首页 >出版文学> The Provincial Letters>第7章
  criedthemonk。"Godforbid!Isaidhemightkillhimprivately,andyouconcludethathemaykillhimtreacherously,asifthatwerethesamething!
  Attend,sir,toEscobar’sdefinitionbeforeallowingyourselftospeakagainonthissubject:’Wecallitkillingintreacherywhenthepersonwhoisslainhadnoreasontosuspectsuchafate。He,therefore,thatslayshisenemycannotbesaidtokillhimintreachery,evenalthoughtheblowshouldbegiveninsidiouslyandbehindhisback—licetperinsidiasautatergopercutiat。’Andagain:’Hethatkillshisenemy,withwhomhewasreconciledunderapromiseofneveragainattemptinghislife,cannotbeabsolutelysaidtokillintreachery,unlesstherewasbetweenthemallthestricterfriendship—arctioramicitia。’Youseenowyoudonotevenunderstandwhatthetermssignify,andyetyoupretendtotalklikeadoctor。""Igrantyouthisissomethingquitenewtome,"Ireplied;
  "andIshouldgatherfromthatdefinitionthatfew,ifany,wereeverkilledintreachery;forpeopleseldomtakeitintotheirheadstoassassinateanybuttheirenemies。Bethisasitmay,however,itseemsthat,accordingtoSanchez,amanmayfreelyslay(Idonotsaytreacherously,butonlyinsidiouslyandbehindhisback)acalumniator,forexample,whoprosecutesusatlaw?""Certainlyhemay,"returnedthemonk,"always,however,inthewayofgivingarightdirectiontotheintention:youconstantlyforgetthemainpoint。Molinasupportsthesamedoctrine;andwhatismore,ourlearnedbrotherReginaldmaintainsthatwemaydespatchthefalsewitnesseswhomhesummonsagainstus。And,tocrownthewhole,accordingtoourgreatandfamousfathersTannerandEmanuelSa,itislawfultokillboththefalsewitnessesandthejudgehimself,ifhehashadanycollusionwiththem。HereareTanner’sverywords:’SotusandLessiusthinkthatitisnotlawfultokillthefalsewitnessesandthemagistratewhoconspiretogethertoputaninnocentpersontodeath;butEmanuelSaandotherauthorswithgoodreasonimpugnthatsentiment,atleastsofarastheconscienceisconcerned。’Andhegoesontoshowthatitisquitelawfultokillboththewitnessesandthejudge。""Well,father,"saidI,"IthinkInowunderstandprettywellyourprincipleregardingthedirectionoftheintention:butIshouldliketoknowsomethingofitsconsequences,andallthecasesinwhichthismethodofyoursarmsamanwiththepoweroflifeanddeath。
  Letusgooverthemagain,forfearofmistake,forequivocationheremightbeattendedwithdangerousresults。Killingisamatterwhichrequirestobewell—timed,andtobebackedwithagoodprobableopinion。Youhaveassuredme,then,thatbygivingaproperturntotheintention,itislawful,accordingtoyourfathers,forthepreservationofone’shonour,orevenproperty,toacceptachallengetoaduel,togiveonesometimes,tokillinaprivatewayafalseaccuser,andhiswitnessesalongwithhim,andeventhejudgewhohasbeenbribedtofavourthem;andyouhavealsotoldmethathewhohasgotablowmay,withoutavenginghimself,retaliatewiththesword。Butyouhavenottoldme,father,towhatlengthhemaygo。""Hecanhardlymistakethere,"repliedthefather,"forhemaygoallthelengthofkillinghisman。ThisissatisfactorilyprovedbythelearnedHenriquez,andothersofourfathersquotedbyEscobar,asfollows:’Itisperfectlyrighttokillapersonwhohasgivenusaboxontheear,althoughheshouldrunaway,provideditisnotdonethroughhatredorrevenge,andthereisnodangerofgivingoccasiontherebytomurdersofagrosskindandhurtfultosociety。Andthereasonisthatitisaslawfultopursuethethiefthathasstolenourhonour,ashimthathasrunawaywithourproperty。For,althoughyourhonourcannotbesaidtobeinthehandsofyourenemyinthesamesenseasyourgoodsandchattelsareinthehandsofthethief,stillitmayberecoveredinthesameway—byshowingproofsofgreatnessandauthority,andthusacquiringtheesteemofmen。And,inpointoffact,isitnotcertainthatthemanwhohasreceivedabuffetontheearisheldtobeunderdisgrace,untilhehaswipedofftheinsultwiththebloodofhisenemy?’"IwassoshockedonhearingthisthatitwaswithgreatdifficultyIcouldcontainmyself;
  but,inmyanxietytoheartherest,Iallowedhimtoproceed。"Nay,"hecontinued,"itisallowabletopreventabuffet,bykillinghimthatmeanttogiveit,iftherebenootherwaytoescapetheinsult。Thisopinionisquitecommonwithourfathers。Forexample,Azor,oneofthefour—and—twentyelders,proposingthequestion,’Isitlawfulforamanofhonourtokillanotherwhothreatenstogivehimaslapontheface,orstrikehimwithastick?’replies,’Somesayhemaynot;allegingthatthelifeofourneighbourismorepreciousthanourhonour,andthatitwouldbeanactofcrueltytokillamanmerelytoavoidablow。Others,however,thinkthatitisallowable;andIcertainlyconsideritprobable,whenthereisnootherwayofwardingofftheinsult;for,otherwise,thehonouroftheinnocentwouldbeconstantlyexposedtothemaliceoftheinsolent。’
  ThesameopinionisgivenbyourgreatFiliutius;byFatherHereau,inhisTreatiseonHomicide,byHurtadodeMendoza,inhisDisputations,byBecan,inhisSummary;byourFathersFlahautandLecourt,inthosewritingswhichtheUniversity,intheirthirdpetition,quotedatlength,inordertobringthemintodisgrace(thoughinthistheyfailed);andbyEscobar。
  Inshort,thisopinionissogeneralthatLessiuslaysitdownasapointwhichnocasuisthascontested;hequotesagreatmanythatuphold,andnonethatdenyit;andparticularlyPeterNavarre,who,speakingofaffrontsingeneral(andthereisnonemoreprovokingthanaboxontheear),declaresthat’bytheuniversalconsentofthecasuists,itislawfultokillthecalumniator,iftherebenootherwayofavertingtheaffront—exsententiaomnium,licetcontumeliosumoccidere,sialitereainjuriaarcerinequit。’
  Doyouwishanymoreauthorities?"askedthemonk。IdeclaredIwasmuchobligedtohim;Ihadheardrathermorethanenoughofthemalready。But,justtoseehowfarthisdamnabledoctrinewouldgo,Isaid,"But,father,maynotonebeallowedtokillforsomethingstillless?Mightnotapersonsodirecthisintentionaslawfullytokillanotherfortellingalie,forexample?""Hemay,"returnedthemonk;"andaccordingtoFatherBaldelle,quotedbyEscobar,’youmaylawfullytakethelifeofanotherforsaying,"Youhavetoldalie";ifthereisnootherwayofshuttinghismouth。’
  Thesamethingmaybedoneinthecaseofslanders。OurFathersLessiusandHereauagreeinthefollowingsentiments:’Ifyouattempttoruinmycharacterbytellingstoriesagainstmeinthepresenceofmenofhonour,andIhavenootherwayofpreventingthisthanbyputtingyoutodeath,mayIbepermittedtodoso?Accordingtothemodernauthors,Imay,andthateventhoughIhavebeenreallyguiltyofthecrimewhichyoudivulge,provideditisasecretone,whichyoucouldnotestablishbylegalevidence。
  AndIproveitthus:Ifyoumeantorobmeofmyhonourbygivingmeaboxontheear,Imaypreventitbyforceofarms;andthesamemodeofdefenceislawfulwhenyouwoulddomethesameinjurywiththetongue。
  Besides,wemaylawfullyobviateaffrontsand,therefore,slanders。Infine,honourisdearerthanlife;andasitislawfultokillindefenceoflife,itmustbesotokillindefenceofhonour。’There,yousee,areargumentsindueform;thisisdemonstration,sir—notmerediscussion。
  And,toconclude,thisgreatmanLessiusshows,inthesameplace,thatitislawfultokillevenforasimplegesture,orasignofcontempt。
  ’Aman’shonour,’heremarks,’maybeattackedorfilchedawayinvariousways—inallofwhichvindicationappearsveryreasonable;as,forinstance,whenoneofferstostrikeuswithastick,orgiveusaslapontheface,oraffrontuseitherbywordsorsigns—sivepersigna。’""Well,father,"
  saidI,"itmustbeownedthatyouhavemadeeverypossibleprovisiontosecurethesafetyofreputation;butitstrikesmethathumanlifeisgreatlyindanger,ifanyonemaybeconscientiouslyputtodeathsimplyforadefamatoryspeechorasaucygesture。""Thatistrue,"hereplied;"but,asourfathersareverycircumspect,theyhavethoughtitpropertoforbidputtingthisdoctrineintopracticeonsuchtriflingoccasions。Theysay,atleast,’thatitoughthardlytobereducedtopractice—practicevixprobaripotest。’Andtheyhaveagoodreasonforthat,asyoushallsee。"
  "Oh,Iknowwhatitwillbe,"interruptedI;"becausethelawofGodforbidsustokill,ofcourse。""Theydonotexactlytakethatground,"saidthefather;"asamatterofconscience,andviewingthethingabstractly,theyholditallowable。""Andwhythen,dotheyforbidit?""Ishalltellyouthat,sir。Itisbecause,werewetokillallthedefamersamongus,weshouldveryshortlydepopulatethecountry。’Although,’saysReginald,’theopinionthatwemaykillamanforcalumnyisnotwithoutitsprobabilityintheory,thecontraryoneoughttobefollowedinpractice;for,inourmodeofdefendingourselves,weshouldalwaysavoiddoinginjurytothecommonwealth;anditisevidentthatbykillingpeopleinthiswaytherewouldbetoomanymurders。’Weshouldbeonourguard,’saysLessius,’lestthepracticeofthismaximprovehurtfultotheState;forinthiscaseitoughtnottobepermitted—tuncenimnonestpermittendus。’""What,father!isitforbiddenonlyasapointofpolicy,andnotofreligion?
  Fewpeople,Iamafraid,willpayanyregardtosuchaprohibition,particularlywheninapassion。VeryprobablytheymightthinktheyweredoingnoharmtotheState,byriddingitofanunworthymember。""Andaccordingly,"
  repliedthemonk,"ourFiliutiushasfortifiedthatargumentwithanother,whichisofnoslenderimportance,namely,’thatforkillingpeopleafterthismanner,onemightbepunishedinacourtofjustice。’""Therenow,father;Itoldyoubefore,thatyouwillneverbeabletodoanythingworththewhile,unlessyougetthemagistratestogoalongwithyou。""Themagistrates,"
  saidthefather,"astheydonotpenetrateintotheconscience,judgemerelyoftheoutsideoftheaction,whilewelookprincipallytotheintention;
  andhenceitoccasionallyhappensthatourmaximsarealittledifferentfromtheirs。""Bethatasitmay,father;fromyours,atleast,onethingmaybefairlyinferred—that,bytakingcarenottoinjurethecommonwealth,wemaykilldefamerswithasafeconscience,providedwecandoitwithasoundskin。But,sir,afterhavingseensowelltotheprotectionofhonour,haveyoudonenothingforproperty?Iamawareitisofinferiorimportance,butthatdoesnotsignify;Ishouldthinkonemightdirectone’sintentiontokillforitspreservationalso。""Yes,"repliedthemonk;"andIgaveyouahinttothateffectalready,whichmayhavesuggestedtheideatoyou。Allourcasuistsagreeinthatopinion;andtheyevenextendthepermissiontothosecases’wherenofurtherviolenceisapprehendedfromthosethatstealourproperty;as,forexample,wherethethiefrunsaway。’Azor,oneofourSociety,provesthatpoint。""But,sir,howmuchmustthearticlebeworth,tojustifyourproceedingtothatextremity?"
  "AccordingtoReginaldandTanner,’thearticlemustbeofgreatvalueintheestimationofajudiciousman。’AndsothinkLaymanandFiliutius。"
  "But,father,thatissayingnothingtothepurpose;whereamItofind’ajudiciousman’(ararepersontomeetwithatanytime),inordertomakethisestimation?Whydotheynotsettleuponanexactsumatonce?"
  "Ay,indeed!"retortedthemonk;"andwasitsoeasy,thinkyou,toadjustthecomparativevaluebetweenthelifeofaman,andaChristianman,too,andmoney?ItishereIwouldhaveyoufeeltheneedofourcasuists。Showmeanyofyourancientfatherswhowilltellforhowmuchmoneywemaybeallowedtokillaman。Whatwilltheysay,but’Nonoccides—Thoushaltnotkill?’""Andwho,then,hasventuredtofixthatsum?"Iinquired。
  "OurgreatandincomparableMolina,"hereplied—"thegloryofourSociety—
  whohas,inhisinimitablewisdom,estimatedthelifeofaman’atsixorsevenducats;forwhichsumheassuresusitiswarrantabletokillathief,eventhoughheshouldrunoff’;andheadds,’thathewouldnotventuretocondemnthatmanasguiltyofanysinwhoshouldkillanotherfortakingawayanarticleworthacrown,orevenless—uniusaurei,velminorisadhucvaloris’;whichhasledEscobartolayitdown,asageneralrule,’thatamanmaybekilledquiteregularly,accordingtoMolina,forthevalueofacrown—piece。’""Ofather,"criedI;"wherecanMolinahavegotallthiswisdomtoenablehimtodetermineamatterofsuchimportance,withoutanyaidfromScripture,thecouncils,orthefathers?Itisquiteevidentthathehasobtainedanilluminationpeculiartohimself,andisfarbeyondSt。Augustineinthematterofhomicide,aswellasofgrace。
  Well,now,IsupposeImayconsidermyselfmasterofthischapterofmorals;
  andIseeperfectlythat,withtheexceptionofecclesiastics,nobodyneedrefrainfromkillingthosewhoinjurethemintheirpropertyorreputation。"
  "Whatsayyou?"exclaimedthemonk。"Doyou,then,supposethatitwouldbereasonablethatthose,whooughtofallmentobemostrespected,shouldalonebeexposedtotheinsolenceofthewicked?Ourfathershaveprovidedagainstthatdisorder;forTannerdeclaresthat’Churchmen,andevenmonks,arepermittedtokill,forthepurposeofdefendingnotonlytheirlives,buttheirproperty,andthatoftheircommunity。’Molina,Escobar,Becan,Reginald,Layman,Lessius,andothers,holdthesamelanguage。Nay,accordingtoourcelebratedFatherLamy,priestsandmonksmaylawfullypreventthosewhowouldinjurethembycalumniesfromcarryingtheirilldesignsintoeffect,byputtingthemtodeath。Care,however,mustalwaysbetakentodirecttheintentionproperly。Hiswordsare:’Anecclesiasticoramonkmaywarrantablykilladefamerwhothreatenstopublishthescandalouscrimesofhiscommunity,orhisowncrimes,whenthereisnootherwayofstoppinghim;if,forinstance,heispreparedtocirculatehisdefamationsunlesspromptlydespatched。For,inthesecircumstances,asthemonkwouldbeallowedtokillonewhothreatenedtotakehislife,heisalsowarrantedtokillhimwhowoulddeprivehimofhisreputationorhisproperty,inthesamewayasthemenoftheworld。’""Iwasnotawareofthat,"saidI;"infact,Ihavebeenaccustomedsimplyenoughtobelievetheveryreverse,withoutreflectingonthematter,inconsequenceofhavingheardthattheChurchhadsuchanabhorrenceofbloodshedasnoteventopermitecclesiasticaljudgestoattendincriminalcases。""Nevermindthat,"hereplied;"ourFatherLamyhascompletelyprovedthedoctrineIhavelaiddown,although,withahumilitywhichsitsuncommonlywellonsogreataman,hesubmitsittothejudgementofhisjudiciousreaders。Caramuel,too,ourfamouschampion,quotingitinhisFundamentalTheology,p。543。thinksitsocertain,thathedeclaresthecontraryopiniontobedestituteofprobability,anddrawssomeadmirableconclusionsfromit,suchasthefollowing,whichhecalls’theconclusionofconclusions—conclusionumconclusio’:’Thatapriestnotonlymaykillaslanderer,buttherearecertaincircumstancesinwhichitmaybehisdutytodoso—etiamaliquandodebetoccidere。’
  Heexaminesagreatmanynewquestionsonthisprinciple,suchasthefollowing,forinstance:’MaytheJesuitskilltheJansenists?’""Acuriouspointofdivinitythat,father!"criedI。"IholdtheJanseniststobeasgoodasdeadmen,accordingtoFatherLamy’sdoctrine。""There,now,youareinthewrong,"saidthemonk:"Caramuelinferstheveryreversefromthesameprinciples。""Andhowso,father?""Because,"hereplied,"itisnotinthepoweroftheJanseniststoinjureourreputation。’TheJansenists,’
  sayshe,’calltheJesuitsPelagians,maytheynotbekilledforthat?
  No;inasmuchastheJansenistscannomoreobscurethegloryoftheSocietythananowlcaneclipsethatofthesun;onthecontrary,theyhave,thoughagainsttheirintention,enhancedit—occidinonpossunt,quianocerenonpotuerunt。’""Ha,father!dothelivesoftheJansenists,then,dependonthecontingencyoftheirinjuringyourreputation?Ifso,Ireckonthemfarfrombeinginasafeposition;forsupposingitshouldbethoughtintheslightestdegreeprobablethattheymightdoyousomemischief,why,theyarekillableatonce!Youhaveonlytodrawupasyllogismindueform,and,withadirectionoftheintention,youmaydespatchyourmanatoncewithasafeconscience。Thricehappymustthosehotspiritsbewhocannotbearwithinjuries,tobeinstructedinthisdoctrine!Butwoetothepoorpeoplewhohaveoffendedthem!Indeed,father,itwouldbebettertohavetodowithpersonswhohavenoreligionatallthanwiththosewhohavebeentaughtonthissystem。For,afterall,theintentionofthewounderconveysnocomforttothewounded。Thepoormanseesnothingofthatsecretdirectionofwhichyouspeak;heisonlysensibleofthedirectionoftheblowthatisdealthim。AndIambynomeanssurebutapersonwouldfeelmuchlesssorrytoseehimselfbrutallykilledbyaninfuriatedvillainthantofindhimselfconscientiouslystilettoedbyadevotee。Tobeplainwithyou,father,Iamsomewhatstaggeredatallthis;
  andthesequestionsofFatherLamyandCaramueldonotpleasemeatall。"
  "Howso?"criedthemonk。"AreyouaJansenist?""Ihaveanotherreasonforit,"Ireplied。"YoumustknowIaminthehabitofwritingfromtimetotime,toafriendofmineinthecountry,allthatIcanlearnofthemaximsofyourdoctors。Now,althoughIdonomorethansimplyreportandfaithfullyquotetheirownwords,yetIamapprehensivelestmylettershouldfallintothehandsofsomestraygeniuswhomaytakeintohisheadthatIhavedoneyouinjury,andmaydrawsomemischievousconclusionfromyourpremisses。""Away!"criedthemonk;"nofearofdangerfromthatquarter,I’llgiveyoumywordforit。Knowthatwhatourfathershavethemselvesprinted,withtheapprobationofoursuperiors,itcannotbewrongtoreadnordangeroustopublish。"Iwriteyou,therefore,onthefaithofthisworthyfather’swordofhonour。But,inthemeantime,Imuststopforwantofpaper—notofpassages;forIhavegotasmanymoreinreserve,andgoodonestoo,aswouldrequirevolumestocontainthem。Iam,&;c。TheProvincialLettersofBlaisePascalLETTERVIIIParis,May28,1656