首页 >出版文学> Essays on Paul Bourget>第2章
  Ifairlyshouted,forIhadneverhearditsoundbetter;andthenIwasbackathimasquickasaflash——"Right,yourExcellency!ButIreckonaFrenchman’sgothislittlestand—byforadulltime,too;becausewhenallotherinterestsfailhecanturninandseeifhecan’tfindoutwhohisfatherwas!"
  Well,youshouldhaveheardhimjustwhoop,andcackle,andcarryon!
  Hereachedupandhitmeoneontheshoulder,andsays:
  "Land,butit’sgood!It’sim—menselygood!I’George,Ineverhearditsaidsogoodinmylifebefore!Sayitagain。"
  SoIsaiditagain,andhesaidhisagain,andIsaidmineagain,andthenhedid,andthenIdid,andthenhedid,andwekeptondoingit,anddoingit,andIneverhadsuchagoodtime,andhesaidthesame。
  Inmyopinionthereisn’tanythingthatisaskillingasoneofthosedearoldripepensionersifyouknowhowtosnatchitoutinakindofafreshsortoforiginalway。
  ButIwishM。Bourgethadreadmoreofournovelsbeforehecame。Itistheonlywaytothoroughlyunderstandapeople。WhenIfoundIwascomingtoParis,Iread’LaTerre’。
  ALITTLENOTETOM。PAULBOURGET
  [TheprecedingsquibwasassailedintheNorthAmericanReviewinanarticleentitled"MarkTwainandPaulBourget,"byMaxO’Rell。ThefollowinglittlenoteisaRejoindertothatarticle。Itispossiblethatthepositionassumedhere——thatM。BourgetdictatedtheO’Rellarticlehimself——isuntenable。]
  Youhaveeveryright,mydearM。Bourget,toretortuponmebydictation,ifyoupreferthatmethodtowritingatmewithyourpen;butifImaysayitwithouthurt——andcertainlyImeannooffence——Ibelieveyouwouldhaveacquittedyourselfbetterwiththepen。Withthepenyouareathome;itisyournaturalweapon;youuseitwithgrace,eloquence,charm,persuasiveness,whenmenaretobeconvinced,andwithformidableeffectwhentheyhaveearnedacastigation。ButIamsureIseesignsintheabovearticlethatyouareeitherunaccustomedtodictatingorareoutofpractice。Ifyouwillre—readityouwillnotice,yourself,thatitlacksdefiniteness;thatitlackspurpose;thatitlackscoherence;thatitlacksasubjecttotalkabout;thatitislooseandwabbly;thatitwandersaround;thatitlosesitselfearlyanddoesnotfinditselfanymore。Therearesomeotherdefects,asyouwillnotice,butIthinkI
  havenamedthemainones。Ifeelsurethattheyareallduetoyourlackofpracticeindictating。
  InasmuchasyouhadnotsigneditIhadtheimpressionatfirstthatyouhadnotdictatedit。Butonlyforamoment。Certainquitesimpleanddefinitefactsremindedmethatthearticlehadtocomefromyou,forthereasonthatitcouldnotcomefromanyoneelsewithoutaspecificinvitationfromyouorfromme。Imean,itcouldnotexceptasanintrusion,atransgressionofthelawwhichforbidsstrangerstomixintoaprivatedisputebetweenfriends,unasked。
  Thosesimpleanddefinitefactswerethese:Ihadpublishedanarticleinthismagazine,withyouformysubject;justyouyourself;Istuckstrictlytothatonesubject,anddidnotinterlardanyother。Noone,ofcourse,couldcallmetoaccountbutyoualone,oryourauthorizedrepresentative。Iaskedsomequestions——askedthemofmyself。
  Iansweredthemmyself。Myarticlewasthirteenpageslong,andalldevotedtoyou;devotedtoyou,anddividedupinthisway:onepageofguessesastowhatsubjectsyouwouldinstructusin,asteacher;onepageofdoubtsastotheeffectivenessofyourmethodofexaminingusandourways;twoorthreepagesofcriticismofyourmethod,andofcertainresultswhichitfurnishedyou;twoorthreepagesofattemptstoshowthejustnessofthesesamecriticisms;halfadozenpagesmadeupofslightfault—findingswithcertainminordetailsofyourliteraryworkmanship,ofextractsfromyour’Outre—Mer’andcommentsuponthem;
  thenIclosedwithananecdote。Irepeat——forcertainreasons——thatI
  closedwithananecdote。
  WhenIwasaskedbythismagazineifIwishedto"answer"a"reply"tothatarticleofmine,Isaid"yes,"andwaitedinParisfortheproof—
  sheetsofthe"reply"tocome。Ialreadyknew,bythecablegram,thatthe"reply"wouldnotbesignedbyyou,butuponreflectionIknewitwouldbedictatedbyyou,becausenovolunteerwouldfeelhimselfatlibertytoassumeyourchampionshipinaprivatedispute,unasked,inviewofthefactthatyouarequitewellabletotakecareofyourmattersofthatsortyourselfandarenotinneedofanyone’shelp。
  No,avolunteercouldnotmakesuchaventure。Itwouldbetooimmodest。
  Alsotoogratuitouslygenerous。Andashadetooself—sufficient。No,hecouldnotventureit。Itwouldlooktoomuchlikeanxietytogetinatafeastwherenoplatehadbeenprovidedforhim。Infacthecouldnotgetinatall,exceptbythebackway,andwithafalsekey;thatistosay,apretext——apretextinventedfortheoccasionbyputtingintomymouthwordswhichIdidnotuse,andbywrestingsayingsofminefromtheirplainandtruemeaning。Wouldheresorttomethodslikethosetogetin?No;therearenopeopleofthatkind。SothenIknewforacertaintythatyoudictatedtheReplyyourself。Iknewyoudidittosaveyourselfmanuallabor。
  Andyouhadtheright,asIhavealreadysaidandIamcontent——perfectlycontent。
  Yetitwouldhavebeenlittletroubletoyou,andagreatkindnesstome,ifyouhadwrittenyourReplyalloutwithyourowncapablehand。
  Becausethenitwouldhavereplied——andthatisreallywhataReplyisfor。Broadlyspeaking,itsfunctionistorefute——asyouwilleasilyconcede。Thatleavessomethingfortheotherpersontotakeholdof:
  hehasachancetoreplytotheReply,hehasachancetorefutetherefutation。Thiswouldhavehappenedifyouhadwrittenitoutinsteadofdictating。Dictatingisnearlysuretounconcentratethedictator’smind,whenheisoutofpractice,confusehim,andbetrayhimintousingonesetofliteraryruleswhenheoughttouseaquitedifferentset。
  OftenitbetrayshimintoemployingtheRULESFORCONVERSATIONBETWEENA
  SHOUTERANDADEAFPERSON——asinthepresentcase——whenheoughttoemploytheRULESFORCONDUCTINGDISCUSSIONWITHAFAULT—FINDER。Thegreatfoundation—ruleandbasicprincipleofdiscussionwithafault—
  finderisrelevancyandconcentrationuponthesubject;whereasthegreatfoundation—ruleandbasicprinciplegoverningconversationbetweenashouterandadeafpersonisirrelevancyandpersistentdesertionofthetopicinhand。IfImaybeallowedtoillustratebyquotingexampleIV。,sectionfromchapterix。of"RevisedRulesforConductingConversationbetweenaShouterandaDeafPerson,"itwillassistusingettingaclearideaofthedifferencebetweenthetwosetsofrules:
  Shouter。DidyousayhisnameisWETHERBY?
  DeafPerson。Change?Yes,Ithinkitwill。ThoughifitshouldclearoffI——
  Shouter。It’shisNAMEIwant——hisNAME。
  DeafPerson。Maybeso,maybeso;butitwillonlybeashower,Ithink。
  Shouter。No,no,no!——youhavequitemisunderSTOODme。If——
  DeafPerson。Ah!GOODmorning;Iamsorryyoumustgo。Butcallagain,andletmecontinuetobeofassistancetoyouineverywayIcan。
  Youseeitisaperfectkodakofthearticleyouhavedictated。Itisreallycuriousandinterestingwhenyoucometocompareitwithyours;
  indetail,withmyformerarticletowhichitisaReplyinyourhand。
  ItalktwelvepagesaboutyourAmericaninstructionprojects,andyourdoubtfulscientificsystem,andyourpainstakingclassificationofnonexistentthings,andyourdiligenceandzealandsincerity,andyourdisloyalattitudetowardsanecdotes,andyourunduereverenceforunsafestatisticsandfarfactsthatlackapedigree;andyouturnaroundandcomebackatmewitheightpagesofweather。
  Idonotseehowapersoncanactso。Itisgoodofyoutorepeat,withchangeoflanguage,inthebulkofyourrejoinder,somuchofmyownarticle,andadoptmysentiments,andmakethemover,andputnewbuttonson;andIlikethecompliment,andamfranktosayso;butagreeingwithapersoncripplescontroversyandoughtnottobeallowed。Itisweather;andofalmosttheworstsort。Itpleasesmegreatlytohearyoudiscoursewithsuchapprovalandexpansivenessuponmytext:
  "Aforeignercanphotographtheexteriorsofanation,butIthinkthatisasfarashecanget。Ithinkthatnoforeignercanreportitsinterior;"——[Andyousay:"Amanofaverageintelligence,whohaspassedsixmonthsamongapeople,cannotexpressopinionsthatareworthjottingdown,buthecanformimpressionsthatareworthrepeating。Formypart,Ithinkthatforeigners’impressionsaremoreinterestingthannativeopinions。Afterall,suchimpressionsmerelymean’howthecountrystrucktheforeigner。’"]——whichisaquiteclearwayofsayingthataforeigner’sreportisonlyvaluablewhenitrestrictsitselftoimpressions。Itpleasesmetohaveyoufollowmyleadinthatglowingway,butitleavesmenothingtocombat。Youshouldgivemesomethingtodenyandrefute;Iwoulddoasmuchforyou。
  Itpleasesmetohaveyouplayfullywarnthepublicagainsttakingoneofyourbooksseriously。——[WhenIpublishedJonathanandhisContinent,I
  wroteinaprefaceaddressedtoJonathan:"Ifeveryoushouldinsistinseeinginthislittlevolumeaseriousstudyofyourcountryandofyourcountrymen,Iwarnyouthatyourworld—widefameforhumorwillbeexploded。"]——BecauseIusedtodothatcunningthingmyselfinearlierdays。IdiditinaprefatorynotetoabookofminecalledTomSawyer。
  NOTICE。
  Personsattemptingtofindamotiveinthisnarrativewillbeprosecuted;
  personsattemptingtofindamoralinitwillbebanished;personsattemptingtofindaplotinitwillbeshot。
  BYORDEROFTHEAUTHOR
  PERG。G。,CHIEFOFORDNANCE。
  Thekernelisthesameinbothprefaces,yousee——thepublicmustnottakeustooseriously。Ifweremovethatkernelweremovethelife—
  principle,andtheprefaceisacorpse。Yes,itpleasesmetohaveyouusethatidea,foritisahighcompliment。Butisleavesmenothingtocombat;andthatisdamagetome。
  AmIseemingtosaythatyourReplyisnotareplyatall,M。Bourget?
  Ifso,Imustmodifythat;itistoosweeping。ForyouhavefurnishedageneralanswertomyinquiryastowhatFrancethroughyou——canteachus。
  ——["WhatcouldFranceteachAmerica!"exclaimsMarkTwain。FrancecanteachAmericaallthehigherpursuitsoflife,andthereismoreartisticfeelingandrefinementinastreetofFrenchworkingmenthaninmanyavenuesinhabitedbyAmericanmillionaires。Shecanteachher,notperhapshowtowork,buthowtorest,howtolive,howtobehappy。
  Shecanteachherthattheaimoflifeisnotmoney—making,butthatmoney—makingisonlyameanstoobtainanend。Shecanteachherthatwivesarenotexpensivetoys,butusefulpartners,friends,andconfidants,whoshouldalwayskeepmenundertheirwholesomeinfluencebytheirdiplomacy,theirtact,theircommon—sense,withoutbumptiousness。
  Thesequalities,addedtothehigheststandardofmorality(notangularandmorose,butcheerfulmorality),areconcededtoFrenchwomenbywhoeverknowssomethingofFrenchlifeoutsideoftheParisboulevards,andMarkTwain’sill—naturedsneercannotevensomuchasstainthem。
  ImighttellMarkTwainthatinFranceamanwhowasseentipsyinhisclubwouldimmediatelyseehisnamecanceledfrommembership。Amanwhohadsettledhisfortuneonhiswifetoavoidmeetinghiscreditorswouldberefusedadmissionintoanydecentsociety。ManyaFrenchmanhasblownhisbrainsoutratherthandeclarehimselfabankrupt。NowwouldMarkTwainremarktothis:’AnAmericanisnotsuchafool:whenacreditorstandsinhiswayhecloseshisdoors,andreopensthemthefollowingday。Whenhehasbeenabankruptthreetimeshecanretirefrombusiness?"]——Itisagoodanswer。
  Itrelatestomanners,customs,andmorals——threethingsconcerningwhichwecanneverhaveexhaustiveanddeterminatestatistics,andsotheverdictsdelivereduponthemmustalwayslackconclusivenessandbesubjecttorevision;butyouhavestatedthetruth,possibly,asnearlyasanyonecoulddoit,inthecircumstances。Butwhydidyouchooseadetailofmyquestionwhichcouldbeansweredonlywithvaguehearsayevidence,andgorightbyonewhichcouldhavebeenansweredwithdeadlyfacts?——factsineverybody’sreach,factswhichnonecandispute。
  IaskedwhatFrancecouldteachusaboutgovernment。Ilaidmyselfprettywideopen,there;andIthoughtIwashandsomelygenerous,too,whenIdidit。Francecanteachushowtolevyvillageandcitytaxeswhichdistributetheburdenwithanearerapproachtoperfectfairnessthanisthecaseinanyotherland;andshecanteachusthewisestandsurestsystemofcollectingthemthatexists。ShecanteachushowtoelectaPresidentinasaneway;andalsohowtodoitwithoutthrowingthecountryintoearthquakesandconvulsionsthatcrippleandembarrassbusiness,stiruppartyhatredintheheartsofmen,andmakepeacefulpeoplewishthetermextendedtothirtyyears。Francecanteachus——butenoughofthatpartofthequestion。AndwhatelsecanFranceteachus?
  Shecanteachusallthefinearts——anddoes。Shethrowsopenherhospitableartacademies,andsaystous,"Come"——andwecome,troopsandtroopsofouryoungandgifted;andshesetsoverustheablestmastersintheworldandbearingthegreatestnames;andshe,teachesusallthatwearecapableoflearning,andpersuadesusandencouragesuswithprizesandhonors,muchasifweweresomehowchildrenofherown;andwhenthisnobleeducationisfinishedandwearereadytocarryithomeandspreaditsgraciousministriesabroadoverournation,andwecomewithhomageandgratitudeandaskFranceforthebill——thereisnothingtopay。Andinreturnforthisimperialgenerosity,whatdoesAmericado?ShechargesadutyonFrenchworksofart!
  IwishIhadyourendofthisdispute;Ishouldhavesomethingworthtalkingabout。Ifyouwouldonlyfurnishmesomethingtoargue,somethingtorefute——butyoupersistentlywon’t。Youleavegoodchancesunutilizedandspendyourstrengthinprovingandestablishingunimportantthings。Forinstance,youhaveprovenandestablishedtheseeightfactsherefollowing——agoodscoreastonumber,butnotworthwhile:
  MarkTwainis——
  1。"Insulting。"
  2。(Sarcasticallyspeaking)"Thisrefinedhumor,1st。"
  3。Prefersthemanure—piletotheviolets。
  4。Hasuttered"anill—naturedsneer。"
  5。Is"nasty。"
  6。Needsa"lessoninpolitenessandgoodmanners。"
  7。Haspublisheda"nastyarticle。"
  8。Hasmaderemarks"unworthyofagentleman。"——["Itismorefunnythanhis"(MarkTwain’s)"anecdote,andwouldhavebeenlessinsulting。"
  Aquotedremarkofmine"isagrossinsulttoanationfriendlytoAmerica。"
  "HehasreadLaTerre,thisrefinedhumorist。"
  "WhenMarkTwainvisitsagarden……hegoesinthefar—awaycomerwherethesoilisprepared。"
  "MarkTwain’sill—naturedsneercannotsomuchasstainthem"(theFrenchwomen)。
  "Whenhe"(MarkTwain)"takeshisrevengeheisunkind,unfair,bitter,nasty。"
  "Butnotevenyournastyarticleonmycountry,Mark,"etc。
  "Markmightcertainlyhavederivedfromit"(M。Bourget’sbook)"alessoninpolitenessandgoodmanners。"
  Aquotedremarkofmineis"unworthyofagentleman。"]——
  Thesearealltrue,butreallytheyarenotvaluable;noonecaresmuchforsuchfinds。InourAmericanmagazineswerecognizethisandsuppressthem。Weavoidnamingthem。Americanwritersneverallowthemselvestonamethem。Itwouldlookasiftheywereinatemper,andweholdthatexhibitionsoftemperinpublicarenotgoodformexceptintheveryyoungandinexperienced。Andevenifwehadthedispositiontonamethem,inordertofillupagapwhenwewereshortofideasandarguments,ourmagazineswouldnotallowustodoit,becausetheythinkthatsuchwordssullytheirpages。Thispresentmagazineisparticularlystrenuousaboutit。Itsnotetomeannouncingtheforwardingofyourproof—sheetstoFranceclosedthus——foryourprotection:
  "Itisneedlesstoaskyoutoavoidanythingthathemightconsideraspersonal。"
  Itwaswellenough,asameasureofprecaution,butreallyitwasnotneeded。Youcantrustmeimplicitly,M。Bourget;IshallnevercallyouanynamesinprintwhichIshouldbeashamedtocallyouwithyourunoffendinganddearestonespresent。
  Indeed,wearereserved,andparticularinAmericatoadegreewhichyouwouldconsiderexaggerated。Forinstance,weshouldnotwritenoteslikethatoneofyourstoaladyforasmallfault——oralargeone。——[WhenM。
  PaulBourgetindulgesinalittlechaffingattheexpenseoftheAmericans,"whocanalwaysgetawaywithafewyears’tryingtofindoutwhotheirgrandfatherswere,"hemerelymakesanallusiontoanAmericanfoible;but,forsooth,whatakindman,whatahumoristMarkTwainiswhenheretortsbycallingFranceanationofbastards!HowtheAmericansofcultureandrefinementwilladmirehimforthusspeakingintheirname!
  Snobbery……IcouldgiveMarkTwainanexampleoftheAmericanspecimen。Itisapiquantstory。IneverpublisheditbecauseIfearedmyreadersmightthinkthatIwasgivingthematypicalillustrationofAmericancharacterinsteadofarareexception。
  Iwasoncebookedbymymanagertogiveacauserieinthedrawing—roomofaNewYorkmillionaire。Iacceptedwithreluctance。Idonotlikeprivateengagements。Atfiveo’clockonthedaythecauseriewastobegiven,theladysenttomymanagertosaythatshewouldexpectmetoarriveatnineo’clockandtospeakforaboutanhour。Thenshewroteapostscript。Manywomenareunfortunatethere。Theirmindsarefullofafter—thoughts,andthemostimportantpartoftheirlettersisgenerallytobefoundaftertheirsignature。Thislady’sP。S。ranthus:"I
  supposebewillnotexpecttobeentertainedafterthelecture。"
  Ifairlyshorted,asMarkTwainwouldsay,andthen,indulgingmyselfinabitofsnobbishness,Iwasbackatherasquickasaflash:
  "DearMadam:Asaliterarymanofsomereputation,IhavemanytimeshadthepleasureofbeingentertainedbythemembersoftheoldaristocracyofFrance。IhavealsomanytimeshadthepleasureofbeingentertainedbythemembersoftheoldaristocracyofEngland。Ifitmayinterestyou,IcaneventellyouthatIhaveseveraltimeshadthehonorofbeingentertainedbyroyalty;butmyambitionhasneverbeensowildastoexpectthatonedayImightbeentertainedbythearistocracyofNewYork。No,Idonotexpecttobeentertainedbyyou,nordoIwantyoutoexpectmetoentertainyouandyourfriendsto—night,forIdeclinetokeeptheengagement。"
  Now,IcouldfillabookonAmericawithreminiscencesofthissort,addingafewchaptersonbossesandboodlers,onNewYork’chroniquescandaleuse’,onthetenementhousesofthelargecities,onthegambling—hellsofDenver,andthedensofSanFrancisco,andwhatnot!
  Butnotevenyournastyarticleonmycountry,Mark,willmakemedoit。]——Weshouldnotthinkitkind。Nomatterhowmuchwemighthaveassociatedwithkingsandnobilities,weshouldnotthinkitrighttocrushherwithitandmakeherashamedofherlowlierwalkinlife;forwehaveasaying,"Whohumiliatesmymotherincludeshisown。"
  DoIseriouslyimagineyoutobetheauthorofthatstrangeletter,M。Bourget?IndeedIdonot。Ibelieveittohavebeensurreptitiouslyinsertedbyyouramanuensiswhenyourbackwasturned。Ithinkhediditwithagoodmotive,expectingittoaddforceandpiquancytoyourarticle,butitdoesnotreflectyournature,andIknowitwillgrieveyouwhenyouseeit。Ialsothinkheinterlardedmanyotherthingswhichyouwilldisapproveofwhenyouseethem。Iamcertainthatalltheharshnamesdischargedatmecomefromhim,notyou。Nodoubtyoucouldhaveprovedmeentitledtothemwithaslittletroubleasithascosthimtodoit,butitwouldhavebeenyourdispositiontohuntgameofahigherquality。
  Why,IevendoubtifitisyouwhofurnishmeallthatexcellentinformationaboutBalzacandthoseothers。——["NowthestyleofM。
  BourgetandmanyotherFrenchwritersisapparentlyaclosedlettertoMarkTwain;butletusleavethatalone。HashereadErckmann—Chatrian,VictorHugo,Lamartine,EdmondAbout,Cherbuliez,Renan?HashereadGustaveDroz’s’Monsieur,Madame,etBebe’,andthosebookswhichleaveforalongtimeaperfumeaboutyou?HashereadthenovelsofAlexandreDumas,EugeneSue,GeorgeSand,andBalzac?HasbereadVictorHugo’s’LesMiserables’and’NotreDamedeParis’?HashereadorheardtheplaysofSandeau,Augier,Dumas,andSardou,theworksofthoseTitansofmodernliterature,whosenameswillbehouseholdwordsallovertheworldforhundredsofyearstocome?HehasreadLaTerre——thiskind—hearted,refinedhumorist!WhenMarkTwainvisitsagardendoeshesmelltheviolets,theroses,thejasmine,orthehoneysuckle?No,hegoesinthefar—awaycomerwherethesoilisprepared。Hearwhathesays:"IwishM。
  PaulBourgethadreadmoreofournovelsbeforehecame。Itistheonlywaytothoroughlyunderstandapeople。WhenIfoundIwascomingtoParisIreadLaTerre。"]——Allthisinsimplejusticetoyou——andtome;
  for,togravelyacceptthoseinterlardingsasyourswouldbetowrongyourheadandheart,andatthesametimeconvictmyselfofbeingequippedwithavacancywheremypenetrationoughttobelodged。
  AndnowfinallyImustuncoverthesecretpain,theweesorefromwhichtheReplygrew——theanecdotewhichclosedmyrecentarticle——andconsiderhowitisthatthispimplehasspreadtothesecancerousdimensions。
  IfanybutyouhaddictatedtheReply,M。Bourget,Iwouldknowthatthatanecdotewastwistedaroundanditsintentionmagnifiedsomehundredsoftimes,inorderthatitmightbeusedasapretexttocreepinthebackway。ButIaccuseyouofnothing——nothingbuterror。WhenyousaythatI"retortbycallingFranceanationofbastards,"itisanerror。Andnotasmallone,butalargeone。Imadenosuchremark,noranythingresemblingit。Moreover,themagazinewouldnothaveallowedmetousesogrossawordasthat。
  Youtoldananecdote。Afunnyone——Iadmitthat。IthitafoibleofourAmericanaristocracy,anditstungme——Iadmitthat;itstungmesharply。
  Itwaslikethis:YoufoundsomeancientportraitsofFrenchkingsinthegalleryofoneofouraristocracy,andyousaid:
  "HehastheGrandMonarch,butwhereistheportraitofhisgrandfather?"
  Thatis,theAmericanaristocrat’sgrandfather。
  Nowthathitsonlyafewofus,Igrant——justtheuppercrustonly——butithitsexceedinglyhard。
  Iwonderediftherewasanywayofgettingbackatyou。InoneofyourchaptersIfoundthischance:
  "InourhighParisianexistence,forinstance,wefindappliedtoartsandluxury,andtodebauchery,allthepowersandalltheweaknessesoftheFrenchsoul。"
  Yousee?Your"higherParisian"class——noteverybody,notthenation,butonlythetopcrustoftheOvation——appliestodebaucheryallthepowersofitssoul。
  Iarguedtomyselfthatthatenergymustproduceresults。SoIbuiltananecdoteoutofyourremark。InitImakeNapoleonBonapartesaytome——
  butseeforyourselftheanecdote(ingeniouslyclippedandcurtailed)inparagraphelevenofyourReply。——[So,Irepeat,MarkTwaindoesnotlikeM。PaulBourget’sbook。SolongashemakeslightfunofthegreatFrenchwriterheisathome,heispleasant,heistheAmericanhumoristweknow。Whenhetakeshisrevenge(andwhereisthereasonfortakingarevenge?)heisunkind,unfair,bitter,nasty。
  Forexample:
  SeehisanswertoaFrenchmanwhojokinglyremarkstohim:
  "IsupposelifecannevergetentirelydulltoanAmerican,becausewheneverhecan’tstrikeupanyotherwaytoputinhistime,hecanalwaysgetawaywithafewyearstryingtofindoutwhohisgrandfatherwas。"
  Heartheanswer:
  "IreckonaFrenchman’sgothislittlestandbyforadulltime,too;
  becausewhenallotherinterestsfail,hecanturninandseeifhecan’tfindoutwhohisfatherwas。"
  Thefirstremarkisagood—humoredbitofchaffingonAmericansnobbery。
  Imaybeutterlydestituteofhumor,butIcallthesecondremarkagratuitouschargeofimmoralityhurledattheFrenchwomen——aremarkunworthyofamanwhohastheearofthepublic,unworthyofagentleman,agrossinsulttoanationfriendlytoAmerica,anationthathelpedMarkTwain’sancestorsintheirstruggleforliberty,anationwhereto—dayitisenoughtosaythatyouareAmericantoseeeverydooropenwidetoyou。
  IfMarkTwainwashardupinsearchof,aFrench"chestnut,"Imighthavetoldhimthefollowinglittleanecdote。Itismorefunnythanhis,andwouldhavebeenlessinsulting:Twolittlestreetboysareabusingeachother。"Ah,holdyourtongue,"saysone,"youain’tgotnofather。"
  "Ain’tgotnofather!"repliestheother;"I’vegotmorefathersthanyou。"]
  Now,then,youranecdoteaboutthegrandfathershurtme。Why?Becauseithadapoint。Itwouldn’thavehurtmeifithadn’thadpoint。Youwouldn’thavewastedspaceonitifithadn’thadpoint。
  Myanecdotehashurtyou。Why?Becauseithadpoint,Isuppose。Itwouldn’thavehurtyouifithadn’thadpoint。IjudgedfromyourremarkaboutthediligenceandindustryofthehighParisianuppercrustthatitwouldhavesomepoint,butreallyIhadnoideawhatagold—mineIhadstruck。Ineversuspectedthatthepointwasgoingtostickintotheentirenation;butofcourseyouknowyournationbetterthanIdo,andifyouthinkitpuncturesthemall,Ihavetoyieldtoyourjudgment。
  Butyouaretoblame,yourownself。Yourremarkmisledme。Isupposedtheindustrywasconfinedtothatlittleunnumerousupperlayer。
  Well,nowthattheunfortunatethinghasbeendone,letusdowhatwecantoundoit。Theremustbeaway,M。Bourget,andIamwillingtodoanythingthatwillhelp;forIamassorryasyoucanbeyourself。
  IwilltellyouwhatIthinkwillbetheverything。
  Wewillswapanecdotes。Iwilltakeyouranecdoteandyoutakemine。I
  willsaytothedukesandcountsandprincesoftheancientnobilityofFrance:
  "Ha,ha!Youmusthaveaprettyhardtimetryingtofindoutwhoyourgrandfatherswere?"
  Theywillmerelysmileindifferentlyandnotfeelhurt,becausetheycantracetheirlineagebackthroughcenturies。
  AndyouwillhurlmineateveryindividualintheAmericannation,saying:
  "Andyoumusthaveaprettyhardtimetryingtofindoutwhoyourfatherswere。"Theywillmerelysmileindifferently,andnotfeelhurt,becausetheyhaven’tanydifficultyinfindingtheirfathers。
  Doyougettheidea?Thewholeharmintheanecdotesisinthepoint,yousee;andwhenweswapthemaroundthatway,theyhaven’tany。
  Thatsettlesitperfectlyandbeautifully,andIamgladIthoughtofit。
  Iamverygladindeed,M。Bourget;foritwasjustthatlittleweethingthatcausedthewholedifficultyandmadeyoudictatetheReply,andyouramanuensiscallmeallthosehardnameswhichthemagazinesdislikeso。
  AndIdiditallinfun,too,tryingtocapyourfunnyanecdotewithanotherone——onthegive—and—takeprinciple,youknow——whichisAmerican。
  Ididn’tknowthatwiththeFrenchitwasallgiveandnotake,andyoudidn’ttellme。ButnowthatIhavemadeeverythingcomfortableagain,andfixedbothanecdotessotheycanneverhaveanypointanymore,I
  knowyouwillforgiveme。