instancesofverygreatdisparityarerare,andsupposesomelocalandspecialreasonswhichwecannottrace。Suchdisparitiesseemtopoint,however,toarotationaccordingtotwocourses,becausethefallowofthethreecoursescouldhavebeenleftoutofthereckoningonlyifallthepartsinthefieldswereequal。14*IthinkthatacarefulinspectionofthesurveysfromthispointofviewmayleadtotheconclusionthatthetwocoursesrotationwasveryextensivelyspreadinEnglandinthethirteenthcentury。
Amostimportantfeatureofthemediaevalsystemoftillagewasitscompulsorycharacter。Theseveraltenants,evenwhenfreeholders,couldnotmanagetheirplotsattheirownchoice。15*Theentiresoilofthetownshipformedonewholeinthisrespect,andwassubjectedtothemanagementoftheentirevillage。Thesuperiorrightofthecommunityfoundexpressioninthefactthatthefieldswereopentocommonuseaspastureaftertheharvest,aswellasintheregulationofthemodesoffarmingandorderoftillagebythetownship。Eventhelordhimselfhadtoconformtothecustomsandrulessetupbythecommunity,andattemptstobreakthroughthem,althoughtheybecomefrequentenoughatthecloseofthethirteenthcentury,andespeciallyinthefourteenth,aremetbyaresistancewhichsometimesactuallyleadstolitigation。16*Thefreeholdersalonehaveaccesstothecourts,butinpracticetheentirebodyofthetenantryisequallyconcerned。Thepassagetowardsmoreefficientmodesofcultivationwasverymuchobstructedbythesecustomaryrulesastorotationofcrops,whichflownotfromthewillandinterestofsingleowners,butfromthedecisionofcommunities。
TheseveralplotsandholdingsdonotlieincompactI
patches,butareformedofstripsintermixedwitheachother。Theso-calledopen-fieldsystemhasbeentreatedsoexhaustivelyandwithsuchadmirableclearnessbySeebohm,thatIneednotdetainmyreadersinordertodiscussitatlength。IshallmerelytakefromtheEynshamCartularythegeneraldescriptionofthearableofShifford,Oxon。Itconsistsofseveralfurlongsorareas,moreorlessrectangularinshape;eachfurlongdividedintoacertainnumberofstripsseliones,mostlyhalfanacreoraroodquarteracreinwidth;someofthesestripsgetshortened,howeverselionescurtae,orsharpenedgorae,accordingtotheshapeofthecountry。Atrightangleswiththestripsinthefieldsliethe’headlands’capitales,whichadmittootherstripswhenthereisnospecialroadforthepurpose。17*Whentheareaundertillageabutsagainstsomeobstacles,asagainstahighway,ariver,aneighbouringfurlong,thestripsarestuntedbuttae。Everystripisseparatedfromthenextbybalksonevenground,andlinchesonthesteepslopesofahill。Theholdingofapeasant,freeorvillain,hasbeenappropriatelylikenedtoabundleofthesestripsofdifferentshapes,thecomponentpartsofwhichlieintermixedwiththeelementsofotherholdingsinthedifferentfieldsofthetownship。Thereise。g。intheAlvinghamCartularyadeedbywhichJohnAysterbygrantstothePrioryofAlvinghaminLincolnshirehisvillainRobertandhalfabovateofland。18*Thehalf-bovateisfoundtoconsistoftwelvestripswestofAlvinghamandsixteenstripseastofthevillage;theseveralplotslieamongsimilarplotsownedbytheprioryandbyotherpeasants。Thedemesnelandoftheprioryisalsosituatednotincompactareas,butinstripsintermixedwiththoseofthetenantry,inthe’communalfields’accordingtothephraseologyofourdocuments。
Suchadistributionofthearableseemsoddenough。Itledundoubtedlytoverygreatinconvenienceinmanyways:itwasdifficultfortheownertolookafterhispropertyintheseveralfields,andtomoveconstantlyfromoneplacetoanotherforthepurposesofcultivation。Athriftyhusbandmanwasmoreorlessdependentfortheresultsofhisworkonhisneighbours,whoverylikelywerenotthrifty。Thestripswerenotalwaysmeasuredwithexactness,19*andoursurveysmentioncuriousmisunderstandingsinthisrespect:ithappensthatasmuchasthreeacresbelongingtoaparticularpersongetmislaidsomehowandcannotbeidentified。20*Itisneedlesstosaythatdisputesamongtheneighbourswererenderedespeciallyfrequentbytheroughwayofdividingthestrips,andbythecuttingupoftheholdingsintonarrowstripsinvolvingaverylonglineofboundary。Andstilltheopen-fieldsystem,withtheintermixedstrips,isquiteaprevalentfeatureofmediaevalhusbandryalloverEurope。Itcoversthewholeareaoccupiedbythevillagecommunity;itisfoundinRussiaaswellasinEngland。
Beforewetrytofindanexplanationforit,IshallcalltheattentionofthereadertothefollowingtalepreservedbyanancientsurveyofDunstablePriory。Ithinkthattherecordmaysuggesttheexplanationwiththemoreauthorityasitwillproceedfromwell-establishedfactsandnotfromsuppositions。21*ThestorygoesbacktotheoriginaldivisionofthelandbelongingtotheWahullmanorbythelordsdeWahullanddelaLege。Theformerhadtoreceivetwo-thirdsofthemanorandthelatterone-third:anoteexplainsthistomean,thatonehadtotaketwentyknight-feesandtheotherten。ThelorddeWahulltookalltheparkinSeghehoandtheentiredemesnefarmin’Bechebury’。Asacompensationforthesurrenderofrightsonthepartofhisfellowparcener,heorderedthewoodandpasturecalledNorthwoodtobemeasured,asalsotheneighbouringwoodcalledChurlwood。Heremovedallthepeasantswholivedintheseplaces,andhadalsothearableofSeghehomeasured,anditwasfoundthattherewereeighthidesofvillainland。Oftheseeighthidesone-fourthwastaken,anditwasreckonedthatthisfourthwasanequivalenttotheone-thirdoftheparkandofthedemesnefarm,whichoughtbyrighttohavegonetothelorddelaLege。
Onthebasisofthisestimationanexchangewaseffected。Inthetimeofthewarperhapstherebellionof1173theeighthidesandotherhidesinSeghehowereencroacheduponandappropriatedunrighteouslybymany,andforthisreasonageneralrevisionoftheholdingswasundertakenbeforeWalterdeWahullandHughdelaLegeinfullcourtbysixoldmen;itwasmadeouttowhichofthehidestheseveralacresbelonged。Atthattime,whenallthetenantsinSeghehoknights,freeholders,andothersdidnotknowexactlyaboutthelandofthevillageandthetenements,andwheneachmanwascontendingthathisneighboursheldunrighteouslyandmorethantheyought,allthepeopledecidedbycommonagreementandinthepresenceofthelordsdeWahullanddelaLege,thateverybodyshouldsurrenderhislandtobemeasuredanewwiththeroodbytheoldmenasifthegroundhadbeenoccupiedafresh:everyonehadtoreceivehisduepartonconsiderationofhisrights。AtthattimeR。F。admittedthatheandhispredecessorshadheldtheareanearthecastleunrighteously。Themeninchargeofthedistributiondividedthatareaintosixteenstripsbuttos,andtheseweredividedasfollows:thereareeighthidesofvillainlandinSeghehoandtoeachtwostripswereapportioned。
Thenarrativeiscuriousinmanyrespects。itillustratesbeautifullytheextenttowhichtheintermixtureofplotswascarried,andtheinconveniencesconsequentuponit。AlthoughthelandhadbeenmeasuredanddividedatthetimewhenthelorddeWahulltooktheland,everythinggotintoconfusionatthetimeofthecivilwar,andthedisputesoriginatednotinviolencefromabroadbutinencroachmentsofthevillagepeopleamongthemselves:theownersofconterminousstripswereconstantlyquarrelling。Anewdivisionbecamenecessary,andittookplaceundercircumstancesofgreatsolemnity,asaresultofanagreementeffectedatagreatmeetingofthetenantrybeforebothlords。Thenewdistributionmaystandforallpurposesinlieuoftheoriginalparcellingofthelandonfreshoccupation。Themodeoftreatingoneoftheareasshowsthattheintermixtureofthestripswasadirectconsequenceoftheattempttoequalisetheportions。insteadofputtingthewholeofthisareaintoonelot,theoldmendivideitintostripsandassigntoeverygreatholding,toeveryhide,twostripsofthisarea。Manyinconveniencesfollowforsomeoftheowners,e。g。forthechurchwhich,itiscomplained,cannotputitsplottoanyuseonaccountofitslyingfaraway,andinintermixturewithotherpeople’sland。Buttheguidingprincipleofequalapportionmenthasfoundasuitableexpression。
Wemayturnnowfromtheanalysisofthiscasetogeneralconsiderations。Theimportantpointintheinstancequotedwas,thattheassignmentofscatteredstripstoeveryholdingdependedonthewishtoequalisethesharesofthetenants。IthinkitmaybeshownthatthetreatmentadoptedinSeghehowasthemostnatural,andthereforethemostwidely-spreadone。Tobeginwith,whatotherformofallotmentappearsmorenaturalinacrudestateofsociety?ToemployasimilewhichIhaveusedalready,theterritoryofthetownshipisnotlikeahomogeneoussheetofpaperoutofwhichyoumaycutlotsofeverydesirableshapeandsize:thetilthwillpresentallkindsofaccidentalfeatures,accordingtotheelevationoftheground,thedirectionofthewatercoursesandways,thequalityofthesoil,thesituationofdwellings,thedispositionofwoodandpasture-ground,etc。Thewholemustneedsbedismemberedintocomponentparts,intosmallerareasorfurlongs,eachstretchingoverlandofoneandthesamecondition,andseparatedfromlandofdifferentqualityandsituation。Overtheirregularsquaresofthisroughchess-boardamoreorlessentanglednetworkofrightsandinterestsmustbeextended。Thereseemtobeonlytwowaysofdoingit:ifyouwanttheholdingtolieinonecompactpatchyouwillhavetomakeaverycomplicatedreckoningofallthemanycircumstanceswhichinfluencehusbandry,willhavetofindsomenumericalexpressionforfertility,accessibility,andthelike;
orelseyoumaysimplygiveeveryhouseholderashareineveryoneofthecomponentareas,andsubjecthiminthiswaytoalltheadvantagesanddrawbackswhichbearuponhisneighbours。Ifthegroundcannotbemadetofitthesystemofallotment,thesystemmustconformitselftotheground。Therecanbenoquestionthatthesecondwayofescapingfromthedifficultyismuchtheeasierone,andverysuitabletothepracticeofcommunitiesinanearlystageofdevelopment。Thissecondwayleadsnecessarilytoascatteringandanintermixtureofstrips。
Theexplanationiswideenoughtomeettherequirementsofcasesplacedinentirelydifferentlocalsurroundingsandhistoricalconnexions;thetendencytowardsanequalisingofthesharesofthetenantryisequallynoticeableinEnglandandinRussia,inthefarwestandinthefareastofEurope。InRussiaweneednotevengointohistorytofinditoperatinginthewaydescribed;
thepracticeisaliveevennow。
Thisintermixtureofstripsintheopenfieldsisalsocharacteristicinanotherway:itmanifeststheworkingofaprinciplewhichbecameobliteratedinthecourseofhistory,buthadtoplayaveryimportantpartoriginally。Itwasasystemprimarilyintendedforthepurposeofequalisingshares,anditconsideredeveryman’srightsandpropertyasinterwovenwithotherpeople’srightsandproperty:itwasthereforeasystemparticularlyadaptedtobringhomethesuperiorrightofthecommunityasawhole,andtheinferior,derivativecharacterofindividualrights。Themostcompleteinferencefromsuchageneralconceptionwouldbetotreatindividualoccupationofthelandasashiftingownership,toredistributethelandamongthemembersofthecommunityfromtimetotime,accordingtosomesystemoflotorrotation。Thewesternvillagecommunitydoesnotgosofar,asarule,inregardtothearable,atleastinthetimetowhichourrecordsbelong。Buteveninthewest,andparticularlyinEngland,tracesofshiftingownership,’shiftingseveralty,’maybefoundasscatteredsurvivalsofaconditionwhich,ifnotgeneral,wascertainlymuchmorewidelyspreadinearliertimes。22*Thearableissometimestreatedasmeadowsconstantlyare:everyhouseholder’slotisonlyan’ideal’one,andmaybeassignedoneyearinoneplace,andnextyearinanother。Thestubbornexistenceofintermixedownership,evenasdescribedbyfeudalandlaterrecords,isinitselfastrongtestimonytothecommunalcharacterofearlyproperty。Thestripsoftheseveralholderswerenotdividedbyhedgesorinclosures,andagoodpartofthetime,afterharvestandbeforeseed,individualrightsretreatedbeforecommonuse;everyindividualisingtreatmentofthesoilwasexcludedbythecompulsoryrotationofcropsandthefactthateveryshareconsistedofanumberofnarrowstripswedgedinamongotherpeople’sshares。Thehusbandrycouldnotbeveryenergeticandlucrativeundersuchpressure,andapowerfulconsiderationwhichkeptthesystemworking,againstconvenienceandinterest,wasitsequalisingandasitwerecommunaltendency。Ilaystressonthefact:iftheopen-fieldsystemwithitsintermixturehadbeenmerelyareflectionoftheoriginalallotment,itwouldhavecertainlylostitsregularityverysoon。Peoplecouldnotbeblindtoitsdrawbacksfromthepointofviewofindividualfarming;andifthesinglestripshadbecomeprivatepropertyassoonastheyceasedtobeshifting,exchanges,ifnotsales,wouldhavegreatlydestroyedthe