ButitmustberememberedtherecanbenoGodwhoisnotpersonalandmaterial:andifpersonal,then,thoughinconceivablyvastincomparisonwithman,stilllimitedinspaceandtime,andcapableofmakingmistakesconcerninghisowninterests,thoughasageneralrulerightinhisestimatesconcerningthem。Where,then,isthisBeing?Hemustbeonearth,orwhatfollycanbegreaterthanspeakingofhimasaperson?Whatarepersonsonanyotherearthtous,orwetothem?Hemusthaveexistedandbegoingtoexistthroughalltime,andhemusthaveatangiblebody。Where,then,isthebodyofthisGod?AndwhatisthemysteryofhisIncarnation?
Itwillbemybusinesstoshowthisinthefollowingchapter。
CHAPTERVI
THETREEOFLIFE
AtheismdeniesknowledgeofaGodofanykind。PantheismandTheismalikeprofesstogiveusaGod,buttheyalikefailtoperformwhattheyhavepromised。WecanknownothingoftheGodtheyofferus,fornotevendotheythemselvesprofessthatanyofoursensescanbecognisant[sic]ofhim。TheytellusthatheisapersonalGod,butthathehasnomaterialperson。ThisisdisguisedAtheism。WhatwewantisaPersonalGod,thegloryofwhosePresencecanbemadeinpartevidenttooursenses,thoughwhatwecanrealise[sic]islessthannothingincomparisonwithwhatwemustleaveforeverunimagined。
AndtrulysuchaGodisnotfarfromeveryoneofus;forifwesurveythebroaderanddeepercurrentsofmen’sthoughtsduringthelastthreethousandyears,wemayobservetwogreatandsteadysetsashavingcarriedawaywiththemthemoreeligibleracesofmankind。TheoneisatendencyfromPolytheismtoMonotheism;theotherfromPolytypismtoMonotypismoftheearliestformsoflife-allanimalandvegetableformshavingatlengthcometoberegardedasdifferentiationsofasinglesubstance-towit,protoplasm。
Nomandoeswellsotokickagainstthepricksastosethimselfagainsttendenciesofsuchdepth,strength,andpermanenceasthis。Ifheistobeinharmonywiththedominantopinionofhisownandofmanypastages,hewillseeasingleGod-impregnatesubstanceashavingbeentheparentfromwhichalllivingformshavesprung。Onespirit,andoneformcapableofsuchmodificationasitsdirectingspiritshallthinkfit;onesoulandonebody,oneGodandoneLife。
Forthetimehascomewhenthetwounitiessopainfullyarrivedatmustbejoinedtogetherasbodyandsoul,andbeseennotastwo,butone。ThereisnolivingorganismuntenantedbytheSpiritofGod,noranySpiritofGodperceivablebymanapartfromorganismembodyingandexpressingit。GodandtheLifeoftheWorldarelikeamountain,whichwillpresentdifferentaspectsaswelookatitfromdifferentsides,butwhich,whenwehavegoneallroundit,provestobeoneonly。Godistheanimalandvegetableworld,andtheanimalandvegetableworldisGod。
Ihaverepeatedlysaidthatweoughttoseeallanimalandvegetablelifeasunitingtoformasinglepersonality。Ishouldperhapsexplainthismorefully,fortheideaofacompoundpersonisonewhichatfirstisnotveryeasytograsp,inasmuchaswearenotconsciousofanybutourmoresuperficialaspects,andhavethereforeuntillatelyfailedtounderstandthatweareourselvescompoundpersons。Imayperhapsbeallowedtoquotefromanearlierwork。
"Eachcellinthehumanbodyisnowadmittedbyphysiologiststobeapersonwithanintelligentsoul,differingfromourownmorecomplexsoulindegreeandnotinkind,and,likeourselves,beingborn,living,anddying。Itwouldappear,then,asthough’we,’’oursouls,’or’selves,’or’personalities,’orbywhatevernamewemayprefertobecalled,arebuttheconsensusandfull-flowingstreamofcountlesssensationsandimpulsesonthepartofourtributarysoulsor’selves,’whoprobablynomoreknowthatweexist,andthattheyexistasapartofus,thanamicroscopicinsectknowstheresultsofspectrumanalysis,orthananagriculturallabourer[sic]knowstheworkingoftheBritishConstitution;andofwhomweknownomorethanwedoofthehabitsandfeelingsofsomeclasswidelyseparatedfromourown。"-("LifeandHabit,"p。110。)
Afterwhichitbecamenaturaltoaskthefollowingquestion:-
"Isitpossibletoavoidimaginingthatwemaybeourselvesatoms,undesignedlycombiningtoformsomevasterbeing,thoughweareutterlyincapableofperceivingthisbeingasasingleindividual,orofrealising[sic]theschemeandscopeofourowncombination?Andthis,too,notaspiritualbeing,which,withoutmatterorwhatwethinkmatterofsomesort,isascompletenonsensetousasthoughmenbadeusloveandleanuponanintelligentvacuum,butabeingwithwhatisvirtuallyfleshandbloodandbones,withorgans,senses,dimensionsinsomewayanalogoustoourown,intosomeotherpartofwhichbeingatthetimeofourgreatchangewemustinfalliblyre-enter,startingcleananew,withbygonesbygones,andnomoreacheforeverfromageorantecedents。
"’Anorganicbeing,’writesMr。Darwin,’isamicrocosm,alittleuniverse,formedofahostofself-propagatingorganismsinconceivablyminuteandnumerousasthestarsinHeaven。’Asthesemyriadsofsmallerorganismsarepartsandprocessesofus,soarewepartsandprocessesoflifeatlarge。"
Atreeiscomposedofamultitudeofsubordinatetrees,eachbudbeingadistinctindividual。Socoralpolypes[sic]formatree-
likegrowthofanimallife,withbranchesfromwhichspringindividualpolypes[sic]thatareconnectedbyacommontissueandsupportedbyacommonskeleton。Wehavenodifficultyinseeingaunityinmultitude,andamultitudeinunityhere,becausewecanobservethewoodandthegelatinoustissueconnectingtogetheralltheindividualswhichcomposeeitherthetreeorthemassofpolypes[sic]。Yettheskeleton,whetheroftreeorofpolype[sic],isinanimate;andthetissue,whetherofbarkorgelatine[sic],isonlythemattedrootsoftheindividualbuds;sothattheoutwardandstrikingconnectionbetweentheindividualsismoredelusivethanreal。Thetrueconnectionisonewhichcannotbeseen,andconsistsintheanimationofeachbudbyalikespirit-inthecommunityofsoul,in"thevoiceoftheLordwhichmakethmentobeofonemindinanhouse"-"todwelltogetherinunity"-totakewhatarepracticallyidenticalviewsofthings,andexpressthemselvesinconcertunderallcircumstances。Providedthis-thetrueunifieroforganism-canbeshowntoexist,theabsenceofgrossoutwardandvisiblebutinanimatecommonskeletonisnobartoonenessofpersonality。
Letuspicturetoourmindsatreeofwhichallthewoodyfibre[sic]shallbeinvisible,thebudsandleavesseemingtostandinmid-airunsupportedandunconnectedwithoneanother,sothatthereisnothingbutacertaintree-likecollocationoffoliagetosuggestanycommonprincipleofgrowthunitingtheleaves。
Threeorfourleavesofdifferentagesstandlivingtogetherattheplaceintheairwheretheendofeachboughshouldbe;ofthesetheyoungestarestilltenderandinthebud,whiletheolderonesareturningyellowandonthepointoffalling。
Betweentheseleavesasortoftwig-likegrowthcanbedetectediftheyarelookedatincertainlights,butitishardtosee,exceptperhapswhenabudisonthepointofcomingout。Thentheredoesappeartobeaconnectionwhichmightbecalledbranch-like。
Theseparatetuftsareverydifferentfromoneanother,sothatoakleaves,ashleaves,horse-chestnutleaves,etc。,areeachrepresented,butthereisonespeciesonlyattheendofeachbough。
Thoughthetrunkandalltheinnerboughsandleaveshavedisappeared,yettherehanghereandtherefossilleaves,alsoinmid-air;theyappeartohavebeenpetrified,withoutmethodorselection,bywhatwecallthecapricesofnature;theyhanginthepathwhichtheboughsandtwigswouldhavetaken,andtheyseemtoindicatethatifthetreecouldhavebeenseenamillionyearsearlier,beforeithadgrownnearitspresentsize,theleavesstandingattheendofeachboughwouldhavebeenfoundverydifferentfromwhattheyarenow。Letussupposethatalltheleavesattheendofalltheinvisibleboughs,nomatterhowdifferenttheynowarefromoneanother,werefoundinearliestbudhoodtobeabsolutelyindistinguishable,andafterwardstodeveloptowardseachdifferentiationthroughstageswhichwereindicatedbythefossilleaves。Lastly,letussupposethatthoughtheboughswhichseemwantedtoconnectallthelivingformsofleaveswiththefossilleaves,andwithcountlessformsofwhichalltracehasdisappeared,andalsowithasingleroot-
havebecomeinvisible,yetthatthereisirrefragableevidencetoshowthattheyonceactuallyexisted,andindeedareexistingatthismoment,inaconditionasrealthoughasinvisibletotheeyeasairorelectricity。Shouldwe,Iask,underthesecircumstanceshesitatetocallourimaginaryplantortreebyasinglename,andtothinkofitasoneperson,merelyuponthescorethatthewoodyfibre[sic]wasinvisible?Shouldwenotesteemthecommonsoul,memoriesandprinciplesofgrowthwhicharepreservedbetweenallthebuds,nomatterhowwidelytheydifferindetail,asamorelivingbondofunionthanaframeworkofwoodwouldbe,which,thoughitwerevisibletotheeye,wouldstillbeinanimate?
Themistletoeappearsascloselyconnectedwiththetreeonwhichitgrowsasanyofthebudsofthetreeitself;itisfeduponthesamesapastheotherbudsare,whichsap-howevermuchitmaymodifyitatthelastmoment-itdrawsthroughthesamefibres[sic]asdoitsfoster-brothers-whythendoweatoncefeelthatthemistletoeisnopartoftheappletree?Notfromanywantofmanifestcontinuity,butfromthespiritualdifference-fromtheprofoundlydifferentviewsoflifeandthingswhicharetakenbytheparasiteandthetreeonwhichitgrows-thetwoarenowdifferentbecausetheythinkdifferently-aslongastheythoughtaliketheywerealike-thatistosaytheywereprotoplasm-theyandweandallthatlivesmeetinginthiscommonsubstance。
Weoughtthereforetoregardoursupposedtuftsofleavesasatree,thatistosay,asacompoundexistence,eachoneofwhosecomponentitemsiscompoundedofotherswhicharealsointheirturncompounded。Butthetreeabovedescribedisnoimaginaryparalleltotheconditionoflifeupontheglobe;itisperhapsasaccurateadescriptionoftheTreeofLifeascanbeputintososmallacompass。Themostsureproofofaman’sidentityisthepowertorememberthatsuchandsuchthingshappened,whichnonebuthecanknow;themostsureproofofhisrememberingisthepowertoreacthispartintheoriginaldrama,whateveritmayhavebeen;ifamancanrepeataperformancewithconsummatetruth,andcanstandanyamountofcross-questioningaboutit,heistheperformeroftheoriginalperformance,whateveritwas。
Thememorieswhichalllivingformsprovebytheiractionsthattheypossess-thememoriesoftheircommonidentitywithasinglepersoninwhomtheymeet-thisisincontestableproofoftheirbeinganimatedbyacommonsoul。Itiscertain,therefore,thatalllivingforms,whetheranimalorvegetable,areinrealityoneanimal;weandthemossesbeingpartofthesamevastpersoninnofigurativesense,butwithasmuchbonafideliteraltruthaswhenwesaythataman’sfinger-nailsandhiseyesarepartsofthesameman。
ItisinthisPersonthatwemayseetheBodyofGod-andintheevolutionofthisPerson,themysteryofHisIncarnation。
[In"UnconsciousMemory,"ChapterV,Butlerwrote:"Inthearticlesabovealludedto("GodtheKnownandGodtheUnknown")I
separatedtheorganicfromtheinorganic,butwhenIcametorewritethemIfoundthatthiscouldnotbedone,andthatImustreconstructwhatIhadwritten。"Thisreconstructionneverhavingbeeneffected,itmaybewelltoquotefurtherfrom"UnconsciousMemory"(concludingchapter):"Atparting,therefore,Iwouldrecommendthereadertoseeeveryatomintheuniverseaslivingandabletofeelandremember,butinahumbleway。Hemusthavelifeeternalaswellasmattereternal;andthelifeandthemattermustbejoinedtogetherinseparablyasbodyandsoultooneanother。ThushewillseeGodeverywhere,notasthosewhorepeatphrasesconventionally,butaspeoplewhowouldhavetheirwordstakenaccordingtotheirmostnaturalandlegitimatemeaning;andhewillfeelthatthemaindifferencebetweenhimandmanyofthosewhoopposehimliesinthefactthatwhereasbothheandtheyusethesamelanguage,hisopponentsonlyhalfmeanwhattheysay,whilehemeansitentirely……Weshallendeavour[sic]toseetheso-calledinorganicasliving,inrespectofthequalitiesithasincommonwiththeorganic,ratherthantheorganicasnon-livinginrespectofthequalitiesithasincommonwiththeinorganic。"]
CHAPTERVII
THELIKENESSOFGOD
InmylastchapterIendeavoured[sic]toshowthateachlivingbeing,whetheranimalorplant,throughouttheworldisacomponentitemofasinglepersonality,inthesamewayaseachindividualcitizenofacommunityisamemberofonestate,oraseachcellofourownbodiesisaseparateperson,oreachbudofatreeaseparateplant。WemustthereforeseethewholevariedcongeriesoflivingthingsasasingleveryancientBeing,ofinconceivablevastness,andanimatedbyoneSpirit。
Wecalltheoctogenarianonepersonwiththeembryoofafewdaysoldfromwhichhehasdeveloped。Anoakoryewtreemaybetwothousandyearsold,butwecallitoneplantwiththeseedfromwhichithasgrown。Millionsofindividualbudshavecomeandgone,totheyearlywastingandrepairingofitssubstance;butthetreestilllivesandthrives,andthedeadleaveshavelifetherein。SotheTreeofLifestilllivesandthrivesasasingleperson,nomatterhowmanynewfeaturesithasacquiredduringitsdevelopment,nor,again,howmanyofitsindividualleavesfallyellowtothegrounddaily。ThespiritorsoulofthispersonistheSpiritofGod,anditsbody-forweknowofnosoulorspiritwithoutabody,norofanylivingbodywithoutaspiritorsoul,andifthereisaGodatalltheremustbeabodyofGod-isthemany-memberedoutgrowthofprotoplasm,theensembleofanimalandvegetablelife。
Torepeat。TheTheologianofto-daytellsusthatthereisaGod,butishorrifiedattheideaofthatGodhavingabody。WesaythatwebelieveinGod,butthatourmindsrefusetorealise[sic]anintelligentBeingwhohasnobodilyperson。"Wherethen,"saystheTheologian,"isthebodyofyourGod?"Wehaveanswered,"Inthelivingformsupontheearth,which,thoughtheylookmany,are,whenweregardthembythelightoftheirhistoryandoftrueanalogies,onepersononly。"Thespiritualconnectionbetweenthemisamorerealbondofunionthanthevisiblediscontinuityofmaterialpartsisgroundforseparatingtheminourthoughts。
Letthereaderlookatacaseofmothsintheshop-windowofanaturalist,andnotetheunspeakabledelicacy,beauty,andyetserviceablenessoftheirwings;orlethimlookatacaseofhumming-birds,andrememberhowinfinitelysmallapartofNatureisthewholegroupoftheanimalshemaybeconsidering,andhowinfinitelysmallapartofthatgroupisthecasethatheislookingat。Lethimbearinmindthatheislookingonthedeadhusksonlyofwhatwasinconceivablymoremarvellous[sic]whenthemothsorhumming-birdswerealive。Lethimthinkofthevastnessoftheearth,andoftheactivitybydayandnightthroughcountlessagesofsuchcountlessformsofanimalandvegetablelifeasthatnohumanmindcanformthefaintestapproachtoanythingthatcanbecalledaconceptionoftheirmultitude,andlethimrememberthatalltheseformshavetouchedandtouchedandtouchedotherlivingbeingstilltheymeetbackonacommonsubstanceinwhichtheyarerooted,andfromwhichtheyallbranchforthsoastobeoneanimal。WillhenotinthisrealandtangibleexistencefindaGodwhoisasmuchmoreworthyofadmirationthantheGodoftheordinaryTheologian-asHeisalsomoreeasyofcomprehension?
FortheTheologiandreamsofaGodsittingabovethecloudsamongthecherubim,whoblowtheirloudupliftedangeltrumpetsbeforeHim,andhumour[sic]HimasthoughHeweresomedespotinanOrientaltale;butweenthroneHimuponthewingsofbirds,onthepetalsofflowers,onthefacesofourfriends,anduponwhateverwemostdelightinofallthatlivesupontheearth。WethencannotonlyloveHim,butwecandothatwithoutwhichlovehasneitherpowernorsweetness,butisaphantomonly,animpersonalperson,avainstretchingforthofarmstowardssomethingthatcanneverfillthem-wecanexpressourloveandhaveitexpressedtousinreturn。Andthisnotintheuprearingofstonetemples-fortheLorddwelleth[sic]intemplesmadewithotherorgansthanhands-noryetinthecleansingofourhearts,butinthecaressbestoweduponhorseanddog,andkissesuponthelipsofthosewelove。
Wide,however,asisthedifferencebetweentheorthodoxTheologianandourselves,itisnotmoreremarkablethanthenumberofthepointsonwhichwecanagreewithhim,andonwhich,moreover,wecanmakehismeaningclearertohimselfthanitcanhaveeverhithertobeen。He,forexample,saysthatmanhasbeenmadeintheimageofGod,buthecannotmeanwhathesays,unlesshisGodhasamaterialbody;we,ontheotherhand,donotindeedbelievethatthebodyofGod-theincorporationofalllife-islikethebodyofaman,morethanwebelieveeachoneofourowncellsorsubordinatepersonalitiestobelikeamaninminiature;butweneverthelessholdthateachofourtributaryselvesissofarmadeafterthelikenessofthebodycorporatethatitpossessesallourmainandessentialcharacteristics-thatistosay,thatitcanwasteandrepairitself;canfeel,move,andremember。Tothisextent,also,we-whostandinmeanproportionalbetweenourtributarypersonalitiesandGod-aremadeinthelikenessofGod;forwe,andGod,andoursubordinatecellsalikepossesstheessentialcharacteristicsoflifewhichhavebeenaboverecited。Itismoretrue,therefore,forustosaythatwearemadeinthelikenessofGodthanfortheorthodoxTheologiantodoso。
Nor,again,dowefinddifficultyinadoptingsuchanexpressionasthat"GodhastakenournatureuponHim。"Weholdthisasfirmly,andmuchmoreso,thanChristianscando,butwesaythatthisisnonewthingforHimtodo,forthatHehastakenfleshanddweltamongusfromthedaythatHefirstassumedourshape,somemillionsofyearsago,untilnow。GodcannotbecomemanmoreespeciallythanHecanbecomeotherlivingforms,anymorethanwecanbeoureyesmoreespeciallythananyotherofourorgans。Wemaydeveloplargereyes,sothatoureyesmaycometooccupyastillmoreimportantplaceinoureconomythantheydoatpresent;andinasimilarwaythehumanracemaybecomeamorepredominantpartofGodthanitnowis-butwecannotadmitthatonelivingformismorelikeGodthananother;wemustholdallequallylikeHim,inasmuchasthey"keepever,"asBuffonsays,"thesamefundamentalunity,inspiteofdifferencesofdetail-
nutrition,development,reproduction"(and,Iwouldadd,"memory")"beingthecommontraitsofallorganicbodies。"Theutmostwecanadmitis,thatsomeembodimentsoftheSpiritofLifemaybemoreimportantthanotherstothewelfareofLifeasawhole,inthesamewayassomeofourorgansaremoreimportantthanotherstoourselves。
ButtheaboveresemblancesbetweenthelanguagewhichwecanadoptintelligentlyandthatwhichTheologiansusevaguely,seemtoreducethedifferencesofopinionbetweenthetwocontendingpartiestodisputesaboutdetail。Foreventhosewhobelievetheirideastobethemostdefinite,andwhopicturetothemselvesaGodasanthropomorphicasHewasrepresentedbyRaffaelle,areyetnotpreparedtostandbytheirideasiftheyarehardpressedinthesamewayaswearebyours。ThosewhosaythatGodbecamemanandtookfleshuponHim,andthatHeisnowperfectGodandperfectmanofareasonablesoulandhumanfleshsubsisting,willyetnotmeanthatChristhasaheart,blood,astomach,etc。,likeman’s,which,ifhehasnot,itisidletospeakofhimas"perfectman。"Iampersuadedthattheydonotmeanthis,norwishtomeanit;butthattheyhavebeenledintosayingitbyaseriesofstepswhichitisveryeasytounderstandandsympathise[sic]with,iftheyareconsideredwithanydiligence。
Forourforefathers,thoughtheymightanddidfeeltheexistenceofaPersonalGodintheworld,yetcouldnotdemonstratethisexistence,andmademistakesintheirendeavour[sic]topersuadethemselvesthattheyunderstoodthoroughlyatruthwhichtheyhadasyetperceivedonlyfromalongdistance。Henceallthedogmatismandtheologyofmanycenturies。ItwasimpossibleforthemtoformaclearordefiniteconceptionconcerningGoduntiltheyhadstudiedHisworksmoredeeply,soastograsptheideaofmanyanimalsofdifferentkindsandwithnoapparentconnectionbetweenthem,beingyettrulypartsofoneandthesameanimalwhichcomprisedtheminthesamewayasatreecomprisesallitsbuds。Theymightspeakofthisbyafigureofspeech,buttheycouldnotseeitasafact。Beforethiscouldbeintendedliterally,Evolutionmustbegrasped,andnotEvolutionastaughtinwhatisnowcommonlycalledDarwinism,buttheoldteleologicalDarwinismofeightyyearsago。Noristhisagainsufficient,foritmustbesupplementedbyaperceptionoftheonenessofpersonalitybetweenparentsandoffspring,thepersistenceofmemorythroughallgenerations,thelatencyofthismemoryuntilrekindledbytherecurrenceoftheassociatedideas,andtheunconsciousnesswithwhichrepeatedactscometobeperformed。Thesearemodernideaswhichmightbecaughtsightofnowandagainbyprophetsintimepast,butwhichareevennowmasteredandheldfirmlyonlybythefew。
Whenonce,however,theseideashavebeenaccepted,thechiefdifferencebetweentheorthodoxGodandtheGodwhocanbeseenofallmenis,thatthefirstissupposedtohaveexistedfromalltime,whilethesecondhasonlylivedformoremillionsofyearsthanourmindscanreckonintelligently;thefirstisomnipresentinallspace,whilethesecondisonlypresentinthelivingformsuponthisearth-thatistosay,isonlymorewidelypresentthanourmindscanintelligentlyembrace。Thefirstisomnipotentandall-wise;thesecondisonlyquasi-omnipotentandquasiall-wise。Itistrue,then,thatwedepriveGodofthatinfinitywhichorthodoxTheologianshaveascribedtoHim,buttheboundsweleaveHimareofsuchincalculableextentthatnothingcanbeimaginedmoregloriousorvaster;andinreturnforthelimitationswehaveassignedtoHim,werenderitpossibleformentobelieveinHim,andloveHim,notwiththeirlipsonly,butwiththeirheartsandlives。
Which,Imaynowventuretoaskmyreaders,isthetrueGod-theGodoftheTheologian,orHewhomwemayseearoundus,andinwhosepresencewestandeachhourandmomentofourlives?
CHAPTERVIII
THELIFEEVERLASTING
Letusnowconsiderthelifewhichwecanlookforwardtowithcertaintyafterdeath,andthemoralgovernmentoftheworldhereonearth。
Ifwecouldheartheleavescomplainingtooneanotherthattheymustdie,andcommiseratingthehardnessoftheirlotinhavingeverbeeninducedtobudforth,weshould,Iimagine,despisethemfortheirpeevishnessmorethanweshouldpitythem。Weshouldtellthemthatthoughwecouldnotseereasonforthinkingthattheywouldeverhangagainuponthesame-oranyatallsimilar-boughasthesameindividualleaves,aftertheyhadoncefadedandfallenoff,yetthatastheyhadbeenchangingpersonalitieswithoutfeelingitduringthewholeoftheirleafhood,sotheywouldondeathcontinuetodothisselfsamethingbyenteringintonewphasesoflife。True,deathwilldeprivethemofconsciousmemoryconcerningtheirnowcurrentlife;but,thoughtheydieasleaves,theyliveinthetreewhomtheyhavehelpedtovivify,andwhosegrowthandcontinuedwell-
beingisduesolelytothislifeanddeathofitscomponentpersonalities。
Weconsiderthecellswhicharebornanddiewithinusyearlytohavebeensufficientlyhonoured[sic]inhavingcontributedtheirquotumtoourlife;whyshouldwehavesuchdifficultyinseeingthatahealthyenjoymentandemploymentofourlifewillgiveusasufficientrewardinthatgrowthofGodwhereinwemaylivemoretrulyandeffectuallyafterdeaththanwehavelivedwhenwewereconsciousofexistence?IsHandeldeadwhenheinfluencesandsetsinmotionmorehumanbeingsinthreemonthsnowthanduringthewhole,probably,oftheyearsinwhichhethoughtthathewasalive?Whatisbeingaliveifthepowertodrawmenformanymilesinorderthattheymayputthemselvesenrapportwithhimisnotbeingso?True,Handelnolongerknowsthepowerwhichhehasoverus,butthisisasmallmatter;
henolongeranimatessixfeetoffleshandblood,buthelivesinusasthedeadleaflivesinthetree。HeiswithGod,andGodknowshimthoughheknowshimselfnomore。
Thisshouldsuffice,andIobserveinpracticedoessuffice,forallreasonablepersons。Itmaybesaidthatonedaythetreeitselfmustdie,andtheleavesnolongerlivetherein;andso,also,thattheveryGodorLifeoftheWorldwillonedayperish,asallthatisbornmustsurelyintheenddie。Buttheywhofretuponsuchgroundsasthismustbeinsomuchwantofagrievancethatitwereacrueltytorobthemofone:ifamanwhoisfondofmusictortureshimselfonthegroundthatonedayallpossiblecombinationsandpermutationsofsoundswillhavebeenexhaustedsothattherecanbenomorenewtunes,theonlythingwecandowithhimistopityhimandleavehim;noristhereanybettercoursethanthistotakewiththoseidlepeoplewhoworrythem
selvesandothersonthescorethattheywillonedaybeunabletorememberthesmallbalanceoftheirlivesthattheyhavenotalreadyforgottenasunimportanttothem-thattheywillonedaydietothebalanceofwhattheyhavenotalreadydiedto。Ineverknewawell-bredoramiablepersonwhocomplainedseriouslyofthefactthathewouldhavetodie。Grantedwemustallsome
timesfindourselvesfeelingsorrythatwecannotremainforeveratourpresentage,andthatwemaydiesomuchsoonerthanwelike;buttheseregretsarepassingwithwell-disposedpeople,andareasinequanonfortheexistenceoflifeatall。
Forifpeoplecouldliveforeversoastosufferfromnosuchregret,therewouldbenogrowthnordevelopmentinlife;if,ontheotherhand,therewerenounwillingnesstodie,peoplewouldcommitsuicideuponthesmallestcontradiction,andtheracewouldendinatwelvemonth。
Wethenofferimmortality,butwedonotofferresurrectionfromthedead;wesaythatthosewhodieliveintheLordwhethertheybejustorunjust,andthatthepresentgrowthofGodistheoutcomeofallpastlives;butwebelievethatastheyliveinGod-intheeffecttheyhaveproducedupontheuniversallife-whenoncetheirindividuallifeisended,soitisGodwhoknowsoftheirlifethenceforwardandnotthemselves;andweurgethatthisimmortality,thisentranceintothejoyoftheLord,thisbeingeverwithGod,istrue,andcanbeapprehendedbyallmen,andthattheperceptionofitshouldandwilltendtomakethemleadhappier,healthierlives;whereasthecommonlyreceivedopinionistruewithastagetruthonly,andhaslittlepermanenteffectuponthosewhoarebestworthconsidering。Neverthelesstheexpressionsincommonuseamongtheorthodoxfitinsoperfectlywithfacts,whichwemustallacknowledge,thatitisimpossiblenottoregardtheexpressionsasfoundeduponapropheticperceptionofthefacts。
Twothingsstandoutwithsufficientclearness。Thefirstistherarityofsuicideevenamongthosewhorailatlifemostbitterly。Theotheristhelittleeagernesswithwhichthosewhocryoutmostloudlyforaresurrectiondesiretobegintheirnewlife。Whencomfortingahusbanduponthelossofhiswifewedonottellhimwehopehewillsoonjoinher;butweshouldcertainlydothisifwecouldevenpretendwethoughtthehusbandwouldlikeit。Icanneverrememberhavingfeltorwitnessedanypain,bodilyormental,whichwouldhavemademeoranyoneelsereceiveasuggestionthatwehadbettercommitsuicidewithoutindignantlyaskinghowouradviserwouldliketocommitsuicidehimself。Yettherearesomanyandsucheasywaysofdyingthatindignationatbeingadvisedtocommitsuicidearisesmorefromenjoymentoflifethanfromfearofthemerephysicalpainofdying。Grantedthatthereismuchdeplorablepainintheworldfromill-health,lossofmoney,lossofreputation,misconductofthosenearesttous,orwhatnot,andgrantedthatinsomecasesthesecausesdodrivementoactualself-destruction,yetsufferingsuchasthishappenstoacomparativelysmallnumber,andoccupiescomparativelyasmallspaceinthelivesofthosetowhomitdoeshappen。
What,however,havewetosaytothosecasesinwhichsufferingandinjusticeareinflictedupondefenceless[sic]peopleforyearsandyears,sothattheironentersintotheirsouls,andtheyhavenoavenger。Canwegiveanycomforttosuchsufferers?
and,ifnot,isourreligionanybetterthanamockery-afillingtherichwithgoodthingsandsendingthehungryemptyaway?Canwetellthem,whentheyareoppressedwithburdens,yetthattheircrywillcomeuptoGodandbeheard?Thequestionsuggestsitsownanswer,forassuredlyourGodknowsourinnermostsecrets:thereisnotawordinourheartsbutHeknowethitaltogether;Heknowethourdown-sittingandouruprising,Heisaboutourpathandaboutourbed,andspiethoutallourways;Hehasfashionedusbehindandbefore,and"wecannotattainsuchknowledge,"for,likeallknowledgewhenithasbecomeperfect,"itistooexcellentforus。"
"Whitherthen,"saysDavid,"shallIgofromthySpirit,orwhithershallIgo,then,fromthypresence?IfIclimbupintoheaventhouartthere;ifIgodownintohellthouarttherealso。IfItakethewingsofthemorningandremainintheuttermostpartsofthesea;eventherealsoshallthyhandleadme,andthyrighthandshallholdme。IfIsayperadventurethedarknessshallcoverme,thenshallmynightbeturnedintoday:
thedarknessandlighttotheearebothalike。Formyreinsarethine;thouhastcoveredmeinmymother’swomb。Mybonesarenothidfromthee:thoughIbemadesecretlyandfashionedbeneathintheearth,thineeyesdidseemysubstanceyetbeingunperfect;andinthybookwereallmymemberswritten,whichdaybydaywerefashionedwhenasyettherewasnoneofthem。DoI
nothatethem,OLord,thathatethee?andamInotgrievedwiththemthatriseupagainstthee?Yea,Ihatethemrightsore,asthoughtheyweremineenemies。"(PsalmCXXXIX。)Thereisnotawordofthiswhichwecannotendorsewithmoresignificance,aswellaswithgreaterheartinessthanthosecanwholookuponGodasHeiscommonlyrepresentedtothem;whatevercomfort,therefore,thoseindistresshavebeeninthehabitofreceivingfromtheseandkindredpassages,weintensifyratherthannot。Wecannot,alas!makepainceasetobepain,norinjusticeeasytobear;butwecanshowthatnopainisbootless,andthatthereisatendencyinallinjusticetorightitself;sufferingisnotinflictedwilfully,[sic]asitwerebyamagicianwhocouldhaveavertedit;norisitvaininitsresults,butunlesswearecutofffromGodbyhavingdweltinsomeplacewherenoneofourkindcanknowofwhathashappenedtous,itwillmoveGod’shearttoredressourgrievance,andwilltendtothehappinessofthosewhocomeafterus,evenifnottoourown。
ThemoralgovernmentofGodovertheworldisexercisedthroughus,whoarehisministersandpersons,andagovernmentofthisdescriptionistheonlyonewhichcanbeobservedaspracticallyinfluencingmen’sconduct。Godhelpsthosewhohelpthemselves,becauseinhelpingthemselvestheyarehelpingHim。Again,VoxPopulivoxDei。Thecurrentfeelingofourpeersiswhatweinstinctivelyturntowhenwewouldknowwhethersuchandsuchacourseofconductisrightorwrong;andsoPaulclencheshislistofthingsthatthePhilippiansweretoholdfastwiththewords,"whatsoeverthingsareofgoodfame"-thatistosay,hefallsbackuponanappealtotheeducatedconscienceofhisage。
Certainlythewickeddosometimesappeartoescapepunishment,butitmustberememberedtherearepunishmentsfromwithinwhichdonotmeettheeye。Ifthesefallonaman,heissufficientlypunished;iftheydonotfallonhim,itisprobablewehavebeenoverhastyinassumingthatheiswicked。
CHAPTERIX
GODTHEUNKNOWN
ThereaderwillalreadyhavefeltthatthepanzoisticconceptionofGod-theconception,thatistosay,ofGodascomprisingalllivingunitsinHisownsingleperson-doesnothelpustounderstandtheoriginofmatter,noryetthatoftheprimordialcellwhichhasgrownandunfoldeditselfintothepresentlifeoftheworld。HowwastheworldrenderedfitforthehabitationofthefirstgermofLife?Howcameittohaveairandwater,withoutwhichnothingthatweknowofaslivingcanexist?Wastheworldfashionedandfurnishedwithaqueousandatmosphericadjunctswithaviewtotherequirementsoftheinfantmonad,andtohisduedevelopment?Ifso,wehaveevidenceofdesign,andifsoofadesigner,andifsotheremustbeSomefarvasterPersonwholoomsoutbehindourGod,andwhostandsinthesamerelationtohimashetous。AndbehindthisvasterandmoreunknownGodtheremaybeyetanother,andanother,andanother。
ItiscertainthatLifedidnotmaketheworldwithaviewtoitsownfuturerequirements。Fortheworldwasatonetimeredhot,andtherecanhavebeennolivingbeinguponit。Norisitconceivablethatmatterinwhichtherewasnolife-inasmuchasitwasinfinitelyhotterthanthehottestinfusionwhichanylivinggermcansupport-couldgraduallycometobealivewithoutimpregnationfromalivingparent。Alllivingthingsthatweknowofhavecomefromotherlivingthingswithbodiesandsouls,whoseexistencecanbesatisfactorilyestablishedinspiteoftheirbeingoftentoosmallforourdetection。Since,then,theworldwasoncewithoutlife,andsincenoanalogypointsinthedirectionofthinkingthatlifecanspringupspontaneously,wearedriventosupposethatitwasintroducedintothisworldfromsomeothersourceextraneoustoitaltogether,andifsowefindourselvesirresistiblydrawntotheinquirywhetherthesourceofthelifethatisintheworld-theimpregnatorofthisearth-maynotalsohavepreparedtheearthforthereceptionofhisoffspring,asahenmakesanegg-shellorapeachastonefortheprotectionofthegermwithinit?Notonlyarewedrawntotheinquiry,butwearedrawnalsototheanswerthattheearthwassoprepareddesignedlybyaPersonwithbodyandsoulwhoknewbeforehandthekindofthingherequired,andwhotookthenecessarystepstobringitabout。
IfthisissowearemembersindeedoftheGodofthisworld,butwearenothischildren;wearechildrenoftheUnknownandVasterGodwhocalledhimintoexistence;andthisinafarmoreliteralsensethanwehavebeeninthehabitofrealising[sic]
toourselves。Foritmaybedoubtedwhetherthemonadsarenotastrulyseminalincharacterastheprocreativematterfromwhichallanimalsspring。
Itmustberememberedthatifthereisanytruthintheviewputforwardin"LifeandHabit,"andin"EvolutionOldandNew"(andIhavemetwithnoseriousattempttoupsetthelineofargumenttakenineitherofthesebooks),thennocomplexanimalorplantcanreachitsfulldevelopmentwithouthavingalreadygonethroughthestagesofthatdevelopmentonaninfinitenumberofpastoccasions。Aneggmakesitselfintoahenbecauseitknowsthewaytodoso,havingalreadymadeitselfintoahenmillionsandmillionsoftimesover;theeaseandunconsciousnesswithwhichitgrowsbeinginthemselvessufficientdemonstrationofthisfact。Ateachstageinitsgrowth{hechickenisreminded,byareturnoftheassociatedideas,ofthenextstepthatitshouldtake,anditaccordinglytakesit。
Butifthisisso,andifalsothecongeriesofallthelivingformsintheworldmustberegardedasasingleperson,throughouttheirlonggrowthfromtheprimordialcellonwardstothepresentday,then,byparityofreasoning,thepersonthuscompounded-thatistosay,LifeorGod-shouldhavealreadypassedthroughagrowthanalogoustothatwhichwefindhehastakenuponthisearthonaninfinitenumberofpastoccasions;andthedevelopmentofeachclassoflife,withitsculminationinthevertebrateanimalsandinman,shouldbeduetorecollectionbyGodofhishavingpassedthroughthesamestages,ornearlyso,inworldsanduniverses,whichweknowoffrompersonalrecollection,asevidencedinthegrowthandstructureofourbodies,butconcerningwhichwehavenootherknowledgewhatsoever。
SosmallaspaceremainstomethatIcannotpursuefurtherthereflectionswhichsuggestthemselves。Afewconcludingconsiderationsareherealonepossible。
Weknowofthreegreatconcentricphasesoflife,andwearenotwithoutreasontosuspectafourth。Iftherearesomanythereareverylikelymore,butwedonotknowwhetherthereareornot。Theinnermostsphereoflifeweknowofisthatofourowncells。Thesepeopleliveinaworldoftheirown,knowingnothingofus,norbeingknownbyourselvesuntilveryrecently。Yettheycanbeseenunderamicroscope;theycanbetakenoutofus,andmaythenbewatchedgoinghereandthereinperturbationofmind,endeavouring[sic]tofindsomethingintheirnewenvironmentthatwillsuitthem,andthendyingonfindinghowhopelesslydifferentitisfromanytowhichtheyhavebeenaccustomed。Theyliveinus,andmakeusupintothesinglepersonwhichweconceiveourselvestoform;wearetothemaworldcomprisinganorganicandaninorganickingdom,ofwhichtheyconsiderthemselvestobetheorganic,andwhateverisnotverylikethemselvestobetheinorganic。Whethertheyarecomposedofsubordinatepersonalitiesornotwedonotknow,butwehavenoreasontothinkthattheyare,andifwetouchground,sotospeak,withlifeintheunitsofwhichourownbodiesarecomposed,itislikelythatthereisalimitalsoinanupwarddirection,thoughwehavenothingwhatevertoguideusastowhereitis,noranycertaintythatthereisalimitatall。
Weareourselvesthesecondconcentricsphereoflife,webeingtheconstituentcellswhichunitetoformthebodyofGod。Ofthethirdsphereweknowasinglememberonly-theGodofthisworld;
butweseealsothestarsinheaven,andknowtheirmultitude。
Analogypointsirresistiblyinthedirectionofthinkingthattheseotherworldsarelikeourown,begoddedandfulloflife;
italsobidsusbelievethattheGodoftheirworldisbegottenofonemoreorlesslikehimself,andthathisgrowthhasfollowedthesamecourseasthatofallothergrowthsweknowof。
Ifso,heisoneoftheconstituentunitsofanunknownandvasterpersonalitywhoiscomposedofGods,asourGodiscomposedofallthelivingformsonearth,andasallthoselivingformsarecomposedofcells。ThisistheUnknownGod。
BeyondthissecondGodwecannotatpresentgo,norshouldwewishtodoso,ifwearewise。Itisnoreproachtoasystemthatitdoesnotprofesstogiveanaccountoftheoriginofthings;
thereproachrathershouldlieagainstasystemwhichprofessedtoexplainit,forwemaybewellassuredthatsuchaprofessionwould,forthepresentatanyrate,beanemptyboast。Itisenoughifasystemistrueasfarasitgoes;ifitthrowsnewlightonoldproblems,andopensupvistaswhichrevealahopeoffurtheradditiontoourknowledge,andthisIbelievemaybefairlyclaimedforthetheoryoflifeputforwardin"LifeandHabit"and"Evolution,OldandNew,"andforthecorollaryinsisteduponinthesepages;acorollarywhichfollowslogicallyandirresistiblyifthepositionIhavetakenintheabove-namedbooksisadmitted。
Letusimaginethatoneofthecellsofwhichwearecomposedcouldattaintoaglimmeringperceptionofthemannerinwhichheuniteswithothercells,ofwhomheknowsverylittle,soastoformagreatercompoundpersonofwhomhehashithertoknownnothingatall。Wouldhenotdowelltocontenthimselfwiththemasteringofthisconception,atanyrateforaconsiderabletime?Woulditbeanyjustgroundofcomplaintagainsthimonthepartofhisbrothercells,thathehadfailedtoexplaintothemwhomadetheman(or,ashewouldcallit,theomnipotentdeity)
whoseexistenceandrelationstohimselfhehadjustcaughtsightof?
Butifheweretoarguefurtheronthesamelinesasthoseonwhichhehadtravelledhitherto,andweretoarriveattheconclusionthattheremightbeothermenintheworld。besidestheonewhomhehadjustlearnttoapprehend,itwouldbestillnorefutationorjustgroundofcomplaintagainsthimthathehadfailedtoshowthemannerinwhichhissupposedhumanracehadcomeintoexistence。
Hereourcellwouldprobablystop。Hecouldhardlybeexpectedtoarriveattheexistenceofanimalsandplantsdifferingfromthehumanrace,andunitingwiththatracetoformasinglePersonorGod,inthesamewayashehashimselfunitedwithothercellstoformman。Theexistence,andmuchmoretheroundnessoftheearthitself,wouldbeunknowntohim,exceptbywayofinferenceanddeduction。Theonlyuniversewhichhecouldatallunderstandwouldbethebodyofthemanofwhomhewasacomponentpart。
Howwouldnotsuchacellbeastoundedifallthatweknowourselvescouldbesuddenlyrevealedtohim,sothatnotonlyshouldthevastnessofthisearthburstuponhisdazzledview,butthatofthesunandofhisplanetsalso,andnotonlythese,butthecountlessothersunswhichwemayseebynightaroundus。
Yetitisprobablethatanactualbeingishiddenfromus,whichnolesstranscendsthewildestdreamofourtheologiansthantheexistenceoftheheavenlybodiestranscendstheperceptionofourownconstituentcells。