thepermanenceofthereligiousworldtothecontinualshiftingofpolitics;theexperienceofthepeopletoitstheoreticalignorance;anditspracticalknowledgeofbusinesstotheimpatienceofitsdesires。
TheAmericans,then,havenotrelieduponthenatureoftheircountrytocounterpoisethosedangerswhichoriginateintheirConstitutionandintheirpoliticallaws。Toevilswhicharecommontoalldemocraticpeoplestheyhaveappliedremedieswhichnonebutthemselveshadeverthoughtofbefore;andalthoughtheywerethefirsttomaketheexperiment,theyhavesucceededinit。
ThemannersandlawsoftheAmericansarenottheonlyoneswhichmaysuitademocraticpeople;buttheAmericanshaveshownthatitwouldbewrongtodespairofregulatingdemocracybytheaidofmannersandoflaws。IfothernationsshouldborrowthisgeneralandpregnantideafromtheAmericans,withouthoweverintendingtoimitatetheminthepeculiarapplicationwhichtheyhavemadeofit;iftheyshouldattempttofitthemselvesforthatsocialcondition,whichitseemstobethewillofProvidencetoimposeuponthegenerationsofthisage,andsotoescapefromthedespotismortheanarchywhichthreatensthem;
whatreasonistheretosupposethattheireffortswouldnotbecrownedwithsuccess?TheorganizationandtheestablishmentofdemocracyinChristendomisthegreatpoliticalproblemofthetime。TheAmericans,unquestionably,havenotresolvedthisproblem,buttheyfurnishusefuldatatothosewhoundertakethetask。
ImportanceOfWhatPrecedesWithRespectToTheStateOfEuropeItmayreadilybediscoveredwithwhatintentionIundertooktheforegoinginquiries。ThequestionherediscussedisinterestingnotonlytotheUnitedStates,buttothewholeworld;itconcerns,notanation,butallmankind。Ifthosenationswhosesocialconditionisdemocraticcouldonlyremainfreeaslongastheyareinhabitantsofthewilds,wecouldnotbutdespairofthefuturedestinyofthehumanrace;fordemocracyisrapidlyacquiringamoreextendedsway,andthewildsaregraduallypeopledwithmen。Ifitweretruethatlawsandmannersareinsufficienttomaintaindemocraticinstitutions,whatrefugewouldremainopentothenations,exceptthedespotismofasingleindividual?Iamawarethattherearemanyworthypersonsatthepresenttimewhoarenotalarmedatthislatteralternative,andwhoaresotiredoflibertyastobegladofrepose,farfromthosestormsbywhichitisattended。Buttheseindividualsareillacquaintedwiththehaventowardswhichtheyarebound。Theyaresodeludedbytheirrecollections,astojudgethetendencyofabsolutepowerbywhatitwasformerly,andnotbywhatitmightbecomeatthepresenttime。
Ifabsolutepowerwerere—establishedamongstthedemocraticnationsofEurope,Iampersuadedthatitwouldassumeanewform,andappearunderfeaturesunknowntoourforefathers。
TherewasatimeinEuropewhenthelawsandtheconsentofthepeoplehadinvestedprinceswithalmostunlimitedauthority;buttheyscarcelyeveravailedthemselvesofit。Idonotspeakoftheprerogativesofthenobility,oftheauthorityofsupremecourtsofjustice,ofcorporationsandtheircharteredrights,orofprovincialprivileges,whichservedtobreaktheblowsofthesovereignauthority,andtomaintainaspiritofresistanceinthenation。Independentlyofthesepoliticalinstitutions—
which,howeveropposedtheymightbetopersonalliberty,servedtokeepalivetheloveoffreedominthemindofthepublic,andwhichmaybeesteemedtohavebeenusefulinthisrespect—themannersandopinionsofthenationconfinedtheroyalauthoritywithinbarrierswhichwerenotlesspowerful,althoughtheywerelessconspicuous。Religion,theaffectionsofthepeople,thebenevolenceoftheprince,thesenseofhonor,familypride,provincialprejudices,custom,andpublicopinionlimitedthepowerofkings,andrestrainedtheirauthoritywithinaninvisiblecircle。Theconstitutionofnationswasdespoticatthattime,buttheirmannerswerefree。Princeshadtheright,buttheyhadneitherthemeansnorthedesire,ofdoingwhatevertheypleased。
Butwhatnowremainsofthosebarrierswhichformerlyarrestedtheaggressionsoftyranny?Sincereligionhaslostitsempireoverthesoulsofmen,themostprominentboundarywhichdividedgoodfromevilisoverthrown;theveryelementsofthemoralworldareindeterminate;theprincesandthepeoplesoftheearthareguidedbychance,andnonecandefinethenaturallimitsofdespotismandtheboundsoflicense。LongrevolutionshaveforeverdestroyedtherespectwhichsurroundedtherulersoftheState;andsincetheyhavebeenrelievedfromtheburdenofpublicesteem,princesmayhenceforwardsurrenderthemselveswithoutfeartotheseductionsofarbitrarypower。
Whenkingsfindthattheheartsoftheirsubjectsareturnedtowardsthem,theyareclement,becausetheyareconsciousoftheirstrength,andtheyarecharyoftheaffectionoftheirpeople,becausetheaffectionoftheirpeopleisthebulwarkofthethrone。Amutualinterchangeofgood—willthentakesplacebetweentheprinceandthepeople,whichresemblesthegraciousintercourseofdomesticsociety。Thesubjectsmaymurmuratthesovereign’sdecree,buttheyaregrievedtodispleasehim;andthesovereignchastiseshissubjectswiththelighthandofparentalaffection。
Butwhenoncethespellofroyaltyisbrokeninthetumultofrevolution;whensuccessivemonarchshavecrossedthethrone,soasalternatelytodisplaytothepeopletheweaknessoftheirrightandtheharshnessoftheirpower,thesovereignisnolongerregardedbyanyastheFatheroftheState,andheisfearedbyallasitsmaster。Ifhebeweak,heisdespised;ifhebestrong,heisdetested。Hehimselfisfullofanimosityandalarm;hefindsthatheisasastrangerinhisowncountry,andhetreatshissubjectslikeconqueredenemies。
Whentheprovincesandthetownsformedsomanydifferentnationsinthemidstoftheircommoncountry,eachofthemhadawillofitsown,whichwasopposedtothegeneralspiritofsubjection;butnowthatallthepartsofthesameempire,afterhavinglosttheirimmunities,theircustoms,theirprejudices,theirtraditions,andtheirnames,aresubjectedandaccustomedtothesamelaws,itisnotmoredifficulttooppressthemcollectivelythanitwasformerlytooppressthemsingly。
Whilstthenoblesenjoyedtheirpower,andindeedlongafterthatpowerwaslost,thehonorofaristocracyconferredanextraordinarydegreeofforceupontheirpersonalopposition。
Theyaffordinstancesofmenwho,notwithstandingtheirweakness,stillentertainedahighopinionoftheirpersonalvalue,anddaredtocopesingle—handedwiththeeffortsofthepublicauthority。Butatthepresentday,whenallranksaremoreandmoreconfounded,whentheindividualdisappearsinthethrong,andiseasilylostinthemidstofacommonobscurity,whenthehonorofmonarchyhasalmostlostitsempirewithoutbeingsucceededbypublicvirtue,andwhennothingcanenablemantoriseabovehimself,whoshallsayatwhatpointtheexigenciesofpowerandtheservilityofweaknesswillstop?
Aslongasfamilyfeelingwaskeptalive,theantagonistofoppressionwasneveralone;helookedabouthim,andfoundhisclients,hishereditaryfriends,andhiskinsfolk。Ifthissupportwaswanting,hewassustainedbyhisancestorsandanimatedbyhisposterity。Butwhenpatrimonialestatesaredivided,andwhenafewyearssufficetoconfoundthedistinctionsofarace,wherecanfamilyfeelingbefound?Whatforcecantherebeinthecustomsofacountrywhichhaschangedandisstillperpetuallychanging,itsaspect;inwhicheveryactoftyrannyhasaprecedent,andeverycrimeanexample;inwhichthereisnothingsooldthatitsantiquitycansaveitfromdestruction,andnothingsounparalleledthatitsnoveltycanpreventitfrombeingdone?Whatresistancecanbeofferedbymannersofsopliantamakethattheyhavealreadyoftenyielded?
Whatstrengthcanevenpublicopinionhaveretained,whennotwentypersonsareconnectedbyacommontie;whennotaman,norafamily,norcharteredcorporation,norclass,norfreeinstitution,hasthepowerofrepresentingorexertingthatopinion;andwheneverycitizen—beingequallyweak,equallypoor,andequallydependent—hasonlyhispersonalimpotencetoopposetotheorganizedforceofthegovernment?
TheannalsofFrancefurnishnothinganalogoustotheconditioninwhichthatcountrymightthenbethrown。Butitmaymoreaptlybeassimilatedtothetimesofold,andtothosehideouserasofRomanoppression,whenthemannersofthepeoplewerecorrupted,theirtraditionsobliterated,theirhabitsdestroyed,theiropinionsshaken,andfreedom,expelledfromthelaws,couldfindnorefugeintheland;whennothingprotectedthecitizens,andthecitizensnolongerprotectedthemselves;
whenhumannaturewasthesportofman,andprincesweariedouttheclemencyofHeavenbeforetheyexhaustedthepatienceoftheirsubjects。ThosewhohopetorevivethemonarchyofHenryIVorofLouisXIV,appeartometobeafflictedwithmentalblindness;andwhenIconsiderthepresentconditionofseveralEuropeannations—aconditiontowhichalltheotherstend—I
amledtobelievethattheywillsoonbeleftwithnootheralternativethandemocraticliberty,orthetyrannyoftheCaesars。*n[Footnoten:[ThispredictionofthereturnofFrancetoimperialdespotism,andofthetruecharacterofthatdespoticpower,waswrittenin1832,andrealizedtotheletterin1852。]]
Andindeeditisdeservingofconsideration,whethermenaretobeentirelyemancipatedorentirelyenslaved;whethertheirrightsaretobemadeequal,orwhollytakenawayfromthem。Iftherulersofsocietywerereducedeithergraduallytoraisethecrowdtotheirownlevel,ortosinkthecitizensbelowthatofhumanity,wouldnotthedoubtsofmanyberesolved,theconsciencesofmanybehealed,andthecommunitypreparedtomakegreatsacrificeswithlittledifficulty?Inthatcase,thegradualgrowthofdemocraticmannersandinstitutionsshouldberegarded,notasthebest,butastheonlymeansofpreservingfreedom;andwithoutlikingthegovernmentofdemocracy,itmightbeadoptedasthemostapplicableandthefairestremedyforthepresentillsof...完整阅读请扫描二维码下载丁香书院APP免费看:
第27章