grains,thisisequivalentto62cubicinchesofwater;sothatasbrainisheavierthanwater,weareperfectlysafeagainsterringonthesideofdiminutionintakingthisasthesmallestcapacityofanyadultmalehumanbrain。Theonlyadultmalebrain,weighingaslittleas970grammes,isthatofanidiot;butthebrainofanadultwoman,againstthesoundnessofwhosefacultiesnothingappears,weighedaslittleas907grammes(55。3cubicinchesofwater);andReidgivesanadultfemalebrainofstillsmallercapacity。Theheaviestbrain(1872grammes,orabout115cubicinches)was,however,thatofawoman;nexttoitcomesthebrainofCuvier(1861grammes),thenByron(1807grammes),andthenaninsaneperson(1783grammes)。
Thelightestadultbrainrecorded(720grammes)wasthatofanidioticfemale。Thebrainsoffivechildren,fouryearsold,weighedbetween1275and992grammes。Sothatitmaybesafelysaid,thatanaverageEuropeanchildoffouryearsoldhasabraintwiceaslargeasthatofanadultGorilla。
Nodoubt,thisisaverystrikingdifference,butitlosesmuchofitsapparentsystematicvalue,whenviewedbythelightofcertainotherequallyindubitablefactsrespectingcranialcapacities。
Thefirstoftheseis,thatthedifferenceinthevolumeofthecranialcavityofdifferentracesofmankindisfargreater,absolutely,thanthatbetweenthelowestManandthehighestApe,while,relatively,itisaboutthesame。ForthelargesthumanskullmeasuredbyMortoncontained114cubicinches,thatistosay,hadverynearlydoublethecapacityofthesmallest;whileitsabsolutepreponderance,of52cubicinches——isfargreaterthanthatbywhichthelowestadultmalehumancraniumsurpassesthelargestoftheGorillas(62-34-1/2=27-1/2)。
Secondly,theadultcraniaofGorillaswhichhaveasyetbeenmeasureddifferamongthemselvesbynearlyone-third,themaximumcapacitybeing34。5cubicinches,theminimum24cubicinches;and,thirdly,aftermakingalldueallowancefordifferenceofsize,thecranialcapacitiesofsomeofthelowerApesfallnearlyasmuch,relatively,belowthoseofthehigherApesasthelatterfallbelowMan。
Thus,evenintheimportantmatterofcranialcapacity,MendiffermorewidelyfromoneanotherthantheydofromtheApes;whilethelowestApesdifferasmuch,inproportion,fromthehighest,asthelatterdoesfromMan。ThelastpropositionisstillbetterillustratedbythestudyofthemodificationswhichotherpartsofthecraniumundergointheSimianseries。
ItisthelargeproportionalsizeofthefacialbonesandthegreatprojectionofthejawswhichconfersupontheGorilla’sskullitssmallfacialangleandbrutalcharacter。
FIG。16。——SectionsoftheskullsofManandvariousApes,drawnsoastogivethecerebralcavitythesamelengthineachcase,therebydisplayingthevaryingproportionsofthefacialbones。Theline’b’
indicatestheplaneofthetentorium,whichseparatesthecerebrumfromthecerebellum;’d’,theaxisoftheoccipitaloutletoftheskull。Theextentofcerebralcavitybehind’c’,whichisaperpendicularerectedon’b’atthepointwherethetentoriumisattachedposteriorly,indicatesthedegreetowhichthecerebrumoverlapsthecerebellum——thespaceoccupiedbywhichisroughlyindicatedbythedarkshading。Incomparingthesediagrams,itmustberecollected,thatfiguresonsosmallascaleasthesesimplyexemplifythestatementsinthetext,theproofofwhichistobefoundintheobjectsthemselves。
Butifweconsidertheproportionalsizeofthefacialbonestotheskullproperonly,thelittle’Chrysothrix’(Fig。16)differsverywidelyfromtheGorilla,and,inthesameway,asMandoes;whiletheBaboons(’Cynocephalus’,Fig。16)exaggeratethegrossproportionsofthemuzzleofthegreatAnthropoid,sothatitsvisagelooksmildandhumanbycomparisonwiththeirs。ThedifferencebetweentheGorillaandtheBaboonisevengreaterthanitappearsatfirstsight;forthegreatfacialmassoftheformerislargelyduetoadownwarddevelopmentofthejaws;anessentiallyhumancharacter,superaddeduponthatalmostpurelyforward,essentiallybrutal,developmentofthesamepartswhichcharacterizestheBaboon,andyetmoreremarkablydistinguishestheLemur。
Similarly,theoccipitalforamenof’Mycetes’(Fig。16),andstillmoreoftheLemurs,issituatedcompletelyintheposteriorfaceoftheskull,orasmuchfurtherbackthanthatoftheGorilla,asthatoftheGorillaisfurtherbackthanthatofMan;while,asiftorenderpatentthefutilityoftheattempttobaseanybroadclassificatorydistinctiononsuchacharacter,thesamegroupofPlatyrhine,orAmericanmonkeys,towhichtheMycetesbelongs,containstheChrysothrix,whoseoccipitalforamenissituatedfarmoreforwardthaninanyotherape,andnearlyapproachesthepositionitholdsinMan。
Again,theOrang’sskullisasdevoidofexcessivelydevelopedsupraciliaryprominencesasaMan’s,thoughsomevarietiesexhibitgreatcrestselsewhere(Seepp。231,232);andinsomeoftheCebineapesandinthe’Chrysothrix’,thecraniumisassmoothandroundedasthatofManhimself。
Whatistrueoftheseleadingcharacteristicsoftheskull,holdsgood,asmaybeimagined,ofallminorfeatures;sothatforeveryconstantdifferencebetweentheGorilla’sskullandtheMan’s,asimilarconstantdifferenceofthesameorder(thatistosay,consistinginexcessordefectofthesamequality)maybefoundbetweentheGorilla’sskullandthatofsomeotherape。Sothat,fortheskull,nolessthanfortheskeletoningeneral,thepropositionholdsgood,thatthedifferencesbetweenManandtheGorillaareofsmallervaluethanthosebetweentheGorillaandsomeotherApes。
Inconnectionwiththeskull,Imayspeakoftheteeth——organswhichhaveapeculiarclassificatoryvalue,andwhoseresemblancesanddifferencesofnumber,form,andsuccession,takenasawhole,areusuallyregardedasmoretrustworthyindicatorsofaffinitythananyothers。
FIG。17。——Lateralviews,ofthesamelength,oftheupperjawsofvariousPrimates。’i’,incisors;’c’,canines’’pm’,premolars;’m’,molars。AlineisdrawnthroughthefirstmolarofMan,’Gorilla’,’Cynocephalus’,and’Cebus’,andthegrindingsurfaceofthesecondmolarisshownineach,itsanteriorandinternalanglebeingjustabovethe’m’of’m2’。
Manisprovidedwithtwosetsofteeth——milkteethandpermanentteeth。
Theformerconsistoffourincisors,orcuttingteeth;twocanines,oreyeteeth;andfourmolars,orgrinders,ineachjaw——makingtwentyinall。Thelatter(Fig。17)comprisefourincisors,twocanines,foursmallgrinders,calledpremolarsorfalsemolars,andsixlargegrinders,ortruemolars,ineachjaw——makingthirty-twoinall。Theinternalincisorsarelargerthantheexternalpair,intheupperjaw,smallerthantheexternalpair,inthelowerjaw。Thecrownsoftheuppermolarsexhibitfourcusps,orblunt-pointedelevations,andaridgecrossesthecrownobliquely,fromtheinner,anteriorcusptotheouter,posteriorcusp(Fig。17m2)。Theanteriorlowermolarshavefivecusps,threeexternalandtwointernal。Thepremolarshavetwocusps,oneinternalandoneexternal,ofwhichtheouteristhehigher。
InalltheserespectsthedentitionoftheGorillamaybedescribedinthesametermsasthatofMan;butinothermattersitexhibitsmanyandimportantdifferences(Fig。17)。
Thustheteethofmanconstitutearegularandevenseries——withoutanybreakandwithoutanymarkedprojectionofonetoothabovetheleveloftherest;apeculiaritywhich,asCuvierlongagoshowed,issharedbynoothermammalsaveone——asdifferentacreaturefrommanascanwellbeimagined——namely,thelongextinct’Anoplotherium’。TheteethoftheGorilla,onthecontrary,exhibitabreak,orinterval,termedthe’diastema’,inbothjaws:infrontoftheeye-tooth,orbetweenitandtheouterincisor,intheupperjaw;behindtheeyetooth,orbetweenitandthefrontfalsemolar,inthelowerjaw。Intothisbreakintheseries,ineachjaw,fitsthecanineoftheoppositejaw;thesizeoftheeye-toothintheGorillabeingsogreatthatitprojects,likeatusk,farbeyondthegeneralleveloftheotherteeth。TherootsofthefalsemolarteethoftheGorilla,again,aremorecomplexthaninMan,andtheproportionalsizeofthemolarsisdifferent。TheGorillahasthecrownofthehindmostgrinderofthelowerjawmorecomplex,andtheorderoferuptionofthepermanentteethisdifferent;thepermanentcaninesmakingtheirappearancebeforethesecondandthirdmolarsinMan,andafterthemintheGorilla。
Thus,whiletheteethoftheGorillacloselyresemblethoseofManinnumber,kind,andinthegeneralpatternoftheircrowns,theyexhibitmarkeddifferencesfromthoseofManinsecondaryrespects,suchasrelativesize,numberoffangs,andorderofappearance。
But,iftheteethoftheGorillabecomparedwiththoseofanApe,nofurtherremovedfromitthana’Cynocephalus’,orBaboon,itwillbefoundthatdifferencesandresemblancesofthesameorderareeasilyobservable;butthatmanyofthepointsinwhichtheGorillaresemblesManarethoseinwhichitdiffersfromtheBaboon;whilevariousrespectsinwhichitdiffersfromManareexaggeratedinthe’Cynocephalus’。ThenumberandthenatureoftheteethremainthesameintheBaboonasintheGorillaandinMan。ButthepatternoftheBaboon’suppermolarsisquitedifferentfromthatdescribedabove(Fig。17),thecaninesareproportionallylongerandmoreknife-like;
theanteriorpremolarinthelowerjawisspeciallymodified;theposteriormolarofthelowerjawisstilllargerandmorecomplexthanintheGorilla。
Passingfromtheold-worldApestothoseofthenewworld,wemeetwithachangeofmuchgreaterimportancethananyofthese。Insuchagenusas’Cebus’,forexample(Fig。17),itwillbefoundthatwhileinsomesecondarypoints,suchastheprojectionofthecaninesandthediastema,theresemblancetothegreatapeispreserved;inotherandmostimportantrespects,thedentitionisextremelydifferent。Insteadof20teethinthemilkset,thereare24:insteadof32teethinthepermanentset,thereare36,thefalsemolarsbeingincreasedfromeighttotwelve。Andinform,thecrownsofthemolarsareveryunlikethoseoftheGorilla,anddifferfarmorewidelyfromthehumanpattern。
TheMarmosets,ontheotherhand,exhibitthesamenumberofteethasManandtheGorilla;but,notwithstandingthis,theirdentitionisverydifferent,fortheyhavefourmorefalsemolars,liketheotherAmericanmonkeys——butastheyhavefourfewertruemolars,thetotalremainsthesame。AndpassingfromtheAmericanapestotheLemurs,thedentitionbecomesstillmorecompletelyandessentiallydifferentfromthatoftheGorilla。Theincisorsbegintovarybothinnumberandinform。Themolarsacquire,moreandmore,amany-pointed,insectivorouscharacter,andinoneGenus,theAye-Aye(’Cheiromys’),thecaninesdisappear,andtheteethcompletelysimulatethoseofaRodent(Fig。17)。
Henceitisobviousthat,greatlyasthedentitionofthehighestApediffersfromthatofMan,itdiffersfarmorewidelyfromthatofthelowerandlowestApes。
Whateverpartoftheanimalfabric——whateverseriesofmuscles,whatevervisceramightbeselectedforcomparison——theresultwouldbethesame——thelowerApesandtheGorillawoulddiffermorethantheGorillaandtheMan。Icannotattemptinthisplacetofollowoutallthesecomparisonsindetail,andindeeditisunnecessaryIshoulddoso。Butcertainreal,orsupposed,structuraldistinctionsbetweenmanandtheapesremain,uponwhichsomuchstresshasbeenlaid,thattheyrequirecarefulconsideration,inorderthatthetruevaluemaybeassignedtothosewhicharereal,andtheemptinessofthosewhicharefictitiousmaybeexposed。Irefertothecharactersofthehand,thefoot,andthebrain。
Manhasbeendefinedastheonlyanimalpossessedoftwohandsterminatinghisforelimbs,andoftwofeetendinghishindlimbs,whileithasbeensaidthatalltheapespossessfourhands;andhehasbeenaffirmedtodifferfundamentallyfromalltheapesinthecharactersofhisbrain,whichalone,ithasbeenstrangelyassertedandre-asserted,exhibitsthestructuresknowntoanatomistsastheposteriorlobe,theposteriorcornuofthelateralventricle,andthehippocampusminor。
Thattheformerpropositionshouldhavegainedgeneralacceptanceisnotsurprising——indeed,atfirstsight,appearancesaremuchinitsfavour:
but,asforthesecond,onecanonlyadmirethesurpassingcourageofitsenunciator,seeingthatitisaninnovationwhichisnotonlyopposedtogenerallyandjustlyaccepteddoctrines,butwhichisdirectlynegativedbythetestimonyofalloriginalinquirers,whohavespeciallyinvestigatedthematter:andthatitneitherhasbeen,norcanbe,supportedbyasingleanatomicalpreparation。Itwould,infact,beunworthyofseriousrefutation,exceptforthegeneralandnaturalbeliefthatdeliberateandreiteratedassertionsmusthavesomefoundation。
Beforewecandiscussthefirstpointwithadvantagewemustconsiderwithsomeattention,andcomparetogether,thestructureofthehumanhandandthatofthehumanfoot,sothatwemayhavedistinctandclearideasofwhatconstitutesahandandwhatafoot。
Theexternalformofthehumanhandisfamiliarenoughtoeveryone。Itconsistsofastoutwristfollowedbyabroadpalm,formedofflesh,andtendons,andskin,bindingtogetherfourbones,anddividingintofourlongandflexibledigits,orfingers,eachofwhichbearsonthebackofitslastjointabroadandflattenednail。Thelongestcleftbetweenanytwodigitsisratherlessthanhalfaslongasthehand。
Fromtheoutersideofthebaseofthepalmastoutdigitgoesoff,havingonlytwojointsinsteadofthree;soshort,thatitonlyreachestoalittlebeyondthemiddleofthefirstjointofthefingernextit;
andfurtherremarkablebyitsgreatmobility,inconsequenceofwhichitcanbedirectedoutwards,almostatarightangletotherest。Thisdigitiscalledthe’pollex,’orthumb;and,liketheothers,itbearsaflatnailuponthebackofitsterminaljoint。Inconsequenceoftheproportionsandmobilityofthethumb,itiswhatistermed"opposable";inotherwords,itsextremitycan,withthegreatestease,bebroughtintocontactwiththeextremitiesofanyofthefingers;apropertyuponwhichthepossibilityofourcarryingintoeffecttheconceptionsofthemindsolargelydepends。
Theexternalformofthefootdifferswidelyfromthatofthehand;andyet,whencloselycompared,thetwopresentsomesingularresemblances。Thustheanklecorrespondsinamannerwiththewrist;
thesolewiththepalm;thetoeswiththefingers;thegreattoewiththethumb。Butthetoes,ordigitsofthefoot,arefarshorterinproportionthanthedigitsofthehand,andarelessmoveable,thewantofmobilitybeingmoststrikinginthegreattoe——which,again,isverymuchlargerinproportiontotheothertoesthanthethumbtothefingers。Inconsideringthispoint,however,itmustnotbeforgottenthatthecivilizedgreattoe,confinedandcrampedfromchildhoodupwards,isseentoagreatdisadvantage,andthatinuncivilizedandbarefootedpeopleitretainsagreatamountofmobility,andevensomesortofopposability。TheChineseboatmenaresaidtobeabletopullanoar;theartisansofBengaltoweave,andtheCarajastostealfishhooks,byitshelp;though,afterall,itmustberecollectedthatthestructureofitsjointsandthearrangementofitsbones,necessarilyrenderitsprehensileactionfarlessperfectthanthatofthethumb。
Buttogainapreciseconceptionoftheresemblancesanddifferencesofthehandandfoot,andofthedistinctivecharactersofeach,wemustlookbelowtheskin,andcomparethebonyframeworkanditsmotorapparatusineach(Fig。18)。
FIG。18-TheskeletonoftheHandandFootofManreducedfromDr。
Carter’sdrawingsinGray’s’Anatomy。’Thehandisdrawntoalargerscalethanthefoot。Theline’aa’inthehandindicatestheboundarybetweenthecarpusandthemetacarpus;’bb’thatbetweenthelatterandtheproximalphalanges;’cc’markstheendsofthedistalphalanges。Theline"a’a’"inthefootindicatestheboundarybetweenthetarsusandmetatarsus;"b’b’"marksthatbetweenthemetatarsusandtheproximalphalanges;and"c’c’"boundstheendsofthedistalphalanges;’ca’,thecalcaneum;’as’,theastragalus;’sc’,thescaphoidboneinthetarsus。
Theskeletonofthehandexhibits,intheregionwhichwetermthewrist,andwhichistechnicallycalledthe’carpus’——tworowsofcloselyfittedpolygonalbones,fourineachrow,whicharetolerablyequalinsize。Thebonesofthefirstrowwiththebonesoftheforearm,formthewristjoint,andarearrangedsidebyside,noonegreatlyexceedingoroverlappingtherest。
Thefourbonesofthesecondrowofthecarpusbearthefourlongboneswhichsupportthepalmofthehand。Thefifthboneofthesamecharacterisarticulatedinamuchmorefreeandmoveablemannerthantheothers,withitscarpalbone,andformsthebaseofthethumb。
Thesearecalled’metacarpal’bones,andtheycarrythe’phalanges’,orbonesofthedigits,ofwhichtherearetwointhethumb,andthreeineachofthefingers。
Theskeletonofthefootisverylikethatofthehandinsomerespects。
Thustherearethreephalangesineachofthelessertoes,andonlytwointhegreattoe,whichanswerstothethumb。Thereisalongbone,termed’metatarsal’,answeringtothemetacarpal,foreachdigit;andthe’tarsus’,whichcorrespondswiththecarpus,presentsfourshortpolygonalbonesinarow,whichcorrespondverycloselywiththefourcarpalbonesofthesecondrowofthehand。Inotherrespectsthefootdiffersverywidelyfromthehand。Thusthegreattoeisthelongestdigitbutone;anditsmetatarsalisfarlessmoveablyarticulatedwiththetarsus,thanthemetacarpalofthethumbwiththecarpus。Butafarmoreimportantdistinctionliesinthefactthat,insteadoffourmoretarsalbonesthereareonlythree;and,thatthesethreearenotarrangedsidebyside,orinonerow。Oneofthem,the’oscalcis’orheelbone(’ca’),liesexternally,andsendsbackthelargeprojectingheel;another,the’astragalus’(’as’),restsonthisbyoneface,andbyanother,forms,withthebonesoftheleg,theanklejoint;whileathirdface,directedforwards,isseparatedfromthethreeinnertarsalbonesoftherownextthemetatarsusbyabonecalledthe’scaphoid’
(’sc’)。
Thusthereisafundamentaldifferenceinthestructureofthefootandthehand,observablewhenthecarpusandthetarsusarecontrasted;andtherearedifferencesofdegreenoticeablewhentheproportionsandthemobilityofthemetacarpalsandmetatarsals,withtheirrespectivedigits,arecomparedtogether。
Thesametwoclassesofdifferencesbecomeobviouswhenthemusclesofthehandarecomparedwiththoseofthefoot。
Threeprincipalsetsofmuscles,called"flexors,"bendthefingersandthumb,asinclenchingthefist,andthreesets——theextensors——extendthem,asinstraighteningthefingers。Thesemusclesareall"longmuscles";thatistosay,thefleshypartofeach,lyinginandbeingfixedtothebonesofthearm,is,attheotherend,continuedintotendons,orroundedcords,whichpassintothehand,andareultimatelyfixedtotheboneswhicharetobemoved。Thus,whenthefingersarebent,thefleshypartsoftheflexorsofthefingers,placedinthearm,contract,invirtueoftheirpeculiarendowmentasmuscles;andpullingthetendinouscords,connectedwiththeirends,causethemtopulldownthebonesofthefingerstowardsthepalm。
Notonlyaretheprincipalflexorsofthefingersandofthethumblongmuscles,buttheyremainquitedistinctfromoneanotherthroughtheirwholelength。
Inthefoot,therearealsothreeprincipalflexormusclesofthedigitsortoes,andthreeprincipalextensors;butoneextensorandoneflexorareshortmuscles;thatistosay,theirfleshypartsarenotsituatedintheleg(whichcorrespondswiththearm),butinthebackandinthesoleofthefoot——regionswhichcorrespondwiththebackandthepalmofthehand。
Again,thetendonsofthelongflexorofthetoes,andofthelongflexorofthegreattoe,whentheyreachthesoleofthefoot,donotremaindistinctfromoneanother,astheflexorsinthepalmofthehanddo,buttheybecomeunitedandcommingledinaverycuriousmanner——whiletheirunitedtendonsreceiveanaccessorymuscleconnectedwiththeheel-bone。
Butperhapsthemostabsolutelydistinctivecharacteraboutthemusclesofthefootistheexistenceofwhatistermedthe’peronaeuslongus’,alongmusclefixedtotheouterboneoftheleg,andsendingitstendontotheouterankle,behindandbelowwhichitpasses,andthencrossesthefootobliquelytobeattachedtothebaseofthegreattoe。
Nomuscleinthehandexactlycorrespondswiththis,whichiseminentlyafootmuscle。
Toresume——thefootofmanisdistinguishedfromhishandbythefollowingabsoluteanatomicaldifferences:——
1。Bythearrangementofthetarsalbones。
2。Byhavingashortflexorandashortextensormuscleofthedigits。
3。Bypossessingthemuscletermed’peronaeuslongus’。
Andifwedesiretoascertainwhethertheterminaldivisionofalimb,inotherPrimates,istobecalledafootorahand,itisbythepresenceorabsenceofthesecharactersthatwemustbeguided,andnotbythemereproportionsandgreaterorlessermobilityofthegreattoe,whichmayvaryindefinitelywithoutanyfundamentalalterationinthestructureofthefoot。
Keepingtheseconsiderationsinmind,letusnowturntothelimbsoftheGorilla。Theterminaldivisionoftheforelimbpresentsnodifficulty——boneforboneandmuscleformuscle,arefoundtobearrangedessentiallyasinman,orwithsuchminordifferencesasarefoundasvarietiesinman。TheGorilla’shandisclumsier,heavier,andhasathumbsomewhatshorterinproportionthanthatofman;butnoonehaseverdoubteditsbeingatruehand。
FIG19。——FootofMan,Gorilla,andOrang-Utanofthesameabsolutelength,toshowthedifferencesinproportionofeach。LettersasinFig。18。ReducedfromoriginaldrawingsbyMr。WaterhouseHawkins。
Atfirstsight,theterminationofthehindlimboftheGorillalooksveryhand-like,andasitisstillmoresoinmanyofthelowerapes,itisnotwonderfulthattheappellation"Quadrumana,"orfour-handedcreatures,adoptedfromtheolderanatomists*byBlumenbach,andunfortunatelyrenderedcurrentbyCuvier,shouldhavegainedsuchwideacceptanceasanamefortheSimiangroup。Butthemostcursoryanatomicalinvestigationatonceprovesthattheresemblanceoftheso-called"hindhand"toatruehand,isonlyskindeep,andthat,inallessentialrespects,thehindlimboftheGorillaisastrulyterminatedbyafootasthatofman。Thetarsalbones,inallimportantcircumstancesofnumber,disposition,andform,resemblethoseofman(Fig。19)。Themetatarsalsanddigits,ontheotherhand,areproportionallylongerandmoreslender,whilethegreattoeisnotonlyproportionallyshorterandweaker,butitsmetatarsalboneisunitedbyamoremoveablejointwiththetarsus。Atthesametime,thefootissetmoreobliquelyuponthelegthaninman。
{Footnote}*Inspeakingofthefootofhis"Pygmie,"Tysonremarks,p。
13:——"Butthispartintheformationandinitsfunctiontoo,beinglikeraHandthanaFoot:forthedistinguishingthissortofanimalsfromothers,IhavethoughtwhetheritmightnotbereckonedandcalledratherQuadru-manusthanQuadrupes,’i。e。’afour-handedratherthanafour-footedanimal。"
Asthispassagewaspublishedin1699,M。I。G。St。Hilaireisclearlyinerrorinascribingtheinventionoftheterm"quadrumanous"toBuffon,though"himanous"maybelongtohim。Tysonuses"Quadrumanus"
inseveralplaces,asatp。91……"Our’Pygmie’isnoMan,noryetthe’commonApe’,butasortof’Animal’betweenboth;andthougha’Biped’,yetofthe’Quadrumanus’-kind:thoughsome’Men’toohavebeenobservedtousetheir’Feet’like’Hands’,asIhaveseenseveral。"
Astothemuscles,thereisashortflexor,ashortextensor,anda’peronaeuslongus’,whilethetendonsofthelongflexorsofthegreattoeandoftheothertoesareunitedtogetherandwithanaccessoryfleshybundle。
ThehindlimboftheGorilla,therefore,endsinatruefoot,withaverymoveablegreattoe。Itisaprehensilefoot,indeed,butisinnosenseahand:itisafootwhichdiffersfromthatofmannotinanyfundamentalcharacter,butinmereproportions,inthedegreeofmobility,andinthesecondaryarrangementofitsparts。
Itmustnotbesupposed,however,becauseIspeakofthesedifferencesasnotfundamental,thatIwishtounderratetheirvalue。Theyareimportantenoughintheirway,thestructureofthefootbeinginstrictcorrelationwiththatoftherestoftheorganismineachcase。
NorcanitbedoubtedthatthegreaterdivisionofphysiologicallabourinMan,sothatthefunctionofsupportisthrownwhollyonthelegandfoot,isanadvanceinorganizationofverygreatmomenttohim;but,afterall,regardedanatomically,theresemblancesbetweenthefootofManandthefootoftheGorillaarefarmorestrikingandimportantthanthedifferences。
Ihavedweltuponthispointatlength,becauseitisoneregardingwhichmuchdelusionprevails;butImighthavepasseditoverwithoutdetrimenttomyargument,whichonlyrequiresmetoshowthat,bethedifferencesbetweenthehandandfootofManandthoseoftheGorillawhattheymay——thedifferencesbetweenthoseoftheGorilla,andthoseofthelowerApesaremuchgreater。
ItisnotnecessarytodescendlowerinthescalethantheOrangforconclusiveevidenceonthishead。
ThethumboftheOrangdiffersmorefromthatoftheGorillathanthethumboftheGorilladiffersfromthatofMan,notonlybyitsshortness,butbytheabsenceofanyspeciallongflexormuscle。ThecarpusoftheOrang,likethatofmostlowerapes,containsninebones,whileintheGorilla,asinManandtheChimpanzee,thereareonlyeight。
TheOrang’sfoot(Fig。19)isstillmoreaberrant;itsverylongtoesandshorttarsus,shortgreattoe,shortandraisedheel,greatobliquityofarticulationintheleg,andabsenceofalongflexortendontothegreattoe,separatingitfarmorewidelyfromthefootoftheGorillathanthelatterisseparatedfromthatofMan。
But,insomeofthelowerapes,thehandandfootdivergestillmorefromthoseoftheGorilla,thantheydointheOrang。ThethumbceasestobeopposableintheAmericanmonkeys;isreducedtoamererudimentcoveredbytheskinintheSpiderMonkey;andisdirectedforwardsandarmedwithacurvedclawliketheotherdigits,intheMarmosets——sothat,inallthesecases,therecanbenodoubtbutthatthehandismoredifferentfromthatoftheGorillathantheGorilla’shandisfromMan’s。
Andastothefoot,thegreattoeoftheMarmosetisstillmoreinsignificantinproportionthanthatoftheOrang——whileintheLemursitisverylarge,andascompletelythumb-likeandopposableasintheGorilla——butintheseanimalsthesecondtoeisoftenirregularlymodified,andinsomespeciesthetwoprincipalbonesofthetarsus,the’astragalus’andthe’oscalcis’,aresoimmenselyelongatedastorenderthefoot,sofar,totallyunlikethatofanyothermammal。
Sowithregardtothemuscles。TheshortflexorofthetoesoftheGorilladiffersfromthatofManbythecircumstancethatoneslipofthemuscleisattached,nottotheheelbone,buttothetendonsofthelongflexors。ThelowerApesdepartfromtheGorillabyanexaggerationofthesamecharacter,two,three,ormore,slipsbecomingfixedtothelongflexortendons——orbyamultiplicationoftheslips。——Again,theGorilladiffersslightlyfromManinthemodeofinterlacingofthelongflexortendons:andthelowerapesdifferfromtheGorillainexhibitingyetother,sometimesverycomplex,arrangementsofthesameparts,andoccasionallyintheabsenceoftheaccessoryfleshybundle。
Throughoutallthesemodificationsitmustberecollectedthatthefootlosesnooneofitsessentialcharacters。EveryMonkeyandLemurexhibitsthecharacteristicarrangementoftarsalbones,possessesashortflexorandshortextensormuscle,anda’peronaeuslongus’。
Variedastheproportionsandappearanceoftheorganmaybe,theterminaldivisionofthehindlimbremains,inplanandprincipleofconstruction,afoot,andnever,inthoserespects,canbeconfoundedwithahand。
Hardlyanypartofthebodilyframe,then,couldbefoundbettercalculatedtoillustratethetruththatthestructuraldifferencesbetweenManandthehighestApeareoflessvaluethanthosebetweenthehighestandthelowerApes,thanthehandorthefoot,andyet,perhaps,thereisoneorganthestudyofwhichenforcesthesameconclusioninastillmorestrikingmanner——andthatistheBrain。
ButbeforeenteringupontheprecisequestionoftheamountofdifferencebetweentheApe’sbrainandthatofMan,itisnecessarythatweshouldclearlyunderstandwhatconstitutesagreat,andwhatasmalldifferenceincerebralstructure;andweshallbebestenabledtodothisbyabriefstudyofthechiefmodificationswhichthebrainexhibitsintheseriesofvertebrateanimals。
Thebrainofafishisverysmall,comparedwiththespinalcordintowhichitiscontinued,andwiththenerveswhichcomeofffromit:ofthesegmentsofwhichitiscomposed——theolfactorylobes,thecerebralhemisphere,andthesucceedingdivisions——noonepredominatessomuchovertherestastoobscureorcoverthem;andtheso-calledopticlobesare,frequently,thelargestmassesofall。InReptiles,themassofthebrain,relativelytothespinalcord,increasesandthecerebralhemispheresbegintopredominateovertheotherparts;whileinBirdsthispredominanceisstillmoremarked。ThebrainofthelowestMammals,suchastheduck-billedPlatypusandtheOpossumsandKangaroos,exhibitsastillmoredefiniteadvanceinthesamedirection。Thecerebralhemisphereshavenowsomuchincreasedinsizeas,moreorless,tohidetherepresentativesoftheopticlobes,whichremaincomparativelysmall,sothatthebrainofaMarsupialisextremelydifferentfromthatofaBird,Reptile,orFish。Astephigherinthescale,amongtheplacentalMammals,thestructureofthebrainacquiresavastmodification——notthatitappearsmuchalteredexternally,inaRatorinaRabbit,fromwhatitisinaMarsupial——northattheproportionsofitspartsaremuchchanged,butanapparentlynewstructureisfoundbetweenthecerebralhemispheres,connectingthemtogether,aswhatiscalledthe’greatcommissure’or’corpuscallosum。’Thesubjectrequirescarefulre-investigation,butifthecurrentlyreceivedstatementsarecorrect,theappearanceofthe’corpuscallosum’intheplacentalmammalsisthegreatestandmostsuddenmodificationexhibitedbythebraininthewholeseriesofvertebratedanimals——itisthegreatestleapanywheremadebyNatureinherbrainwork。Forthetwohalvesofthebrainbeingoncethusknittogether,theprogressofcerebralcomplexityistraceablethroughacompleteseriesofstepsfromthelowestRodent,orInsectivore,toMan;andthatcomplexityconsists,chiefly,inthedisproportionatedevelopmentofthecerebralhemispheresandofthecerebellum,butespeciallyoftheformer,inrespecttotheotherpartsofthebrain。
Inthelowerplacentalmammals,thecerebralhemispheresleavetheproperupperandposteriorfaceofthecerebellumcompletelyvisible,whenthebrainisviewedfromabove;but,inthehigherforms,thehinderpartofeachhemisphere,separatedonlybythetentorium(p。
281)fromtheanteriorfaceofthecerebellum,inclinesbackwardsanddownwards,andgrowsout,astheso-called"posteriorlobe,"soasatlengthtooverlapandhidethecerebellum。InallMammals,eachcerebralhemispherecontainsacavitywhichistermedthe’ventricle,’
andasthisventricleisprolonged,ontheonehand,forwards,andontheotherdownwards,intothesubstanceofthehemisphere,itissaidtohavetwohornsor’cornua,an’anteriorcornu,’anda’descendingcornu。’Whentheposteriorlobeiswelldeveloped,athirdprolongationoftheventricularcavityextendsintoit,andiscalledthe"posteriorcornu。"
InthelowerandsmallerformsofplacentalMammalsthesurfaceofthecerebralhemispheresiseithersmoothorevenlyrounded,orexhibitsaveryfewgrooves,whicharetechnicallytermed’sulci,’separatingridgesor’convolutions’ofthesubstanceofthebrain;andthesmallerspeciesofallorderstendtoasimilarsmoothnessofbrain。But,inthehigherorders,andespeciallythelargermembersoftheseorders,thegrooves,orsulci,becomeextremelynumerous,andtheintermediateconvolutionsproportionatelymorecomplicatedintheirmeanderings,until,intheElephant,thePorpoise,thehigherApes,andMan,thecerebralsurfaceappearsaperfectlabyrinthoftortuousfoldings。
Whereaposteriorlobeexistsandpresentsitscustomarycavity——theposteriorcornu——itcommonlyhappensthataparticularsulcusappearsupontheinnerandundersurfaceofthelobe,parallelwithandbeneaththefloorofthecornu——whichis,asitwere,archedovertheroofofthesulcus。Itisasifthegroovehadbeenformedbyindentingtheflooroftheposteriorhornfromwithoutwithabluntinstrument,sothatthefloorshouldriseasaconvexeminence。Nowthiseminenceiswhathasbeentermedthe’Hippocampusminor;’the’Hippocampusmajor’
beingalargereminenceinthefloorofthedescendingcornu。Whatmaybethefunctionalimportanceofeitherofthesestructuresweknownot。
Asiftodemonstrate,byastrikingexample,theimpossibilityoferectinganycerebralbarrierbetweenmanandtheapes,Naturehasprovidedus,inthelatteranimals,withanalmostcompleteseriesofgradationsfrombrainslittlehigherthanthatofaRodent,tobrainslittlelowerthanthatofMan。Anditisaremarkablecircumstancethatthough,sofarasourpresentknowledgeextends,there’is’onetruestructuralbreakintheseriesofformsofSimianbrains,thishiatusdoesnotliebetweenManandtheman-likeapes,butbetweenthelowerandthelowestSimians;or,inotherwords,betweentheoldandnewworldapesandmonkeys,andtheLemurs。EveryLemurwhichhasyetbeenexamined,infact,hasitscerebellumpartiallyvisiblefromabove,anditsposteriorlobe,withthecontainedposteriorcornuandhippocampusminor,moreorlessrudimentary。EveryMarmoset,Americanmonkey,old-worldmonkey,Baboon,orMan-likeape,onthecontrary,hasitscerebellumentirelyhidden,posteriorly,bythecerebrallobes,andpossessesalargeposteriorcornu,withawell-developedhippocampusminor。
FIG。20。——DrawingsoftheinternalcastsofaMan’sandofaChimpanzee’sskull,ofthesameabsolutelength,andplacedincorrespondingpositions。’A’。Cerebrum;’B’。Cerebellum。TheformerdrawingistakenfromacastintheMuseumoftheRoyalCollegeofSurgeons,thelatterfromthephotographofthecastofaChimpanzee’sskull,whichillustratesthepaperbyMr。Marshall’OntheBrainoftheChimpanzee’inthe’NaturalHistoryReview’forJuly,1861。ThesharperdefinitionoftheloweredgeofthecastofthecerebralchamberintheChimpanzeearisesfromthecircumstancethatthetentoriumremainedinthatskullandnotintheMan’s。ThecastmoreaccuratelyrepresentsthebraininChimpanzeethanintheMan;andthegreatbackwardprojectionoftheposteriorlobesofthecerebrumoftheformer,beyondthecerebellum,isconspicuous。
Inmanyofthesecreatures,suchastheSaimiri(’Chrysothrix’),thecerebrallobesoverlapandextendmuchfurtherbehindthecerebellum,inproportion,thantheydoinman(Fig。16)——anditisquitecertainthat,inall,thecerebellumiscompletelycoveredbehind,bywell-developedposteriorlobes。Thefactcanbeverifiedbyeveryonewhopossessestheskullofanyoldornewworldmonkey。For,inasmuchasthebraininallmammalscompletelyfillsthecranialcavity,itisobviousthatacastoftheinterioroftheskullwillreproducethegeneralformofthebrain,atanyratewithsuchminuteand,forthepresentpurpose,utterlyunimportantdifferencesasmayresultfromtheabsenceoftheenvelopingmembranesofthebraininthedryskull。Butifsuchacastbemadeinplaster,andcomparedwithasimilarcastoftheinteriorofahumanskull,itwillbeobviousthatthecastofthecerebralchamber,representingthecerebrumoftheape,ascompletelycoversoverandoverlapsthecastofthecerebellarchamber,representingthecerebellum,asitdoesintheman(Fig。20)。A
carelessobserver,forgettingthatasoftstructurelikethebrainlosesitspropershapethemomentitistakenoutoftheskull,mayindeedmistaketheuncoveredconditionofthecerebellumofanextractedanddistortedbrainforthenaturalrelationsoftheparts;buthiserrormustbecomepatenteventohimselfifhetrytoreplacethebrainwithinthecranialchamber。Tosupposethatthecerebellumofanapeisnaturallyuncoveredbehindisamiscomprehensioncomparableonlytothatofonewhoshouldimaginethataman’slungsalwaysoccupybutasmallportionofthethoraciccavity——becausetheydosowhenthechestisopened,andtheirelasticityisnolongerneutralizedbythepressureoftheair。
Andtheerroristhelessexcusable,asitmustbecomeapparenttoeveryonewhoexaminesasectionoftheskullofanyapeaboveaLemur,withouttakingthetroubletomakeacastofit。Forthereisaverymarkedgrooveineverysuchskull,asinthehumanskull——whichindicatesthelineofattachmentofwhatistermedthe’tentorium’——asortofparchment-likeshelf,orpartition,which,intherecentstate,isinterposedbetweenthecerebrumandcerebellum,andpreventstheformerfrompressinguponthelatter。(SeeFig。16。)
Thisgroove,therefore,indicatesthelineofseparationbetweenthatpartofthecranialcavitywhichcontainsthecerebrum,andthatwhichcontainsthecerebellum;andasthebrainexactlyfillsthecavityoftheskull,itisobviousthattherelationsofthesetwopartsofthecranialcavityatonceinformsusoftherelationsoftheircontents。
Nowinman,inalltheold-world,andinallthenew-worldSimiae,withoneexception,whenthefaceisdirectedforwards,thislineofattachmentofthetentorium,orimpressionforthelateralsinus,asitistechnicallycalled,isnearlyhorizontal,andthecerebralchamberinvariablyoverlapsorprojectsbehindthecerebellarchamber。IntheHowlerMonkeyor’Mycetes’(seeFig。16),thelinepassesobliquelyupwardsandbackwards,andthecerebraloverlapisalmostnil;whileintheLemurs,asinthelowermammals,thelineismuchmoreinclinedinthesamedirection,andthecerebellarchamberprojectsconsiderablybeyondthecerebral。
Whenthegravesterrorsrespectingpointssoeasilysettledasthisquestionrespectingtheposteriorlobescanbeauthoritativelypropounded,itisnowonderthatmattersofobservation,ofnoverycomplexcharacter,butstillrequiringacertainamountofcare,shouldhavefaredworse。Anyonewhocannotseetheposteriorlobeinanape’sbrainisnotlikelytogiveaveryvaluableopinionrespectingtheposteriorcornuorthehippocampusminor。Ifamancannotseeachurch,itispreposteroustotakehisopinionaboutitsaltar-pieceorpaintedwindow——sothatIdonotfeelboundtoenteruponanydiscussionofthesepoints,butcontentmyselfwithassuringthereaderthattheposteriorcornuandthehippocampusminor,havenowbeenseen——usually,atleastaswelldevelopedasinman,andoftenbetter——notonlyintheChimpanzee,theOrang,andtheGibbon,butinallthegeneraoftheoldworldbaboonsandmonkeys,andinmostofthenewworldforms,includingtheMarmosets。*
[Footnote]*Seethenoteattheendofthisessayforasuccincthistoryofthecontroversytowhichallusionisheremade。
FIG。21。——DrawingsofthecerebralhemispheresofaManandofaChimpanzeeofthesamelength,inordertoshowtherelativeproportionsoftheparts:theformertakenfromaspecimen,whichMr。
Flower,ConservatoroftheMuseumoftheRoyalCollegeofSurgeons,wasgoodenoughtodissectforme;thelatter,fromthephotographofasimilarlydissectedChimpanzee’sbrain,giveninMr。Marshall’spaperabovereferredto。’a’,posteriorlobe;’b’,lateralventricle;’c’,posteriorcornu;’x’,thehippocampusminor。
Infact,alltheabundantandtrustworthyevidence(consistingoftheresultsofcarefulinvestigationsdirectedtothedeterminationoftheseveryquestions,byskilledanatomists)whichwenowpossess,leadstotheconvictionthat,sofarfromtheposteriorlobe,theposteriorcornu,andthehippocampusminor,beingstructurespeculiartoandcharacteristicofman,astheyhavebeenoverandoveragainassertedtobe,evenafterthepublicationoftheclearestdemonstrationofthereverse,itispreciselythesestructureswhicharethemostmarkedcerebralcharacterscommontomanwiththeapes。TheyareamongthemostdistinctlySimianpeculiaritieswhichthehumanorganismexhibits。
Astotheconvolutions,thebrainsoftheapesexhibiteverystageofprogress,fromthealmostsmoothbrainoftheMarmoset,totheOrangandtheChimpanzee,whichfallbutlittlebelowMan。Anditismostremarkablethat,assoonasalltheprincipalsulciappear,thepatternaccordingtowhichtheyarearrangedisidenticalwiththatofthecorrespondingsulciofman。Thesurfaceofthebrainofamonkeyexhibitsasortofskeletonmapofman’s,andintheman-likeapesthedetailsbecomemoreandmorefilledin,untilitisonlyinminorcharacters,suchasthegreaterexcavationoftheanteriorlobes,theconstantpresenceoffissuresusuallyabsentinman,andthedifferentdispositionandproportionsofsomeconvolutions,thattheChimpanzee’sortheOrang’sbraincanbestructurallydistinguishedfromMan’s。
Sofarascerebralstructuregoes,therefore,itisclearthatMandifferslessfromtheChimpanzeeortheOrang,thanthesedoevenfromtheMonkeys,andthatthedifferencebetweenthebrainsoftheChimpanzeeandofManisalmostinsignificant,whencomparedwiththatbetweentheChimpanzeebrainandthatofaLemur。
Itmustnotbeoverlooked,however,thatthereisaverystrikingdifferenceinabsolutemassandweightbetweenthelowesthumanbrainandthatofthehighestape——adifferencewhichisallthemoreremarkablewhenwerecollectthatafullgrownGorillaisprobablyprettynearlytwiceasheavyasaBosjesman,orasmanyanEuropeanwoman。Itmaybedoubtedwhetherahealthyhumanadultbraineverweighedlessthanthirty-oneortwoounces,orthattheheaviestGorillabrainhasexceededtwentyounces。