beforebeingplungedintotheirlasttranceofforty—ninehours’duration(astothisday,intheEast),fromwhichtheyaroseasglorifiedadeptsorChristoi。"IntheClementineRecognitionsitisannouncedthatthefatheranointedhissonwith"oilthatwastakenfromthewoodoftheTreeofLife,andfromthisanointingheiscalledtheChrist":whencetheChristianname。ThisagainisEgyptian。Horuswastheanointedsonofthefather。ThemodeofanointinghimfromtheTreeofLife,portrayedonthemonuments,isveryprimitiveindeed;andtheHorusofEgyptwascontinuedintheGnosticChrist,whoisreproducedupontheGnosticstonesastheintermediatelinkbetwixttheKarestandtheChrist,alsoastheHorusofbothsexes。("ThenameandnatureoftheChrist。"——GeraldMassey)Mr。G。MasseyconnectstheGreekChristosorChristwiththeEgyptianKarest,the"mummytypeofimmortality,"andprovesitverythoroughly。HebeginsbysayingthatinEgyptianthe"WordofTruth"isMa—Kheru,andthatitisthetitleofHorus。Thusasheshows,HorusprecededChristastheMessengeroftheWordofTruth,theLogosorthemanifestorofthedivinenatureinhumanity。Inthesamepaperhewritesasfollows:TheGnosishadthreephases——astronomical,spiritual,anddoctrinal,andallthreecanbeidentifiedwiththeChristofEgypt。IntheastronomicalphasetheconstellationOrioniscalledtheSahuormummy。ThesoulofHoruswasrepresentedasrisingfromthedeadandascendingtoheaveninthestarsofOrion。Themummy—imagewasthepreservedone,thesaved,thereforeaportraitoftheSavior,asatypeofimmortality。Thiswasthefigureofadeadman,which,asPlutarchandHerodotustellus,wascarriedroundatanEgyptianbanquet,whentheguestswereinvitedtolookonitandeatanddrinkandbehappy,because,whentheydied,theywouldbecomewhattheimagesymbolized——thatis,theyalsowouldbeimmortal!ThistypeofimmortalitywascalledtheKarest,orKarust,anditwastheEgyptianChrist。ToKaresmeanstoembalm,anoint,tomaketheMummyasatypeoftheeternal;
and,whenmade,itwascalledtheKarest;sothatthisisnotmerelyamatterofnameforname,theKarestfortheChrist。ThisimageoftheKarestwasboundupinawoofwithoutaseam,thepropervestureoftheChrist!Nomatterwhatthelengthofthebandagemightbe,andsomeofthemummy—swatheshavebeenunwoundthatwere1,000yardsinlength,thewoofwasfrombeginningtoendwithoutaseam……Now,thisseamlessrobeoftheEgyptianKarestisaverytell—taletypeofthemysticalChrist,whobecomeshistoricintheGospelsasthewearerofacoatorchiton,madewithoutaseam,whichneithertheGreeknortheHebrewfullyexplains,butwhichisexplainedbytheEgyptianKetuforthewoof,andbytheseamlessrobeorswathingwithoutseamthatwasmadeforeternalwear,andwornbytheMummy—Christ,theimageofimmortalityinthetombsofEgypt。Further,JesusisputtodeathinaccordancewiththeinstructionsgivenformakingtheKarest。Notabonemustbebroken。ThetrueKarestmustbeperfectineverymember。"Thisishewhocomesoutsound;whommenknownotishisname。"IntheGospelsJesusrisesagainwitheverymembersound,liketheperfectly—preservedKarest,todemonstratethephysicalresurrectionofthemummy。But,intheEgyptianoriginal,themummytransforms。
Thedeceasedsays:"Iamspiritualized。Iambecomeasoul。IriseasaGod。"Thistransformationintothespiritualimage,theKa,hasbeenomittedintheGospel。ThisspellingofthenameasChrestorChrestinLatinissupremelyimportant,becauseitenablesmetoprovetheidentitywiththeEgyptianKarestorKarust,thenameoftheChristastheembalmedmummy,whichwastheimageoftheresurrectioninEgyptiantombs,thetypeofimmortality,thelikenessoftheHorus,whoroseagainandmadethepathwayoutofthesepulcherforthosewhowerehisdisciplesorfollowers。Moreover,thistypeoftheKarestorMummy—ChristisreproducedintheCatacombsofRome。NorepresentationofthesupposedhistoricresurrectionofJesushasbeenfoundonanyoftheearlyChristianmonuments。
But,insteadofthemissingfact,wefindthesceneofLazarusbeingraisedfromthedead。Thisisdepictedoverandoveragainasthetypicalresurrectionwherethereisnorealone!ThesceneisnotexactlyinaccordancewiththerisingfromthegraveintheGospel。ItispurelyEgyptian,andLazarusisanEgyptianmummy!ThusLazarus,ineachrepresentation,isthemummy—typeoftheresurrection;LazarusistheKarest,whowastheEgyptianChrist,andwhoisreproducedbyGnosticartintheCatacombsofRomeasaformoftheGnosticChrist,whowasnotandcouldnotbecomeanhistoricalcharacter。Further,asthethingisEgyptian,itisprobablethatthenameisderivedfromEgyptian。Ifso,Laz(equaltoRas)meanstoberaisedup,whilearuisthemummybyname。WiththeGreekterminalsthisbecomesLazarus。InthecourseofhumanizingthemythosthetypicalrepresentationoftheresurrectionfoundinthetombsofRomeandEgyptwouldbecomethestoryofLazarusbeingraisedfromthedead。ThisKaresttypeoftheChristintheCatacombsisnotlimitedtoLazarus。BymeansoftheKaresttypetheChristandtheChristianscanbothbetracedintheancienttombsofEgypt。ThemummywasmadeinthislikenessoftheChrist。ItwastheChristbyname,identicalwiththeChrestoioftheGreekInscriptions。Thusthehonoreddead,whoroseagainasthefollowersofHorus—Makheru,theWordofTruth,arefoundtobetheChristians,ontheEgyptianmonuments。Ma—Kheruisthetermthatisalwaysappliedtothefaithfuloneswhowinthecrownoflifeandwearitatthefestivalwhichisdesignated’Comethoutome’——aninvitationbyHorustheJustifiertothosewhoarethe’Blessedonesofhisfather,Osiris’——theywho,havingmadetheWordofTruththelawoftheirlives,weretheJustified——[hoichrestoi],theChristians,onearth。InafifthcenturyrepresentationoftheMadonnaandchildfromthecemeteryofSt。Valentinus,thenew—bornbabelyinginaboxorcribisalsotheKarest,ormummy—type,furtheridentifiedasthedivinebabeofthesolarmythosbythediskofthesunandthecrossoftheequinoxatthebackoftheinfant’shead。Thusthechild—Christofthehistoricfaithisborn,andvisiblybeginsintheKarestimageofthedeadChrist,whichwasthemummy—typeoftheresurrectioninEgyptforthousandsofyearsbeforetheChristianera。ThisdoublestheproofthattheChristoftheChristianCatacombswasasurvivaloftheKarestofEgypt。Moreover,asDidronshows,therewasaportraitoftheChristwhohadhisbodypaintedred!(35)ItwasapopulartraditionthattheChristwasofaredcomplexion。This,too,maybeexplainedasasurvivaloftheMummy—Christ。Itwasanaboriginalmodeofrenderingthingstapubycoloringthemred。Thedeadcorpsewascoatedwithredochre——averyprimitivemodeofmakingthemummy,ortheanointedone。ThustheGodPtahtellsRamesesIIthathehas"re—fashionedhisfleshinvermilion。"ThisanointingwithredochreiscalledKurabytheMaori,wholikewisemadetheKarestorChrist。Weseethemummy—imagecontinuedonanotherlineofdescentwhenwelearnthatamongotherperniciousheresiesanddeadlysinswithwhichtheKnightsTemplarswerecharged,wastheimpiouscustomofadoringaMummythathadredeyes。TheirIdol,calledBaphomet,isalsothoughttohavebeenamummy……TheMummywastheearliesthumanimageoftheChrist。IdonotdoubtthattheancientRomanfestivalscalledtheCharistiawereconnectedintheiroriginwiththeKarestandtheEucharistasacelebrationinhonorofthemanesoftheirdepartedkithandkin,forwhosesakestheybecamereconciledatthefriendlygatheringonceayear。Itishere,then,wehavetoseektheessentialconnectionbetweentheEgyptianChrist,theChristians,andtheRomanCatacombs。TheseChristianMysteries,ignorantlyexplainedtobeinexplicable,canbeexplainedbyGnosticismandMythology,butinnootherway。Itisnotthattheyareinsolublebyhumanreason,astheirincompetent,howsoeverhighlypaid,expoundersnow—a—dayspretend。Thatisbutthepuerileapologyoftheunqualifiedfortheirownhelplessignorance——theywhohaveneverbeeninpossessionofthegnosisorscienceoftheMysteriesbywhichalonethesethingscanbeexplainedinaccordancewiththeirnaturalgenesis。InEgyptonlycanwereadthemattertotheroot,oridentifytheoriginoftheChristbynatureandbyname,tofindatlastthattheChristwastheMummy—type,andthatourChristologyismummifiedmythology。"——AgnosticAnnualTheaboveisanexplanationonpurelyscientificevidence,but,perhaps,alittletoomaterialistic,justbecauseofthatscience,notwithstandingthattheauthorisawell—knownSpiritualist。OccultismpureandsimplefindsthesamemysticelementsintheChristianasinotherfaiths,thoughitrejectsasemphaticallyitsdogmaticandhistoriccharacter。Itisafactthatintheterms[IesoushoChristos]
(SeeActsv。42,ix。34;ICorinth。iii。11,etc。),thearticle[ho]designating"Christos,"provesitsimplyasurname,likethatofPhocion,whoisreferredtoas[Phokionhochrestos](Plut。v。)。
Still,thepersonage(Jesus)soaddressed——wheneverhelived——wasagreatInitiateanda"SonofGod。"
For,wesayitagain,thesurnameChristosisbasedon,andthestoryoftheCrucifixionderivedfrom,eventsthatprecededit。Everywhere,inIndiaasinEgypt,inChaldeaasinGreece,alltheselegendswerebuiltupononeandthesameprimitivetype;thevoluntarysacrificeofthelogoi——theraysoftheoneLOGOS,thedirectmanifestedemanationfromtheOneever—concealedInfiniteandUnknown——whoseraysincarnatedinmankind。Theyconsentedtofallintomatter,andare,therefore,calledthe"FallenOnes。"Thisisoneofthosegreatmysterieswhichcanhardlybetoucheduponinamagazinearticle,butshallbenoticedinaseparateworkofmine,TheSecretDoctrine,veryfully。
Havingsaidsomuch,afewmorefactsmaybeaddedtotheetymologyofthetwoterms。[Christos]beingtheverbaladjectiveinGreekof[chrio]"toberubbedon,"asointmentorsalve,andthewordbeingfinallybroughttomean"theAnointedOne,"inChristiantheology;andKri,inSanskrit,thefirstsyllableinthenameofKrishna,meaning"topourout,orrubover,tocoverwith,"(36)
amongmanyotherthings,thismayleadoneaseasilytomakeofKrishna,"theanointedone。"ChristianphilologiststrytolimitthemeaningofKrishna’snametoitsderivationfromKrish,"black";butiftheanalogyandcomparisonoftheSanskritwiththeGreekrootscontainedinthenamesofChrestos,Christos,andChrishna,areanalyzedmorecarefully,itwillbefoundthattheyareallofthesameorigin。(37)
"InBockh’sChristianInscriptions,numbering1287,thereisnosingleinstanceofanearlierdatethanthethirdcentury,whereinthenameisnotwrittenChrestorChreist。""TheNameandNatureoftheChrist,"byG。Massey,TheAgnosticAnnual。)
Yetnoneofthesenamescanbeunriddled,assomeOrientalistsimagine,merelywiththehelpofastronomyandtheknowledgeofzodiacalsignsinconjunctionwithphallicsymbols。Because,whilethesiderealsymbolsofthemysticcharactersorpersonificationsinPuranasorBible,fulfillastronomicalfunctions,theirspiritualanti—typesruleinvisibly,butveryeffectively,theworld。Theyexistasabstractionsonthehigherplane,asmanifestedideasontheastral,andbecomemales,femalesandandrogynepowersonthislowerplaneofours。Scorpio,asChrestos—Meshiac,andLeo,asChristos—MessiahantedatedbyfartheChristianerainthetrialsandtriumphsofInitiationduringtheMysteries,Scorpiostandingassymbolforthelatter,Leofortheglorifiedtriumphofthe"sun"oftruth。ThemysticphilosophyoftheallegoryiswellunderstoodbytheauthoroftheSourceofMeasures;whowrites:One(Chrestos)causinghimselftogodownintothepit(ofScorpio,orincarnationinthewomb)forthesalvationoftheworld;thiswastheSun,shornofhisgoldenrays,andcrownedwithblackened(38)ones(symbolizingthisloss)
asthethorns;theotherwasthetriumphantMessiah,mounteduptothesummitofthearchofheaven,personatedastheLionofthetribeofJudah。InbothinstanceshehadtheCross;
onceinhumiliation(asthesonofcopulation),andonceholdingitinhiscontrol,asthelawofcreation,hebeingJehovah——intheschemeoftheauthorsofdogmaticChristianity。For,asthesameauthorshowsfurther,John,JesusandevenApolloniusofTyanawerebutepitomizersofthehistoryoftheSun"underdifferencesofaspectorcondition。"
(39)Theexplanation,hesays,issimpleenough,whenitisconsideredthatthenamesJesus,Hebrew[JSH]andApollonius,orApollo,arealikenamesoftheSunintheheavens,and,necessarily,thehistoryoftheone,astohistravelsthroughthesigns,withthepersonificationsofhissufferings,triumphsandmiracles,couldbebutthehistoryoftheother,wheretherewasawide—spread,commonmethodofdescribingthosetravelsbypersonification。ThefactthattheSecularChurchwasfoundedbyConstantine,andthatitwasapartofhisdecree"thatthevenerabledayoftheSunshouldbethedaysetapartfortheworshipofJesusChristasSun—day,"
showsthattheyknewwellinthat"SecularChurch""thattheallegoryresteduponanastronomicalbasis,"astheauthoraffirms。Yet,again,thecircumstancethatbothPuranasandBiblearefullofsolarandastronomicalallegories,doesnotmilitateagainstthatotherfactthatallsuchscripturesinadditiontothesetwoareclosedbookstothescholars"havingauthority。"
(!)Nordoesitaffectthatothertruth,thatallthosesystemsarenottheworkofmortalman,noraretheyhisinventionintheiroriginandbasis。
Thus"Christos,"underwhatevername,meansmorethanKarest,amummy,oreventhe"anointed"andtheelectoftheology。BothofthelatterapplytoChrestos,themanofsorrowandtribulation,inhisphysical,mental,andpsychicconditions,andbothrelatetotheHebrewMashiac(fromwhenceMessiah)
condition,asthewordisetymologized(40)byFuerst,andtheauthorofTheSourceofMeasures,p。255。ChristosisthecrownofgloryofthesufferingChrestosofthemysteries,asofthecandidatetothefinalUNION,ofwhateverraceandcreed。TothetruefolloweroftheSPIRITOFTRUTH,itmatterslittle,therefore,whetherJesus,asmanandChrestos,livedduringtheeracalledChristian,orbefore,orneverlivedatall。TheAdepts,wholivedanddiedforhumanity,haveexistedinmanyandalltheages,andmanywerethegoodandholymeninantiquitywhoborethesurnameortitleofChrestosbeforeJesusofNazareth,otherwiseJesus(orJehoshua)BenPandirawasborn。(41)
Therefore,onemaybepermittedtoconclude,withgoodreason,thatJesus,orJehoshua,waslikeSocrates,likePhocian,likeTheodorus,andsomanyotherssurnamedChrestos,i。e。,the"good,theexcellent,"
thegentle,andtheholyInitiate,whoshowedthe"way"totheChristoscondition,andthusbecamehimself"theWay"intheheartsofhisenthusiasticadmirers。TheChristians,asallthe"Hero—worshippers"havetriedtothrowintothebackgroundalltheotherChrestoi,whohaveappearedtothemasrivalsoftheirMan—God。ButifthevoiceoftheMYSTERIES
hasbecomesilentformanyagesintheWest,ifEleusis,Memphis,Antium,Delphi,andCresahavelongagobeenmadethetombsofaScienceonceascolossalintheWestasitisyetintheEast,therearesuccessorsnowbeingpreparedforthem。Wearein1887andthenineteenthcenturyisclosetoitsdeath。Thetwentiethcenturyhasstrangedevelopmentsinstoreforhumanity,andmayevenbethelastofitsname。
FOOTNOTES:
18。Theword[chreon]isexplainedbyHerodotus(7,11,7,)asthatwhichanoracledeclares,and[tochreon]isgivenbyPlutarch(Nich。14。)as"fate,""necessity。"VideHerodotus,7,215;5,108;andSophocles,Phil。437。(returntotext)
19。SeeLiddellandScott’sGreek—EnglishLexicon。(returntotext)
20。HenceofaGuru,"ateacher,"
andchela,a"disciple,"intheirmutualrelations。(returntotext)
21。Inhisrecentwork——TheEarlyDaysofChristianity,CanonFarrarremarks:——"Somehavesupposedapleasantplayofwordsfoundedonit,as……betweenChrestos(’sweet’
Ps。xxx。,iv。,8)andChristos(Christ),"(I。p。158,footnote)。Butthereisnothingtosuppose,sinceitbeganbya"playofwords,"
indeed。ThenameChristuswasnot"distortedintoChrestus,"
asthelearnedauthorwouldmakehisreadersbelieve(p。19),butitwastheadjectiveandnounChrestoswhichbecamedistortedintoChristus,andappliedtoJesus。Inafootnoteontheword"Chrestian,"occurringintheFirstEpistleofPeter(chap。iv。,16),inwhichintherevisedlaterMSS。thewordwaschangedintoChristian,CanonFarrarremarksagain,"Perhapsweshouldreadtheignorantheathendistortion,Chrestian。"Mostdecidedlyweshould;fortheeloquentwritershouldrememberhisMaster’scommandtorenderuntoCaesarthatwhichisCaesar’s。
Hisdislikenotwithstanding,Mr。FarrarisobligedtoadmitthatthenameChristianwasfirstINVENTED,bythesneering,mockingAntiochians,asearlyasA。D。44,buthadnotcomeintogeneralusebeforethepersecutionbyNero。"Tacitus,"hesays,"usesthewordChristianswithsomethingofapology。ItiswellknownthatintheN。T。itonlyoccursthreetimes,andalwaysinvolvesahostilesense(Actsxi。26,xxvi。28asitdoesiniv。16)。"ItwasnotClaudiusalonewholookedwithalarmandsuspicionontheChristians,sonicknamedinderisionfortheircarnalizingasubjectiveprincipleorattribute,butallthepagannations。ForTacitus,speakingofthosewhomthemassescalled"Christians,"describesthemasasetofmendetestedfortheirenormitiesandcrimes。Nowonder,forhistoryrepeatsitself。Thereare,nodoubt,thousandsofnoble,sincere,andvirtuousChristian—bornmenandwomennow。ButwehaveonlytolookattheviciousnessofChristian"heathen"converts;atthemoralityofthoseproselytesinIndia,whomthemissionariesthemselvesdeclinetotakeintotheirservice,todrawaparallelbetweentheconvertsof1800yearsago,andthemodernheathens"touchedbygrace。"(returntotext)
22。JustinMartyr,Tertullian,Lactantius,ClemensAlexandrinus,andothersspeltitinthisway。(returntotext)
23。VideLiddellandScott’sGreekandEnglishLexicon。Chrestosisreallyonewhoiscontinuallywarned,advised,guided,whetherbyoracleorprophet。Mr。G。Masseyisnotcorrectinsayingthat"……TheGnosticformofthenameChrest,orChrestos,denotestheGoodGod,notahumanoriginal,"foritdenotedthelatter,i。e。,agood,holyman;butheisquiterightwhenheaddsthat"Chrestianussignifies……’SweetnessandLight’。"’TheChrestoi,astheGoodPeople,werepre—extant。NumerousGreekinscriptionsshowthatthedeparted,thehero,thesaintlyone——thatis,the’Good’
——wasstyledChrestos,ortheChrist;andfromthismeaningofthe’Good’doesJustin,theprimalapologist,derivetheChristianname。
ThisidentifiesitwiththeGnosticsource,andwiththe’GoodGod’whorevealedhimselfaccordingtoMarcion——thatis,theUn—NeferorGood—openeroftheEgyptiantheology。"——(AgnosticAnnual。)(returntotext)
24。AgainImustbringforwardwhatMr。
G。Masseysays(whomIquoterepeatedlybecausehehasstudiedthissubjectsothoroughlyandsoconscientiously)。
"Mycontention,orratherexplanation,"hesays,"isthattheauthoroftheChristiannameistheMummy—ChristofEgypt,calledtheKarest,whichwasatypeoftheimmortalspiritinman,theChristwithin(asPaulhasit),thedivineoffspringincarnated,theLogos,theWordofTruth,theMakheruofEgypt。Itdidnotoriginateasameretype!ThepreservedmummywasthedeadbodyofanyonethatwasKarest,ormummified,tobekeptbytheliving;and,throughconstantrepetition,thisbecameatypeoftheresurrectionfrom(notof!)thedead。"Seetheexplanationofthisfurtheron。(returntotext)
25。OrLydda。ReferenceismadeheretotheRabbinicaltraditionintheBabylonianGemara,calledSepherToledothJeshu,aboutJesusbeingthesonofonenamedPandira,andhavinglivedacenturyearlierthantheeracalledChristian,namely,duringthereignoftheJewishkingAlexanderJannaeusandhiswifeSalome,whoreignedfromtheyear106to79B。C。AccusedbytheJewsofhavinglearnedthemagicartinEgypt,andofhavingstolenfromtheHolyofHoliestheIncommunicableName,Jehoshua(Jesus)wasputtodeathbytheSanhedrinatLud。Hewasstonedandthencrucifiedonatree,ontheeveofPassover。ThenarrativeisascribedtotheTalmudisticauthorsofSotaandSanhedrin,p。19,BookofZechiel。SeeIsisUnveiled,II。201;Arnobius,Adv。
Gentes,I,43;EliphasLevi’sSciencedesEsprits,and"TheHistoricalJesusandMythicalChrist,"alecturebyG。Massey。(returntotext)
26。"Christianusquantuminterpretationedeunctionededucitas。SedutcumpreferamChrestianuspronunciatusavobis(namnecnominiscertaestnotitiapenesvos)desuavitatevelbenignitatecompositumest。"CanonFarrarmakesagreatefforttoshowsuchlapsuscalamibyvariousFathersastheresultsofdisgustandfear。"Therecanbelittledoubt,"hesays(intheEarlyDaysofChristianity)"thatthe……nameChristian……wasanick—nameduetothewitoftheAntiochians……Itisclearthatthesacredwritersavoidedthename(Christians)becauseitwasemployedbytheirenemies(Tac。Ann。
xv。44)。ItonlybecamefamiliarwhenthevirtuesofChristianshadshedlusteruponit"Thisisaverylameexcuse,andapoorexplanationtogiveforsoeminentathinkerasCanonFarrar。Astothe"virtuesofChristians"
eversheddinglusteruponthename,letushopethatthewriterhadinhismind’seyeneitherBishopCyril,ofAlexandria,norEusebius,northeEmperorConstantine,ofmurderousfame,noryetthePopesBorgiaandtheHolyInquisition。(returntotext)
27。QuotedbyG。Higgins。(SeeVol。I。,pp。569—573。)(returntotext)
28。InthedaysofHomer,wefindthiscity,oncecelebratedforitsmysteries,thechiefseatofInitiationandthenameofChrestosusedasatitleduringthemysteries。ItismentionedintheIliad。ii。,520as"Krisa。"Dr。ClarkesuspecteditsruinsunderthepresentsiteofKrestona,asmalltown,orvillagerather,inPhocis,neartheCrissaeanBay。(SeeE。D。Clarke,4thed。,Vol。viii,p。239,"Delphi。")(returntotext)
29。TherootofChrestosandChrestosisoneandthesame;[chrao]whichmeans"consultingtheoracle,"inonesense,butinanotherone"consecrated,"setapart,belongingtosometemple,ororacle,ordevotedtooracularservices。
Ontheotherhand,theword[chre(chreo)]means"obligation,"
a"bond,duty,"oronewhoisundertheobligationofpledges,orvowstaken。(returntotext)
30。Theadjective[chrestos]wasalsousedasanadjectivebeforepropernamesasacompliment,asinPlat。Theaet,p。166A,"[HoutoshoSokrateshochrestos]";(hereSocratesistheChrestos),andalsoasasurname,asshownbyPlutarch(V。Phocion),whowondershowsucharoughanddullfellowasPhocioncouldbesurnamedChrestos。(returntotext)
31。Therearestrangefeatures,quitesuggestive,foranOccultist,inthemyth(ifone)ofJanus。SomemakeofhimthepersonificationofKosmos,others,ofCoelus(heaven),henceheis"two—faced"becauseofhistwocharactersofspiritandmatter;andheisnotonly"JanusBifrons"(two—faced),butalsoQuadrifrons——theperfectsquare,theemblemoftheKabbalisticDeity。Histempleswerebuiltwithfourequalsides,withadoorandthreewindowsoneachside。Mythologistsexplainitasanemblemofthefourseasonsoftheyear,andthreemonthsineachseason,andinallofthetwelvemonthsoftheyear。DuringthemysteriesofInitiation,however,hebecametheDay—SunandtheNight—Sun。Henceheisoftenrepresentedwiththenumber300inonehand,andintheother65,orthenumberofdaysoftheSolaryear。NowChanoch(KanochandEnoshintheBible)is,asmaybeshownonKabalisticauthority,whethersonofCain,sonofSeth,orthesonofMethuselah,oneandthesamepersonage。
AsChanoch(accordingtoFuerst),"heistheInitiator,Instructor——oftheastronomicalcircleandsolaryear,"assonofMethuselah,whoissaidtohavelived365yearsandbeentakentoheavenalive,astherepresentativeoftheSun(orGod)。(SeeBookofEnoch。)
ThispatriarchhasmanyfeaturesincommonwithJanus,who,exoterically,isIonbutIAOkabalistically,orJehovah,the"LordGodofGenerations,"
themysteriousYod,orONE(aphallicnumber)。ForJanusorIonisalsoConsivius,aconserendo,becausehepresidedovergenerations。HeisshowngivinghospitalitytoSaturn(Kronos"time"),andistheInitiatoroftheyear,ortimedividedinto365。(returntotext)
32。Staurosbecamethecross,theinstrumentofcrucifixion,farlater,whenitbegantoberepresentedasaChristiansymbolandwiththeGreekletterT,theTau。(Luc。Jud。Voc。)Itsprimitivemeaningwasphallic,asymbolforthemaleandfemaleelements;
thegreatserpentoftemptation,thebodywhichhadtobekilledorsubduedbythedragonofwisdom,theseven—voweledsolarchnouphisorSpiritofChristosoftheGnostics,or,again,ApollokillingPython。(returntotext)
33。EventothisdayinIndia,thecandidateloseshisnameandasalsoinMasonry,hisage(monksandnunsalsochangingtheirChristiannamesattheirtakingtheorderorveil),andbeginscountinghisyearsfromthedayheisacceptedachelaandentersuponthecycleofinitiations。ThusSaulwas"achildofoneyear,"whenhebegantoreign,thoughagrown—upadult。See1Samuelch。xiii。1,andHebrewscrolls,abouthisinitiationbySamuel。(returntotext)
34。Demosthenes,DeCorona,313,declaresthatthecandidatesforinitiationintotheGreekmysterieswereanointedwithoil。SotheyarenowinIndia,evenintheinitiationtheYogimysteries——variousointmentsorunguentsbeingused。(returntotext)
35。BecauseheiskabalisticallythenewAdam,thecelestialman,andAdamwasmadeofredearth。(returntotext)
36。HencethememorializingofthedoctrineduringtheMYSTERIES。Thepuremonad,the"god"incarnatingandbecomingChrestos,orman,onhistrialoflife,aseriesofthosetrialsledhimtothecrucifixionofflesh,andfinallyintotheChristoscondition。
(returntotext)
37。OnthebestauthoritythederivationoftheGreekChristosisshownfromtheSanskritrootghrish="rub";thus:ghrish—a—mi—to,"torub,"andghrish—ta—s"flayed,sore。"Moreover,Krish,whichmeansinonesensetoploughandmakefurrows,meansalsotocausepain,"totorturetotorment,"andghrsh—ta—s"rubbing"——
allthesetermsrelatingtoChrestosandChristosconditions。OnehastodieinChrestos,i。e。,killone’spersonalityanditspassions,toblotouteveryideaofseparatenessfromone’s"Father,"
theDivineSpiritinman;tobecomeonewiththeeternalandabsoluteLifeandLight(SAT)beforeonecanreachthegloriousstateofChristos,theregeneratedman,themaninspiritualfreedom。(returntotext)
38。TheOrientalistsandTheologiansareinvitedtoreadoverandstudytheallegoryofVisvakarman,the"Omnificent,"theVedicGod,thearchitectoftheworld,whosacrificedhimselftohimselfortheworld,afterhavingofferedupallworlds,whicharehimself,ina"SarvaMadha"(generalsacrifice)——andponderoverit。InthePuranicallegory,hisdaughterYoga—siddha"Spiritualconsciousness,"thewifeofSurya,theSun,complainstohimofthetoogreateffulgenceofherhusband;andVisvakarma,inhischaracterofTakshaka,"woodcutterandcarpenter,"placingtheSunuponhislathecutsawayapartofhisbrightness。Suryalooks,afterthis,crownedwithdarkthornsinsteadofrays,andbecomesVikarttana("shornofhisrays")。
AllthesenamesaretermswhichwereusedbythecandidateswhengoingthroughthetrialsofInitiation。TheHierophant—InitiatorpersonatedVisvakarman;
thefather,andthegeneralartificerofthegods(theadeptsonearth),andthecandidate——Surya,theSun,whohadtokillallhisfierypassionsandwearthecrownofthornswhilecrucifyinghisbodybeforehecouldriseandbere—bornintoanewlifeastheglorified"LightoftheWorld"——Christos。NoOrientalistseemstohaveeverperceivedthesuggestiveanalogy,letalonetoapplyit!(returntotext)
39。TheauthoroftheSourceofMeasuresthinksthatthis"servestoexplainwhyithasbeenthattheLifeofApolloniusofTyana,byPhilostratus,hasbeensocarefullykeptbackfromtranslationandpopularreading。"Thosewhohavestudieditintheoriginalhavebeenforcedtothecommentthateitherthe"LifeofApolloniushasbeentakenfromtheNewTestament,orthatNewTestamentnarrativeshavebeentakenfromtheLifeofApollonius,becauseofthemanifestsamenessofthemeansofconstructionofthenarrative。"
(p。260)。(returntotext)
40。"Thewordshiach,isinHebrewthesamewordasaverbal,signifyingtogodownintothepit。Asanoun,placeofthorns,pit。ThehifilparticipleofthiswordisMessiach,ortheGreekMessias,Christ,andmeans"hewhocausestogodownintothepit"(orhell,indogmatism)。
Inesotericphilosophy,thisgoingdownintothepithasthemostmysterioussignificance。TheSpirit"Christos"orratherthe"Logos"(readLogoi),issaidto"godownintothepit,"whenitincarnatesinflesh,isbornasaman。AfterhavingrobbedtheElohim(orgods)oftheirsecret,thepro—creating"fireoflife,"
theAngelsofLightareshowncastdownintothepitorabyssofmatter,calledHell,orthebottomlesspit,bythekindtheologians。
This,inCosmogonyandAnthropology。DuringtheMysteries,however,itistheChrestos,neophyte,(asman),etc。,whohadtodescendintothecryptsofInitiationandtrials;andfinally,duringthe"SleepofSiloam"orthefinaltrancecondition,duringthehoursofwhichthenewInitiatehasthelastandfinalmysteriesofbeingdivulgedtohim。Hades,Scheol,orPatala,areallone。ThesametakesplaceintheEastnow,astookplace2,000yearsagointheWest,duringtheMYSTERIES。(returntotext)
41。Severalclassicsbeartestimonytothisfact。
Lucian,c。16says[Phokionhochrestos],and[Phokionhoepiklen]
([legomenos],surnamed)[chrestos]。InPhaedr。p。226E;
itiswritten,"youmeanTheodorustheChrestos。""[TonchrestonlegeisTheodoron]。"Plutarchshowsthesame;and[Chrestos]——Chrestus,isthepropername(seethewordinThesaur。Steph。)ofanoratoranddiscipleofHerodesAtticus。(returntotext)
H。P。Blavatsky,"TheEsotericCharacteroftheGospels"pt3TheEsotericCharacteroftheGospelsPartIII
NoonecanberegardedasaChristianunlessheprofesses,orissupposedtoprofess,beliefinJesus,bybaptism,andinsalvation,"throughthebloodofChrist。"TobeconsideredagoodChristian,onehas,asaconditiosinequanon,toshowfaithinthedogmasexpoundedbytheChurchandtoprofessthem;afterwhichamanisatlibertytoleadaprivateandpubliclifeonprinciplesdiametricallyoppositetothoseexpressedintheSermonontheMount。Thechiefpointandthatwhichisdemandedofhimis,thatheshouldhave——orpretendtohave——ablindfaithin,andvenerationfor,theecclesiasticalteachingsofhisspecialChurch。"FaithisthekeyofChristendom,"saithChaucer,andthepenaltyforlackingitisasclearlystatedaswordscanmakeit,inSt。Mark’sGospel,Chapterxvi。,verse16th:
"Hethatbelievethandisbaptizedshallbesaved;buthethatbelievethnotshallbedamned。"
IttroublestheChurchverylittlethatthemostcarefulsearchforthesewordsintheoldesttextsduringthelastcenturiesremainedfruitless;
or,thattherecentrevisionoftheBibleledtoaunanimousconvictioninthetruth—seekingandtruth—lovingscholarsemployedinthattask,thatnosuchun—Christ—likesentencewastobefound,exceptinsomeofthelatest,fraudulenttexts。ThegoodChristianpeoplehadassimilatedtheconsolingwords,andtheyhadbecometheverypithandmarrowoftheircharitablesouls。Totakeawaythehopeofeternaldamnation,forallothersexceptthemselves,fromthesechosenvesselsoftheGodofIsrael,wasliketakingtheirverylife。Thetruth—lovingandGod—fearingrevisersgotscared;theylefttheforgedpassage(aninterpolationofelevenverses,fromthe9thtothe20th),andsatisfiedtheirconscienceswithafoot—noteremarkofaveryequivocalcharacter,onethatwouldgracetheworkanddohonortothediplomaticfacultiesofthecraftiestJesuits。Ittellsthe"believer"that:——ThetwooldestGreekMSS。andsomeotherauthoritiesOMITfromverse9totheend。SomeauthoritieshaveadifferentendingtotheGospel,(42)——andexplainsnofurther。
Butthetwo"oldestGreekMSS。"omittheversesnolensvolens,asthesehaveneverexisted。Andthelearnedandtruth—lovingrevisersknowthisbetterthananyofusdo;yetthewickedfalsehoodisprintedattheveryseatofProtestantDivinity,anditisallowedtogoon,glaringintothefacesofcominggenerationsofstudentsoftheologyand,hence,intothoseoftheirfutureparishioners。Neithercanbe,noraretheydeceivedbyit,yetbothpretendbeliefintheauthenticityofthecruelwordsworthyofatheologicalSatan。AndthisSatan—MolochistheirownGodofinfinitemercyandjusticeinHeaven,andtheincarnatesymbolofloveandcharityonEarth——blendedinone!
Trulymysteriousareyourparadoxicalways,Oh——ChurchesofChrist!
Ihavenointentionofrepeatingherestaleargumentsandlogicalexposé;softhewholetheologicalscheme;forallthishasbeendone,overandoveragain,andinamostexcellentway,bytheablest"Infidels"ofEnglandandAmerica。ButImaybrieflyrepeataprophecywhichisaself—evidentresultofthepresentstateofmen’smindsinChristendom。BeliefintheBibleliterally,andinacanalizedChrist,willnotlastaquarterofacenturylonger。TheChurcheswillhavetopartwiththeircherisheddogmas,orthe20thcenturywillwitnessthedownfallandruinofallChristendom,andwithit,beliefeveninaChristos,aspureSpirit。Theverynamehasnowbecomeobnoxious,andtheologicalChristianitymustdieout,nevertoresurrectagaininitspresentform。This,initself,wouldbethehappiestsolutionofall,weretherenodangerfromthenaturalreactionwhichissuretofollow:crassmaterialismwillbetheconsequenceandtheresultofcenturiesofblindfaith,unlessthelossofoldidealsisreplacedbyotherideals,unassailable,becauseuniversal,andbuiltontherockofeternaltruths,insteadoftheshiftingsandsofhumanfancy。Pureimmaterialitymustreplace,intheend,theterribleanthropomorphismofthoseidealsintheconceptionsofourmoderndogmatists。
Otherwise,whyshouldChristiandogmas——theperfectcounterpartofthosebelongingtootherexotericandpaganreligions——claimanysuperiority?
Thebodiesofallthesewerebuiltuponthesameastronomicalandphysiological(orphallic)symbols。Astrologically,everyreligiousdogmatheworldover,maybetracedto,andlocatedin,theZodiacalsignsandtheSun。Andsolongasthescienceofcomparativesymbologyoranytheologyhasonlytwokeystoopenthemysteriesofreligiousdogmas——andthesetwoonlyverypartiallymastered,howcanalineofdemarcationbedrawn,oranydifferencemadebetweenthereligionsofsay,ChrishnaandChrist,betweensalvationthroughthebloodofthe"first—bornprimevalmale"ofonefaith,andthatofthe"onlybegottenSon"oftheother,faryounger,religion?
StudytheVedas;readeventhesuperficial,oftendisfiguredwritingsofourgreatOrientalists,andthinkoverwhatyouwillhavelearnt。BeholdBrahmans,EgyptianHierophants,andChaldeanMagi,teachingseveralthousandyearsbeforeourerathatthegodsthemselveshadbeenonlymortals(inpreviousbirths)untiltheywontheirimmortalitybyofferingtheirbloodtotheirSupremeGodorchief。TheBookoftheDead,teachesthatmortalman"becameonewiththegodsthroughaninterflowofacommonlifeinthecommonbloodofthetwo。"Mortalsgavethebloodoftheirfirst—bornsonsinsacrificetotheGods。InhisHinduism,p。35,ProfessorMonierWilliams,translatingfromtheTaitiriyaBrahmana,writes:
——"Bymeansofthesacrificethegodsobtainedheaven。"AndintheTandyaBrahmana:——"Thelordofcreaturesofferedhimselfasacrificeforthegods。"……AndagainintheSatapathaBrahmana:——"Hewho,knowingthis,sacrificeswiththePurusha—medhaorthesacrificeoftheprimevalmale,becomeseverything。"
WheneverIheartheVedicritesdiscussedandcalled"disgustinghumansacrifices,"andcannibalism(sic。),Ifeelalwaysinclinedtoask,where’sthedifference?Yetthereisone,infact;forwhileChristiansarecompelledtoaccepttheallegorical(though,whenunderstood,highlyphilosophical)dramaoftheNewTestamentCrucifixion,asthatofAbrahamandIsaacliterally(43),Brahmanism——itsphilosophicalschoolsatanyrate——teachesitsadherents,thatthis(pagan)sacrificeofthe"primevalmale"isapurelyallegoricalandphilosophicalsymbol。Readintheirdead—lettermeaning,thefourgospelsaresimplyslightlyalteredversionsofwhattheChurchproclaimsasSatanicplagiarisms(byanticipation)ofChristiandogmasinPaganreligions。Materialismhasaperfectrighttofindinallofthemthesamesensualworshipand"solar"
mythsasanywhereelse。Analyzedandcriticizedsuperficiallyandonitsdead—letterface,ProfessorJoly("ManbeforeMetals,"pp。189—190)findingintheSvastika,thecruxansata,andthecrosspureandsimple,meresexualsymbols——isjustifiedinspeakingashedoes。Seeingthat"thefatherofthesacredfire(inIndia)borethenameofTwashtri,thatisthedivinecarpenterwhomadetheSwastikaandthePramantha,whosefrictionproducedthedivinechildAgni,inLatinIgnis;thathismotherwasnamedMaya;hehimself,styledAkta(anointed,orChristos)afterthepriestshadpoureduponhisheadthespirituoussomaandonhisbodybutterpurifiedbysacrifice";seeingallthishehasafullrighttoremarkthat:ThecloseresemblancewhichexistsbetweencertainceremoniesoftheworshipofAgniandcertainritesoftheCatholicreligionmaybeexplainedbytheircommonorigin。AgniintheconditionofAkta,oranointed,issuggestiveofChrist;Maya,Mary,hismother;Twashtri,St。Joseph,thecarpenteroftheBible。HastheprofessoroftheScienceFacultyofToulouseexplainedanythingbydrawingattentiontothatwhichanyonecansee?Ofcoursenot。Butif,inhisignoranceoftheesotericmeaningoftheallegoryhehasaddednothingtohumanknowledge,hehasontheotherhanddestroyedfaithinmanyofhispupilsinboththe"divineorigin"orChristianityanditsChurchandhelpedtoincreasethenumberofMaterialists。Forsurely,noman,oncehedevoteshimselftosuchcomparativestudies,canregardthereligionoftheWestinanylightbutthatofapaleandenfeebledcopyofolderandnoblerphilosophies。
Theoriginofallreligions——Judaeo—Christianityincluded——istobefoundinafewprimevaltruths,notoneofwhichcanbeexplainedapartfromalltheothers,aseachisacomplementoftherestinsomeonedetail。
Andtheyareall,moreorless,brokenraysofthesameSunoftruth,andtheirbeginningshavetobesoughtinthearchaicrecordsoftheWisdom—religion。
Withoutthelightofthelatter,thegreatestscholarscanseebuttheskeletonsthereofcoveredwithmasksoffancy,andbasedmostlyonpersonifiedZodiacalsigns。
Athickfilmofallegoryandblinds,the"darksayings"
offictionandparable,thuscoverstheoriginalesoterictextsfromwhichtheNewTestament——asnowknown——wascompiled。Whence,then,theGospels,thelifeofJesusofNazareth?Hasitnotbeenrepeatedlystatedthatnohuman,mortalbraincouldhaveinventedthelifeoftheJewishReformer,followedbytheawfuldramaonCalvary?Wesay,ontheauthorityoftheesotericEasternSchool,thatallthiscamefromtheGnostics,asfarasthenameChristosandtheastronomico—mysticalallegoriesareconcerned,andfromthewritingsoftheancientTanaimasregardstheKabalisticconnectionofJesusorJoshua,withtheBiblicalpersonifications。OneoftheseisthemysticesotericnameofJehovah——
notthepresentfancifulGodoftheprofaneJewsignorantoftheirownmysteries,theGodacceptedbythestillmoreignorantChristians——butthecompoundJehovahofthepaganInitiation。ThisisprovenveryplainlybytheglyphsormysticcombinationsofvarioussignswhichhavesurvivedtothisdayintheRomanCatholichieroglyphics。
TheGnosticRecordscontainedtheepitomeofthechiefscenesenactedduringthemysteriesofinitiation,sincethememoryofman;thougheventhatwasgivenoutinvariablyunderthegarbofsemi—allegory,wheneverentrustedtoparchmentorpaper。ButtheancientTanaim,theInitiatesfromwhomthewisdomoftheKabala(oraltradition)wasobtainedbythelaterTalmudists,hadintheirpossessionthesecretsofthemysterylanguage,anditisinthislanguagethattheGospelswerewritten。(44)Healonewhohasmasteredtheesotericcipherofantiquity——thesecretmeaningofthenumerals,acommonpropertyatonetimeofallnations——hasthefullproofofthegeniuswhichwasdisplayedintheblendingofthepurelyEgypto—Jewish,OldTestamentallegoriesandnames,andthoseofthepagan—GreekGnostics,themostrefinedofallthemysticsofthatday。BishopNewtonprovesithimselfquiteinnocently,byshowingthat"St。Barnabas,thecompanionofSt。Paul,inhisepistle(ch。ix。)discovers……thenameofJesuscrucifiedinthenumber318,"
namely,BarnabasfindsitinthemysticGreekIHT——thetaubeingtheglyphofthecross。Onthis,aKabalist,theauthorofanunpublishedMS。ontheKeyofFormationoftheMysteryLanguage,observes:——ButthisisbutaplayupontheHebrewlettersJodh,Cheth,andShin,fromwhencetheIHSasthemonogramofChristcomingdowntoourday,andthisreadsas[JChSh]
or381,andsumofthelettersbeing318orthenumberofAbrahamandhisSatan,andofJoshuaandhisAmalek……alsothenumberofJacobandhisantagonist……(GodfreyHigginsgivestheauthorityforthenumber608)……ItisthenumberofMelchizedek’sname,forthevalueofthelastis304andMelchizedekwasthepriestofthemosthighGod,withoutbeginningorendingofdays。ThesolutionandsecretofMelchizedekarefoundinthefactthat:——intheancientPantheonsthetwoplanetswhichhadexistedfrometernity(aeoniceternity)andwereeternal,weretheSunandtheMoon,orOsirisandIsis,hencethetermsofwithoutbeginningorendingofdays。304multipliedbytwois608。SoalsothenumbersinthewordSeth,whowasatypeoftheyear。Thereareanumberofauthoritiesforthenumber888asapplyingtothenameofJesusChrist,andassaidthisisinantagonismtothe666oftheAnti—Christ……ThestaplevalueinthenameofJoshuawasthenumber365,theindicationoftheSolaryear,whileJehovahdelightedinbeingtheindicationoftheLunaryear——andJesusChristwasbothJoshuaandJehovahintheChristianPantheon。ThisisbutanillustrationtoourpointtoprovethattheChristianapplicationofthecompoundnameJesus—ChristisallbasedonGnosticandEasternmysticism。ItwasonlyrightandnaturalthatChroniclersliketheinitiatedGnostics,pledgedtosecrecy,shouldveilorcloakthefinalmeaningoftheiroldestandmostsacredteachings。TherightoftheChurchfatherstocoverthewholewithanepithemeofeuhemerizedfancyisrathermoredubious。(45)TheGnosticScribeandChroniclerdeceivednoone。EveryInitiateintotheArchaicgnosis——whetherofthepre—Christianorpost—Christianperiod——knewwellthevalueofeverywordofthe"mystery—language。"FortheseGnostics——theinspirersofprimitiveChristianity——were"themostcultured,themostlearnedandmostwealthyoftheChristianname,"asGibbonhasit。Neitherthey,northeirhumblerfollowers,wereindangerofacceptingthedeadletteroftheirowntexts。ButitwasdifferentwiththevictimsofthefabricatorsofwhatisnowcalledorthodoxandhistoricChristianity。Theirsuccessorshaveallbeenmadetofallintothemistakesofthe"foolishGalatians"reprovedbyPaul,who,ashetellsthem(Galat。iii。
1—5),havingbegun(bybelieving)intheSpirit(ofChristos),"endedbybelievingintheflesh,"——i。e。,acorporealChrist。
ForsuchisthetruemeaningoftheGreeksentence(46),"[enarzamenoiPneumati,nunsarkiepiteleisthe。]"ThatPaulwasagnostic,afounderofanewsectofgnosiswhichrecognized,asallothergnosticsectsdid,a"Christ—Spirit,"thoughitwentagainstitsopponents,therivalsects,issufficientlycleartoallbutdogmatistsandtheologians。NorisitlessclearthattheprimitiveteachingsofJesus,wheneverhemayhavelived,couldbediscoveredonlyinGnosticteachings;
againstwhichdiscovery,thefalsifierswhodraggeddownSpiritintomatter,thusdegradingthenoblephilosophyofprimevalWisdom—Religion,havetakenampleprecautionsfromthefirst。TheworksofBasilidesalone——"ThephilosopherdevotedtothecontemplationofDivinethings,"asClementdescribeshim——the24volumesofhisinterpretationsupontheGospels——wereallburnedbyorderoftheChurch,Eusebiustellsus(Hist。Ecctes。,iv。7)。
AstheseInterpretationswerewrittenatatimewhentheGospelswehavenow,werenotyetinexistence(47),hereisagoodproofthattheEvangel,thedoctrinesofwhichweredeliveredtoBasilidesbytheApostleMatthew,andGlaucus,thediscipleofPeter(ClemensAl。Strom。vii。7,§;106),musthavedifferedwidelyfromthepresentNewTestament。NorcanthesedoctrinesbejudgedbythedistortedaccountsofthemlefttoposteritybyTertullian。Yeteventhelittlethispartisanfanaticgives,showsthechiefgnosticdoctrinestobeidentical,undertheirownpeculiarterminologyandpersonations,withthoseoftheSecretDoctrineoftheEast。For,discussingBasilides,the"pious,god—like,theosophicphilosopher,"
asClementofAlexandriathoughthim,Tertullianexclaims:Afterthis,Basilides,theHeretic,brokeloose。
(48)HeassertedthatthereisaSupremeGod,bynameAbraxas,bywhomMind[Mahat]wascreatedwhichtheGreekscallNous。FromthisemanatedtheWord;fromtheWord,Providence;fromProvidence,VirtueandWisdom;fromthesetwoagain,Virtues,Principalities(49),andPowersweremade;thenceinfiniteproductionsandemissionsofangels。Amongthelowestangels,indeed,andthosethatmadethisworld,hesetslastofallthegodoftheJews,whomhedeniestobeGodhimself,affirmingthatheisbutoneoftheangels。(50)(IsisUnveiled,II,289)AnotherproofoftheclaimthattheGospelofMatthewintheusualGreektextsisnottheoriginalgospelwritteninHebrew,isgivenbynolessanauthoritythanSt。Jerome(orHieronymus)。ThesuspicionofaconsciousandgradualeuhemerizationoftheChristprincipleeversincethebeginning,growsintoaconviction,oncethatonebecomesacquaintedwithacertainconfessioncontainedinbookii。
oftheComment。toMatthewbyHieronymus。Forwefindinittheproofsofadeliberatesubstitutionofthewholegospel,theonenowintheCanonhavingbeenevidentlyrewrittenbythistoozealousChurchFather。
(51)Hesaysthathewassenttowardthecloseofthefourthcenturyby"theirFelicities,"theBishopsChromatiusandHeliodorustoCaesarea,withthemissiontocomparetheGreektext(theonlyonetheyeverhad)withtheHebreworiginalversionpreservedbytheNazarenesintheirlibrary,andtotranslateit。Hetranslatedit,butunderprotest;for,ashesays,theEvangel"exhibitedmatternotforedification,butfordestruction。"(52)
The"destruction"ofwhat?OfthedogmathatJesusofNazarethandtheChristosareone——evidently;henceforthe"destruction"ofthenewlyplannedreligion。(53)InthissamelettertheSaint(whoadvisedhisconvertstokilltheirfathers,trampleonthebosomthatfedthem,bywalkingoverthebodiesoftheirmothers,iftheparentsstoodasanobstaclebetweentheirsonsandChrist)——admitsthatMatthewdidnotwishhisgospeltobeopenlywritten,hencethattheMS。wasasecretone。Butwhileadmittingalsothatthisgospel"waswritteninHebrewcharactersandbythehandofhimself"
(Matthew),yetinanotherplacehecontradictshimselfandassuresposteritythatasitwastamperedwithandre—writtenbyadiscipleofManicheus,namedSeleucus……"theearsoftheChurchproperlyrefusedtolistentoit。"(Hieronymus,Comment。toMatthew,bookii。chapterxii。,13。)
NowonderthattheverymeaningofthetermsChrestosandChristos,andthebearingofbothon"JesusofNazareth,"anamecoinedoutofJoshuatheNazar,hasnowbecomeadeadletterforallwiththeexceptionofnon—ChristianOccultists。ForeventheKabalistshavenooriginaldatanowtorelyupon。TheZoharandtheKabalahavebeenremodeledbyChristianhandsoutofrecognition;andwereitnotforacopyoftheChaldeanBookofNumberstherewouldremainnobetterthangarbledaccounts。LetnotourBrothers,theso—calledChristianKabalistsofEnglandandFrance,manyofwhomareTheosophists,protesttoovehemently;forthisishistory(SeeMunk)。Itisasfoolishtomaintain,assomeGermanOrientalistsandmoderncriticsstilldo,thattheKabalahasneverexistedbeforethedayoftheSpanishJew,MosesdeLeon,accusedofhavingforgedthispseudographinthe13thcentury,astoclaimthatanyoftheKabalisticalworksnowinourpossessionareasoriginalastheywerewhenRabbiSimeonBenJochaideliveredthe"traditionstohissonsandfollowers。Notasingleofthesebooksisimmaculate,nonehasescapedmutilationbyChristianhands。Munk,oneofthemostlearnedandablecriticsofhisdayonthissubject,provesit,whileprotestingaswedo,againsttheassumptionthatitisapost—Christianforgery,forhesays:Itappearsevidenttousthattheauthormadeuseofancientdocuments,andamongtheseofcertainMidraschimorcollectionsoftraditionsandBiblicalexpositions,whichwedonotnowpossess。Afterwhich,quotingfromTholuck(1。c。pp。24and31),headds:"HayaGaon,whodiedin1038,istoourknowledgethefirstauthorwhodevelopedthetheoryoftheSephirothandhegavetothemthenameswhichwefindagaintobeamongtheKabalists(Tellenik,MosesbenSchemTobdiLeon,p。13,note5);thisdoctor,whohadintimateintercoursewiththeSyrianandChaldeanChristiansavans,wasenabledbytheselasttoacquireaknowledgeofsomeoftheGnosticwritings。"Which"Gnosticwritings"andesoterictenetspassedpartandparcelintotheKabalisticworks,withmanymoremoderninterpolationsthatwenowfindintheZohar,asMunkwellproves。TheKabalaisChristiannow,notJewish。
Thus,whatwithseveralgenerationsofmostactiveChurchFatherseverworkingatthedestructionofolddocumentsandthepreparationofnewpassagestobeinterpolatedinthosewhichhappenedtosurvive,thereremainsoftheGnostics——thelegitimateoffspringoftheArchaicWisdom—religion——butafewunrecognizableshreds。Butaparticleofgenuinegoldwillglitterforever;and,howevergarbledtheaccountsleftbyTertullianandEpiphaniusoftheDoctrinesofthe"Heretics,"anoccultistcanyetfindeveninthemtracesofthoseprimevaltruthswhichwereonceuniversallyimpartedduringthemysteriesofInitiation。Amongotherworkswithmostsuggestiveallegoriesinthem,wehavestilltheso—calledApocryphalGospels,andthelastdiscoveredasthemostpreciousrelicofGnosticliterature,afragmentcalledPistis—Sophia,"Knowledge—Wisdom。"
InmynextarticleupontheEsotericcharacteroftheGospels,IhopetobeabletodemonstratethatthosewhotranslatePistisby"Faith,"
areutterlywrong。Theword"faith"asgraceorsomethingtobebelievedinthroughunreasonedorblindfaith,isawordthatdatesonlysinceChristianity。NorhasPauleverusedthisterminthissenseinhisEpistles;andPaulwasundeniablyanINITIATE。(ThisserieswasnevercompletedbyH。P。B。)
FOOTNOTES:
42。Vide"GospelaccordingtoSt。Mark,"
intherevisededitionprintedfortheUniversitiesofOxfordandCambridge,1881。(returntotext)
43。Vide"TheSoldier’sDaughter,"Lucifer,vol。I,No。6,bytheRev。T。G。Headley,andnoticethedesperateprotestofthistrueChristian,againsttheliteralacceptanceofthe"bloodsacrifices,""Atonementbyblood,"etc。,intheChurchofEngland。
Thereactionbegins:anothersignofthetimes。(returntotext)
44。ThuswhilethethreeSynopticsdisplayacombinationofthepaganGreekandJewishsymbologiestheRevelationiswritteninthemysterylanguageoftheTanaim——therelicofEgyptianandChaldeanwisdom——andSt。John’sGospelispurelyGnostic。
(returntotext)
45。"TheclaimofChristianitytopossessDivineauthorityrestsontheignorantbeliefthatthemysticalChristcouldanddidbecomeaPerson,whereasthegnosisprovesthecorporealChristtobeonlyacounterfeitPresentmentofthetrans—corporealman;consequently,historicalportraitureis,andevermustbe,afatalmodeoffalsifyinganddiscreditingtheSpiritualReality。"(G。Massey,"GnosticandHistoricChristianity。")(returntotext)
46。Thissentenceanalyzedmeans"Shallyou,whointhebeginninglookedtotheChrist—Spirit,nowendbybelievinginaChristofflesh,"oritmeansnothing。Theverb[epiteloumai]
hasnotthemeaningof"becomingperfect,"butof"endingby,"becomingso。Paul’slifelongstrugglewithPeterandothers,andwhathehimselftellsofhisvisionofaSpiritualChristandnotofJesusofNazareth,asintheActs——aresomanyproofsofthis。(returntotext)
47。SeeSupernaturalReligion,vol。