首页 >出版文学> A STUDY OF THE BIBLE>第5章
  allpoliticalwriting,withVoltaireandWebster。
  NearthatsamefieldmustliemanyofthoseessaysincriticismofwhichProfessorDowdenspeaks。Thiswhichweomit,thisliteratureofknowledge,ispowerfulliterature,thoughitsmainpurposeisnottomove,buttoteach。
  Weareonlyreducingourfieldsothatwecansurveyit。Forourusesjustnowweshallfindpureliteraturetakingthethreestandardforms:thepoem,theessay,andthestory。ItistheinfluenceoftheEnglishBibleonthislargefieldofliteraturewhichwearetoobserve。
  Justforsafety'ssake,acceptanothernarrowingofthefield。TheeffectoftheBibleanditsreligiousteaching,onthewriterhimselfisaseparatestudy,andisforthemostpartleftoutofconsideration。ItsoundscorrectwhenMiltonsays:"HewhowouldnotbefrustrateofhisPowertowritewelloughthimselftobeatruepoem。"ButthereisMiltonhimselftodealwith;irreproachableinmorals,thereareyettheunhappyyearsofhisyoungwifetotroubleus,andtherewerehisdaughters,whowerenotatpeacewithhim,andwhomaftertheirserviceinhisblindnessheyetstigmatizesinhiswillas"undutifulchildren。"Then,ifyouthinkofShelleyorByron,youaretroubledbytheirlives;orevenCarlyle,theverymasteroftheVictorianera——onewouldnotliketoscanhislifeaccordingtothelawsoftruepoetry。
  ThenthereisColeridge,fallingapreytoopiumuntil,asyearscame,conscienceandwillseemedtogo。OnlyaveryardentScotwillfeelthathecandefendRobertBurnsatallpoints,andwewouldbestrangeAmericansifwefeltthatEdgarAllenPoewasamodelofpropriety。Thatisalargeandinterestingfield,buttheBibleseemseventogainpowerasabook-makingbookwhenitlaysholdonthebook-makingproclivitiesofmenwhoarenotpreparedtoyieldtoitspersonalpower。Theymaygetawayfromitasreligion;theydonotgetawayfromitasliterature。
  ThefirstandmostnotablefactregardingtheinfluenceoftheBibleonEnglishliteratureistheremarkableextentofthatinfluence。Itisliterallyeverywhere。IfeveryBibleinanyconsiderablecityweredestroyed,theBookcouldberestoredinallitsessentialpartsfromthequotationsontheshelvesofthecitypubliclibrary。Thereareworks,coveringalmostallthegreatliterarywriters,devotedespeciallytoshowinghowmuchtheBiblehasinfluencedthem。
  TheliteraryeffectoftheKingJamesversionatfirstwaslessthanitssocialeffect;butinthatveryfactliesastrikingliteraryinfluence。
  ForalongtimeitformedvirtuallythewholeliteraturewhichwasreadilyaccessibletoordinaryEnglishmen。Wegetourphrasesfromathousandbooks。Thecommontalkofanintelligentmanshowstheeffectofmanyauthorsuponhisthinking。Ourfathersgottheirphrasesfromonegreatbook。Theirwritingandtheirspeakingshowtheeffectofthatbook。
  Itisastudybyitself,andyetitistruethatworldliteratureis,asProfessorMoultonputsit,theautobiographyofcivilization。"Anationalliteratureisareflectionofthenationalhistory。"
  Booksasbooksreflecttheirauthors。Asliteraturetheyreflectthepublicopinionwhichgivesthemindorsement。When,therefore,publicopinion:keepsaliveacertaingroupofbooks,thereistestimonynotsimplytothosebooks,buttothepublicopinionwhichhaspreservedthem。Thehistoryofpopularestimatesofliteratureisitselfmostinteresting。Ontheotherhand,somewritershavebeenamusinglyoverestimated。
  NodoubtEdwardFitzgerald,whogaveusthe"RubaiyatofOmarKhayyam"didsomeotherdesirablework;butProfessorMoultonquotesthisparagraphfromapopularlifeofFitzgerald,publishedinDublin:"NotGreeceofoldinherpalmiestdays——theGreeceofHomerandDemosthenes,ofEschylus,Euripides,andSophocles,ofPericles,Leonidas,andAlcibiades,ofSocrates,Plato,andAristotle,ofSolonandLycurgus,ofApellesandPraxiteles——noteventhisGreece,prolificasshewasinsagesandheroes,canboastsuchalengthybead-rollasIrelandcanofnamesimmortalinhistory!"
  But"thiswasforIrishconsumption。"Andpopularopinionandevencriticalopinionhassometimesgonefarastrayinitsdestructivetendency。TherewereauthoritativecriticswhodeclaredthatWordsworth,Shelley,andColeridgewrote"unintelligiblenonsense。"GeorgeMeredith'sstyle,especiallyinhispoetry,wascountedsobadthatit——wasnotworthreading。
  WeareallnearenoughtheBrowningepochtorecallhowtheobscurityofhisstyleimpressedsomeandoppressedothers。AlfredAustin,in1869,saidthat"Mr。Tennysonhasnosoundpretensionstobecalledagreatpoet。"
  Contemporarypublicopinionisseldomafinalgaugeofstrengthforapieceofliterature。Ittakesthetestoftime。Howmanybookswehaveseencomeonthestageandthenpassoffagain!Yetthebooksthathavestayedonthestagehavebeenkepttherebypublicopinionexpressingitselfinthelongrun。ThesocialinfluenceoftheKingJamesversion,creatingapublictasteforcertaintypesofliterature,tendedtoproducethematonce。
  EnglishliteratureinthesethreehundredyearshasfoundintheBiblethreeinfluentialelements:style,language,andmaterial。
  First,thestyleoftheKingJamesversionhasinfluencedEnglishliteraturemarkedly。ProfessorGardineropensoneofhisessayswiththedictumthat"inallstudyofEnglishliterature,iftherebeanyoneaxiomwhichmaybeacceptedwithoutquestion,itisthattheultimatestandardofEnglishprosestyleissetbytheKingJamesversionoftheBible。"[1]Youalmostmeasurethestrengthofwritingbyitsagreementwiththepredominanttraitsofthisversion。
  Carlyle'sweakestworksarethosethatlosethehonestsimplicityofitsstyleinaforcedturgidityandaffectedroughness。HisHeroesandHeroWorshiporhisFrenchRevolutionshowshisdistinctivestyle,andyetshowstheinfluenceofthissimplerstyle,whilehisFredericktheGreatisalmostimpossiblebecausehehasgivenfullplaytohisbrokenanddisconnectedsentences。Ontheotherhand,Macaulayfailsusmostinhisstrivingforeffect,makingnicebalanceofsentences,straininghis"either-or,"
  orhis"while-one-was-doing-this-the-other-was-
  doing-that。"Thenhissentencesgrowinvolved,andhisparagraphslengthen,andheswingsawayfromthestyleoftheKingJamesversion。
  "OnecansaythatifanywritingdepartsveryfarfromthecharacteristicsoftheEnglishBibleitisnotgoodEnglishwriting。"
  [1]AtlanticMonthly,May,1900,p。684。
  ThesecondelementwhichEnglishliteraturefindsintheBibleisitsLANGUAGE。ThewordsoftheBiblearethefamiliaronesoftheEnglishtongue,andhavebeenkeptfamiliarbytheuseoftheBible。Theresultisthat"thepathofliteratureliesparalleltothatofreligion。Theyareoldanddearcompanions,brethrenindeedofoneblood;notalwaysagreeing,tobesure;
  squabblingratherintruebrotherlyfashionnowandthen;occasionallyfallingoutveryseriouslyandbitterly;butstillinterdependentandnecessarytoeachother。"[1]YearsagoawriterremarkedthateverystudentofEnglishliterature,orofEnglishspeech,findsthreeworksorsubjectsreferredto,orquotedfrom,morefrequentlythanothers。ThesearetheBible,talesofGreekandRomanmythology,andAesop'sFables。Ofthesethree,certainlytheBiblefurnishesthelargestnumberofreferences。Thereisreasonforthat。Awriterwantsanaudience。Veryfewmencanclaimtobeindependentofthepublicforwhichtheywrite。ThereisnothingthepublicwillbemoreapttounderstandandappreciatequicklythanapassingreferencetotheEnglishBible。SoitcomesaboutthatwhenDickensisdescribingtheinjusticeoftheMurdstonestolittleDavidCopperfield,hecanputthewholematterbeforeusinaparenthesis:
  "ThoughtherewasOneoncewhosetachildinthemidstofthedisciples。"Dickensknewthathisreaderswouldatoncecatchthemeaningofthatreference,andwouldfeelthecontrastbetweenthescenehewasdescribingandthatsimplescene。TakeanyofthegreatbooksofliteratureandblackoutthephraseswhichmanifestlycomedirectlyfromtheEnglishBible,andyouwouldmarkthembeyondrecovery。
  [1]Chapman,EnglishLiteratureinAccountwithReligion。
  ButEnglishliteraturehasfoundmoreofitsmaterialintheBiblethananythingelse。Ithaslookedthereforitscharacters,itsillustrations,itssubject-matter。Weshallsee,asweconsiderindividualwriters,howmanyoftheirtitlesandcompleteworksaresuggestedbytheBible。
  ItisinterestingtoseehowoneideaoftheScripturewillappearandreappearamongmanywriters。Takeoneillustration。TheFauststoryisanefforttomakeconcreteoneverseofScripture:
  "Whatshallitprofitamanifheshallgainthewholeworldandlosehisownsoul?"
  ProfessorMoultonremindsusthattheFaustlegendappearedfirstintheMiddleAges。InearlyEnglish,Marlowehasit,CalderonputitintoSpanish,themostfamiliarformofitisGoethe's,whilePhilipBaileyhascalledhisaccountofitFestus。Ineachofthoseformsthesameideaoccurs。Amansellshissoultothedevilforthegainingofwhatistohimtheworld。ThatisoneofagoodmanyideaswhichtheBiblehasgiventoliterature。Theprodigalsonhasbeenanotherprolificsourceofliterarywriting。Theguidingstarisanother。Otherswillreadilycometomind。
  Withthatsimplebackgroundletourmindsmovedownthecourseofliteraryhistory。Style,language,material——wewilleasilythinkhowmuchofeachtheBiblehasgiventoallourgreatwritersiftheirnamesareonlymentioned。Therearefourgroupsofthesewriters。
  1。TheJacobean,whowrotewhenandjustafterourversionwasmade。
  2。TheGeorgian,whogracedthereignsofthekingswhosenametheperiodbears。
  3。TheVictorian。
  4。TheAmerican。
  Thereisanattractivefifthgroupcomprisingourpresent-dayworkersintherealmofpureliterature,butwemustomitthemandgiveourattentiontonamesthatarestarred。
  ItisfamiliarthatinthetimeofElizabeth,"Englandbecameanestofsingingbirds。"InthefiftyyearsafterthefirstEnglishtheaterwaserected,themiddleofElizabeth'sreign,fiftydramaticpoetsappeared,manyofthefirstorder。Someweredistinctlyirreligious,asweremanyofthepeoplewhoselivestheytouched。
  SuchmenasFord,Marlowe,Massinger,Webster,Beaumont,andFletcherstandlikeachorusaroundShakespeareandBenJonsonasleaders。
  AsTaineputsit:"Theysingthesamepiecetogether,andattimesthechorusisequaltothesolo;butonlyattimes。"[1]Culturedpeopleto-dayknowthenamesofmostofthesewriters,butnotmuchelse,anditdoesnotheavilyserveourargumenttosaythattheyfeltthePuritaninfluence;buttheyalldidfeeliteitherdirectlyorbyreaction。
  [1]HistoryofEnglishLiterature,chap。iii。
  EdmundSpenserandhisfriend,SirPhilipSidney,hadclosedtheirworkbeforetheKingJamesversionappeared,yettheFaerieQueeneinitsreligioustheoryisPuritantothecore,andSidneyisbestrememberedbyhisparaphrasesofScripture。TheinfluenceofbothwasevengreaterintheJacobeanthanintheirownperiod。
  ItishardlyfaireventonotetheElizabethanShakespeareasundertheinfluenceoftheKingJamesversion。TheBibleinfluencedhimmarkedly,butitwastheGenevanversionpreparedduringtheexileofthescholarsunderBloodyMary,ortheBishops'BiblepreparedunderElizabeth。Thoseversionswerefamiliarashouseholdfactstohim。"NowriterhasassimilatedthethoughtsandreproducedthewordsofHolyScripturemorecopiouslythanShakespeare。"Dr。Furnivallsaysthat"heissaturatedwiththeBiblestory,"andacenturyagoCapelLloftsaidquaintlythatShakespeare"haddeeplyimbibedtheScriptures。"ButtheKingJamesversionappearedonlyfiveyearsbeforehisdeath,anditisinsomesensefairertosaythatShakespeareandtheKingJamesversionareformedbythesameinfluenceastotheirEnglishstyle。TheBishopofSt。
  AndrewsevendevotesthefirstpartofhisbookonShakespeareandtheBibletoastudyofparallelsbetweenthetwoinpeculiarformsofspeech,andthinksit"probablethatourtranslatorsof1611owedasmuchtoShakespeareas,orratherfarmorethan,heowedtothem。"[1]
  Itisgenerallyagreedthatonlytwoofhisworkswerewrittenafterourversionappeared。SeveralotherwritershavedevotedseparatevolumestonotingthefrequentusebyShakespeareofBiblicalphrasesandallusionsandcharacterstakenfromearlyversions。Itisaverytemptingfield,andwepassitbyonlybecauseitishardlyintherangeofthestudywearenowmaking。
  [1]Wordsworth,Shakespeare'sKnowledgeandUseoftheBible,p。
  9。
  When,however,wecometoJohnMilton1608-1674,werememberhewasonlythreeyearsoldwhenourversionwasissued;thatwhenatfifteen,anundergraduateinCambridge,hemadehisfirstparaphrases,castingtwoofthePsalmsintometer,theversionheusedwasthisfamiliarone。AbiographersayshebeganthedayalwayswiththereadingofScriptureandkepthismemorydeeplychargedwithitsphrases。
  InlaterlifethemorningchapterwasgenerallyfromtheHebrew,andwasfollowedbyanhourofsilenceformeditation,anexercisewhoseinfluencenoman'sstylecouldescape。AsawriterhemovedsteadilytowardtheScriptureandthereligiousteachingwhichitbroughthisage。Hisearlierwritingisagroupofpoemslargelysecular,whichyetshowinphrasesandexpressionsmuchoftheinfluenceofhisboyhoodstudyoftheBible,aswellasthefamiliaruseofmythology。Thememorialpoem"Lycidas,"
  forexample,containsthemuch-quotedreferencetoPeterandhistwokeys——
  "LastcameandlastdidgoThepilotoftheGalileanlake;
  Twomassykeysheboreofmetalstwain,Thegoldenopes,theironshutsamain。"
  Butafterthesepoemscametheperiodofhisprose,theworkwhichhesupposedwastheabidingworkofhislife。GeorgeWilliamCurtistoldafriendthatourcivilwarchangedhisownliterarystyle:"ThatrousedmetoseethatI
  hadnorighttospendmylifeinliteraryleisure。
  IfeltthatImustthrowmyselfintothestruggleforfreedomandtheUnion。Ibegantolectureandtowrite。Thestyletookcareofitself。
  ButIfancyitismoresolidthanitwasthirtyyearsago。"ThatiswhathappenedtoMiltonwhentheprotectoratecame。[1]Itmadehisstylemoresolid。Hedidnotmeantoliveasapoet。
  Hefeltthathisbestenergieswerebeingputintohisessaysindefenseofliberty,onthefreedomofthepressandonthejusticeofthebeheadingofCharles,inwhichservicehesacrificedhissight。AllofitisshotthroughwithScripturequotationsandarguments,andsomeofit,atleast,isintheveryspiritofScripture。Thepleaforlargerfreedomofdivorceissuedplainlyfromhisownbitterexperience;buthismainargumentrootsinafewBibletextstakenoutoftheirconnectionandurgedwithnoshadowofquestionoftheirauthority。Indeed,whenhecomestohismorereligiousessays,hisheavyargumentisthatthereshouldbenoreligionpermittedinEnglandwhichisnotdrawndirectlyfromtheBible;which,therefore,heurgesmustbecommonpropertyforallthepeople。
  Thereisacuriousbitofevidencethatthemenofhisowntimedidnotrealizehispowerasapoet。InPierreBayle'scriticalsurveyoftheliteratureofthetime,hecallsMilton"thefamousapologistfortheexecutionofCharlesI。,"who"meddledinpoetryandseveralofwhosepoemssawthelightduringhislifeorafterhisdeath!"Forallthat,Miltonwasonlyworkingontowardhisrealpower,andhispowerwastobeshowninhisservicetoreligion。Histhreegreatpoems,intheorderoftheirvalue,are,ofcourse,"ParadiseLost,""SamsonAgonistes,"
  and"ParadiseRegained。"WhoeverknowsanythingofMiltonknowsthesethreeandknowstheyareScripturalfromfirsttolastinphrase,inallusion,and,inpartatleast,inidea。Thereisnottimeforextendedillustration。Oneinstancemaystandforall,whichshallillustratehowMilton'smindwaslikeagardenwheretheseedsofScripturecametoflowerandfruit。HewilltakeonephrasefromtheBibleandletitgrowtoapagein"ParadiseLost。"Hereisanillustrationwhichcomesreadilytohand。IntheGenesisitissaidthat"thespiritofGodmovedonthefaceofthewaters。"Theverbsuggeststheideaofbrooding。ThereisonlyoneotherpossiblereferencePsalmxxiv:9。
  whichisincludedinthisstatementwhichMiltonmakesoutofthatbriefwordintheGenesis:
  "OnthewaterycalmHisbroadeningwingstheSpiritofGodoutspread,Andvitalvirtueinfused,andvitalwarmthThroughoutthefluidmass,butdownwardpurgedTheblacktartareouscoldinfernaldregs,Adversetolife;thenformed,thencon-globed,Likethingstolike;theresttoseveralplaceDisparted,andbetweenspunouttheair——
  Andearthself-balancedonhercenterswung。"
  [1]Strong,TheTheologyofthePoets。
  AnyonefamiliarwithMiltonwillrecognizethatasatypicalinstanceofthewayinwhichaseedideafromtheScripturecomestoflowerandfruitinhim。TheresultisthatmorepeoplehavetheirideasaboutheavenandhellfromMiltonthanfromtheBible,thoughtheydonotknowit。
  ItseemshardlyfairtouseJohnBunyan1628-1688asanillustrationoftheinfluenceoftheEnglishBibleonliterature,becausehischiefworkiscomposedsolargelyinthelanguageofScripture。Pilgrim'sProgressisthemostwidelyreadbookintheEnglishlanguageaftertheBible。Itsphrases,itsnames,itsmatterareeitherdirectlyorindirectlytakenfromtheBible。Ithasgivenusalonglistofphraseswhicharepartofourliteraryandreligiouscapital。Thackeraytookthemottoofoneofhisbest-knownbooksfromtheBible;butthetitle,VanityFair,comesfromPilgrim'sProgress。
  Whenadiscouragedmansaysheis"inthesloughofdespond,"hequotesBunyan;andwhenapopularevangelisttellsthepeoplethattheburdenofsinwillrollawayiftheylookatthecross,"accordingtotheBible,"heoughttosayaccordingtoBunyan。ButallthiswasonlytheoutcomeofthefamiliarityofBunyanwiththeScripture。Itwasalmostallhedidknowinaliteraryway。Macaulaysaysthat"heknewnolanguagebuttheEnglishasitwasspokenbythecommonpeople;hehadstudiednogreatmodelofcomposition,withtheexceptionofournobletranslationoftheBible。
  Butofthathisknowledgewassuchthathemighthavebeencalledalivingconcordance。"[1]
  [1]HistoryofEngland,vol。III。,p。220。
  Afterthesethree——Shakespeare,Milton,andBunyan——thereappearedanotherthree,verymuchtheirinferiorsandhavingmuchlessinfluenceonliteraryhistory。ImeanDryden,Addison,andPope。ItisnotnecessarytocredittheScripturewithmuchofDryden'sspirit,norwithmuchofhisstyle,andcertainlynotwithhisattitudetowardhisfellows;butitisaconstantsurpriseinreadingDrydentodiscoverhowfamiliarhewaswiththeKingJamesversion。
  WalterScottinsiststhatDrydenwasatheartserious,that"hisindelicacywasliketheforcedimpudenceofabashfulman。"Thatisgenerousjudgment。Butthereisthistobesaid:ashegrowsmoreserioushefallsmoreintoBiblewords。Ifhewritesapoliticalpamphlethecallsit"AbsalomandAhithophel。"
  InitheholdsthemenofthedayuptoscornunderBiblenames。TheyareZimriandShimei,andthelike。Whenheisfallingintobitterestsatire,hiswritingaboundsintheseBiblicalallusionswhichcouldbemadeonlybyonewhowasveryfamiliarwiththeBook。Quotationscannotbeabundant,ofcourse,butthereisagreatdealofthissortofthing:
  "Sinking,helefthisdruggetrobebehind,Borneupwardbyasubterraneanwind,Themantlefelltotheyoungprophet'spart,Withdoubleportionofhisfather'sart。"
  InhisEpistlesthereismuchofthesamesort。
  WhenhewritestoCongrevehespeaksofthefathers,andsays:
  "Their'swasthegiantracebeforetheflood。"
  Fartheronhesays:
  "Ourbuilderswerewithwantofgeniuscurst,Thesecondtemplewasnotlikethefirst。"
  NowDrydenmayhavebeen,asMacaulaysaid,an"illustriousrenegade,"butallhiswritingshowstheinfluenceofthelanguageandtheideasoftheKingJamesversion。Wheneverwesingthe"VeniCreator"wesingJohnDryden。
  SowesingAddisonintheparaphraseofScripture,whichHaydn'smusichasmadefamiliar:
  "Thespaciousfirmamentonhigh,Withalltheblueetherealsky。"
  WhileDrydenyieldedtohistimes,Addisondidnot,andtheSpectatorbecamenotonlyaliterarybutamoralpower。Intheefforttomakeitsohewasthrownbackonthelargestmoralinfluenceoftheday,theBible,andthroughouttheSpectatorandthroughallofAddison'swritingyoufindonallproperoccasionstheBiblepressedtothefront。HereagainTaineputsitstrikingly:"Itisnosmallthingtomakemoralityfashionable;Addisondidit,anditremainsfashionable。"
  Ifwespeakofsinging,wemayrememberthatwesingthehymnofevenpoorlittledwarfedinvalidAlexanderPope。HewasborntheyearBunyandied,bornatcross-purposeswiththeworld。Hecouldwriteabittersatire,likethe"Dunciad";hecouldgivetheworldTheIliadandTheOdysseyinsuchEnglishthatweknowthemfarbetterthanintheGreekofHomer;
  butinthoseraremomentswhenhewasathisbetterselfhewouldwritehisgreaterpoem,"TheMessiah",inwhichthemovementofScriptureisoutlinedasitcouldbeonlybyonewhoknewtheEnglishBible。Andwhenwesing——
  "Rise,crownedwithlight,imperialSalem,rise"——
  itisworthwhiletorealizethatthevoicethatfirstsungitwasthatoftheirritablelittlepoetwhofoundsomeofhisscantcomfortinthegrandwordsandphrasesandideasofourEnglishBible。
  Withthesesix——Shakespeare,Milton,Bunyan,Dryden,Addison,andPope——thecourseoftheJacobeanliteratureissufficientlymeasured。
  Therearemanylessernames,butthesearetheoneswhichmadeitanepochinliterature,andtheseareattheirbestunderthepoweroftheBible。
  IntheGeorgiangroupweneedtocallonlyfivegreatnameswhichhavehadcreativeinfluenceinliterature。Ordinarycultureinliteraturewillincludesomeacquaintancewitheachofthem。IntheorderoftheirdeaththeyareShelley1829。,Byron1824,Coleridge1831,WalterScott1832,andWordsworth1850。
  Thelastlongoutlivedtheothers;buthebelongswiththem,becausehewasbornearlierthananyotherinthegroupanddidhischiefworkintheirtimeandbeforethelatergroupappeared。ExceptWordsworth,alltheseweregonebeforeQueenVictoriacametothethronein1837。Threeothernamescouldbecalled:
  Keats,RobertBurns,andCharlesLamb。Allwouldillustratewhatwearestudying。KeatsleastofallandBurnsmost。TheyareomittedherenotbecausetheydidnotfeeltheinfluenceoftheEnglishBible,notbecausetheydonotconstantlyshowitsinfluence,butbecausetheyarenotsocreativeastheothers;theyhavenotsoinfluencedthecurrentofliterature。Atanyrate,thefivenamedwillrepresentworthilyandwithsufficientcompletenesstheGeorgianperiodofEnglishliterature。
  NothingcouldrevealmoreclearlythanthislisthowwearedistinguishingtheBibleasliteraturefromtheBibleasanauthoritativebookinmorals。OnewouldmuchdisliketocredittheBiblewithanypartofthepersonallifeofShelleyorByron。Theywerefriends;they,weregeniuses;buttheywerebothbadlyafflictedwithcommonmoralleprosy。Itisplayingwithmoralstoexcuseeitherofthembecausehewasagenius。Nothinginthegeniusofeitherdemandedorwasservedbythecourseofcheapimmoralitywhichbothpractised。ItwasnotbecauseShelleywasageniusthathemarriedHarrietWestbrook,thenranawaywithMaryGodwin,thentriedtogetthetwotobecomefriendsandneighborsuntilhisownwifecommittedsuicide;itwasnothisgeniusthatmadehimyieldtotheinfluenceofEmiliaVivianiandwriteherthepoem"Epipsychidion,"tellingherandtheworldthathe"wasneverattachedtothatgreatsectwhobelievedthateachoneshouldselectoutofthecrowdamistressorafriend"andlettherestgo。Thatwasnotgenius,thatwasjustcommonpassion;andourdivorcecourtsarefullofShelleysofthattype。
  SoByron'spersonalimmoralityisnottobeexplainednorexcusedonthegroundofhisgenius。ItwasnotgeniusthatledhimsoastrayinEnglandthathiswifehadtodivorcehim,andthatpublicopiniondrovehimoutoftheland。ItwasnothisgeniusthatsenthimtovisitShelleyandhismistressatLakeGenevaandseducetheirguest,sothatsheborehimadaughter,thoughshewasneverhiswife。ItwasnotgeniusthatmadehimpickupstillanothercompanionoutofseveralinItalyandlivewithherinimmoralrelation。InthenameofcommondecencyletnoonestandupforShelleyandByronintheirpersonalcharacters!Therearenottwomorallaws,oneforgeniusesandoneforcommonpeople。Byron,atanyrate,wasneverdeceivedabouthimself,neverblamedhisgeniusnorhisconscienceforhiswrong。Thesearestrikinglinesin"ChildeHarold,"inwhichhedisclaimsallrighttosympathy,because,"ThethornswhichIhavereapedareofthetreeIplanted,——theyhavetornmeandIbleed。
  Ishouldhaveknownwhatfruitwouldspringfromsuchatree。"
  Shelley'swifewouldnotsaythatforhim。
  "InallShelleydid,"shesays,"heatthetimeofdoingitbelievedhimselfjustifiedtohisownconscience。"Well,somuchtheworseforShelley!Geniusesarenottheonlymenwhocanfindgoodreasonfordoingwhattheywanttodo。OneofShelley'scriticssuggeststhatthetroublewashisintroductionintopersonalconductoftheimaginationwhichheoughttohavesavedforhiswriting。PerhapswemightexplainByron'smisconductbyremindingourselvesofhisclub-foot,andapplyingonecodeofmoralstomenwithclub-feetandanothertomenwithnormalfeet。
  IfwespeakoftheinfluenceoftheBibleonthesemen,itmustbeontheirliterarywork;
  andwhenwefinditthere,itbecomespeculiarmarkofitspower。Theyhadlittlesenseofitasmorallaw。Theirconsciencesapproveditandcondemnedthemselves,orelsetheirdelicateliterarytastesenseditasabookofpower。
  ThisisnotablytrueofShelley。WhenhewasstillastudentinOxfordhecommittedhimselftotheopinionofanotherwriter,that"themindcannotbelieveintheexistenceofGod。"Hetriestoworkthatoutfullyinhisnoteson"QueenMab。"Whenhewashardlyyetofagehehimselfwrotethat"ThegeniusofhumanhappinessmustteareveryleaffromtheaccursedBookofGod,eremancanreadtheinscriptiononitsheart。"HeoncesaidthathishighestdesirewasthatthereshouldbeamonumenttohimselfsomewhereintheAlpswhichshouldbeonlyagreatstonewithitsfacesmoothedandthisshortinscriptioncutinit,"PercyByssheShelley,Atheist。"
  ItwouldseemthatwhateverShelleydrewofstrengthorinspirationfromtheBiblewouldbebywayofreaction;butitisnotso。Howeverhemayhavehatedthe"accursedBookofGod,"
  hiswifetellsinhernoteon"TheRevoltofIslam"
  thatShelley"debatedwhetherheshoulddevotehimselftopoetryormetaphysics,"and,resolvingontheformer,he"educatedhimselfforit,engaginghimselfinthestudyofthepoetsofGreece,England,andItaly。Tothese,maybeadded,"shegoeson,"aconstantperusalofportionsoftheOldTestament,theBookofPsalms,Job,Isaiah,andothers,thesublimepoetryofwhichfilledhimwithdelight。"Notonlydidhecatchthespiritofthatpoetry,butitsphraseshauntedhismemory。Inhisbestprosework,whichhecalledADefenseofPoetry,thereisaninterestingrevelationoftheinfluenceofhisBiblereadinguponhim。Towardtheendoftheessaythesetwosentencesoccur:"Itisinconsistentwiththisdivisionofoursubjecttocitelivingpoets,butposterityhasdoneamplejusticetothegreatnamesnowreferredto。Theirerrorshavebeenweighedandfoundtohavebeendustinthebalance;iftheirsinsareasscarlet,theyarenowwhiteassnow;theyhavebeenwashedinthebloodofthemediatorandredeemer,Time。"Thereisnomoreeloquentpassageintheessaythantheoneofwhichthisispart,andyetitisfullofallusiontothisBookfromwhichallpagesmustbetorn!Evenin"QueenMab"hemakesAhasuerus,thewanderingJew,recounttheBiblestoryinsuchbroadoutlinesascouldbegivenonlybyamanwhowasfamiliarwithit。WhenShelleywasinItalyandthewordcametohimofthemassacreatManchester,hewrotehis"MasqueofAnarchy。"
  Therearefewmoremelodiouslinesofhiswritingthanthosewhichoccurinthislongpoeminthesectionregardingfreedom。Fourofthoselinesareoftenquoted。TheyareattheveryheartofShelley'sbestwork。Addressingfreedom,hesays:
  "Thouartlove:therichhavekissedThyfeet,and,likehimfollowingChrist,Gavetheirsubstancetothefree,Andthroughtheroughworldfollowthee。"
  PageafterpageofShelleyrevealsthesehalf-
  consciousreferencestotheBible。Thereweretwosourcesfromwhichhereceivedhispassionatedemocracy。OnewasthetreatmenthereceivedatEton,andlateratOxford;theotherishisfrequentreadingoftheEnglishBible,eventhoughhewasinthespiritofrebellionagainstmuchofitsteaching。InBrowning'sessayonShelley,hereachestheamazingconclusionthat"hadShelleylived,hewouldfinallyhaverangedhimselfwiththeChristians,"andseekstojustifyitbyshowingthathewasmovingstraighttowardthepositionsofPaulandofDavid。Someofusmaynotseesuchrapidapproach,butthatShelleyfeltthedrawingofGodintheuniverseisplainenough。
  TheinfluenceoftheBibleisstillmoremarkedonByron。HespenthischildhoodyearsatAberdeen。TherehisnursetrainedhimintheBible;and,thoughhedidnotlivebyit,heneverlosthisloveforit,norhisknowledgeofit。Hetellsofhisownexperienceinthisway:
  "Iamagreatreaderofthosebooks[theBible],andhadreadthemthroughandthroughbeforeIwaseightyearsold;thatistosay,theOldTestament,fortheNewstruckmeasatask,buttheotherasapleasure。"[1]OneoftheearliestbitsofhisworkisaparaphraseofoneofthePsalms。Hisphysicalinfirmityputhimatoddswiththeworld,whilehisstrikingbeautydrewtohimacrowdofadmirerswhohelpedtopoisoneveryspringofhisgenius。Evenso,heheldhislovefortheBible。WhileShelleyoftenspokeofitincontempt,whilehepridedhimselfonhisdivergencefromthepathofitsteaching,Byronneverdid。Hewanderedfar,buthealwaysknewit;and,thoughhecouldhardlyfindtermstoexpresshiscontemptfortheChurch,thereisnolineofByron'swritingwhichisaslurattheBible。Ontheotherhand,muchofhisworkrevealsapassionforthebeautyofitaswellasitstruth。HismostmelodiouswritingisinthatgroupofHebrewmelodieswhichwerewrittentobesung。TheydemandfarmorethanapassingknowledgeoftheBiblebothfortheirwritingandtheirunderstanding。Thereisalonglistofthem,butnoonewithoutaknowledgeoftheBiblewouldhaveknownwhathemeantbyhispoem,"TheHarptheMonarchMinstrelSwept。""Jephtha'sDaughter"presumesuponaknowledgeoftheOldTestamentstorywhichwouldnotcometooneinapassingstudyoftheBible。"TheSongofSaulBeforehisLastBattle"andthepoemheaded"Saul"
  couldnothavebeenwritten,norcantheybereadintelligentlybyanyonewhodoesnotknowhisBible。AmongByron'sdramas,twoofwhichhethoughtmost,were,"HeavenandEarth"
  and"Cain。"WhenhewasaccusedofpervertingtheScripturein"Cain,"herepliedthathehadonlytakentheScriptureatitsfacevalue。
  BothofthedramasarenotonlybuiltdirectlyoutofScripturalevents,butimplyafarwiderknowledgeofScripturethantheirmeretitlessuggest。
  [1]Taine,EnglishLiterature,II。,279。
  Therearestrikingreferencesinmanyotherpoems,eveninhisalmostvilepoem,"DonJuan。"Themostnotableinstanceisinthefifteenthcanto,whereheisspeakingofpersecutedsagesandtheselinesoccur:
  "Wasitnotso,greatLocke?andgreaterBacon?
  GreatSocrates?AndThouDivinerstill,Whoselotitisbymentobemistaken,AndThypurecreedmadesanctionofallill?
  Redeemingworldstobebybigotsshaken,HowwasThytoilrewarded?"
  InanoteonthispassageByronsays:"Asitisnecessaryinthesetimestoavoidambiguity,IsaythatImeanby'Divinerstill'Christ。IfeverGodwasman——ormanGod——Hewasboth。
  IneverarraignedHiscreed,buttheuseorabuseofit。Mr。CanningonedayquotedChristianitytosanctionslavery,andMr。Wilberforcehadlittletosayinreply。AndwasChristcrucifiedthatblackmenmightbescourged?Ifso,Hehadbetterbeenbornamulatto,togivebothcolorsanequalchanceoffreedom,oratleastsalvation。"ByroncouldlivefarfromtheinfluenceoftheBibleinhispersonallife;butheneverescapeditsinfluenceinhisliterarywork。
  OfColeridgelessneedstobesaid,becausewethinkofhimsomuchintermsofhismoremeditativemusings,whichareoftenreligious。
  HehimselftellsoflongandcarefulrereadingsoftheEnglishBibleuntilhecouldsay:IntheBible"thereismorethatfindsmethanIhaveexperiencedinallotherbookstogether;thewordsoftheBiblefindmeatgreaterdepthsofmybeing。"Ofcourse,thatwouldinfluencehiswriting,anditdid。Eveninthe"RimeoftheAncientMariner"muchofthephraseologyisScriptural。Whenthealbatrossdrewnear,"AsifithadbeenaChristiansoul,WehaileditinGod'sname。"
  WhenthemarinerslepthegavepraisetoMary,QueenofHeaven。Hesoughttheshrivingofthehermit-priest。Heendsthestorybecausehehears"thelittlevesperbell"whichbidshimtoprayer。Whenyoureadhis"HymnBeforeSunriseintheValeofChamounix"youfindyourselfreadingtheNineteenthPsalm。HecallsonthemotionlesstorrentsandthesilentcataractsandthegreatMontBlancitselftopraiseGod。ColeridgeneverhadseenChamounix,norMontBlanc,noraglacier,butheknewhisBible。SohehashisChristmasCarolalongwithalltherest。HispoemoftheMoorsaftertheCivilWarunderPhilipII。isScripturalinitsphraseology,andsoismuchelsethathewrote。
  Franklyandwillinglyheyieldedtoitsinfluence。
  Inhis"TableTalk"heoftenreferstothevalueoftheBibleintheformingofliterarystyle。Oncehesaid:"IntensestudyoftheBiblewillkeepanywriterfrombeingvulgarinpointofstyle。"[1]
  [1]June14,1830。
  TheverymentionofColeridgemakesonethinkofWordsworth。TheyhadaDamonandPythiasfriendship。TheWordsworthswerepoor;theyhadonlyseventypoundsayear,andtheywerenotashamed。Coleridgecalledthemthehappiestfamilyheeversaw。WordsworthwasnotnarrowlyaChristianpoet,hewasnotalwaysseekingtoputChristiandogmaintopoetry,butthroughouthewasexpressingtheChristianspiritwhichhehadlearnedfromtheBible。HispoetrywasonelongprotestagainstbanishingGodfromtheuniverse。Itwasliterallytrueofhimthat"themeanestflowerthatgrowscangivethoughtsthattoooftenlietoodeepfortears。"Ifthiswerethetimetobecritical,onewouldthinkthattoomuchwassometimesmadeofveryminuteoccurrences;butthistendencytogetbackoftheeventandseehowGodismovingislearnedbestfromScripture,whereWordsworthhimselflearnedit。Ifyoureadhis"IntimationsofImmortality,"orthe"OdetoDuty,"or"TinternAbbay,"oreventheratherlabored"Excursion,"youfindyourselfundertheScripturalinfluence。
  ThereremainsinthisGeorgiangroupthegreatprosemaster,WalterScott。Mr。GladstonesaidhethoughtScottthegreatestofhiscountrymen。JohnMorleysuggestedJohnKnoxinstead。Mr。Gladstonereplied:"No,thelinemustbedrawnfirmlybetweenthewriterandthemanofaction——nocomparisonthere。"[1]HewentontosaythatBurnsisveryfineandtrue,nodoubt,"buttoimagineawholegroupofcharacters,tomarshalthem,tosetthemtowork,andtosustaintheaction,Imustcountthatthetestofhighestandmostdiversifiedquality。"AllwhoarefondofScottwillrealizehowconstantlythesceneswhichheisdescribinggroupthemselvesaroundreligiousobservances,howoftenmenareheldincheckfromdeedsofviolencebyreligiousconception。ManyofthesescenescrystallizearoundaScripturalevent。