首页 >出版文学> Medical Essays>第17章

第17章

  Answer。“OfcourseIshouldrequireaverylargeextrapremium,ifIwouldtaketakeriskatall。“
  ButIdonotchoosetoaddtheexpressionsofindignationwhichtheexaminationofthefactsbeforehimcalledout。Iwassatisfiedfromtheeffecttheyproducedonhim,thatifallthehideouscataloguesofcasesnowaccumulatedwerefullybroughttotheknowledgeofthepublic,nothing,sincethedaysofBurkeandHare,hasraisedsuchacryofhorroraswouldbeshriekedintheearsoftheProfession。
  Dr。Meigshaselsewhereinvoked“Providence“asthealternativeofaccident,toaccountforthe“coincidences。““Obstetrics,“Phil。
  1852,p。631。Ifso,Providenceeitheractsthroughtheagencyofsecondarycauses,asinotherdiseases,ornot。Ifthroughsuchcauses,letusfindoutwhattheyare,aswetrytodoinothercases。Itmaybetruethatoffences,ordiseases,willcome,but“woeuntohimthroughwhomtheycome,“ifwecatchhiminthevoluntaryorcarelessactofbringingthem!ButifProvidencedoesnotactthroughsecondarycausesinthisparticularsphereofetiology,thenwhydoesDr。Meigstakesuchpainstoreasonsoextensivelyaboutthelawsofcontagion,which,onthatsupposition,havenomoretodowiththiscasethanwiththeplaguewhichdestroyedthepeopleafterDavidhadnumberedthem?Aboveall,whatbecomesofthetheologicalaspectofthequestion,whenheassertsthatapractitionerwas“onlyunluckyinmeetingwiththeepidemiccases?“Op。cit。p。633。WedonotdenythattheGodofbattlesdecidesthefateofnations;butweliketohavethebiggestsquadronsonourside,andweareparticularthatoursoldiersshouldnotonlysaytheirprayers,butalsokeeptheirpowderdry。WedonotdenytheagencyofProvidenceinthedisasteratNorwalk,butweturnofftheengineer,andchargetheCompanyfivethousanddollarsapieceforeverylifethatissacrificed。
  Whyagrandjuryshouldnotbringinabillagainstaphysicianwhoswitchesoffascoreofwomenoneaftertheotheralonghisprivatetrack,whenheknowsthatthereisablackgulfattheendofit,downwhichtheyaretoplunge,whilethegreathighwayisclear,ismorethanIcananswer。ItisnotbylayingtheopendrawtoProvidencethatheistoescapethechargeofmanslaughter。
  Tofinishwithalltheselessermattersofquestion,Iamunabletoseewhyafemalemustnecessarilybeunattendedinherconfinement,becauseshedeclinestheservicesofaparticularpractitioner。Inalltheseriesofcasesmentioned,thedeath-carryingattendantwassurroundedbyothersnottrackedbydiseaseanditsconsequences。
  Which,Iwouldask,isworse,——tocallinanother,evenarivalpractitioner,ortosubmitanunsuspectingfemaletoariskwhichanInsuranceCompanywouldhavenothingtodowith?
  Idonotexpectevertoreturntothissubject。Thereisapointofmentalsaturation,beyondwhichargumentcannotbeforcedwithoutbreedingimpatient,ifnotharsh,feelingstowardsthosewhorefusetobeconvinced。IfIhavesofarmanifestedneither,itiswelltostophere,andleavetheresttothoseyoungerfriendswhomayhavemorestomachforthedregsofastaleargument。
  TheextentofmyprefatoryremarksmayleadsometothinkthatI
  attachtoomuchimportancetomyownEssay。OthersmaywonderthatI
  shouldexpendsomanywordsuponthetwoproductionsreferredto,theLetterandtheLecture。IdoconsidermyEssayofmuchimportancesolongasthedoctrineitmaintainsistreatedasaquestion,andsolongasanyimportantpartofthedefenceofthatdoctrineisthoughttorestonitsevidenceorarguments。Icannottreatasinsignificantanyopinionsbearingonlife,andinterestsdearerthanlife,proclaimedyearlytohundredsofyoungmen,whowillcarrythemtotheirlegitimateresultsinpractice。
  TheteachingsofthetwoProfessorsinthegreatschoolsofPhiladelphiaaresuretobelistenedto,notonlybytheirimmediatepupils,butbytheProfessionatlarge。Iamtoomuchinearnestforeitherhumilityorvanity,butIdoentreatthosewhoholdthekeysoflifeanddeathtolistentomealsoforthisonce。Iasknopersonalfavor;butIbegtobeheardinbehalfofthewomenwhoselivesareatstake,untilsomestrongervoiceshallpleadforthem。
  ItrustthatIhavemadetheissueperfectlydistinctandintelligible。Andletitberememberedthatthisisnosubjecttobesmoothedoverbynicelyadjustedphrasesofhalf-assentandhalf-
  censuredividedbetweentheparties。Thebalancemustbestruckboldlyandtheresultdeclaredplainly。IfIhavebeenhasty,presumptuous,ill-informed,illogical;ifmyarrayoffactsmeansnothing;ifthereisnoreasonforanycautionintheviewofthesefacts;letmebetoldsoonsuchauthoritythatImustbelieveit,andIwillbesilenthenceforth,recognizingthatmymindisinastateofdisorganization。IfthedoctrineIhavemaintainedisamournfultruth;iftodisbelieveit,andtopractiseonthisdisbelief,andtoteachotherssotodisbelieveandpractise,istocarrydesolation,andtocharterotherstocarryit,intoconfidingfamilies,letitbeproclaimedasplainlywhatistobethoughtoftheteachingsofthosewhosneerattheallegeddangers,andscouttheveryideaofprecaution。Letitberememberedthatpersonsarenothinginthismatter;betterthattwentypamphleteersshouldbesilenced,orasmanyprofessorsunseated,thanthatonemother’slifeshouldbetaken。Thereisnoquarrelherebetweenmen,butthereisdeadlyincompatibilityandexterminatingwarfarebetweendoctrines。
  Coincidences,meaningnothing,thoughamanhaveamonopolyofthediseaseforweeksormonths;orcauseandeffect,thecausebeinginsomewayconnectedwiththeperson;thisisthequestion。IfIamwrong,letmebeputdownbysucharebukeasnorashdeclaimerhasreceivedsincetherehasbeenapublicopinioninthemedicalprofessionofAmerica;ifIamright,letdoctrineswhichleadtoprofessionalhomicidebenolongertaughtfromthechairsofthosetwogreatInstitutions。Indifferencewillnotdohere;ourJournalistsandCommitteeshavenorighttotakeuptheirpageswithminuteanatomyandtediouslydetailedcases,whileitisaquestionwhetherornotthe“blackdeath“ofchild-bedistobescatteredbroadcastbytheagencyofthemother’sfriendandadviser。Letthemenwhomouldopinionslooktoit;ifthereisanyvoluntaryblindness,anyinterestedoversight,anyculpablenegligence,even,insuchamatter,andthefactsshallreachthepublicear;thepestilence-carrierofthelying-inchambermustlooktoGodforpardon,formanwillneverforgivehim。
  THECONTAGIOUSNESSOFPUERPERALFEVER。
  Incollecting,enforcing,andaddingtotheevidenceaccumulateduponthismostserioussubject,Iwouldnotbeunderstoodtoimplythatthereexistsadoubtinthemindofanywell-informedmemberofthemedicalprofessionastothefactthatpuerperalfeverissometimescommunicatedfromonepersontoanother,bothdirectlyandindirectly。InthepresentstateofourknowledgeuponthispointI
  shouldconsidersuchdoubtsmerelyasaproofthatthesceptichadeithernotexaminedtheevidence,or,havingexaminedit,refusedtoacceptitsplainandunavoidableconsequences。Ishouldbesorrytothink,withDr。Rigby,thatitwasacaseof“obliquevision;“I
  shouldbeunwillingtoforcehometheargumentumadhominemofDr。
  Blundell,butIwouldnotconsenttomakeaquestionofamomentousfactwhichisnolongertobeconsideredasasubjectfortrivialdiscussions,buttobeacteduponwithsilentpromptitude。Itsignifiesnothingthatwiseandexperiencedpractitionershavesometimesdoubtedtherealityofthedangerinquestion;nomanhastherighttodoubtitanylonger。Nonegativefacts,noopposingopinions,betheywhattheymay,orwhosetheymay,canformanyanswertotheseriesofcasesnowwithinthereachofallwhochoosetoexploretherecordsofmedicalscience。
  Iftherearesomewhoconceivethatanyimportantendwouldbeansweredbyrecordingsuchopinions,orbycollectingthehistoryofallthecasestheycouldfindinwhichnoevidenceoftheinfluenceofcontagionexisted,Ibelievetheyareinerror。Supposeafewwritersofauthoritycanbefoundtoprofessadisbeliefincontagion,——andtheyareveryfewcomparedwiththosewhothinkdifferently,——isitquiteclearthattheyformedtheiropinionsonaviewofallthefacts,orisitnotapparentthattheyreliedmostlyontheirownsolitaryexperience?Stillfurther,ofthosewhosenamesarequoted,isitnottruethatscarcelyasingleonecouldbyanypossibilityhaveknownthehalforthetenthofthefactsbearingonthesubjectwhichhavereachedsuchafrightfulamountwithinthelastfewyears?Again,astotheutilityofnegativefacts,aswemaybrieflycallthem,——instances,namely,inwhichexposurehasnotbeenfollowedbydisease,——although,likeothertruths,theymaybeworthknowing,Idonotseethattheyareliketoshedanyimportantlightuponthesubjectbeforeus。Everysuchinstancerequiresagooddealofcircumstantialexplanationbeforeitcanbeaccepted。
  Itisnotenoughthatapractitionershouldhavehadasinglecaseofpuerperalfevernotfollowedbyothers。Itmustbeknownwhetherheattendedotherswhilethiscasewasinprogress,whetherhewentdirectlyfromonechambertoothers,whetherhetookany,andwhatprecautions。Itisimportanttoknowthatseveralwomenwereexposedtoinfectionderivedfromthepatient,sothatallowancemaybemadeforwantofpredisposition。Nowifofnegativefactssosiftedtherecouldbeaccumulatedahundredforeveryoneplaininstanceofcommunicationhererecorded,Itrustitneednotbesaidthatweareboundtoguardandwatchoverthehundredthtenantofourfold,thoughtheninetyandninemaybesureofescapingthewolfatitsentrance。Ifanyoneisdisposed,then,totakeahundredinstancesoflivesendangeredorsacrificedoutofthoseIhavementioned,andmakeitreasonablyclearthatwithinasimilartimeandcompasstenthousandescapedthesameexposure,Ishallthankhimforhisindustry,butImustbepermittedtoholdtomyownpracticalconclusions,andbeghimtoadoptoratleasttoexaminethemalso。
  Childrenthatwalkincalicobeforeopenfiresarenotalwaysburnedtodeath;theinstancestothecontrarymaybeworthrecording;butbynomeansiftheyaretobeusedasargumentsagainstwoollenfrocksandhighfenders。
  Iamnotsurethatthispaperwillescapeanotherremarkwhichitmightbewishedwerefoundedinjustice。Itmaybesaidthatthefactsaretoogenerallyknownandacknowledgedtorequireanyformalargumentorexposition,thatthereisnothingnewinthepositionsadvanced,andnoneedoflayingadditionalstatementsbeforetheProfession。Butonturningtotwoworks,onealmostuniversally,andtheotherextensivelyappealedtoasauthorityinthiscountry,Iseeamplereasontooverlookthisobjection。InthelasteditionofDewees’sTreatiseonthe“DiseasesofFemales,“itisexpresslysaid,“Inthiscountry,undernocircumstancethatpuerperalfeverhasappearedhitherto,doesitaffordtheslightestgroundforthebeliefthatitiscontagious。“Inthe“PhiladelphiaPracticeofMidwifery“
  notonewordcanbefoundinthechapterdevotedtothisdiseasewhichwouldleadthereadertosuspectthattheideaofcontagionhadeverbeenentertained。Itseemsproper,therefore,toremindthosewhoareinthehabitofreferringtotheseworksforguidance,thattheremaypossiblybesomesourcesofdangertheyhaveslightedoromitted,quiteasimportantasatriflingirregularityofdiet,oraconfinedstateofthebowels,andthatwhateverconfidenceaphysicianmayhaveinhisownmodeoftreatment,hisservicesareofquestionablevaluewheneverhecarriesthebaneaswellastheantidoteabouthisperson。
  Thepracticalpointtobeillustratedisthefollowing:
  ThediseaseknownasPuerperalFeverissofarcontagiousastobefrequentlycarriedfrompatienttopatientbyphysiciansandnurses。
  Letmebeginbythrowingoutcertainincidentalquestions,which,withoutbeingabsolutelyessential,wouldrenderthesubjectmorecomplicated,andbymakingsuchconcessionsandassumptionsasmaybefairlysupposedtobewithoutthepaleofdiscussion。
  1。Itisgrantedthatalltheformsofwhatiscalledpuerperalfevermaynotbe,andprobablyarenot,equallycontagiousorinfectious。Idonotenterintothedistinctionswhichhavebeendrawnbyauthors,becausethefactsdonotappeartomesufficienttoestablishanyabsolutelineofdemarcationbetweensuchformsasmaybepropagatedbycontagionandthosewhichareneversopropagated。
  ThisgeneralresultIshallonlysupportbytheauthorityofDr。
  Ramsbotham,whogives,astheresultofhisexperience,thatthesamesymptomsbelongtowhathecallstheinfectiousandthesporadicformsofthedisease,andtheopinionofArmstronginhisoriginalEssay。Ifotherscanshowanysuchdistinction,Ileaveittothemtodoit。Buttherearecasesenoughthatshowtheprevalenceofthediseaseamongthepatientsofasinglepractitionerwhenitwasinnodegreeepidemic,inthepropersenseoftheterm。ImayrefertothoseofMr。RobertonandofDr。Peirson,hereaftertobecited,asexamples。
  2。Ishallnotenterintoanydisputeabouttheparticularmodeofinfection,whetheritbebytheatmospherethephysiciancarriesabouthimintothesick-chamber,orbythedirectapplicationofthevirustotheabsorbingsurfaceswithwhichhishandcomesincontact。
  Manyfactsandopinionsareinfavorofeachofthesemodesoftransmission。Butitisobviousthatinthemajorityofcasesitmustbeimpossibletodecidebywhichofthesechannelsthediseaseisconveyed,fromthenatureoftheintercoursebetweenthephysicianandthepatient。