SinclairgainedacertainreputationbyaHistoryoftheRevenue1785-90,and,likeMalthus,travelledontheContinenttoimprovehisknowledge。Hisfirstbookfinished,hebeganthegreatstatisticalworkbywhichheisbestremembered。HeissaidtohaveintroducedintoEnglishthenameof’statistics,’
fortheresearchesofwhichalleconomicalwriterswerebeginningtofeelthenecessity。Hecertainlydidmuchtointroducethereality。Sinclaircirculatedanumberofqueriesupon’naturalhistory,’’population,’’productions,’
and’miscellaneous’informationstoeveryparishministerinScotland。Hesurmountedvariousjealousiesnaturallyexcited,andtheultimateresultwastheStatisticalAccountofScotlandwhichappearedintwenty-onevolumesbetween1791and1799。35*ItgivesanaccountofeveryparishinScotland,andwasofgreatvalueassupplying36*basisforallsocialinvestigations。
Sinclairboretheexpense,andgavetheprofitstothe’SonsoftheClergy。’
In1793Sinclair,whohadbeeninparliamentsince1780,madehimselfusefultoPittinconnectionwiththeissueofexchequerbillstomeetthecommercialcrisis。HebeggedinreturnforthefoundationofaBoardofAgriculture。
HebecamethepresidentandArthurYoungthesecretary;37*andtheboardrepresentedtheircommonaspirations。Itwasaratheranomalousbody,somethingbetweenagovernmentofficeandsuchaninstitutionastheRoyalSociety;
andwassupportedbyanannualgrantof£;3000。ThefirstaimoftheboardwastoproduceastatisticalaccountofEnglandontheplanoftheScottishaccount。TheEnglishclergy,however,weresuspicious;theythought,itseems,thatthecollectionofstatisticsmeantanattackupontithes;
andYoung’sfrequentdenunciationoftithesasdiscouragingagriculturalimprovementsuggestssomeexcuseforthebelief。Theplanhadtobedropped;
alessthorough-goingdescriptionofthecountieswassubstituted;andagoodmany’Views’oftheagricultureofdifferentcountieswerepublishedin1794andsucceedingyears。Theboarddiditsbesttobeactivewithnarrowmeans。Itcirculatedinformation,distributedmedals,andbroughtagriculturalimproverstogether。ItencouragedthepublicationofErasmusDarwin’sPhytologia1799,andprocuredaseriesoflecturesfromHumphryDavy,afterwardspublishedasElementsofAgriculturalChemistry1813。SinclairalsoclaimstohaveencouragedMacadam1756-1836,theroadmaker,andMeikle,theinventorofthethrashing-machine。Onegreataimoftheboardwastopromoteenclosures。
YoungobservesintheintroductorypapertotheAnnalsthatwithinfortyyearsninehundredbillshadbeenpassedaffectingaboutamillionacres。
Thisincludedwastes,butthegreaterpartwasalreadycultivatedunderthe’constraintandimperfectionoftheopenfieldsystem,’arelicofthe’barbarityofourancestors。’Enclosuresinvolvedprocuringactsofparliament——aconsequentexpenditure,asYoungestimates,ofsome£;2000ineachcase;38*
andastheyweregenerallyobtainedbythegreatlandowners,therewasafrequentneglectoftherightsofthepoorandofthesmallerholders。Theremedyproposedwasageneralenclosureact;andsuchanactpassedtheHouseofCommonsin1798,butwasthrownoutbytheLords。AnactwasnotobtainedtillaftertheReformBill。Sinclair,however,obtainedsomemodificationoftheprocedure;which,itissaid,facilitatedthepassageofprivatebills。
Theybecamemorenumerousinlateryears,thoughothercausesobviouslyco-operated。
Meanwhile,itischaracteristicthatSinclairandYoungregardedwastesasabackwoodsmanregardedaforest。Theincidentalinjurytopoorcommonerswasnotunnoticed,andbecameoneofthetopicsofCobbett’seloquence。Buttotheardentagriculturisttheexistenceofabitofwastelandwasasimpleproofofbarbarism。Sinclair’sfavouritetoast,wearetold,was’Maycommonsbecomeuncommon’——hisoneattemptatajoke。HeprayedthatEppingForestandFinchleyCommonmightpassundertheyokeaswellasourforeignenemies。
Youngisdrivenoutofallpatiencebythesightof’fern,lingandothertrumpery’inspirituponSalisburyPlain,whichproduceallthecornweimport。39*
Enfielddeclares,isa’realnuisancetothepublic。’40*Wegladthatthezealforenclosurewasnotsuccessfulitsaims;improversischaracteristic。
Itissaid41*thatYoungandSinclairruinedoftheBoardofAgriculturebymakingitakindofpoliticalclub。Itdiedin1822。SinclairobtainedanappointmentinScotland,andcontinuedtolabourunremittingly。Hecarriedonacorrespondencewithallmannerofpeople,includingWashington,Eldon,CatholicbishopinIreland,financiersandagriculturistsontheContinent,andthemostactiveeconomistsinEngland。HesuggestedasubjectforapoemtoScott。42*Hewrotepamphletsaboutcash-payments,CatholicEmancipation,andtheReformBill,alwaysdisagreeingwithallparties,Heprojectedfourcodeswhichweretosummariseallhumanknowledgeuponhealth,agriculture,politicaleconomy,andreligion。TheCodeofHealth4vols。,1807wentthroughsixeditions;TheCodeofAgricultureappearedin1829;buttheworldhasnotbeenenrichedbytheothers。HediedatEdinburghonthe21stSeptember1835。
IhavedweltsofaruponYoungbecauseheisthebestrepresentativeofthat’gloriousspiritofimprovement’whichwastransformingthewholesocialstructure。Young’sviewoftheFrenchrevolutionindicatesonemarkedcharacteristicofthatspirit。HedenouncestheFrenchseigneurbecauseheislethargic。
HeadmirestheEnglishnoblemanbecauseheisenergetic。TheFrenchnoblemayevendeserveconfiscation;buthehasnottheslightestintentionofapplyingthesameremedyinEngland,wheresquiresandnoblemenaretheverysourceofallimprovement。Heholdsthatgovernmentiseverything,andadmiresthegreatworksoftheFrenchdespotism:andyetheisathoroughadmirerofthelibertiesenjoyedundertheBritishConstitution,theessentialnatureofwhichmakessimilarworksimpossible。IneednotaskwhetherYoung’slogiccouldbejustified;thoughitwouldobviouslyrequireforjustificationathoroughly’empirical’view,or,inotherwords,theadmissionthatdifferentcircumstancesmayrequiretotallydifferentinstitutions。Theview,however,whichwascongenialtotheprevalentspiritofimprovementmustbenoted。
Itmightbestatedasaparadoxthat,whereasinFrancethemostpalpableevilsarosefromtheexcessivepowerofthecentralgovernment,andinEnglandthemostpalpableevilsarosefromthefeeblenessofthecentralgovernment,theFrenchreformersdemandedmoregovernmentandtheEnglishreformersdemandedlessgovernment。Everythingforthepeople,nothingbythepeople,’was,asMrMorleyremarks,43*themaximoftheFrencheconomists。Thesolutionseemstobeeasy。InFrance,reformerssuchasTurgotandtheeconomistswereinfavourofanenlighteneddespotism,becausethestatemeantacentralisedpowerwhichmightbeturnedagainstthearistocracy。Once’enlightened’itwouldsuppresstheexclusiveprivilegesofaclasswhich,doingnothinginreturn,hadbecomeamereburthenordeadweightencumberingallsocialdevelopment。
ButinEnglandtheprivilegedclasswasidenticalwiththegoverningclass。
ThepoliticallibertyofwhichEnglishmenwererightfullyproud,the’ruleoflaw’whichmadeeveryofficialresponsibletotheordinarycourseofjustice,andtheactualdischargeoftheirdutiesbythegoverningorder,saveditfrombeingtheobjectsofajealousclasshatred。WhileinFrancegovernmentwasstaggeringunderanever-accumulatingresentmentagainstthearistocracy,thecontemporarypositioninEnglandwas,onthewhole,oneofpoliticalapathy。Thecountry,thoughithadlostitscolonies,wasmakingunprecedentedprogressinwealth;commerce,manufactures,andagriculturewerebeingdevelopedbytheenergyofindividuals;andPittwasbeginningtoapplyAdamSmith’sprinciplestofinance。Thecryforparliamentaryreformdiedout:neitherWhigsnorToriesreallycaredforit;andthe’gloriousspiritofimprovement’
showeditselfinanenergywhichhadlittlepoliticalapplication。Thenobilitywasnotanincubussuppressingindividualenergyandconfrontedbythestate,butwasitselfthestate;anditsindividualmemberswereoftenleadersinindustrialimprovement。Discontent,therefore,tookinthemainadifferentform。Somegovernmentwas,ofcourse,necessary,andtheexistingsystemwastoomuchinharmony,eveninitsdefects,withthesocialordertoprovokeanydistinctrevolutionarysentiment。Englishmenwerenotonlysatisfiedwiththeirmaininstitutions,butregardedthemwithexaggeratedcomplacency。
But,thoughtherewasnoorganicdisorder,therewereplentyofabusestoberemedied。Therulingclass,itseemed,diditsdutiesinthemain,buttookunconscionableperquisitesinreturn。Ifit’farmed’them,itwasrightthatitshouldhaveabeneficialinterestintheconcern;butthatinterestmightbeexcessive。Inmanydirectionsabusesweregrowingupwhichrequiredremedy,thoughnotasubversionofthesystemunderwhichtheyhadbeengenerated。
Itwasnotdesired——unlessbyaveryfewtheorists——tomakeanysweepingredistributionofpower;butitwaseminentlydesirabletofindsomemeansofbetterregulatingmanyevilpractices。Theattackuponsuchpracticesmightultimatelysuggest——as,infact,itdidsuggest——thenecessityoffarmorethorough-goingreforms。Forthepresent,however,thecharacteristicmarkofEnglishreformerswasthislimitationoftheirschemes,andamarkwhichisespeciallyevidentinBenthamandhisfollowers。Iwillspeak,therefore,ofthemanyquestionswhichwerearising,partlyforthesereasonsandpartlybecausetheUtilitariantheorywasingreatpartmouldedbytheparticularproblemswhichtheyhadtoargue。
NOTES:
1。WealthofNations,bk。ii。ch。iii。
2。WealthofNations,bk。i,ch。xi,section1。
3。Ibid。,bk。i,ch。xi,conclusion。
4。Smiles’sWattandBoulton,p。292。
5。Young’sTravelsinFrancewasrepublishedin1892,withaprefaceandshortlifebyMissBethamEdwards。Shehassince1898publishedhisautobiography。
SeealsotheautobiographicalsketchintheAnnalsofAgriculture,XV,152-97。
Young’sFarmer’sLettersfirstappearedin1767;hisToursintheSouthern,Northern,andEasterncountiesin1768,1770,and1771;hisTourinIrelandin1780;andhisTravelsinFrancein1792。Ausefulebibliogrpahy,containingalistofhismanypublicationsisappendedtotheeditionoftheTourinIrelandeditedbyMrA。W。Huttonin1892。
6。Annals,XV,166。
7。TravelsinFrance1892,p。184n。
8。TravelsinFrance,p。54。
9。Ibid。,p。109。
10。Ibid。,p。61。
11。Ibid。,p。70。
12。Ibid。,p。279。
13。TravelsinFrance,p。125。
14。Ibid。,p。131。
15。Ibid。,pp。198,298。
16。Ibid。,pp。55,193,199,237。
17。Ibid。,p。43。
18。TravelsinFrance,pp。291-92。
19。Ibid。,p。132。
20。Ibid。,p。66。
21。Ibid。,p。131。
22。e。g。SouthernTours,p。103;NorthernTour,p。180YorkCathedral。
23。NorthernTour,iv。,344,377。
24。IrishTour,ii,114。
25。SouthernTour,p。326。
26。SouthernTour,p。22。
27。Annals,i,380。
28。Ibid。,vol。x。
29。Ibid。,iv,17。
30。SouthernTour,p。262:NorthernTour,ii,412。
31。NorthernTour,iv,410,etc。
32。IrishTour,ii,118-19。
33。MemoirsofSirJohnSinclair,byhisson。2vols。,1837。
34。Memoirs,i,338。
35。ANewStatisticalAccount,replacingthis,appearedintwenty-fourvolumesfrom1834to1844。
第11章