ItisthisharpingondeathIdespisesomuch,“heremarkedwithemphasisofgestureaswellasofspeechtheinclinedheadandbody,therighthandlightlyplaceduponthelistener’sknee,theabruptchangeintheinflectionofthevoice,allsocharacteristicofhim
“thisidleandoftencowardlyaswellasignorantharping!
Whyshouldwenotchangelikeeverythingelse?Infiction,inpoetry,insomuchofboth,FrenchaswellasEnglish,and,Iamtold,inAmericanartandliterature,theshadowofdeathcallitwhatyouwill,despair,negation,indifferenceisuponus。Butwhatfoolswhotalkthus!
Why,`amicomio’,youknowaswellasIthatdeathislife,justasourdaily,ourmomentarilydyingbodyisnonethelessaliveandeverrecruitingnewforcesofexistence。Withoutdeath,whichisourcrapelikechurchyardywordforchange,forgrowth,therecouldbenoprolongationofthatwhichwecalllife。
Pshaw!itisfoolishtoargueuponsuchathingeven。Formyself,Idenydeathasanendofeverything。NeversayofmethatIamdead!“
OntheeveningofThursday,the12thofDecember1889,hewasinbed,withexceedingweakness。Inthecentreoftheloftyceilingoftheroominwhichhelay,andwhereithadbeenhiswonttowork,thereisapaintingbyhisson。Itdepictsaneaglestrugglingwithaserpent,andisillustrativeofasuperbpassageinShelley’s“RevoltofIslam“。Whatmemories,whatdeepthoughts,itmusthavesuggested;howsignificant,tous,thecircumstance!
Butweakasthepoetwas,heyetdidnotseetheshadowwhichhadbeguntochilltheheartsofthewatchers。
ShortlybeforethegreatbellofSanMarcostruckten,heturnedandaskedifanynewshadcomeconcerning“Asolando“,publishedthatday。Hissonreadhimatelegramfromthepublishers,tellinghowgreatthedemandwasandhowfavourableweretheadvance-articlesintheleadingpapers。Thedyingpoetsmiledandmuttered,“Howgratifying!“
WhenthelasttollofSt。Mark’shadleftadeeperstillnessthanbefore,thosebythebedsidesawayetprofoundersilenceonthefaceofhimwhomtheyloved。
Itisneedlesstodwelluponthegriefeverywherefeltandexpressedfortheirreparableloss。ThemagnificentclosinglinesofShelley’s“Alastor“
musthaveoccurredtomanyamourner;forgone,indeed,was“asurpassingSpirit“。ThesuperbpompoftheVenetianfuneral,thesolemngrandeuroftheintermentinWestminsterAbbey,donotseemworthrecording:soinsignificantarealltheseaccidentsofdeathmadebythesupremefactitself。YetitisfittingtoknowthatVenicehasneverinmoderntimesaffordedamoreimpressivesight,thanthosecrapedprocessionalgondolasfollowingthehighflower-strewnfuneral-bargethroughthethrongedwaterwaysandoutacrossthelagoontothedesolateIsleoftheDead:thatLondonhasrarelyseenaughtmoresolemnthanthefog-duskedCathedralspaces,echoingatfirstwiththeslowtrampofthepall-bearers,andthenwiththesweetaerialmusicswayingupwardthelovedfamiliarwordsofthe`LyricVoice’hushedsolongbefore。
Yetthepoetwasasmuchhonouredbythosehumblefriends,Lambethartisansandafewpoorworking-women,whothrewspraysoflaurelbeforethehearsebythatdesolate,starving,woe-wearygentleman,shiveringinhisthreadbareclothes,whoseemedtransfixedwithaheart-wrungthoughsilentemotion,erehehurriedlydrewfromhissleevealargewhitechrysanthemum,andthrowingitbeneaththecoffinasitwasliftedinward,disappearedinthecrowd,whichclosedagainliketheseauponthislostwanderingwave。
Whowouldnothonourthismightydead?Allwhocouldbepresentwerethere,somewhereintheancientAbbey。Oneofthegreatest,lovedandadmiredbythedeadpoet,hadalreadyputthemourningofmanyintotheloftydignityofhisverse:
“Nowdumbishewhowakedtheworldtospeak,Andvoicelesshandstheworldbesidehisbier,Ourwordsaresobs,ourcryofpraiseatear:
Wearethesmittenmortal,wetheweak。
WeseeaspiritonEarth’sloftiestpeakShine,andwinghencethewayhemakesmoreclear:
SeeagreatTreeofLifethatneversereDroppedleafforaughtthatageorstormsmightwreak:
SuchendingisnotDeath:suchlivingshowsWhatwideilluminationbrightnessshedsFromonebighearttoconquerman’soldfoes:
Thecoward,andthetyrant,andtheforceOfallthoseweedymonstersraisingheadsWhenSongismurkfromspringsofturbidsource。“*
*GeorgeMeredith。
Onewordmoreof“lightandfleetingshadow“。InthegreatnessofhisnaturehemustberankedwithMilton,Defoe,andScott。Hisveryshortcomings,suchastheywere,wereneverbanefulgrowths,butmereweeds,withacertainpleasantthoughpungentsavourmoreover,growinguponarich,anexuberantsoil。Pluckoneoftheleastlovely
rathercallittheunworthyarrowshotatthebodyofadeadcomrade,soinnocentofillintent:yetittoohasabeautyofitsown,fortheshaftwasaflamefromthefulnessofaheartwhoselovehadwithstoodthechillpassageoftheyears。
OnthenightofBrowning’sdeathanewstarsuddenlyappearedinOrion。*
Thecoincidenceissuggestiveifweliketoindulgeinthefancythatinthatconstellation
“NomoresubjectedtothechangeorchanceOftheunsteadyplanets“
gleamthoseother“abodeswheretheImmortalsare。“Certainly,awanderingfirehaspassedawayfromus。Whitherhasitgone?
TothatnewstarinOrion:orwhirledtoremotesilencesinthetrailoflostmeteors?Whence,andforhowlong,willitsraysreachourstormandgloom-beleagueredearth?
*Mrs。Orrdisputesthisstatement。A。L。,1996。
“TheallegedfactisdisprovedbythestatementoftheAstronomerRoyal,towhomithasbeensubmitted;butitwouldhavebeenabeautifulsymboloftranslation,suchasaffectionatefancymightgladlycherishifitweretrue。“Mrs。SutherlandOrr,“LifeandLettersofRobertBrowning“1891。
Suchquestionscannotmeanwhilebesolved。Oureyesarestillconfusedwiththelight,withthatardentflame,asweknewithere。
Butthisweknow,itwasindeed“acentralfiredescendinguponmanyaltars。“
These,thoughtouchedwithbutasparkoftheimmortalprinciple,bearenduringtestimony。Andwhattestimony!Howheartfelt:
happilyalsohowwidespread,howelectricallystimulative!
Butthetimemustcomewhenthepoet’spersonalitywillhavetheremotenessoftradition:whenourperplexedjudgmentswillbeasataleofsoundandfury,signifyingnothing。
Itisimpossibleforanystudentofliterature,foranyinterestedreader,nottoindulgeinsomeforecastastowhatrankinthepoetichierarchyRobertBrowningwillultimatelyoccupy。Thecommonplaceastotheimpossibilityofprognosticatingtheultimateslowdecadence,orslowerrise,or,itmaybe,sustainedsuspension,ofapoet’sfame,isofteninsincere,andbutanexcuseofindolence。
Todogmatiseweretheheightofpresumptionaswellasoffolly:
buttoforegospeculation,baseduponcompletepresentknowledge,foranidlecontentmentwithnarrowhorizons,wereperhapsfoolisherstill。
Butassuredlyeachmustperforcebecontentwithhisownprevision。
Nonecanansweryetforthegenerality,whosedecisivefranchisewillelectafitarbiterinduetime。
So,formyself,letmesummarisewhatIhavealreadywritteninseveralsectionsofthisbook,andparticularlyintheclosingpagesofChapter6。There,itwillberememberedafterhavingfoundthatBrowning’shighestachievementisinhissecondperiod
emphasiswaslaidontheprimaryimportanceofhislife-workinitshavingcompelledustotheassumptionofafreshcriticalstandpointinvolvingtheconstructionofanewdefinition。InthelightofthisnewdefinitionIthinkBrowningwillultimatelybejudged。Asthesculptorin“PippaPasses“
wasthepredestinatednovelthinkerinmarble,soBrowninghimselfappearsasthepredestinatednovelthinkerinverse;thenovelthinker,however,indegree,notinkind。ButIdonotforamomentbelievethathisgreatnessisinhisstatusasathinker:evenless,thatthepoetandthethinkerareindissociable。ManyyearsagoSainte-Beuvedestroyedthisshallowartificeofpseudo-criticism:
“Venirnousdirequetoutpoe“tedetalentest,paressence,ungrandPENSEUR,etquetoutvraiPENSEURestne/cessairementartisteetpoe“te,c’estunepre/tentioninsoutenableetquede/menta\chaqueinstantlare/alite/。“
WhenBrowning’senormousinfluenceuponthespiritualandmentallifeofourdayaninfluenceevershapingitselftowiseandbeautifulissues
shallhavelostmuchofitsimmediateimport,therewillstillsurelybediscernedinhisworkaformativeenergywhoseresultantispurepoeticgain。
Itisasthepoethewilllive:notmerelyasthe“novelthinkerinverse“。
Logically,hisattitudeas`thinker’isunimpressive。Itistheattitude,asIthinksomeonehaspointedout,ofacquiescencewithcodifiedmorality。