首页 >出版文学> Orthodoxy>第7章

第7章

  Lethim,forinstance,comparetheclassesofEuropewiththecastesofIndia。Therearistocracyisfarmoreawful,becauseitisfarmoreintellectual。Itisseriouslyfeltthatthescaleofclassesisascaleofspiritualvalues;thatthebakerisbetterthanthebutcherinaninvisibleandsacredsense。ButnoChristianity,noteventhemostignorantorperverse,eversuggestedthatabaronetwasbetterthanabutcherinthatsacredsense。NoChristianity,howeverignorantorextravagant,eversuggestedthatadukewouldnotbedamned。Inpagansocietytheremayhavebeen(Idonotknow)
  somesuchseriousdivisionbetweenthefreemanandtheslave。
  ButinChristiansocietywehavealwaysthoughtthegentlemanasortofjoke,thoughIadmitthatinsomegreatcrusadesandcouncilsheearnedtherighttobecalledapracticaljoke。
  ButweinEuropeneverreallyandattherootofoursoulstookaristocracyseriously。Itisonlyanoccasionalnon-Europeanalien(suchasDr。OscarLevy,theonlyintelligentNietzscheite)
  whocanevenmanageforamomenttotakearistocracyseriously。
  Itmaybeamerepatrioticbias,thoughIdonotthinkso,butitseemstomethattheEnglisharistocracyisnotonlythetype,butisthecrownandflowerofallactualaristocracies;ithasalltheoligarchicalvirtuesaswellasallthedefects。Itiscasual,itiskind,itiscourageousinobviousmatters;butithasonegreatmeritthatoverlapseventhese。ThegreatandveryobviousmeritoftheEnglisharistocracyisthatnobodycouldpossiblytakeitseriously。
  Inshort,Ihadspelledoutslowly,asusual,theneedforanequallawinUtopia;and,asusual,IfoundthatChristianityhadbeentherebeforeme。ThewholehistoryofmyUtopiahasthesameamusingsadness。Iwasalwaysrushingoutofmyarchitecturalstudywithplansforanewturretonlytofinditsittingupthereinthesunlight,shining,andathousandyearsold。Forme,intheancientandpartlyinthemodernsense,Godansweredtheprayer,"Preventus,OLord,inallourdoings。"Withoutvanity,IreallythinktherewasamomentwhenIcouldhaveinventedthemarriagevow(asaninstitution)outofmyownhead;butIdiscovered,withasigh,thatithadbeeninventedalready。But,sinceitwouldbetoolongabusinesstoshowhow,factbyfactandinchbyinch,myownconceptionofUtopiawasonlyansweredintheNewJerusalem,Iwilltakethisonecaseofthematterofmarriageasindicatingtheconvergingdrift,Imaysaytheconvergingcrashofalltherest。
  WhentheordinaryopponentsofSocialismtalkaboutimpossibilitiesandalterationsinhumannaturetheyalwaysmissanimportantdistinction。Inmodernidealconceptionsofsocietytherearesomedesiresthatarepossiblynotattainable:buttherearesomedesiresthatarenotdesirable。Thatallmenshouldliveinequallybeautifulhousesisadreamthatmayormaynotbeattained。
  Butthatallmenshouldliveinthesamebeautifulhouseisnotadreamatall;itisanightmare。Thatamanshouldlovealloldwomenisanidealthatmaynotbeattainable。Butthatamanshouldregardalloldwomenexactlyasheregardshismotherisnotonlyanunattainableideal,butanidealwhichoughtnottobeattained。
  Idonotknowifthereaderagreeswithmeintheseexamples;
  butIwilladdtheexamplewhichhasalwaysaffectedmemost。
  IcouldneverconceiveortolerateanyUtopiawhichdidnotleavetomethelibertyforwhichIchieflycare,thelibertytobindmyself。
  Completeanarchywouldnotmerelymakeitimpossibletohaveanydisciplineorfidelity;itwouldalsomakeitimpossibletohaveanyfun。Totakeanobviousinstance,itwouldnotbeworthwhiletobetifabetwerenotbinding。Thedissolutionofallcontractswouldnotonlyruinmoralitybutspoilsport。
  Nowbettingandsuchsportsareonlythestuntedandtwistedshapesoftheoriginalinstinctofmanforadventureandromance,ofwhichmuchhasbeensaidinthesepages。Andtheperils,rewards,punishments,andfulfilmentsofanadventuremustbereal,ortheadventureisonlyashiftingandheartlessnightmare。IfIbetImustbemadetopay,orthereisnopoetryinbetting。IfIchallengeImustbemadetofight,orthereisnopoetryinchallenging。
  IfIvowtobefaithfulImustbecursedwhenIamunfaithful,orthereisnofuninvowing。Youcouldnotevenmakeafairytalefromtheexperiencesofamanwho,whenhewasswallowedbyawhale,mightfindhimselfatthetopoftheEiffelTower,orwhenhewasturnedintoafrogmightbegintobehavelikeaflamingo。
  Forthepurposeevenofthewildestromanceresultsmustbereal;
  resultsmustbeirrevocable。Christianmarriageisthegreatexampleofarealandirrevocableresult;andthatiswhyitisthechiefsubjectandcentreofallourromanticwriting。
  AndthisismylastinstanceofthethingsthatIshouldask,andaskimperatively,ofanysocialparadise;Ishouldasktobekepttomybargain,tohavemyoathsandengagementstakenseriously;
  IshouldaskUtopiatoavengemyhonouronmyself。
  AllmymodernUtopianfriendslookateachotherratherdoubtfully,fortheirultimatehopeisthedissolutionofallspecialties。
  ButagainIseemtohear,likeakindofecho,ananswerfrombeyondtheworld。"Youwillhaverealobligations,andthereforerealadventureswhenyougettomyUtopia。Butthehardestobligationandthesteepestadventureistogetthere。"
  VIIITHEROMANCEOFORTHODOXY
  Itiscustomarytocomplainofthebustleandstrenuousnessofourepoch。Butintruththechiefmarkofourepochisaprofoundlazinessandfatigue;andthefactisthatthereallazinessisthecauseoftheapparentbustle。Takeonequiteexternalcase;thestreetsarenoisywithtaxicabsandmotorcars;
  butthisisnotduetohumanactivitybuttohumanrepose。
  Therewouldbelessbustleifthereweremoreactivity,ifpeopleweresimplywalkingabout。Ourworldwouldbemoresilentifitweremorestrenuous。Andthiswhichistrueoftheapparentphysicalbustleistruealsooftheapparentbustleoftheintellect。
  Mostofthemachineryofmodernlanguageislabour-savingmachinery;
  anditsavesmentallabourverymuchmorethanitought。
  Scientificphrasesareusedlikescientificwheelsandpiston-rodstomakeswifterandsmootheryetthepathofthecomfortable。
  Longwordsgorattlingbyuslikelongrailwaytrains。Weknowtheyarecarryingthousandswhoaretootiredortooindolenttowalkandthinkforthemselves。Itisagoodexercisetotryforonceinawaytoexpressanyopiniononeholdsinwordsofonesyllable。
  Ifyousay"Thesocialutilityoftheindeterminatesentenceisrecognizedbyallcriminologistsasapartofoursociologicalevolutiontowardsamorehumaneandscientificviewofpunishment,"
  youcangoontalkinglikethatforhourswithhardlyamovementofthegraymatterinsideyourskull。Butifyoubegin"IwishJonestogotogaolandBrowntosaywhenJonesshallcomeout,"
  youwilldiscover,withathrillofhorror,thatyouareobligedtothink。Thelongwordsarenotthehardwords,itistheshortwordsthatarehard。Thereismuchmoremetaphysicalsubtletyintheword"damn"thanintheword"degeneration。"
  Buttheselongcomfortablewordsthatsavemodernpeoplethetoilofreasoninghaveoneparticularaspectinwhichtheyareespeciallyruinousandconfusing。Thisdifficultyoccurswhenthesamelongwordisusedindifferentconnectionstomeanquitedifferentthings。
  Thus,totakeawell-knowninstance,theword"idealist"hasonemeaningasapieceofphilosophyandquiteanotherasapieceofmoralrhetoric。Inthesamewaythescientificmaterialistshavehadjustreasontocomplainofpeoplemixingup"materialist"
  asatermofcosmologywith"materialist"asamoraltaunt。
  So,totakeacheaperinstance,themanwhohates"progressives"
  inLondonalwayscallshimselfa"progressive"inSouthAfrica。
  Aconfusionquiteasunmeaningasthishasariseninconnectionwiththeword"liberal"asappliedtoreligionandasappliedtopoliticsandsociety。ItisoftensuggestedthatallLiberalsoughttobefreethinkers,becausetheyoughttoloveeverythingthatisfree。YoumightjustaswellsaythatallidealistsoughttobeHighChurchmen,becausetheyoughttoloveeverythingthatishigh。
  YoumightaswellsaythatLowChurchmenoughttolikeLowMass,orthatBroadChurchmenoughttolikebroadjokes。Thethingisamereaccidentofwords。InactualmodernEuropeafreethinkerdoesnotmeanamanwhothinksforhimself。Itmeansamanwho,havingthoughtforhimself,hascometooneparticularclassofconclusions,thematerialoriginofphenomena,theimpossibilityofmiracles,theimprobabilityofpersonalimmortalityandsoon。
  Andnoneoftheseideasareparticularlyliberal。Nay,indeedalmostalltheseideasaredefinitelyilliberal,asitisthepurposeofthischaptertoshow。
  InthefewfollowingpagesIproposetopointoutasrapidlyaspossiblethatoneverysingleoneofthemattersmoststronglyinsistedonbyliberalisersoftheologytheireffectuponsocialpracticewouldbedefinitelyilliberal。Almosteverycontemporaryproposaltobringfreedomintothechurchissimplyaproposaltobringtyrannyintotheworld。Forfreeingthechurchnowdoesnotevenmeanfreeingitinalldirections。Itmeansfreeingthatpeculiarsetofdogmaslooselycalledscientific,dogmasofmonism,ofpantheism,orofArianism,orofnecessity。
  Andeveryoneofthese(andwewilltakethemonebyone)
  canbeshowntobethenaturalallyofoppression。Infact,itisaremarkablecircumstance(indeednotsoveryremarkablewhenonecomestothinkofit)thatmostthingsarethealliesofoppression。
  Thereisonlyonethingthatcannevergopastacertainpointinitsalliancewithoppression——andthatisorthodoxy。Imay,itistrue,twistorthodoxysoaspartlytojustifyatyrant。
  ButIcaneasilymakeupaGermanphilosophytojustifyhimentirely。
  Nowletustakeinordertheinnovationsthatarethenotesofthenewtheologyorthemodernistchurch。Weconcludedthelastchapterwiththediscoveryofoneofthem。Theverydoctrinewhichiscalledthemostold-fashionedwasfoundtobetheonlysafeguardofthenewdemocraciesoftheearth。Thedoctrineseeminglymostunpopularwasfoundtobetheonlystrengthofthepeople。
  Inshort,wefoundthattheonlylogicalnegationofoligarchywasintheaffirmationoforiginalsin。Soitis,Imaintain,inalltheothercases。
  Itakethemostobviousinstancefirst,thecaseofmiracles。
  Forsomeextraordinaryreason,thereisafixednotionthatitismoreliberaltodisbelieveinmiraclesthantobelieveinthem。Why,Icannotimagine,norcananybodytellme。
  Forsomeinconceivablecausea"broad"or"liberal"clergymanalwaysmeansamanwhowishesatleasttodiminishthenumberofmiracles;
  itnevermeansamanwhowishestoincreasethatnumber。ItalwaysmeansamanwhoisfreetodisbelievethatChristcameoutofHisgrave;
  itnevermeansamanwhoisfreetobelievethathisownauntcameoutofhergrave。ItiscommontofindtroubleinaparishbecausetheparishpriestcannotadmitthatSt。Peterwalkedonwater;
  yethowrarelydowefindtroubleinaparishbecausetheclergymansaysthathisfatherwalkedontheSerpentine?Andthisisnotbecause(astheswiftsecularistdebaterwouldimmediatelyretort)
  miraclescannotbebelievedinourexperience。Itisnotbecause"miraclesdonothappen,"asinthedogmawhichMatthewArnoldrecitedwithsimplefaith。MoresupernaturalthingsareALLEGEDtohavehappenedinourtimethanwouldhavebeenpossibleeightyyearsago。
  Menofsciencebelieveinsuchmarvelsmuchmorethantheydid:
  themostperplexing,andevenhorrible,prodigiesofmindandspiritarealwaysbeingunveiledinmodernpsychology。Thingsthattheoldscienceatleastwouldfranklyhaverejectedasmiraclesarehourlybeingassertedbythenewscience。Theonlythingwhichisstillold-fashionedenoughtorejectmiraclesistheNewTheology。
  Butintruththisnotionthatitis"free"todenymiracleshasnothingtodowiththeevidencefororagainstthem。Itisalifelessverbalprejudiceofwhichtheoriginallifeandbeginningwasnotinthefreedomofthought,butsimplyinthedogmaofmaterialism。
  ThemanofthenineteenthcenturydidnotdisbelieveintheResurrectionbecausehisliberalChristianityallowedhimtodoubtit。
  Hedisbelievedinitbecausehisverystrictmaterialismdidnotallowhimtobelieveit。Tennyson,averytypicalnineteenthcenturyman,utteredoneoftheinstinctivetruismsofhiscontemporarieswhenhesaidthattherewasfaithintheirhonestdoubt。Therewasindeed。
  Thosewordshaveaprofoundandevenahorribletruth。Intheirdoubtofmiraclestherewasafaithinafixedandgodlessfate;
  adeepandsincerefaithintheincurableroutineofthecosmos。
  Thedoubtsoftheagnosticwereonlythedogmasofthemonist。
  OfthefactandevidenceofthesupernaturalIwillspeakafterwards。Hereweareonlyconcernedwiththisclearpoint;
  thatinsofarastheliberalideaoffreedomcanbesaidtobeoneithersideinthediscussionaboutmiracles,itisobviouslyonthesideofmiracles。Reformor(intheonlytolerablesense)
  progressmeanssimplythegradualcontrolofmatterbymind。
  Amiraclesimplymeanstheswiftcontrolofmatterbymind。Ifyouwishtofeedthepeople,youmaythinkthatfeedingthemmiraculouslyinthewildernessisimpossible——butyoucannotthinkitilliberal。
  Ifyoureallywantpoorchildrentogototheseaside,youcannotthinkitilliberalthattheyshouldgothereonflyingdragons;
  youcanonlythinkitunlikely。Aholiday,likeLiberalism,onlymeansthelibertyofman。AmiracleonlymeansthelibertyofGod。
  Youmayconscientiouslydenyeitherofthem,butyoucannotcallyourdenialatriumphoftheliberalidea。TheCatholicChurchbelievedthatmanandGodbothhadasortofspiritualfreedom。
  Calvinismtookawaythefreedomfromman,butleftittoGod。
  ScientificmaterialismbindstheCreatorHimself;itchainsupGodastheApocalypsechainedthedevil。Itleavesnothingfreeintheuniverse。Andthosewhoassistthisprocessarecalledthe"liberaltheologians。"
  This,asIsay,isthelightestandmostevidentcase。
  Theassumptionthatthereissomethinginthedoubtofmiraclesakintoliberalityorreformisliterallytheoppositeofthetruth。
  Ifamancannotbelieveinmiraclesthereisanendofthematter;
  heisnotparticularlyliberal,butheisperfectlyhonourableandlogical,whicharemuchbetterthings。Butifhecanbelieveinmiracles,heiscertainlythemoreliberalfordoingso;
  becausetheymeanfirst,thefreedomofthesoul,andsecondly,itscontroloverthetyrannyofcircumstance。Sometimesthistruthisignoredinasingularlynaiveway,evenbytheablestmen。
  Forinstance,Mr。BernardShawspeakswithheartyold-fashionedcontemptfortheideaofmiracles,asiftheywereasortofbreachoffaithonthepartofnature:heseemsstrangelyunconsciousthatmiraclesareonlythefinalflowersofhisownfavouritetree,thedoctrineoftheomnipotenceofwill。Justinthesamewayhecallsthedesireforimmortalityapaltryselfishness,forgettingthathehasjustcalledthedesireforlifeahealthyandheroicselfishness。
  Howcanitbenobletowishtomakeone’slifeinfiniteandyetmeantowishtomakeitimmortal?No,ifitisdesirablethatmanshouldtriumphoverthecrueltyofnatureorcustom,thenmiraclesarecertainlydesirable;wewilldiscussafterwardswhethertheyarepossible。
  ButImustpassontothelargercasesofthiscuriouserror;
  thenotionthatthe"liberalising"ofreligioninsomewayhelpstheliberationoftheworld。Thesecondexampleofitcanbefoundinthequestionofpantheism——orratherofacertainmodernattitudewhichisoftencalledimmanentism,andwhichoftenisBuddhism。
  ButthisissomuchmoredifficultamatterthatImustapproachitwithrathermorepreparation。
  Thethingssaidmostconfidentlybyadvancedpersonstocrowdedaudiencesaregenerallythosequiteoppositetothefact;
  itisactuallyourtruismsthatareuntrue。Hereisacase。
  Thereisaphraseoffacileliberalityutteredagainandagainatethicalsocietiesandparliamentsofreligion:"thereligionsoftheearthdifferinritesandforms,buttheyarethesameinwhattheyteach。"Itisfalse;itistheoppositeofthefact。
  Thereligionsoftheearthdonotgreatlydifferinritesandforms;
  theydogreatlydifferinwhattheyteach。Itisasifamanweretosay,"DonotbemisledbythefactthattheCHURCHTIMES
  andtheFREETHINKERlookutterlydifferent,thatoneispaintedonvellumandtheothercarvedonmarble,thatoneistriangularandtheotherhectagonal;readthemandyouwillseethattheysaythesamething。"Thetruthis,ofcourse,thattheyarealikeineverythingexceptinthefactthattheydon’tsaythesamething。
  AnatheiststockbrokerinSurbitonlooksexactlylikeaSwedenborgianstockbrokerinWimbledon。YoumaywalkroundandroundthemandsubjectthemtothemostpersonalandoffensivestudywithoutseeinganythingSwedenborgianinthehatoranythingparticularlygodlessintheumbrella。Itisexactlyintheirsoulsthattheyaredivided。Sothetruthisthatthedifficultyofallthecreedsoftheearthisnotasallegedinthischeapmaxim:thattheyagreeinmeaning,butdifferinmachinery。Itisexactlytheopposite。
  Theyagreeinmachinery;almosteverygreatreligiononearthworkswiththesameexternalmethods,withpriests,scriptures,altars,swornbrotherhoods,specialfeasts。Theyagreeinthemodeofteaching;whattheydifferaboutisthethingtobetaught。
  PaganoptimistsandEasternpessimistswouldbothhavetemples,justasLiberalsandTorieswouldbothhavenewspapers。Creedsthatexisttodestroyeachotherbothhavescriptures,justasarmiesthatexisttodestroyeachotherbothhaveguns。
  ThegreatexampleofthisallegedidentityofallhumanreligionsistheallegedspiritualidentityofBuddhismandChristianity。
  Thosewhoadoptthistheorygenerallyavoidtheethicsofmostothercreeds,except,indeed,Confucianism,whichtheylikebecauseitisnotacreed。ButtheyarecautiousintheirpraisesofMahommedanism,generallyconfiningthemselvestoimposingitsmoralityonlyupontherefreshmentofthelowerclasses。
  TheyseldomsuggesttheMahommedanviewofmarriage(forwhichthereisagreatdealtobesaid),andtowardsThugsandfetishworshipperstheirattitudemayevenbecalledcold。ButinthecaseofthegreatreligionofGautamatheyfeelsincerelyasimilarity。
  Studentsofpopularscience,likeMr。Blatchford,arealwaysinsistingthatChristianityandBuddhismareverymuchalike,especiallyBuddhism。Thisisgenerallybelieved,andIbelieveditmyselfuntilIreadabookgivingthereasonsforit。
  Thereasonswereoftwokinds:resemblancesthatmeantnothingbecausetheywerecommontoallhumanity,andresemblanceswhichwerenotresemblancesatall。Theauthorsolemnlyexplainedthatthetwocreedswerealikeinthingsinwhichallcreedsarealike,orelsehedescribedthemasalikeinsomepointinwhichtheyarequiteobviouslydifferent。Thus,asacaseofthefirstclass,hesaidthatbothChristandBuddhawerecalledbythedivinevoicecomingoutofthesky,asifyouwouldexpectthedivinevoicetocomeoutofthecoal-cellar。Or,again,itwasgravelyurgedthatthesetwoEasternteachers,byasingularcoincidence,bothhadtodowiththewashingoffeet。Youmightaswellsaythatitwasaremarkablecoincidencethattheybothhadfeettowash。Andtheotherclassofsimilaritieswerethosewhichsimplywerenotsimilar。
  ThusthisreconcilerofthetworeligionsdrawsearnestattentiontothefactthatatcertainreligiousfeaststherobeoftheLamaisrentinpiecesoutofrespect,andtheremnantshighlyvalued。
  Butthisisthereverseofaresemblance,forthegarmentsofChristwerenotrentinpiecesoutofrespect,butoutofderision;
  andtheremnantswerenothighlyvaluedexceptforwhattheywouldfetchintheragshops。Itisratherlikealludingtotheobviousconnectionbetweenthetwoceremoniesofthesword:whenittapsaman’sshoulder,andwhenitcutsoffhishead。Itisnotatallsimilarfortheman。Thesescrapsofpuerilepedantrywouldindeedmatterlittleifitwerenotalsotruethattheallegedphilosophicalresemblancesarealsoofthesetwokinds,eitherprovingtoomuchornotprovinganything。ThatBuddhismapprovesofmercyorofself-restraintisnottosaythatitisspeciallylikeChristianity;
  itisonlytosaythatitisnotutterlyunlikeallhumanexistence。
  Buddhistsdisapproveintheoryofcrueltyorexcessbecauseallsanehumanbeingsdisapproveintheoryofcrueltyorexcess。
  ButtosaythatBuddhismandChristianitygivethesamephilosophyofthesethingsissimplyfalse。Allhumanitydoesagreethatweareinanetofsin。Mostofhumanityagreesthatthereissomewayout。
  Butastowhatisthewayout,IdonotthinkthattherearetwoinstitutionsintheuniversewhichcontradicteachothersoflatlyasBuddhismandChristianity。
  EvenwhenIthought,withmostotherwell-informed,thoughunscholarly,people,thatBuddhismandChristianitywerealike,therewasonethingaboutthemthatalwaysperplexedme;
  Imeanthestartlingdifferenceintheirtypeofreligiousart。
  Idonotmeaninitstechnicalstyleofrepresentation,butinthethingsthatitwasmanifestlymeanttorepresent。
  NotwoidealscouldbemoreoppositethanaChristiansaintinaGothiccathedralandaBuddhistsaintinaChinesetemple。
  Theoppositionexistsateverypoint;butperhapstheshorteststatementofitisthattheBuddhistsaintalwayshashiseyesshut,whiletheChristiansaintalwayshasthemverywideopen。
  TheBuddhistsainthasasleekandharmoniousbody,buthiseyesareheavyandsealedwithsleep。Themediaevalsaint’sbodyiswastedtoitscrazybones,buthiseyesarefrightfullyalive。
  Therecannotbeanyrealcommunityofspiritbetweenforcesthatproducedsymbolssodifferentasthat。Grantedthatbothimagesareextravagances,areperversionsofthepurecreed,itmustbearealdivergencewhichcouldproducesuchoppositeextravagances。
  TheBuddhistislookingwithapeculiarintentnessinwards。
  TheChristianisstaringwithafranticintentnessoutwards。Ifwefollowthatcluesteadilyweshallfindsomeinterestingthings。
  AshorttimeagoMrs。Besant,inaninterestingessay,announcedthattherewasonlyonereligionintheworld,thatallfaithswereonlyversionsorperversionsofit,andthatshewasquitepreparedtosaywhatitwas。AccordingtoMrs。BesantthisuniversalChurchissimplytheuniversalself。Itisthedoctrinethatwearereallyalloneperson;thattherearenorealwallsofindividualitybetweenmanandman。IfImayputitso,shedoesnottellustoloveourneighbours;shetellsustobeourneighbours。
  ThatisMrs。Besant’sthoughtfulandsuggestivedescriptionofthereligioninwhichallmenmustfindthemselvesinagreement。
  AndIneverheardofanysuggestioninmylifewithwhichImoreviolentlydisagree。IwanttolovemyneighbournotbecauseheisI,butpreciselybecauseheisnotI。Iwanttoadoretheworld,notasonelikesalooking-glass,becauseitisone’sself,butasonelovesawoman,becausesheisentirelydifferent。
  Ifsoulsareseparateloveispossible。Ifsoulsareunitedloveisobviouslyimpossible。Amanmaybesaidlooselytolovehimself,buthecanhardlyfallinlovewithhimself,or,ifhedoes,itmustbeamonotonouscourtship。Iftheworldisfullofrealselves,theycanbereallyunselfishselves。ButuponMrs。Besant’sprinciplethewholecosmosisonlyoneenormouslyselfishperson。
  ItisjustherethatBuddhismisonthesideofmodernpantheismandimmanence。AnditisjustherethatChristianityisonthesideofhumanityandlibertyandlove。Lovedesirespersonality;
  thereforelovedesiresdivision。ItistheinstinctofChristianitytobegladthatGodhasbrokentheuniverseintolittlepieces,becausetheyarelivingpieces。Itisherinstincttosay"littlechildrenloveoneanother"ratherthantotellonelargepersontolovehimself。ThisistheintellectualabyssbetweenBuddhismandChristianity;thatfortheBuddhistorTheosophistpersonalityisthefallofman,fortheChristianitisthepurposeofGod,thewholepointofhiscosmicidea。Theworld-souloftheTheosophistsasksmantoloveitonlyinorderthatmanmaythrowhimselfintoit。
  ButthedivinecentreofChristianityactuallythrewmanoutofitinorderthathemightloveit。Theorientaldeityislikeagiantwhoshouldhavelosthislegorhandandbealwaysseekingtofindit;
  buttheChristianpowerislikesomegiantwhoinastrangegenerosityshouldcutoffhisrighthand,sothatitmightofitsownaccordshakehandswithhim。WecomebacktothesametirelessnotetouchingthenatureofChristianity;allmodernphilosophiesarechainswhichconnectandfetter;Christianityisaswordwhichseparatesandsetsfree。NootherphilosophymakesGodactuallyrejoiceintheseparationoftheuniverseintolivingsouls。
  ButaccordingtoorthodoxChristianitythisseparationbetweenGodandmanissacred,becausethisiseternal。ThatamanmayloveGoditisnecessarythatthereshouldbenotonlyaGodtobeloved,butamantolovehim。Allthosevaguetheosophicalmindsforwhomtheuniverseisanimmensemelting-potareexactlythemindswhichshrinkinstinctivelyfromthatearthquakesayingofourGospels,whichdeclarethattheSonofGodcamenotwithpeacebutwithasunderingsword。Thesayingringsentirelytrueevenconsideredaswhatitobviouslyis;thestatementthatanymanwhopreachesrealloveisboundtobegethate。Itisastrueofdemocraticfraternityasadivinelove;shamloveendsincompromiseandcommonphilosophy;
  butreallovehasalwaysendedinbloodshed。YetthereisanotherandyetmoreawfultruthbehindtheobviousmeaningofthisutteranceofourLord。AccordingtoHimselftheSonwasaswordseparatingbrotherandbrotherthattheyshouldforanaeonhateeachother。
  ButtheFatheralsowasasword,whichintheblackbeginningseparatedbrotherandbrother,sothattheyshouldloveeachotheratlast。
  Thisisthemeaningofthatalmostinsanehappinessintheeyesofthemediaevalsaintinthepicture。ThisisthemeaningofthesealedeyesofthesuperbBuddhistimage。TheChristiansaintishappybecausehehasverilybeencutofffromtheworld;
  heisseparatefromthingsandisstaringattheminastonishment。
  ButwhyshouldtheBuddhistsaintbeastonishedatthings?——
  sincethereisreallyonlyonething,andthatbeingimpersonalcanhardlybeastonishedatitself。Therehavebeenmanypantheistpoemssuggestingwonder,butnoreallysuccessfulones。Thepantheistcannotwonder,forhecannotpraiseGodorpraiseanythingasreallydistinctfromhimself。Ourimmediatebusinesshere,however,iswiththeeffectofthisChristianadmiration(whichstrikesoutwards,towardsadeitydistinctfromtheworshipper)uponthegeneralneedforethicalactivityandsocialreform。Andsurelyitseffectissufficientlyobvious。Thereisnorealpossibilityofgettingoutofpantheism,anyspecialimpulsetomoralaction。
  Forpantheismimpliesinitsnaturethatonethingisasgoodasanother;whereasactionimpliesinitsnaturethatonethingisgreatlypreferabletoanother。Swinburneinthehighsummerofhisscepticismtriedinvaintowrestlewiththisdifficulty。
  In"SongsbeforeSunrise,"writtenundertheinspirationofGaribaldiandtherevoltofItalyheproclaimedthenewerreligionandthepurerGodwhichshouldwitherupallthepriestsoftheworld:
  "WhatdoestthounowLookingGodwardtocryIamI,thouartthou,Iamlow,thouarthigh,Iamthouthatthouseekesttofindhim,findthoubutthyself,thouartI。"
  OfwhichtheimmediateandevidentdeductionisthattyrantsareasmuchthesonsofGodasGaribaldis;andthatKingBombaofNapleshaving,withtheutmostsuccess,"foundhimself"
  isidenticalwiththeultimategoodinallthings。Thetruthisthatthewesternenergythatdethronestyrantshasbeendirectlyduetothewesterntheologythatsays"IamI,thouartthou。"
  ThesamespiritualseparationwhichlookedupandsawagoodkingintheuniverselookedupandsawabadkinginNaples。TheworshippersofBomba’sgoddethronedBomba。TheworshippersofSwinburne’sgodhavecoveredAsiaforcenturiesandhaveneverdethronedatyrant。
  TheIndiansaintmayreasonablyshuthiseyesbecauseheislookingatthatwhichisIandThouandWeandTheyandIt。
  Itisarationaloccupation:butitisnottrueintheoryandnottrueinfactthatithelpstheIndiantokeepaneyeonLordCurzon。
  ThatexternalvigilancewhichhasalwaysbeenthemarkofChristianity(thecommandthatweshouldWATCHandpray)hasexpresseditselfbothintypicalwesternorthodoxyandintypicalwesternpolitics:
  butbothdependontheideaofadivinitytranscendent,differentfromourselves,adeitythatdisappears。CertainlythemostsagaciouscreedsmaysuggestthatweshouldpursueGodintodeeperanddeeperringsofthelabyrinthofourownego。ButonlyweofChristendomhavesaidthatweshouldhuntGodlikeaneagleuponthemountains:
  andwehavekilledallmonstersinthechase。
  Hereagain,therefore,wefindthatinsofaraswevaluedemocracyandtheself-renewingenergiesofthewest,wearemuchmorelikelytofindthemintheoldtheologythanthenew。
  Ifwewantreform,wemustadheretoorthodoxy:especiallyinthismatter(somuchdisputedinthecounselsofMr。R。J。Campbell),thematterofinsistingontheimmanentorthetranscendentdeity。
  ByinsistingspeciallyontheimmanenceofGodwegetintrospection,self-isolation,quietism,socialindifference——Tibet。ByinsistingspeciallyonthetranscendenceofGodwegetwonder,curiosity,moralandpoliticaladventure,righteousindignation——Christendom。
  InsistingthatGodisinsideman,manisalwaysinsidehimself。
  ByinsistingthatGodtranscendsman,manhastranscendedhimself。
  Ifwetakeanyotherdoctrinethathasbeencalledold-fashionedweshallfindthecasethesame。Itisthesame,forinstance,inthedeepmatteroftheTrinity。Unitarians(asectnevertobementionedwithoutaspecialrespectfortheirdistinguishedintellectualdignityandhighintellectualhonour)areoftenreformersbytheaccidentthatthrowssomanysmallsectsintosuchanattitude。
  ButthereisnothingintheleastliberalorakintoreforminthesubstitutionofpuremonotheismfortheTrinity。ThecomplexGodoftheAthanasianCreedmaybeanenigmafortheintellect;
  butHeisfarlesslikelytogatherthemysteryandcrueltyofaSultanthanthelonelygodofOmarorMahomet。ThegodwhoisamereawfulunityisnotonlyakingbutanEasternking。
  TheHEARTofhumanity,especiallyofEuropeanhumanity,iscertainlymuchmoresatisfiedbythestrangehintsandsymbolsthatgatherroundtheTrinitarianidea,theimageofacouncilatwhichmercypleadsaswellasjustice,theconceptionofasortoflibertyandvarietyexistingevenintheinmostchamberoftheworld。
  ForWesternreligionhasalwaysfeltkeenlytheidea"itisnotwellformantobealone。"ThesocialinstinctasserteditselfeverywhereaswhentheEasternideaofhermitswaspracticallyexpelledbytheWesternideaofmonks。Soevenasceticismbecamebrotherly;
  andtheTrappistsweresociableevenwhentheyweresilent。
  Ifthisloveofalivingcomplexitybeourtest,itiscertainlyhealthiertohavetheTrinitarianreligionthantheUnitarian。
  FortousTrinitarians(ifImaysayitwithreverence)——tousGodHimselfisasociety。Itisindeedafathomlessmysteryoftheology,andevenifIweretheologianenoughtodealwithitdirectly,itwouldnotberelevanttodosohere。SufficeittosayherethatthistripleenigmaisascomfortingaswineandopenasanEnglishfireside;
  thatthisthingthatbewilderstheintellectutterlyquietstheheart:
  butoutofthedesert,fromthedryplacesandthedreadfulsuns,comethecruelchildrenofthelonelyGod;therealUnitarianswhowithscimitarinhandhavelaidwastetheworld。ForitisnotwellforGodtobealone。
  Again,thesameistrueofthatdifficultmatterofthedangerofthesoul,whichhasunsettledsomanyjustminds。Tohopeforallsoulsisimperative;anditisquitetenablethattheirsalvationisinevitable。Itistenable,butitisnotspeciallyfavourabletoactivityorprogress。Ourfightingandcreativesocietyoughtrathertoinsistonthedangerofeverybody,onthefactthateverymanishangingbyathreadorclingingtoaprecipice。
  Tosaythatallwillbewellanyhowisacomprehensibleremark:
  butitcannotbecalledtheblastofatrumpet。Europeoughtrathertoemphasizepossibleperdition;andEuropealwayshasemphasizedit。
  Hereitshighestreligionisatonewithallitscheapestromances。
  TotheBuddhistortheeasternfatalistexistenceisascienceoraplan,whichmustendupinacertainway。ButtoaChristianexistenceisaSTORY,whichmayendupinanyway。Inathrillingnovel(thatpurelyChristianproduct)theheroisnoteatenbycannibals;butitisessentialtotheexistenceofthethrillthatheMIGHTbeeatenbycannibals。Theheromust(sotospeak)
  beaneatablehero。SoChristianmoralshavealwayssaidtotheman,notthathewouldlosehissoul,butthathemusttakecarethathedidn’t。InChristianmorals,inshort,itiswickedtocallaman"damned":butitisstrictlyreligiousandphilosophictocallhimdamnable。
  AllChristianityconcentratesonthemanatthecross-roads。
  Thevastandshallowphilosophies,thehugesynthesesofhumbug,alltalkaboutagesandevolutionandultimatedevelopments。
  Thetruephilosophyisconcernedwiththeinstant。Willamantakethisroadorthat?——thatistheonlythingtothinkabout,ifyouenjoythinking。Theaeonsareeasyenoughtothinkabout,anyonecanthinkaboutthem。Theinstantisreallyawful:
  anditisbecauseourreligionhasintenselyfelttheinstant,thatithasinliteraturedealtmuchwithbattleandintheologydealtmuchwithhell。ItisfullofDANGER,likeaboy’sbook:
  itisatanimmortalcrisis。Thereisagreatdealofrealsimilaritybetweenpopularfictionandthereligionofthewesternpeople。
  Ifyousaythatpopularfictionisvulgarandtawdry,youonlysaywhatthedrearyandwell-informedsayalsoabouttheimagesintheCatholicchurches。Life(accordingtothefaith)isverylikeaserialstoryinamagazine:lifeendswiththepromise(ormenace)
  "tobecontinuedinournext。"Also,withanoblevulgarity,lifeimitatestheserialandleavesoffattheexcitingmoment。
  Fordeathisdistinctlyanexcitingmoment。
  Butthepointisthatastoryisexcitingbecauseithasinitsostronganelementofwill,ofwhattheologycallsfree-will。
  Youcannotfinishasumhowyoulike。Butyoucanfinishastoryhowyoulike。WhensomebodydiscoveredtheDifferentialCalculustherewasonlyoneDifferentialCalculushecoulddiscover。
  ButwhenShakespearekilledRomeohemighthavemarriedhimtoJuliet’soldnurseifhehadfeltinclined。AndChristendomhasexcelledinthenarrativeromanceexactlybecauseithasinsistedonthetheologicalfree-will。Itisalargematterandtoomuchtoonesideoftheroadtobediscussedadequatelyhere;butthisistherealobjectiontothattorrentofmoderntalkabouttreatingcrimeasdisease,aboutmakingaprisonmerelyahygienicenvironmentlikeahospital,ofhealingsinbyslowscientificmethods。
  Thefallacyofthewholethingisthatevilisamatterofactivechoicewhereasdiseaseisnot。Ifyousaythatyouaregoingtocureaprofligateasyoucureanasthmatic,mycheapandobviousansweris,"Producethepeoplewhowanttobeasthmaticsasmanypeoplewanttobeprofligates。"Amanmayliestillandbecuredofamalady。
  Buthemustnotliestillifhewantstobecuredofasin;
  onthecontrary,hemustgetupandjumpaboutviolently。
  Thewholepointindeedisperfectlyexpressedintheverywordwhichweuseforamaninhospital;"patient"isinthepassivemood;
  "sinner"isintheactive。Ifamanistobesavedfrominfluenza,hemaybeapatient。Butifheistobesavedfromforging,hemustbenotapatientbutanIMPATIENT。Hemustbepersonallyimpatientwithforgery。Allmoralreformmuststartintheactivenotthepassivewill。
  Hereagainwereachthesamesubstantialconclusion。InsofaraswedesirethedefinitereconstructionsandthedangerousrevolutionswhichhavedistinguishedEuropeancivilization,weshallnotdiscouragethethoughtofpossibleruin;weshallratherencourageit。
  Ifwewant,liketheEasternsaints,merelytocontemplatehowrightthingsare,ofcourseweshallonlysaythattheymustgoright。
  ButifweparticularlywanttoMAKEthemgoright,wemustinsistthattheymaygowrong。
  Lastly,thistruthisyetagaintrueinthecaseofthecommonmodernattemptstodiminishortoexplainawaythedivinityofChrist。
  Thethingmaybetrueornot;thatIshalldealwithbeforeIend。
  Butifthedivinityistrueitiscertainlyterriblyrevolutionary。
  Thatagoodmanmayhavehisbacktothewallisnomorethanweknewalready;butthatGodcouldhavehisbacktothewallisaboastforallinsurgentsforever。ChristianityistheonlyreligiononearththathasfeltthatomnipotencemadeGodincomplete。
  ChristianityalonehasfeltthatGod,tobewhollyGod,musthavebeenarebelaswellasaking。Aloneofallcreeds,ChristianityhasaddedcouragetothevirtuesoftheCreator。
  Fortheonlycourageworthcallingcouragemustnecessarilymeanthatthesoulpassesabreakingpoint——anddoesnotbreak。
  InthisindeedIapproachamattermoredarkandawfulthanitiseasytodiscuss;andIapologiseinadvanceifanyofmyphrasesfallwrongorseemirreverenttouchingamatterwhichthegreatestsaintsandthinkershavejustlyfearedtoapproach。
  ButinthatterrifictaleofthePassionthereisadistinctemotionalsuggestionthattheauthorofallthings(insomeunthinkableway)
  wentnotonlythroughagony,butthroughdoubt。Itiswritten,"ThoushaltnottempttheLordthyGod。"No;buttheLordthyGodmaytemptHimself;anditseemsasifthiswaswhathappenedinGethsemane。
  InagardenSatantemptedman:andinagardenGodtemptedGod。
  Hepassedinsomesuperhumanmannerthroughourhumanhorrorofpessimism。Whentheworldshookandthesunwaswipedoutofheaven,itwasnotatthecrucifixion,butatthecryfromthecross:
  thecrywhichconfessedthatGodwasforsakenofGod。Andnowlettherevolutionistschooseacreedfromallthecreedsandagodfromallthegodsoftheworld,carefullyweighingallthegodsofinevitablerecurrenceandofunalterablepower。Theywillnotfindanothergodwhohashimselfbeeninrevolt。Nay,(themattergrowstoodifficultforhumanspeech,)butlettheatheiststhemselveschooseagod。
  Theywillfindonlyonedivinitywhoeverutteredtheirisolation;
  onlyonereligioninwhichGodseemedforaninstanttobeanatheist。
  Thesecanbecalledtheessentialsoftheoldorthodoxy,ofwhichthechiefmeritisthatitisthenaturalfountainofrevolutionandreform;andofwhichthechiefdefectisthatitisobviouslyonlyanabstractassertion。Itsmainadvantageisthatitisthemostadventurousandmanlyofalltheologies。
  Itschiefdisadvantageissimplythatitisatheology。Itcanalwaysbeurgedagainstitthatitisinitsnaturearbitraryandintheair。
  Butitisnotsohighintheairbutthatgreatarchersspendtheirwholelivesinshootingarrowsatit——yes,andtheirlastarrows;
  therearemenwhowillruinthemselvesandruintheircivilizationiftheymayruinalsothisoldfantastictale。Thisisthelastandmostastoundingfactaboutthisfaith;thatitsenemieswilluseanyweaponagainstit,theswordsthatcuttheirownfingers,andthefirebrandsthatburntheirownhomes。MenwhobegintofighttheChurchforthesakeoffreedomandhumanityendbyflingingawayfreedomandhumanityifonlytheymayfighttheChurch。
  Thisisnoexaggeration;Icouldfillabookwiththeinstancesofit。
  Mr。Blatchfordsetout,asanordinaryBible-smasher,toprovethatAdamwasguiltlessofsinagainstGod;inmanoeuvringsoastomaintainthisheadmitted,asameresideissue,thatallthetyrants,fromNerotoKingLeopold,wereguiltlessofanysinagainsthumanity。
  Iknowamanwhohassuchapassionforprovingthathewillhavenopersonalexistenceafterdeaththathefallsbackonthepositionthathehasnopersonalexistencenow。HeinvokesBuddhismandsaysthatallsoulsfadeintoeachother;inordertoprovethathecannotgotoheavenheprovesthathecannotgotoHartlepool。
  Ihaveknownpeoplewhoprotestedagainstreligiouseducationwithargumentsagainstanyeducation,sayingthatthechild’smindmustgrowfreelyorthattheoldmustnotteachtheyoung。Ihaveknownpeoplewhoshowedthattherecouldbenodivinejudgmentbyshowingthattherecanbenohumanjudgment,evenforpracticalpurposes。
  Theyburnedtheirowncorntosetfiretothechurch;theysmashedtheirowntoolstosmashit;anystickwasgoodenoughtobeatitwith,thoughitwerethelaststickoftheirowndismemberedfurniture。
  Wedonotadmire,wehardlyexcuse,thefanaticwhowrecksthisworldforloveoftheother。Butwhatarewetosayofthefanaticwhowrecksthisworldoutofhatredoftheother?Hesacrificestheveryexistenceofhumanitytothenon-existenceofGod。
  Heoffershisvictimsnottothealtar,butmerelytoasserttheidlenessofthealtarandtheemptinessofthethrone。
  Heisreadytoruineventhatprimaryethicbywhichallthingslive,forhisstrangeandeternalvengeanceuponsomeonewhoneverlivedatall。
  Andyetthethinghangsintheheavensunhurt。Itsopponentsonlysucceedindestroyingallthattheythemselvesjustlyholddear。
  Theydonotdestroyorthodoxy;theyonlydestroypoliticalandcommoncouragesense。TheydonotprovethatAdamwasnotresponsibletoGod;howcouldtheyproveit?Theyonlyprove(fromtheirpremises)thattheCzarisnotresponsibletoRussia。
  TheydonotprovethatAdamshouldnothavebeenpunishedbyGod;
  theyonlyprovethatthenearestsweatershouldnotbepunishedbymen。
  Withtheirorientaldoubtsaboutpersonalitytheydonotmakecertainthatweshallhavenopersonallifehereafter;theyonlymakecertainthatweshallnothaveaveryjollyorcompleteonehere。
  WiththeirparalysinghintsofallconclusionscomingoutwrongtheydonottearthebookoftheRecordingAngel;theyonlymakeitalittlehardertokeepthebooksofMarshall&Snelgrove。
  Notonlyisthefaiththemotherofallworldlyenergies,butitsfoesarethefathersofallworldlyconfusion。Thesecularistshavenotwreckeddivinethings;butthesecularistshavewreckedsecularthings,ifthatisanycomforttothem。TheTitansdidnotscaleheaven;
  buttheylaidwastetheworld。
  IXAUTHORITYANDTHEADVENTURER
  Thelastchapterhasbeenconcernedwiththecontentionthatorthodoxyisnotonly(asisoftenurged)theonlysafeguardianofmoralityororder,butisalsotheonlylogicalguardianofliberty,innovationandadvance。Ifwewishtopulldowntheprosperousoppressorwecannotdoitwiththenewdoctrineofhumanperfectibility;
  wecandoitwiththeolddoctrineofOriginalSin。Ifwewanttouprootinherentcrueltiesorliftuplostpopulationswecannotdoitwiththescientifictheorythatmatterprecedesmind;wecandoitwiththesupernaturaltheorythatmindprecedesmatter。
  Ifwewishspeciallytoawakenpeopletosocialvigilanceandtirelesspursuitofpractise,wecannothelpitmuchbyinsistingontheImmanentGodandtheInnerLight:fortheseareatbestreasonsforcontentment;wecanhelpitmuchbyinsistingonthetranscendentGodandtheflyingandescapinggleam;forthatmeansdivinediscontent。IfwewishparticularlytoasserttheideaofagenerousbalanceagainstthatofadreadfulautocracyweshallinstinctivelybeTrinitarianratherthanUnitarian。IfwedesireEuropeancivilizationtobearaidandarescue,weshallinsistratherthatsoulsareinrealperilthanthattheirperilisultimatelyunreal。Andifwewishtoexalttheoutcastandthecrucified,weshallratherwishtothinkthataveritableGodwascrucified,ratherthanameresageorhero。Aboveall,ifwewishtoprotectthepoorweshallbeinfavouroffixedrulesandcleardogmas。
  TheRULESofaclubareoccasionallyinfavourofthepoormember。
  Thedriftofaclubisalwaysinfavouroftherichone。