinkingmeansconnectingthings,andstopsiftheycannotbeconnected。
  Itneedhardlybesaidthatthisscepticismforbiddingthoughtnecessarilyforbidsspeech;amancannotopenhismouthwithoutcontradictingit。ThuswhenMr。Wellssays(ashedidsomewhere),"Allchairsarequitedifferent,"heuttersnotmerelyamisstatement,butacontradictioninterms。Ifallchairswerequitedifferent,youcouldnotcallthem"allchairs。"
  Akintotheseisthefalsetheoryofprogress,whichmaintainsthatwealterthetestinsteadoftryingtopassthetest。
  Weoftenhearitsaid,forinstance,"Whatisrightinoneageiswronginanother。"Thisisquitereasonable,ifitmeansthatthereisafixedaim,andthatcertainmethodsattainatcertaintimesandnotatothertimes。Ifwomen,say,desiretobeelegant,itmaybethattheyareimprovedatonetimebygrowingfatterandatanothertimebygrowingthinner。Butyoucannotsaythattheyareimprovedbyceasingtowishtobeelegantandbeginningtowishtobeoblong。Ifthestandardchanges,howcantherebeimprovement,whichimpliesastandard?Nietzschestartedanonsensicalideathatmenhadoncesoughtasgoodwhatwenowcallevil;ifitwereso,wecouldnottalkofsurpassingorevenfallingshortofthem。
  HowcanyouovertakeJonesifyouwalkintheotherdirection?
  Youcannotdiscusswhetheronepeoplehassucceededmoreinbeingmiserablethananothersucceededinbeinghappy。ItwouldbelikediscussingwhetherMiltonwasmorepuritanicalthanapigisfat。
  Itistruethataman(asillyman)mightmakechangeitselfhisobjectorideal。Butasanideal,changeitselfbecomesunchangeable。
  Ifthechange-worshipperwishestoestimatehisownprogress,hemustbesternlyloyaltotheidealofchange;hemustnotbegintoflirtgailywiththeidealofmonotony。Progressitselfcannotprogress。
  Itisworthremark,inpassing,thatwhenTennyson,inawildandratherweakmanner,welcomedtheideaofinfinitealterationinsociety,heinstinctivelytookametaphorwhichsuggestsanimprisonedtedium。
  Hewrote——
  "Letthegreatworldspinforeverdowntheringinggroovesofchange。"
  Hethoughtofchangeitselfasanunchangeablegroove;andsoitis。
  Changeisaboutthenarrowestandhardestgroovethatamancangetinto。
  Themainpointhere,however,isthatthisideaofafundamentalalterationinthestandardisoneofthethingsthatmakethoughtaboutthepastorfuturesimplyimpossible。Thetheoryofacompletechangeofstandardsinhumanhistorydoesnotmerelydepriveusofthepleasureofhonouringourfathers;itdeprivesusevenofthemoremodernandaristocraticpleasureofdespisingthem。
  Thisbaldsummaryofthethought-destroyingforcesofourtimewouldnotbecompletewithoutsomereferencetopragmatism;
  forthoughIhavehereusedandshouldeverywheredefendthepragmatistmethodasapreliminaryguidetotruth,thereisanextremeapplicationofitwhichinvolvestheabsenceofalltruthwhatever。
  Mymeaningcanbeputshortlythus。Iagreewiththepragmatiststhatapparentobjectivetruthisnotthewholematter;thatthereisanauthoritativeneedtobelievethethingsthatarenecessarytothehumanmind。ButIsaythatoneofthosenecessitiespreciselyisabeliefinobjectivetruth。ThepragmatisttellsamantothinkwhathemustthinkandnevermindtheAbsolute。
  ButpreciselyoneofthethingsthathemustthinkistheAbsolute。
  Thisphilosophy,indeed,isakindofverbalparadox。Pragmatismisamatterofhumanneeds;andoneofthefirstofhumanneedsistobesomethingmorethanapragmatist。Extremepragmatismisjustasinhumanasthedeterminismitsopowerfullyattacks。
  Thedeterminist(who,todohimjustice,doesnotpretendtobeahumanbeing)makesnonsenseofthehumansenseofactualchoice。
  Thepragmatist,whoprofessestobespeciallyhuman,makesnonsenseofthehumansenseofactualfact。
  Tosumupourcontentionsofar,wemaysaythatthemostcharacteristiccurrentphilosophieshavenotonlyatouchofmania,butatouchofsuicidalmania。Themerequestionerhasknockedhisheadagainstthelimitsofhumanthought;andcrackedit。
  Thisiswhatmakessofutilethewarningsoftheorthodoxandtheboastsoftheadvancedaboutthedangerousboyhoodoffreethought。
  Whatwearelookingatisnottheboyhoodoffreethought;itistheoldageandultimatedissolutionoffreethought。Itisvainforbishopsandpiousbigwigstodiscusswhatdreadfulthingswillhappenifwildscepticismrunsitscourse。Ithasrunitscourse。
  Itisvainforeloquentatheiststotalkofthegreattruthsthatwillberevealedifonceweseefreethoughtbegin。Wehaveseenitend。Ithasnomorequestionstoask;ithasquestioneditself。
  Youcannotcallupanywildervisionthanacityinwhichmenaskthemselvesiftheyhaveanyselves。Youcannotfancyamorescepticalworldthanthatinwhichmendoubtifthereisaworld。
  ItmightcertainlyhavereacheditsbankruptcymorequicklyandcleanlyifithadnotbeenfeeblyhamperedbytheapplicationofindefensiblelawsofblasphemyorbytheabsurdpretencethatmodernEnglandisChristian。Butitwouldhavereachedthebankruptcyanyhow。Militantatheistsarestillunjustlypersecuted;
  butratherbecausetheyareanoldminoritythanbecausetheyareanewone。Freethoughthasexhausteditsownfreedom。
  Itiswearyofitsownsuccess。Ifanyeagerfreethinkernowhailsphilosophicfreedomasthedawn,heisonlylikethemaninMarkTwainwhocameoutwrappedinblanketstoseethesunriseandwasjustintimetoseeitset。Ifanyfrightenedcuratestillsaysthatitwillbeawfulifthedarknessoffreethoughtshouldspread,wecanonlyanswerhiminthehighandpowerfulwordsofMr。Belloc,"Donot,Ibeseechyou,betroubledabouttheincreaseofforcesalreadyindissolution。Youhavemistakenthehourofthenight:
  itisalreadymorning。"Wehavenomorequestionslefttoask。
  Wehavelookedforquestionsinthedarkestcornersandonthewildestpeaks。Wehavefoundallthequestionsthatcanbefound。
  Itistimewegaveuplookingforquestionsandbeganlookingforanswers。
  Butonemorewordmustbeadded。AtthebeginningofthispreliminarynegativesketchIsaidthatourmentalruinhasbeenwroughtbywildreason,notbywildimagination。Amandoesnotgomadbecausehemakesastatueamilehigh,buthemaygomadbythinkingitoutinsquareinches。Now,oneschoolofthinkershasseenthisandjumpedatitasawayofrenewingthepaganhealthoftheworld。Theyseethatreasondestroys;
  butWill,theysay,creates。Theultimateauthority,theysay,isinwill,notinreason。Thesupremepointisnotwhyamandemandsathing,butthefactthathedoesdemandit。
  IhavenospacetotraceorexpoundthisphilosophyofWill。
  Itcame,Isuppose,throughNietzsche,whopreachedsomethingthatiscalledegoism。That,indeed,wassimplemindedenough;
  forNietzschedeniedegoismsimplybypreachingit。Topreachanythingistogiveitaway。First,theegoistcallslifeawarwithoutmercy,andthenhetakesthegreatestpossibletroubletodrillhisenemiesinwar。Topreachegoismistopractisealtruism。
  Buthoweveritbegan,theviewiscommonenoughincurrentliterature。
  Themaindefenceofthesethinkersisthattheyarenotthinkers;
  theyaremakers。Theysaythatchoiceisitselfthedivinething。
  ThusMr。BernardShawhasattackedtheoldideathatmen’sactsaretobejudgedbythestandardofthedesireofhappiness。
  Hesaysthatamandoesnotactforhishappiness,butfromhiswill。
  Hedoesnotsay,"Jamwillmakemehappy,"but"Iwantjam。"
  Andinallthisothersfollowhimwithyetgreaterenthusiasm。
  Mr。JohnDavidson,aremarkablepoet,issopassionatelyexcitedaboutitthatheisobligedtowriteprose。Hepublishesashortplaywithseverallongprefaces。ThisisnaturalenoughinMr。Shaw,forallhisplaysareprefaces:Mr。Shawis(Isuspect)theonlymanonearthwhohasneverwrittenanypoetry。ButthatMr。Davidson(whocanwriteexcellentpoetry)shouldwriteinsteadlaboriousmetaphysicsindefenceofthisdoctrineofwill,doesshowthatthedoctrineofwillhastakenholdofmen。EvenMr。H。G。Wellshashalfspokeninitslanguage;sayingthatoneshouldtestactsnotlikeathinker,butlikeanartist,saying,"IFEELthiscurveisright,"or"thatlineSHALLgothus。"Theyareallexcited;andwelltheymaybe。
  Forbythisdoctrineofthedivineauthorityofwill,theythinktheycanbreakoutofthedoomedfortressofrationalism。Theythinktheycanescape。
  Buttheycannotescape。Thispurepraiseofvolitionendsinthesamebreakupandblankasthemerepursuitoflogic。
  Exactlyascompletefreethoughtinvolvesthedoubtingofthoughtitself,sotheacceptationofmere"willing"reallyparalyzesthewill。
  Mr。BernardShawhasnotperceivedtherealdifferencebetweentheoldutilitariantestofpleasure(clumsy,ofcourse,andeasilymisstated)
  andthatwhichhepropounds。Therealdifferencebetweenthetestofhappinessandthetestofwillissimplythatthetestofhappinessisatestandtheotherisn’t。Youcandiscusswhetheraman’sactinjumpingoveracliffwasdirectedtowardshappiness;
  youcannotdiscusswhetheritwasderivedfromwill。Ofcourseitwas。Youcanpraiseanactionbysayingthatitiscalculatedtobringpleasureorpaintodiscovertruthortosavethesoul。
  Butyoucannotpraiseanactionbecauseitshowswill;fortosaythatismerelytosaythatitisanaction。Bythispraiseofwillyoucannotreallychooseonecourseasbetterthananother。Andyetchoosingonecourseasbetterthananotheristheverydefinitionofthewillyouarepraising。
  Theworshipofwillisthenegationofwill。Toadmiremerechoiceistorefusetochoose。IfMr。BernardShawcomesuptomeandsays,"Willsomething,"thatistantamounttosaying,"Idonotmindwhatyouwill,"andthatistantamounttosaying,"Ihavenowillinthematter。"Youcannotadmirewillingeneral,becausetheessenceofwillisthatitisparticular。
  AbrilliantanarchistlikeMr。JohnDavidsonfeelsanirritationagainstordinarymorality,andthereforeheinvokeswill——
  willtoanything。Heonlywantshumanitytowantsomething。
  Buthumanitydoeswantsomething。Itwantsordinarymorality。
  Herebelsagainstthelawandtellsustowillsomethingoranything。
  Butwehavewilledsomething。Wehavewilledthelawagainstwhichherebels。
  Allthewill-worshippers,fromNietzschetoMr。Davidson,arereallyquiteemptyofvolition。Theycannotwill,theycanhardlywish。Andifanyonewantsaproofofthis,itcanbefoundquiteeasily。Itcanbefoundinthisfact:thattheyalwaystalkofwillassomethingthatexpandsandbreaksout。Butitisquitetheopposite。Everyactofwillisanactofself-limitation。Todesireactionistodesirelimitation。Inthatsenseeveryactisanactofself-sacrifice。Whenyouchooseanything,yourejecteverythingelse。Thatobjection,whichmenofthisschoolusedtomaketotheactofmarriage,isreallyanobjectiontoeveryact。
  Everyactisanirrevocableselectionandexclusion。Justaswhenyoumarryonewomanyougiveupalltheothers,sowhenyoutakeonecourseofactionyougiveupalltheothercourses。IfyoubecomeKingofEngland,yougiveupthepostofBeadleinBrompton。
  IfyougotoRome,yousacrificearichsuggestivelifeinWimbledon。
  Itistheexistenceofthisnegativeorlimitingsideofwillthatmakesmostofthetalkoftheanarchicwill-worshipperslittlebetterthannonsense。Forinstance,Mr。JohnDavidsontellsustohavenothingtodowith"Thoushaltnot";butitissurelyobviousthat"Thoushaltnot"isonlyoneofthenecessarycorollariesof"Iwill。""IwillgototheLordMayor’sShow,andthoushaltnotstopme。"Anarchismadjuresustobeboldcreativeartists,andcarefornolawsorlimits。Butitisimpossibletobeanartistandnotcareforlawsandlimits。Artislimitation;
  theessenceofeverypictureistheframe。Ifyoudrawagiraffe,youmustdrawhimwithalongneck。If,inyourboldcreativeway,youholdyourselffreetodrawagiraffewithashortneck,youwillreallyfindthatyouarenotfreetodrawagiraffe。
  Themomentyoustepintotheworldoffacts,youstepintoaworldoflimits。Youcanfreethingsfromalienoraccidentallaws,butnotfromthelawsoftheirownnature。Youmay,ifyoulike,freeatigerfromhisbars;butdonotfreehimfromhisstripes。
  Donotfreeacameloftheburdenofhishump:youmaybefreeinghimfrombeingacamel。Donotgoaboutasademagogue,encouragingtrianglestobreakoutoftheprisonoftheirthreesides。Ifatrianglebreaksoutofitsthreesides,itslifecomestoalamentableend。
  Somebodywroteaworkcalled"TheLovesoftheTriangles";
  Ineverreadit,butIamsurethatiftriangleseverwereloved,theywerelovedforbeingtriangular。Thisiscertainlythecasewithallartisticcreation,whichisinsomewaysthemostdecisiveexampleofpurewill。Theartistloveshislimitations:
  theyconstitutetheTHINGheisdoing。Thepainterisgladthatthecanvasisflat。Thesculptorisgladthattheclayiscolourless。
  Incasethepointisnotclear,anhistoricexamplemayillustrateit。TheFrenchRevolutionwasreallyanheroicanddecisivething,becausetheJacobinswilledsomethingdefiniteandlimited。
  Theydesiredthefreedomsofdemocracy,butalsoallthevetoesofdemocracy。TheywishedtohavevotesandNOTtohavetitles。
  RepublicanismhadanasceticsideinFranklinorRobespierreaswellasanexpansivesideinDantonorWilkes。Thereforetheyhavecreatedsomethingwithasolidsubstanceandshape,thesquaresocialequalityandpeasantwealthofFrance。ButsincethentherevolutionaryorspeculativemindofEuropehasbeenweakenedbyshrinkingfromanyproposalbecauseofthelimitsofthatproposal。
  Liberalismhasbeendegradedintoliberality。Menhavetriedtoturn"revolutionise"fromatransitivetoanintransitiveverb。
  TheJacobincouldtellyounotonlythesystemhewouldrebelagainst,but(whatwasmoreimportant)thesystemhewouldNOTrebelagainst,thesystemhewouldtrust。ButthenewrebelisaSceptic,andwillnotentirelytrustanything。Hehasnoloyalty;thereforehecanneverbereallyarevolutionist。Andthefactthathedoubtseverythingreallygetsinhiswaywhenhewantstodenounceanything。
  Foralldenunciationimpliesamoraldoctrineofsomekind;andthemodernrevolutionistdoubtsnotonlytheinstitutionhedenounces,butthedoctrinebywhichhedenouncesit。Thushewritesonebookcomplainingthatimperialoppressioninsultsthepurityofwomen,andthenhewritesanotherbook(aboutthesexproblem)inwhichheinsultsithimself。HecursestheSultanbecauseChristiangirlslosetheirvirginity,andthencursesMrs。Grundybecausetheykeepit。
  Asapolitician,hewillcryoutthatwarisawasteoflife,andthen,asaphilosopher,thatalllifeiswasteoftime。
  ARussianpessimistwilldenounceapolicemanforkillingapeasant,andthenprovebythehighestphilosophicalprinciplesthatthepeasantoughttohavekilledhimself。Amandenouncesmarriageasalie,andthendenouncesaristocraticprofligatesfortreatingitasalie。Hecallsaflagabauble,andthenblamestheoppressorsofPolandorIrelandbecausetheytakeawaythatbauble。
  Themanofthisschoolgoesfirsttoapoliticalmeeting,wherehecomplainsthatsavagesaretreatedasiftheywerebeasts;thenhetakeshishatandumbrellaandgoesontoascientificmeeting,whereheprovesthattheypracticallyarebeasts。Inshort,themodernrevolutionist,beinganinfinitesceptic,isalwaysengagedinundermininghisownmines。Inhisbookonpoliticsheattacksmenfortramplingonmorality;inhisbookonethicsheattacksmoralityfortramplingonmen。Thereforethemodernmaninrevolthasbecomepracticallyuselessforallpurposesofrevolt。
  Byrebellingagainsteverythinghehaslosthisrighttorebelagainstanything。
  Itmaybeaddedthatthesameblankandbankruptcycanbeobservedinallfierceandterribletypesofliterature,especiallyinsatire。
  Satiremaybemadandanarchic,butitpresupposesanadmittedsuperiorityincertainthingsoverothers;itpresupposesastandard。
  Whenlittleboysinthestreetlaughatthefatnessofsomedistinguishedjournalist,theyareunconsciouslyassumingastandardofGreeksculpture。TheyareappealingtothemarbleApollo。
  Andthecuriousdisappearanceofsatirefromourliteratureisaninstanceofthefiercethingsfadingforwantofanyprincipletobefierceabout。Nietzschehadsomenaturaltalentforsarcasm:
  hecouldsneer,thoughhecouldnotlaugh;butthereisalwayssomethingbodilessandwithoutweightinhissatire,simplybecauseithasnotanymassofcommonmoralitybehindit。Heishimselfmorepreposterousthananythinghedenounces。But,indeed,Nietzschewillstandverywellasthetypeofthewholeofthisfailureofabstractviolence。
  Thesofteningofthebrainwhichultimatelyovertookhimwasnotaphysicalaccident。IfNietzschehadnotendedinimbecility,Nietzscheismwouldendinimbecility。Thinkinginisolationandwithprideendsinbeinganidiot。Everymanwhowillnothavesofteningoftheheartmustatlasthavesofteningofthebrain。
  Thislastattempttoevadeintellectualismendsinintellectualism,andthereforeindeath。Thesortiehasfailed。Thewildworshipoflawlessnessandthematerialistworshipoflawendinthesamevoid。
  Nietzschescalesstaggeringmountains,butheturnsupultimatelyinTibet。HesitsdownbesideTolstoyinthelandofnothingandNirvana。Theyarebothhelpless——onebecausehemustnotgraspanything,andtheotherbecausehemustnotletgoofanything。
  TheTolstoyan’swillisfrozenbyaBuddhistinstinctthatallspecialactionsareevil。ButtheNietzscheite’swillisquiteequallyfrozenbyhisviewthatallspecialactionsaregood;
  forifallspecialactionsaregood,noneofthemarespecial。
  Theystandatthecrossroads,andonehatesalltheroadsandtheotherlikesalltheroads。Theresultis——well,somethingsarenothardtocalculate。Theystandatthecross-roads。
  HereIend(thankGod)thefirstanddullestbusinessofthisbook——theroughreviewofrecentthought。AfterthisI
  begintosketchaviewoflifewhichmaynotinterestmyreader,butwhich,atanyrate,interestsme。Infrontofme,asIclosethispage,isapileofmodernbooksthatIhavebeenturningoverforthepurpose——apileofingenuity,apileoffutility。
  Bytheaccidentofmypresentdetachment,IcanseetheinevitablesmashofthephilosophiesofSchopenhauerandTolstoy,NietzscheandShaw,asclearlyasaninevitablerailwaysmashcouldbeseenfromaballoon。Theyareallontheroadtotheemptinessoftheasylum。
  Formadnessmaybedefinedasusingmentalactivitysoastoreachmentalhelplessness;andtheyhavenearlyreachedit。Hewhothinksheismadeofglass,thinkstothedestructionofthought;
  forglasscannotthink。Sohewhowillstorejectnothing,willsthedestructionofwill;forwillisnotonlythechoiceofsomething,buttherejectionofalmosteverything。AndasI
  turnandtumbleovertheclever,wonderful,tiresome,anduselessmodernbooks,thetitleofoneofthemrivetsmyeye。Itiscalled"Jeanned’Arc,"byAnatoleFrance。Ihaveonlyglancedatit,butaglancewasenoughtoremindmeofRenan’s"ViedeJesus。"
  Ithasthesamestrangemethodofthereverentsceptic。Itdiscreditssupernaturalstoriesthathavesomefoundation,simplybytellingnaturalstoriesthathavenofoundation。Becausewecannotbelieveinwhatasaintdid,wearetopretendthatweknowexactlywhathefelt。ButIdonotmentioneitherbookinordertocriticiseit,butbecausetheaccidentalcombinationofthenamescalleduptwostartlingimagesofSanitywhichblastedallthebooksbeforeme。
  JoanofArcwasnotstuckatthecross-roads,eitherbyrejectingallthepathslikeTolstoy,orbyacceptingthemalllikeNietzsche。
  Shechoseapath,andwentdownitlikeathunderbolt。YetJoan,whenIcametothinkofher,hadinherallthatwastrueeitherinTolstoyorNietzsche,allthatwaseventolerableineitherofthem。
  IthoughtofallthatisnobleinTolstoy,thepleasureinplainthings,especiallyinplainpity,theactualitiesoftheearth,thereverenceforthepoor,thedignityofthebowedback。
  JoanofArchadallthatandwiththisgreataddition,thatsheenduredpovertyaswellasadmiringit;whereasTolstoyisonlyatypicalaristocrattryingtofindoutitssecret。AndthenIthoughtofallthatwasbraveandproudandpatheticinpoorNietzsche,andhismutinyagainsttheemptinessandtimidityofourtime。
  Ithoughtofhiscryfortheecstaticequilibriumofdanger,hishungerfortherushofgreathorses,hiscrytoarms。Well,JoanofArchadallthat,andagainwiththisdifference,thatshedidnotpraisefighting,butfought。WeKNOWthatshewasnotafraidofanarmy,whileNietzsche,forallweknow,wasafraidofacow。
  Tolstoyonlypraisedthepeasant;shewasthepeasant。Nietzscheonlypraisedthewarrior;shewasthewarrior。Shebeatthembothattheirownantagonisticideals;shewasmoregentlethantheone,moreviolentthantheother。Yetshewasaperfectlypracticalpersonwhodidsomething,whiletheyarewildspeculatorswhodonothing。
  Itwasimpossiblethatthethoughtshouldnotcrossmymindthatsheandherfaithhadperhapssomesecretofmoralunityandutilitythathasbeenlost。Andwiththatthoughtcamealargerone,andthecolossalfigureofherMasterhadalsocrossedthetheatreofmythoughts。Thesamemoderndifficultywhichdarkenedthesubject-matterofAnatoleFrancealsodarkenedthatofErnestRenan。
  Renanalsodividedhishero’spityfromhishero’spugnacity。
  RenanevenrepresentedtherighteousangeratJerusalemasamerenervousbreakdownaftertheidyllicexpectationsofGalilee。
  Asiftherewereanyinconsistencybetweenhavingaloveforhumanityandhavingahatredforinhumanity!Altruists,withthin,weakvoices,denounceChristasanegoist。Egoists(witheventhinnerandweakervoices)denounceHimasanaltruist。
  Inourpresentatmospheresuchcavilsarecomprehensibleenough。
  Theloveofaheroismoreterriblethanthehatredofatyrant。
  Thehatredofaheroismoregenerousthantheloveofaphilanthropist。
  Thereisahugeandheroicsanityofwhichmodernscanonlycollectthefragments。Thereisagiantofwhomweseeonlytheloppedarmsandlegswalkingabout。TheyhavetornthesoulofChristintosillystrips,labelledegoismandaltruism,andtheyareequallypuzzledbyHisinsanemagnificenceandHisinsanemeekness。
  TheyhavepartedHisgarmentsamongthem,andforHisvesturetheyhavecastlots;thoughthecoatwaswithoutseamwovenfromthetopthroughout。
  IVTHEETHICSOFELFLAND
  Whenthebusinessmanrebukestheidealismofhisoffice-boy,itiscommonlyinsomesuchspeechasthis:"Ah,yes,whenoneisyoung,onehastheseidealsintheabstractandthesecastlesintheair;
  butinmiddleagetheyallbreakuplikeclouds,andonecomesdowntoabeliefinpracticalpolitics,tousingthemachineryonehasandgettingonwiththeworldasitis。"Thus,atleast,venerableandphilanthropicoldmennowintheirhonouredgravesusedtotalktomewhenIwasaboy。ButsincethenIhavegrownupandhavediscoveredthatthesephilanthropicoldmenweretellinglies。Whathasreallyhappenedisexactlytheoppositeofwhattheysaidwouldhappen。
  TheysaidthatIshouldlosemyidealsandbegintobelieveinthemethodsofpracticalpoliticians。Now,Ihavenotlostmyidealsintheleast;myfaithinfundamentalsisexactlywhatitalwayswas。
  WhatIhavelostismyoldchildlikefaithinpracticalpolitics。
  IamstillasmuchconcernedaseverabouttheBattleofArmageddon;
  butIamnotsomuchconcernedabouttheGeneralElection。
  AsababeIleaptuponmymother’skneeatthemerementionofit。No;thevisionisalwayssolidandreliable。Thevisionisalwaysafact。Itistherealitythatisoftenafraud。
  AsmuchasIeverdid,morethanIeverdid,IbelieveinLiberalism。
  ButtherewasarosytimeofinnocencewhenIbelievedinLiberals。
  Itakethisinstanceofoneoftheenduringfaithsbecause,havingnowtotracetherootsofmypersonalspeculation,thismaybecounted,Ithink,astheonlypositivebias。
  IwasbroughtupaLiberal,andhavealwaysbelievedindemocracy,intheelementaryliberaldoctrineofaself-governinghumanity。
  Ifanyonefindsthephrasevagueorthreadbare,Icanonlypauseforamomenttoexplainthattheprincipleofdemocracy,asI
  meanit,canbestatedintwopropositions。Thefirstisthis:
  thatthethingscommontoallmenaremoreimportantthanthethingspeculiartoanymen。Ordinarythingsaremorevaluablethanextraordinarythings;nay,theyaremoreextraordinary。
  Manissomethingmoreawfulthanmen;somethingmorestrange。
  Thesenseofthemiracleofhumanityitselfshouldbealwaysmorevividtousthananymarvelsofpower,intellect,art,orcivilization。
  Themeremanontwolegs,assuch,shouldbefeltassomethingmoreheartbreakingthananymusicandmorestartlingthananycaricature。
  Deathismoretragiceventhandeathbystarvation。HavinganoseismorecomiceventhanhavingaNormannose。
  Thisisthefirstprincipleofdemocracy:thattheessentialthingsinmenarethethingstheyholdincommon,notthethingstheyholdseparately。Andthesecondprincipleismerelythis:
  thatthepoliticalinstinctordesireisoneofthesethingswhichtheyholdincommon。Fallinginloveismorepoeticalthandroppingintopoetry。Thedemocraticcontentionisthatgovernment(helpingtorulethetribe)isathinglikefallinginlove,andnotathinglikedroppingintopoetry。Itisnotsomethinganalogoustoplayingthechurchorgan,paintingonvellum,discoveringtheNorthPole(thatinsidioushabit),loopingtheloop,beingAstronomerRoyal,andsoon。Forthesethingswedonotwishamantodoatallunlesshedoesthemwell。Itis,onthecontrary,athinganalogoustowritingone’sownlove-lettersorblowingone’sownnose。Thesethingswewantamantodoforhimself,evenifhedoesthembadly。Iamnotherearguingthetruthofanyoftheseconceptions;Iknowthatsomemodernsareaskingtohavetheirwiveschosenbyscientists,andtheymaysoonbeasking,forallIknow,tohavetheirnosesblownbynurses。Imerelysaythatmankinddoesrecognizetheseuniversalhumanfunctions,andthatdemocracyclassesgovernmentamongthem。Inshort,thedemocraticfaithisthis:thatthemostterriblyimportantthingsmustbelefttoordinarymenthemselves——thematingofthesexes,therearingoftheyoung,thelawsofthestate。Thisisdemocracy;
  andinthisIhavealwaysbelieved。
  ButthereisonethingthatIhaveneverfrommyyouthupbeenabletounderstand。Ihaveneverbeenabletounderstandwherepeoplegottheideathatdemocracywasinsomewayopposedtotradition。
  Itisobviousthattraditionisonlydemocracyextendedthroughtime。