首页 >出版文学> The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin>第61章
  Thepaperswhichonthissubjectprecededandcontributedto’FormsofFlowers’werethefollowing:——
  "OnthetwoFormsorDimorphicConditionintheSpeciesofPrimula,andontheirremarkableSexualRelations。"Linn。Soc。Journal,1862。)
  "OntheExistenceofTwoForms,andontheirReciprocalSexualRelations,inseveralSpeciesoftheGenusLinum。"Linn。Soc。Journal,1863。
  "OntheSexualRelationsoftheThreeFormsofLythrumsalicaria,"Ibid。
  1864。
  "OntheCharacterandHybrid—likeNatureoftheOffspringfromtheIllegitimateUnionsofDimorphicandTrimorphicPlants。"Ibid。1869。
  "OntheSpecificDifferencesbetweenPrimulaveris,Brit。Fl。(var。
  Officinalis,Linn。),P。vulgaris,Brit。Fl。(var。acaulis,Linn。)andP。
  elatior,Jacq。;andontheHybridNatureoftheCommonOxlip。WithSupplementaryRemarksonNaturallyProducedHybridsintheGenusVerbascum。"Ibid。1869。
  Thefollowinglettershowsthathebegantheworkonheterostyledplantswithanerroneousviewastothemeaningofthefacts。]
  CHARLESDARWINTOJ。D。HOOKER。
  Down,May7[1860]……Ihavethismorningbeenlookingatmyexperimentalcowslips,andIfindsomeplantshaveallflowerswithlongstamensandshortpistils,whichI
  willcall"maleplants,"otherswithshortstamensandlongpistils,whichIwillcall"femaleplants。"ThisIhavesomewhereseennoticed,IthinkbyHenslow;butIfind(afterlookingatmytwosetsofplants)thatthestigmasofthemaleandfemaleareofslightlydifferentshape,andcertainlydifferentdegreeofroughness,andwhathasastonishedme,thepollenoftheso—calledfemaleplant,thoughveryabundant,ismoretransparent,andeachgranuleisexactlyonly2/3ofthesizeofthepollenoftheso—calledmaleplant。Hasthisbeenobserved?Icannothelpsuspecting[that]thecowslipisinfactdioecious,butitmayturnoutallablunder,butanyhowIwillmarkwithstickstheso—calledmaleandfemaleplantsandwatchtheirseeding。Itwouldbeafinecaseofgradationbetweenanhermaphroditeandunisexualcondition。Likewiseasortofcaseofbalancementoflongandshortpistilsandstamens。Likewiseperhapsthrowslightonoxlips……
  Ihavenowexaminedprimrosesandfindexactlythesamedifferenceinthesizeofthepollen,correlatedwiththesamedifferenceinthelengthofthestyleandroughnessofthestigmas。
  CHARLESDARWINTOASAGRAY。
  June8[1860]……Ihavebeenmakingsomelittletriflingobservationswhichhaveinterestedandperplexedmemuch。Ifindwithprimrosesandcowslips,thataboutanequalnumberofplantsarethuscharacterised。
  SO—CALLED(byme)MALEplant。Pistilmuchshorterthanstamens;stigmarathersmooth,——POLLENGRAINSLARGE,throatofcorollashort。
  SO—CALLEDFEMALEplant。Pistilmuchlongerthanstamens,stigmarougher,POLLEN—GRAINSSMALLER,——throatofcorollalong。
  Ihavemarkedalotofplants,andexpectedtofindtheso—calledmaleplantbarren;butjudgingfromthefeelofthecapsules,thisisnotthecase,andIamverymuchsurprisedatthedifferenceinthesizeofthepollen……Ifitshouldprovethattheso—calledmaleplantsproducelessseedthantheso—calledfemales,whatabeautifulcaseofgradationfromhermaphroditetounisexualconditionitwillbe!Iftheyproduceaboutequalnumberofseed,howperplexingitwillbe。
  CHARLESDARWINTOJ。D。HOOKER。
  Down,December17[1860?]……Ihavejustbeenorderingaphotographofmyselfforafriend;andhaveorderedoneforyou,andforheaven’ssakeobligeme,andburnthatnowhangingupinyourroom。——Itmakesmelookatrociouslywicked……InthespringImustgetyoutolookforlongpistilsandshortpistilsintherarerspeciesofPrimulaandinsomealliedGenera。ItholdswithP。Sinensis。YourememberallthefussImadeonthissubjectlastspring;
  well,theotherdayatlastIhadtimetoweightheseeds,andbyJovetheplantsofprimrosesandcowslipwithshortpistilsandlargegrainedpollen(Thustheplantswhichheimaginedtobetendingtowardsamaleconditionweremoreproductivethanthesupposedfemales。)arerathermorefertilethanthosewithlongpistils,andsmall—grainedpollen。Ifindthattheyrequiretheactionofinsectstosetthem,andIneverwillbelievethatthesedifferencesarewithoutsomemeaning。
  Someofmyexperimentsleadmetosuspectthatthelarge—grainedpollensuitsthelongpistilsandthesmall—grainedpollensuitstheshortpistils;butIamdeterminedtoseeifIcannotmakeoutthemysterynextspring。
  Howdoesyourbookonplantsbrewinyourmind?Haveyoubegunit?……
  RemembermemostkindlytoOliver。Hemustbeastonishedatnothavingastringofquestions,Ifearhewillgetoutofpractice!
  [ThePrimula—workwasfinishedintheautumnof1861,andonNovember8thhewrotetoSirJ。D。Hooker:——
  "IhavesentmypaperondimorphisminPrimulatotheLinn。Soc。Ishallgoupandreaditwheneveritcomeson;Ihopeyoumaybeabletoattend,forIdonotsupposemanywillcareapennyforthesubject。"
  Withregardtothereadingofthepaper(onNovember21st),hewrotetothesamefriend:——
  "IbynomeansthoughtthatIproduceda"tremendouseffect"intheLinn。
  Soc。,butbyJovetheLinn。Soc。producedatremendouseffectonme,forI
  couldnotgetoutofbedtilllatenextevening,sothatIjustcrawledhome。IfearImustgiveuptryingtoreadanypaperorspeak;itisahorridbore,Icandonothinglikeotherpeople。"
  ToDr。Grayhewrote,(December1861):——
  "Youmayrelyonit,IwillsendyouacopyofmyPrimulapaperassoonasIcangetone;butIbelieveitwillnotbeprintedtillApril1st,andthereforeaftermyOrchidBook。IcaremoreforyourandHooker’sopinionthanforthatofalltherestoftheworld,andforLyell’songeologicalpoints。BenthamandHookerthoughtwellofmypaperwhenread;butnoonecanjudgeofevidencebymerelyhearingapaper。"
  TheworkonPrimulawasthemeansofbringingmyfatherincontactwiththelateMr。JohnScott,thenworkingasagardenerintheBotanicGardensatEdinburgh,——anemploymentwhichheseemstohavechoseninordertogratifyhispassionfornaturalhistory。Hewroteoneortwoexcellentbotanicalpapers,andultimatelyobtainedapostinIndia。(WhileinIndiahemadesomeadmirableobservationsonexpressionformyfather。)Hediedin1880。
  AfewphrasesmaybequotedfromletterstoSirJ。D。Hooker,showingmyfather’sestimateofScott:——
  "Ifyouknow,dopleasetellmewhoisJohnScottoftheBotanicalGardensofEdinburgh;Ihavebeencorrespondinglargelywithhim;heisnocommonman。"
  "Ifhehadleisurehewouldmakeawonderfulobserver;tomyjudgmentI
  havecomeacrossnoonelikehim。"
  "Hehasinterestedmestrangely,andIhaveformedaveryhighopinionofhisintellect。Ihopehewillacceptpecuniaryassistancefromme;buthehashithertorefused。"(HeultimatelysucceededinbeingallowedtopayforMr。Scott’spassagetoIndia。)
  "Iknownothingofhimexceptingfromhisletters;theseshowremarkabletalent,astonishingperseverance,muchmodesty,andwhatIadmire,determineddifferencefrommeonmanypoints。"
  SohighlydidheestimateScott’sabilitiesthatheformedaplan(whichhoweverneverwentbeyondanearlystageofdiscussion)ofemployinghimtoworkoutcertainproblemsconnectedwithintercrossing。
  Thefollowingletterreferstomyfather’sinvestigationsonLythrum(Hewasledtothis,hisfirstcaseoftrimorphismbyLecoq’s’GeographieBotanique,’andthismusthaveconsoledhimforthetrickthisworkplayedhiminturningouttobesomuchlargerthanheexpected。HewrotetoSirJ。D。Hooker:"Hereisagoodjoke:IsawanextractfromLecoq,’Geograph。Bot。,’andordereditandhopedthatitwasagoodsizedpamphlet,andninethickvolumeshavearrived!"),aplantwhichrevealsevenamorewonderfulconditionofsexualcomplexitythanthatofPrimula。
  ForinLythrumtherearenotmerelytwo,butthreecastes,differingstructurallyandphysiologicallyfromeachother:]
  CHARLESDARWINTOASAGRAY。
  Down,August9[1862]。
  MydearGray,Itislateatnight,andIamgoingtowritebriefly,andofcoursetobegafavour。
  TheMitchellaverygood,butpollenapparentlyequal—sized。IhavejustexaminedHottonia,granddifferenceinpollen。Echiumvulgare,ahumbug,merelyacaselikeThymus。ButIamalmoststarkstaringmadoverLythrum(Onanotheroccasionhewrote(toDr。Gray)withregardtoLythrum:"I
  mustholdhard,otherwiseIshallspendmylifeoverdimorphism。");ifI
  canprovewhatIfullybelieve,itisagrandcaseofTRIMORPHISM,withthreedifferentpollensandthreestigmas;Ihavecastratedandfertilisedaboveninetyflowers,tryingalltheeighteendistinctcrosseswhicharepossiblewithinthelimitsofthisonespecies!Icannotexplain,butI
  feelsureyouwouldthinkitagrandcase。IhavebeenwritingtoBotaniststoseeifIcanpossiblygetL。hyssopifolia,andithasjustflashedonmethatyoumighthaveLythruminNorthAmerica,andIhavelookedtoyourManual。Fortheloveofheavenhavealookatsomeofyourspecies,andifyoucangetmeseed,do;Iwantmuchtotryspecieswithfewstamens,iftheyaredimorphic;NesaeaverticillataIshouldexpecttobetrimorphic。Seed!Seed!Seed!IshouldratherlikeseedofMitchella。Butoh,Lythrum!
  Yourutterlymadfriend,C。DARWIN。
  P。S。——Thereisreasoninmymadness,forIcanseethattothosewhoalreadybelieveinchangeofspecies,thesefactswillmodifytoacertainextentthewholeviewofHybridity。(AlettertoDr。Gray(July,1862)
  bearsonthispoint:"AfewdaysagoImadeanobservationwhichhassurprisedmemorethanitoughttodo——itwillhavetoberepeatedseveraltimes,butIhavescarcelyadoubtofitsaccuracy。IstatedinmyPrimulapaperthatthelong—styledformofLinumgrandiflorumwasutterlysterilewithitsownpollen;IhavelatelybeenputtingthepollenofthetwoformsonthestigmaoftheSAMEflower;anditstrikesmeastrulywonderful,thatthestigmadistinguishesthepollen;andispenetratedbythetubesoftheoneandnotbythoseoftheother;norarethetubesexserted。Or(whichisthesamething)thestigmaoftheoneformactsonandisactedonbypollen,whichproducesnottheleasteffectonthestigmaoftheotherform。Takingsexualpowerasthecriterionofdifference,thetwoformsofthisonespeciesmaybesaidtobegenericallydistinct。")
  [OnthesamesubjecthewrotetoSirJosephHookerinAugust1862:——
  "IsOliveratKew?WhenIamestablishedatBournemouthIamcompletelymadtoexamineanyfreshflowersofanyLythraceousplant,andIwouldwriteandaskhimifanyareinbloom。"
  AgainhewrotetothesamefriendinOctober:——
  "IfyouaskOliver,IthinkhewilltellyouIhavegotarealoddcaseinLythrum,itinterestsmeextremely,andseemstomethestrangestcaseofpropagationrecordedamongstplantsoranimals,viz。anecessarytriplealliancebetweenthreehermaphrodites。IfeelsureIcannowprovethetruthofthecasefromamultitudeofcrossesmadethissummer。"
  Inanarticle,’DimorphismintheGenitaliaofPlants’(’Silliman’sJournal,’1862,volumexxxiv。page419),Dr。GraypointedoutthatthestructuraldifferencebetweenthetwoformsofPrimulahadalreadybeendefinedinthe’FloraofNorthAmerica,’asDIOECIO—DIMORPHISM。Theuseofthistermcalledforththefollowingremarksfrommyfather。Theletteralsoalludestoareviewofthe’FertilisationofOrchids’inthesamevolumeof’Silliman’sJournal。’]
  CHARLESDARWINTOASAGRAY。
  Down,November26[1862]。
  MydearGray,Theverydayaftermylastletter,yoursofNovember10th,andthereviewin’Silliman,’whichIfearedmighthavebeenlost,reachedme。Wewereallverymuchinterestedbythepoliticalpartofyourletter;andinsomeoddwayoneneverfeelsthatinformationandopinionspaintedinanewspapercomefromalivingsource;theyseemdead,whereasallthatyouwriteisfulloflife。Thereviewsinterestedmeprofoundly;yourashlyaskformyopinion,andyoumustconsequentlyendurealongletter。FirstforDimorphism;IdonotATPRESENTliketheterm"Dioecio—dimorphism;"forIthinkitgivesquiteafalsenotion,thatthephenomenaareconnectedwithaseparationofthesexes。CertainlyinPrimulathereisunequalfertilityinthetwoforms,andIsuspectthisisthecasewithLinum;and,thereforeIfeltboundinthePrimulapapertostatethatitmightbeasteptowardsadioeciouscondition;thoughIbelievetherearenodioeciousformsinPrimulaceaeorLinaceae。ButthethreeformsinLythrumconvincemethatthephenomenonisinnowaynecessarilyconnectedwithanytendencytoseparationofsexes。ThecaseseemstomeinresultorfunctiontobealmostidenticalwithwhatoldC。K。Sprengelcalled"dichogamy,"andwhichissofrequentintrulyhermaphroditegroups;namely,thepollenandstigmaofeachflowerbeingmatureatdifferentperiods。IfIamright,itisveryadvisablenottousetheterm"dioecious,"asthisatoncebringsnotionsofseparationofsexes……IwasmuchperplexedbyOliver’sremarksinthe’NaturalHistoryReview’
  onthePrimulacase,onthelowerplantshavingsexesmoreoftenseparatedthaninthehigherplants,——soexactlythereverseofwhattakesplaceinanimals。Hookerinhisreviewofthe’Orchids’repeatsthisremark。Thereseemstobemuchtruthinwhatyousay("Formswhicharelowinthescaleasrespectsmorphologicalcompletenessmaybehighinthescaleofrankfoundedonspecialisationofstructureandfunction。"——Dr。Gray,in’Silliman’sJournal。’),anditdidnotoccurtome,aboutnoimprobabilityofspecialisationinCERTAINlinesinlowlyorganisedbeings。Icouldhardlydoubtthatthehermaphroditestateistheaboriginalone。ButhowisitintheconjugationofConfervae——isnotoneofthetwoindividualshereinfactmale,andtheotherfemale?Ihavebeenmuchpuzzledbythiscontrastinsexualarrangementsbetweenplantsandanimals。Cantherebeanythinginthefollowingconsideration:ByROUGHESTcalculationaboutone—thirdoftheBritishGENERAofaquaticplantsbelongtotheLinneanclassesofMonoandDioecia;whilstofterrestrialplants(theaquaticgenerabeingsubtracted)onlyone—thirteenthofthegenerabelongtothesetwoclasses。Isthereanytruthinthisfactgenerally?Canaquaticplants,beingconfinedtoasmallareaorsmallcommunityofindividuals,requiremorefreecrossing,andthereforehaveseparatesexes?Buttoreturntoourpoint,doesnotAlph。deCandollesaythataquaticplantstakenasawholearelowlyorganised,comparedwithterrestrial;andmaynotOliver’sremarkontheseparationofthesexesinlowlyorganisedplantsstandinsomerelationtotheirbeingfrequentlyaquatic?Oristhisallrubbish?……Whatamagnificentcomplimentyouendyourreviewwith!YouandHookerseemdeterminedtoturnmyheadwithconceitandvanity(ifnotalreadyturned)andmakemeanunbearablewretch。
  Withmostcordialthanks,mygoodandkindfriend,Farewell,C。DARWIN。
  [Thefollowingpassagefromaletter(July28,1863),toProf。Hildebrand,containsareferencetothereceptionofthedimorphicworkinFrance:——
  "IamextremelymuchpleasedtohearthatyouhavebeenlookingatthemanneroffertilisationofyournativeOrchids,andstillmorepleasedtohearthatyouhavebeenexperimentingonLinum。Imuchhopethatyoumaypublishtheresultoftheseexperiments;becauseIwastoldthatthemosteminentFrenchbotanistsofParissaidthatmypaperonPrimulawastheworkofimagination,andthatthecasewassoimprobabletheydidnotbelieveinmyresults。"]
  CHARLESDARWINTOASAGRAY。
  April19[1864]……IreceivedalittletimeagoapaperwithagoodaccountofyourHerbariumandLibrary,andalongtimepreviouslyyourexcellentreviewofScott’s’Primulaceae,’andIforwardedittohiminIndia,asitwouldmuchpleasehim。IwasverygladtoseeinitanewcaseofDimorphism(I
  forgetjustnowthenameoftheplant);Ishallbegratefultohearofanyothercases,asIstillfeelaninterestinthesubject。IshouldbeverygladtogetsomeseedofyourdimorphicPlantagos;forIcannotbanishthesuspicionthattheymustbelongtoaverydifferentclasslikethatofthecommonThyme。(Inthispredictionhewasright。See’FormsofFlowers,’
  page307。)Howcouldthewind,whichistheagentoffertilisation,withPlantago,fertilise"reciprocallydimorphic"flowerslikePrimula?Theorysaysthiscannotbe,andinsuchcasesofone’sowntheoriesIfollowAgassizanddeclare,"thatnatureneverlies。"IshouldevenbeverygladtoexaminethetwodriedformsofPlantago。Indeed,anydrieddimorphicplantswouldbegratefullyreceived……
  DidmyLythrumpaperinterestyou?Icrawlonattherateoftwohoursperdiem,with’VariationunderDomestication。’
  CHARLESDARWINTOJ。D。HOOKER。
  Down,November26[1864]……YoudonotknowhowpleasedIamthatyouhavereadmyLythrumpaper;I
  thoughtyouwouldnothavetime,andIhaveforlongyearslookedatyouasmyPublic,andcaremoreforyouropinionthanthatofalltherestoftheworld。IhavedonenothingwhichhasinterestedmesomuchasLythrum,sincemakingoutthecomplementalmalesofCirripedes。IfearthatIhavedraggedintoomuchmiscellaneousmatterintothepaper……Igetlettersoccasionally,whichshowmethatNaturalSelectionismakingGREATprogressinGermany,andsomeamongsttheyounginFrance。I
  havejustreceivedapamphletfromGermany,withthecomplimentarytitleof"DarwinischeArten—Enstehung—Humbug"!
  Farewell,mybestofoldfriends,C。DARWIN。
  CHARLESDARWINTOASAGRAY。
  September10,[1867?]……TheonlypointwhichIhavemadeoutthissummer,whichcouldpossiblyinterestyou,isthatthecommonOxlipfoundeverywhere,moreorlesscommonlyinEngland,iscertainlyahybridbetweentheprimroseandcowslip;whilsttheP。elatior(Jacq。),foundonlyintheEasternCounties,isaperfectlydistinctandgoodspecies;hardlydistinguishablefromthecommonoxlip,exceptbythelengthoftheseed—capsulerelativelytothecalyx。Thisseemstomeratherahorridfactforallsystematicbotanists……
  CHARLESDARWINTOF。HILDEBRAND。
  Down,November16,1868。
  MydearSir,IwrotemylastnoteinsuchahurryfromLondon,thatIquiteforgotwhatIchieflywishedtosay,namelytothankyouforyourexcellentnoticesinthe’Bot。Zeitung’ofmypaperontheoffspringofdimorphicplants。ThesubjectissoobscurethatIdidnotexpectthatanyonewouldhavenoticedmypaper,andIamaccordinglyverymuchpleasedthatyoushouldhavebroughtthesubjectbeforethemanyexcellentnaturalistsofGermany。
  OfalltheGermanauthors(buttheyarenotmany)whoseworksIhaveread,youwritebyfarthecleareststyle,butwhetherthisisacomplimenttoaGermanwriterIdonotknow。
  [Thetwofollowinglettersrefertothesmallbud—like"Cleistogamic"
  flowersfoundinthevioletandmanyotherplants。Theydonotopenandarenecessarilyself—fertilised:]
  CHARLESDARWINTOJ。D。HOOKER。
  Down,May30[1862]……WhatwillbecomeofmybookonVariation?Iaminvolvedinamultiplicityofexperiments。IhavebeenamusingmyselfbylookingatthesmallflowersofViola。IfOliver(Shortlyafterwardshewrote:"Oliver,theomniscient,hassentmeapaperinthe’Bot。Zeitung,’withmostaccuratedescriptionofallthatIsawinViola。")hashadtimetostudythem,hewillhaveseenthecuriouscase(asitseemstome)whichIhavejustmadeclearlyout,viz。thatintheseflowers,theFEWpollengrainsarenevershed,orneverleavetheanther—cells,butemitlongpollentubes,whichpenetratethestigma。To—dayIgottheantherwiththeincludedpollengrain(nowempty)atoneend,andabundleoftubespenetratingthestigmatictissueattheotherend;Igotthewholeunderamicroscopewithoutbreakingthetubes;Iwonderwhetherthestigmapourssomefluidintotheanthersoastoexcitetheincludedgrains。Itisaratheroddcaseofcorrelation,thatinthedoublesweetvioletthesmallflowersaredouble;i。e。,haveamultitudeofminutescalesrepresentingthepetals。Whatqueerlittleflowerstheyare。
  HaveyouhadtimetoreadpoordearHenslow’slife?ithasinterestedmefortheman’ssake,and,whatIdidnotthinkpossible,hasevenexaltedhischaracterinmyestimation……
  [Thefollowingisanextractfromthelettergiveninpartabove,andreferstoDr。Gray’sarticleonthesexualdifferencesofplants:]
  CHARLESDARWINTOASAGRAY。
  NOVEMBER26[1862]……YouwillthinkthatIaminthemostunpleasant,contradictory,fractioushumour,whenItellyouthatIdonotlikeyourtermof"precociousfertilisation"foryoursecondclassofdimorphism[i。e。forcleistogamicfertilisation]。IfIcantrustmymemory,thestateofthecorolla,ofthestigma,andthepollen—grainsisdifferentfromthestateofthepartsinthebud;thattheyareinaconditionofspecialmodification。ButuponmylifeIamashamedofmyselftodiffersomuchfrommybettersonthishead。TheTEMPORARYtheory(Thisviewisnowgenerallyaccepted。)whichIhaveformedonthisclassofdimorphism,justtoguideexperiment,isthatthePERFECTflowerscanonlybeperfectlyfertilisedbyinsects,andareinthiscaseabundantlycrossed;butthattheflowersarenotalways,especiallyinearlyspring,visitedenoughbyinsects,andthereforethelittleimperfectself—fertilisingflowersaredevelopedtoensureasufficiencyofseedforpresentgenerations。Violacaninaissterile,whennotvisitedbyinsects,butwhensovisitedformsplentyofseed。IinferfromthestructureofthreeorfourformsofBalsamineae,thattheserequireinsects;atleastthereisalmostasplainadaptationtoinsectsasintheOrchids。IhaveOxalisacetosellareadyinpotsforexperimentnextspring;andIfearthiswillupsetmylittletheory……Campanulacarpathica,asIfoundthissummer,isabsolutelysterileifinsectsareexcluded。Speculariaspeculumisfairlyfertilewhenenclosed;andthisseemedtometobepartiallyeffectedbythefrequentclosingoftheflower;theinwardangularfoldsofthecorollacorrespondingwiththecleftsoftheopenstigma,andinthisactionpushingpollenfromtheoutsideofthestigmaontoitssurface。Nowcanyoutellme,doesS。perfoliatacloseitsflowerlikeS。speculum,withangularinwardfolds?ifso,Iamsmashedwithoutsomefearful"wriggling。"
  AretheIMPERFECTflowersofyourSpeculariatheearlyorthelaterones?
  veryearlyorverylate?ItisratherprettytoseetheimportanceoftheclosingofflowersofS。speculum。
  [’FormsofFlowers’waspublishedinJuly;inJune,1877,hewrotetoProfessorCaruswithregardtothetranslation:——
  "Mynewbookisnotalongone,viz。350pages,chieflyofthelargertype,withfifteensimplewoodcuts。AlltheproofsarecorrectedexcepttheIndex,sothatitwillsoonbepublished。
  "……IdonotsupposethatIshallpublishanymorebooks,thoughperhapsafewmorepapers。Icannotendurebeingidle,butheavenknowswhetherIamcapableofanymoregoodwork。"
  Thereviewalludedtointhenextletterisatpage445ofthevolumeof’Nature’for1878:]
  CHARLESDARWINTOW。THISELTONDYER。
  Down,April5,1878。
  MydearDyer,Ihavejustreadin’Nature’thereviewof’FormsofFlowers,’andIamsurethatitisbyyou。Iwishwithallmyheartthatitdeservedonequarterofthepraiseswhichyougiveit。Someofyourremarkshaveinterestedmegreatly……Heartythanksforyourgenerousandmostkindsympathy,whichdoesamanrealgood,whenheisasdog—tiredasIamatthisminutewithworkingallday,sogood—bye。
  C。DARWIN。
  CHAPTER2。XIII。
  CLIMBINGANDINSECTIVOROUSPLANTS。
  [Myfathermentionsinhis’Autobiography’(volumei。)thathewasledtotakeupthesubjectofclimbingplantsbyreadingDr。Gray’spaper,"NoteontheCoilingoftheTendrilsofPlants。"(’Proc。Amer。Acad。ofArtsandSciences,’1858。)Thisessayseemstohavebeenreadin1862,butIamonlyabletoguessatthedateoftheletterinwhichheasksforareferencetoit,sothattheprecisedateofhisbeginningthisworkcannotbedetermined。
  InJune1863hewascertainlyatwork,andwrotetoSirJ。D。Hookerforinformationastopreviouspublicationsonthesubject,beingtheninignoranceofPalm’sandH。v。Mohl’sworksonclimbingplants,bothofwhichwerepublishedin1827。]
  CHARLESDARWINTOJ。D。HOOKER。
  Down[June]25[1863]。
  MydearHooker,Ihavebeenobservingprettycarefullyalittlefactwhichhassurprisedme;andIwanttoknowfromyouandOliverwhetheritseemsneworoddtoyou,sojusttellmewheneveryouwrite;itisaverytriflingfact,sodonotansweronpurpose。
  IhavegotaplantofEchinocystislobatatoobservetheirritabilityofthetendrilsdescribedbyAsaGray,andwhichofcourse,isplainenough。
  Havingtheplantinmystudy,Ihavebeensurprisedtofindthattheuppermostpartofeachbranch(i。e。thestembetweenthetwouppermostleavesexcludingthegrowingtip)isCONSTANTLYandslowlytwistingroundmakingacircleinfromone—halftotwohours;itwillsometimesgoroundtwoorthreetimes,andthenatthesamerateuntwistsandtwistsinoppositedirections。Itgenerallyrestshalfanhourbeforeitretrogrades。Thestemdoesnotbecomepermanentlytwisted。Thestembeneaththetwistingportiondoesnotmoveintheleast,thoughnottied。
  Themovementgoesonalldayandallearlynight。Ithasnorelationtolightfortheplantstandsinmywindowandtwistsfromthelightjustasquicklyastowardsit。ThismaybeacommonphenomenonforwhatIknow,butitconfoundedmequite,whenIbegantoobservetheirritabilityofthetendrils。Idonotsayitisthefinalcause,buttheresultispretty,fortheplanteveryoneandahalfortwohourssweepsacircle(accordingtothelengthofthebendingshootandthelengthofthetendril)offromonefoottotwentyinchesindiameter,andimmediatelythatthetendriltouchesanyobjectitssensitivenesscausesitimmediatelytoseizeit;aclevergardener,myneighbour,whosawtheplantonmytablelastnight,said:"Ibelieve,Sir,thetendrilscansee,forwhereverIputaplantitfindsoutanysticknearenough。"Ibelievetheaboveistheexplanation,viz。thatitsweepsslowlyroundandround。Thetendrilshavesomesense,fortheydonotgraspeachotherwhenyoung。
  Yoursaffectionately,C。DARWIN。
  CHARLESDARWINTOJ。D。HOOKER。
  Down,July14[1863]。
  MydearHooker,Iamgettingverymuchamusedbymytendrils,itisjustthesortofnigglingworkwhichsuitsme,andtakesupnotimeandratherrestsmewhilstwriting。Sowillyoujustthinkwhetheryouknowanyplant,whichyoucouldgiveorlendme,orIcouldbuy,withtendrils,remarkableinanywayfordevelopment,foroddorpeculiarstructure,orevenforanoddplaceinnaturalarrangement。IhaveseenorcanseeCucurbitaceae,Passion—flower,Virginian—creeper,Cissusdiscolor,Common—peaandEverlasting—pea。Itisreallycuriousthediversificationofirritability(Idonotmeanthespontaneousmovement,aboutwhichIwrotebeforeandcorrectly,asfurtherobservationshows):forinstance,IfindaslightpinchbetweenthethumbandfingerattheendofthetendriloftheCucurbitaceaecausespromptmovement,butapinchexcitesnomovementinCissus。Thecauseisthatonesidealone(theconcave)isirritableintheformer;whereasbothsidesareirritableinCissus,soifyouexciteatthesametimebothOPPOSITEsidesthereisnomovement,butbytouchingwithapencilthetwobranchesofthetendril,inanypartwhatever,youcausemovementtowardsthatpoint;sothatIcanmould,byameretouch,thetwobranchesintoanyshapeIlike……
  CHARLESDARWINTOASAGRAY。
  Down,August4[1863]。
  Mypresenthobby—horseIowetoyou,viz。thetendrils:theirirritabilityisbeautiful,asbeautifulinallitsmodificationsasanythinginOrchids。
  AbouttheSPONTANEOUSmovement(independentoftouch)ofthetendrilsandupperinternodes,Iamrathertakenabackbyyoursaying,"isitnotwell—
  known?"IcanfindnothinginanybookwhichIhave……Thespontaneousmovementofthetendrilsisindependentofthemovementoftheupperinternodes,butbothworkharmoniouslytogetherinsweepingacircleforthetendrilstograspastick。Sowithallclimbingplants(withouttendrils)asyetexamined,theupperinternodesgoonnightanddaysweepingacircleinonefixeddirection。ItissurprisingtowatchtheApocyneaewithshoots18incheslong(beyondthesupportingstick),steadilysearchingforsomethingtoclimbup。Whentheshootmeetsastick,themotionatthatpointisarrested,butintheupperpartiscontinued;sothattheclimbingofallplantsyetexaminedisthesimpleresultofthespontaneouscirculatorymovementoftheupperinternodes。
  Praytellmewhetheranythinghasbeenpublishedonthissubject?Ihatepublishingwhatisold;butIshallhardlyregretmyworkifitisold,asithasmuchamusedme……
  CHARLESDARWINTOASAGRAY。
  May28,1864……AnIrishnoblemanonhisdeath—beddeclaredthathecouldconscientiouslysaythathehadneverthroughoutlifedeniedhimselfanypleasure;andIcanconscientiouslysaythatIhaveneverscrupledtotroubleyou;soheregoes。——HaveyoutravelledSouth,andcanyoutellmewhetherthetrees,whichBignoniacapreolataclimbs,arecoveredwithmossorfilamentouslichenorTillandsia?(HesubsequentlylearnedfromDr。
  GraythatPolypodiumincanumaboundsonthetreesinthedistrictswherethisspeciesofBignoniagrows。See’ClimbingPlants,’page103。)Iaskbecauseitstendrilsabhorasimplestick,donotmuchrelishroughbark,butdelightinwoolormoss。Theyadhereinacuriousmannerbymakinglittledisks,liketheAmpelopsis……Bytheway,Iwillenclosesomespecimens,andifyouthinkitworthwhile,youcanputthemunderthesimplemicroscope。Itisremarkablehowspeciallyadaptedsometendrilsare;thoseofEccremocarpusscaberdonotlikeastick,willhavenothingtosaytowool;butgivethemabundleofculmsofgrass,orabundleofbristlesandtheyseizethemwell。